Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 16 2023
-
- Nomination Christmas decoration at a Christmas market stall at Klemensstraße in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 04:51, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Traditional Christmas dinner; Folklore of Serbia--PetarM 18:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 04:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ineos Grenadier in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 18:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 04:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toyota Highlander Hybrid in Esslingen.--Alexander-93 18:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 04:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rhesus Monkey --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 04:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Feral Pigeons --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Image has a weird crop. Sorry. --Valo139 17:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I don't concur with the reason to oppose. Anyhow not a QI to me due to the high level of noise. You need to work with the settings of your camera. This image could have been a QI with a much lower ISO value compensated with a slower shutter speed. --Poco a poco 18:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: Thanks for the suggestion, actually I wanted take a shot of the pigeon taking off thats why I used high shutter speed and ISO--Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maserati Grecale Trofeo in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 15:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Havlíčkův Brod Maria Sculpture on Plague Column in Main Square --Scotch Mist 12:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Bamberg --Ermell 11:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Bamberg --Ermell 11:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Bamberg --Ermell 11:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Housein Bamberg --Ermell 11:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall in Phalsbourg, France. --Cayambe 10:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A farmhouse in Püttlingen --FlocciNivis 10:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The death march cenotaph in Planegg --FlocciNivis 10:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 09:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teufel, Internationale Funkausstellung 2018, Berlin Crop by User:Pittigrilli --MB-one 08:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Who is the image author/uploader? Decline due to the bottom crop --Poco a poco 09:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination EN57 of SKM Trójmiasto at Gdańsk Główny --MB-one 08:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Row of houses, Allée des Ormes 32 to 38, Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 08:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady church in Canolic, Sant Julia de Loria parish, Andorra. --Tournasol7 06:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Pyrennes seen from Canolic in Sant Julia de Loria parish, Andorra. --Tournasol7 06:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Martin church in La Cortinada, Ordino parish, Andorra. --Tournasol7 06:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Michael church in Ansalonga, Ordino parish, Andorra. --Tournasol7 06:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mural in La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium. --DimiTalen 06:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soyuz in Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 06:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crap Martin, straat in Waltensburg/Vuorz Wooden door.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Crap Martin, straat in Waltensburg/Vuorz Wooden door.
-
- Nomination Crap Martin, straat in Waltensburg/Vuorz Wooden shed.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Crap Martin, straat in Waltensburg/Vuorz Wooden shed.
-
- Nomination Waldhaus Flims, upper Rhineschlucht, view of the Rheinschlucht natural monument.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Waldhaus Flims, upper Rhineschlucht, view of the Rheinschlucht natural monument.
-
- Nomination Sint Jorisdoelen in Middelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk (Grote Kerk) in Veere, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse at Koppmanshaven, Vlissingen, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the beach to the Western Scheldt, Zoutelande, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sign at a Christmas market stall at the Syndikatplatz in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grand Couloir, Tête Rousse, and glaciers.--Jacek79 21:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Noisy, lack of perspective correction, strange transition beetween snow and sky, it looks overall overprocessed --Poco a poco 09:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volvo XC40 in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 20:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Gabriele Procida (ALBA Berlin) --Sandro Halank 20:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Vilia, Attica. --C messier 19:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Vouleftirio of ancient Thermo. --C messier 19:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz GLC in Esslingen.---Alexander-93 16:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Annunciation of Our Lady, central motif of Retable du Mas Girvès de Llo. --Palauenc05 12:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sammandi 05:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abandoned Kaula-Kotselvaara Nickel Mine. --Alexander Novikov 11:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
It lacks detail, maybe too much denoising --Poco a poco 15:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for review. Alexander Novikov 07:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Châsse of Saint Francis Xavier from Hospice Saint-Jacques in Ille-sur-Têt, France. --Palauenc05 10:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fairmont Le Château Frontenac --Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too noisy / lack of detail, sorry --Poco a poco 15:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: New version Uploaded, please let me know what changes should me made?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
