Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 08 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:A_boat_at_Ras_jebel_beach_during_a_colorful_sunset.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination A boat at Ras jebel beach during a colorful sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 04:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sorry but all 5 images have insufficient quality and lack of details imo. --ArildV 06:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment The photo is sharp enough, it's long exposure,so it's normal to appear soft --Marwenwafi 13:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per ArildV. --Sebring12Hrs 10:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This is washed out because it was taken with a smartphone at ISO 400, requiring massive noise reduction. --Plozessor 16:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 18:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Ichkeul_mountain_during_a_dramatic_sunset.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Ichkeul mountain during a dramatic sunsetI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Marwenwafi 04:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sorry but all 5 images have insufficient quality and lack of details imo. --ArildV 06:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment the subject is silhouetted , so no need for details ,as well for the clouds on the background ,softening the clouds is for aesthetics like long exposure effect do , there's no long exposure clouds that have plenty of details they are always soft , but for artistic purpose --Marwenwafi 13:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose With an exposure of 1/160 s this is not at all a long exposure. Of course it's possible to artificially soften the clouds, but then it looks just mushy. --Zinnmann 09:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per ArildV. --Sebring12Hrs 10:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I could live with the lack of details/textures but then at least it would have to be sharp. --Plozessor 16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 18:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)