Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 13 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Instructor_having_a_word_with_Community_rangers_during_a_training_exercise.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Instructor having a word with Community rangers during a training exercise (by Athuman Komora Garisse) --Adoscam 15:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Imehling 06:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose too much CA to me. --Tomer T 21:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, CA, and not very sharp either.--Peulle 07:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 20:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

File:American_Circus_5c_1966_issue_U.S._stamp.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination American Circus 5-cent 1966 issue U.S. stamp. Issued to honor the American Circus on the centenary of the birth of John Ringling (by MrFrosty2) --Adamant1 06:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose sorry, too small --Nightflyer 10:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose too small. --Tomer T 11:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  •   Question I'm not sure what the issue with the size is. There's seven images of stamps in Category:Quality images of stamps that are exactly the same way. Can someone explain what the difference here is? --Adamant1 02:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Image guidelines#Quality and featured photographic images. Tomer T 08:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
  • @Adamant1: Certainly. In the QI Guidelines ("Quality and featured photographic images" section), it says that in order for an image to be considered a Quality Image, it should be at least 2 megapixels in size. This image is not.--Peulle (talk) 08:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per se ineligible on account of size, per above. Should really be speedily declined. -- Ikan Kekek 22:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 20:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)