There is not much you can do here, the lack of detail/noise level will not make it possible. --Poco a poco 09:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace (Facelift) in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 20:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 1, place Sadi Carnot, Saint-Étienne. --Touam 18:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bärensee Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 09:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review Please show more details in the photo, some parts are not sharp enough. I doubt how this is repairable becayse of the high ISO and f-value --Michielverbeek 09:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination nearly flat ice crystal formed by light wind near the ground. --ThoBel-0043 22:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hydrochronometer, Villa Borghese, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 19:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flatrack containers stacked in the port of Hamburg --MB-one 19:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs better description. --C messier 20:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 09:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 14:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skyscrapers in Yeouido, Seoul. --Kallerna 07:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Again, likely to be deleted because South Korea lacks commercial FoP for contemporary buildings. -- Ikan Kekek 08:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
I made some additions to the licences. --Kallerna 10:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
My experience on COM:DR is that this kind of view is not de minimis. You need a broader skyline view for that. -- Ikan Kekek 18:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: In this photo, none of the buildings are not main object. De minimis is applicable. --Ox1997cow 14:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ox1997cow 14:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
CommentOc1997cow, I've had this discussion involving similar photos of, for example, Dubai, and the conclusion has been that De minimis does not apply to photos in which individual copyrighted buildings occupy this much of the picture frame, and the photos have been deleted. I have no doubt, based on experience, that whenever this photo is nominated for deletion, it will be deleted from Commons. Having a QI designation will not protect it, either; FPs have been deleted due to architect's copyright. -- Ikan Kekek 17:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: See these cases. (case 1, case 2) In both cases, the decision to keep was taken from the deletion discussion. I think this photo is similar to the two cases. --Ox1997cow 01:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. They surprise me, because I've seen a bunch of similar cases go the other way. It seems that there isn't consistency from the closing admins. -- Ikan Kekek 08:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Deers_of_Sundarbans_26.jpg edit
- Nomination Spotted Deers of Sundarbans --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
SupportGood quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- I agree and therefore move to Oppose for now, thank you. The problem with the spots on the back is probably due to al heaving highlight/white correction. Probably not fixable. --Poco a poco 11:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Overcategorised and we need the species of the animal to be identified to be a QI. --C messier 20:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Digital errors - file corruption? --Grunpfnul 20:38, 8 January 2023
- Thanks for the review, added the species of the animal and fixed the digital error. Anything else? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)(UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Wasiul Bahar 06:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Again this one has processing artefacts, the spots on the deer look really strange - just pure white splotches with no furry texture at all. BigDom 09:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The categories need to be as specific as possible. This is overcategorised, being in categories like Bangladesh. Categories aren't hashtags. I see there is country specific category for this species, so it should be in it. Also, it will be helpful if you categorise in the male/female/juvenile category too. --C messier 19:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks everyone for your critics, actually the highlights were blown as I took the picture directly under the sun at noon. I tried to fix as much as I could but couldn't fix the white spots. If there is any way to fix it let me know please --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- If the highlights are blown there's not much you can do, it's best to expose for the brightest part of the image and bring the other colours up in post-processing if needed. BigDom 18:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This depends somewhat on whether the overexposed areas are important to the image. In the case of the patterns in the fur, I would consider it important in any case. I would tolerate small, shiny reflections on insect wings, for example, but also on other shiny objects, as long as they do not cause color distortion. Largely overexposed parts of the image are not acceptable at all. Overexposed image parts that lead to clipping in individual color channels and thus to color distortions are not acceptable either. Popular and typical in the latter case are blue skies that run into turquoise/cyan, but also sunlit reddish facades that tilt to "yellow". --Smial 12:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- If the highlights are blown there's not much you can do, it's best to expose for the brightest part of the image and bring the other colours up in post-processing if needed. BigDom 18:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)