Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 13 2020

Consensual review edit

File:BartolomeLeonidasCordero.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Bartolome Leonidas Cordero, marine of Argentina --Ezarate 19:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not a work by Commons-user. --Kallerna 13:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. I did the scanning job and restoriation --Ezarate 14:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment You are not allowed to vote on your own nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 10:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question Can you explain this? "Anonymous scanned by Ezarate". That seems self-contradictory. I should say, I don't know how to vote. I'd like to see a sharper scan, but I don't know what the original looks like or how you'd go about digitally restoring the scan. You should specify the size of the page in your file description. -- Ikan Kekek 10:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
I scanned from the book, there isn't nothing about the author so the author is anonymous and I did the scan, the original size is a 1/8 of a A4 page.Ezarate 12:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
You need a comma: "Anonymous illustrator, scanned by Ezarate". I understand correctly, no? -- Ikan Kekek 19:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose insufficient quality Sorry. --Fischer.H 14:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support It is a historical image, we cannot evaluate this type of images, it would be like trying to criticize chromatic aberrations or noise in a painting. What we should evaluate is the subsequent restoration treatment that I consider quite appreciable and laborious. (Please see the original source image in the image description) --Wilfredor 16:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Doesn't seem to have the quality, methinks.--Peulle 16:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)}
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 16:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Ripetitori_sul_Monte_Secchieta.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The repeaters installed on Monte Secchieta cover the radio and television broadcasting in a large part of the territory of Tuscany--PROPOLI87 10:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Noisy, artefacts in the sky, distortion. --Milseburg 15:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted, noisy/unsharp toward the bottom, wavy posterization lines on the right side of the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 10:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 16:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Озеро_Келейное02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Озеро Келейное --Ele-chudinovsk 09:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The tree in the foreground is blurry. --Gzen92 09:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Gzen92, and also, there are what must be serious stitching errors on the right side of the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 13:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 07:18, 12 June 2020 (UTC)