Open main menu

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 18 2019

< Commons:Quality images candidates

Contents

Consensual reviewEdit

File:Nappersdorf_Kellergasse_36.jpgEdit

 

  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Nappersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 02:56, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Weird patterns in the sky. --Tsungam 07:17, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Wie das bei bedecktem Himmel halt so ist. --Manfred Kuzel 11:35, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Yeah, what weird patterns? I see only clouds. Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 12:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • JPEG artifacts and/or banding --Tsungam 12:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tsungam's right, there's definitely a banding effect visible, both in the sky, on the house wall and the door. It sort of looks like wallpaper; stripes going both horizontally and vertically, giving the whole image a tartan look.--Peulle 08:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Peulle and Tsungam. Looks really weird. Too strong s-curving or contrast rework in postprocessing? --Smial 08:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I see the banding now. It's very subtle but still shouldn't be there. -- Ikan Kekek 08:06, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:35, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Nappersdorf_Kellergasse_33.jpgEdit

 

  • Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Nappersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 02:56, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   SupportGood quality. ----
  • Don't know what happened here, but since there is no signature attached to this vote here now, I suppose it should be stricken.--Peulle 08:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. --Tsungam 07:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I can't say that the subject is clear here; the door is unsharp and the focus is on the foliage in the foreground. This is also quite a disturbing foreground object.--Peulle 08:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Object unsharp and mostly hidden. --Smial 08:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:FM_Santa_María_de_las_Misiones.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Logo of FM Santa María de las Misiones, Misiones Province, Argentina --Ezarate 22:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Too simple. Bad tracing. --Piotr Bart 17:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I disagree. --Ezarate 19:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm not sure how much work is required by a Commoner for an image to be judged as "their own work", but in this case, I agree about the tracing. This image has jagged edges along the sides of the numbers, none of which appear in the logo on the original website.--Peulle 08:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Peulle. --Smial 09:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:34, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:LU6RadioAtlanticaMDP-logo.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Logo of Radio Atlantica, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Bad tracing. --Piotr Bart 17:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I disagree. --Ezarate 19:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose OK, I did a little bit of research and have arrived at an opinion. If an admin tells me it's wrong according to official guidelines, I may change my mind, but otherwise it's a no. Here's the thing: the Commons:Derivative works page describes the official guideline when it comes to such matters, and generally, you need the copyrightholder's permission to copy the work onto Commons: "you cannot trace someone else's copyrighted creative drawing and upload that tracing to Commons under a new, free license because a tracing is a copy without new creative content". So, should the image be deleted from Commons altogether? I'm not so sure; if we look at a different copyrightable logo, that of M.K. Dons, it is generally accepted that: "the use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use ...". This here, however, is not a low-resolution image, because it's possible to enlarge it, so it may be argued that it should be deleted. However, that particular decision is above my pay grade and I shan't bother with it right now.--Peulle 10:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
    •   Comment Exactly my thoughts when it comes to vectorizing low resolution "fair use" images. --Smial 15:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:34, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:LU9radioMDP-logo.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Logo of Lu9 Radio Mar del Plata --Ezarate 22:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Bad tracing.--Piotr Bart 17:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I disagree. --Ezarate 19:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:ClubAtleticoPolicialescudo-Catamarca.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Sword of Club Atletico Policial de Catamarca, Argentina --Ezarate 22:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Vulphere 02:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Bad tracing.--Piotr Bart 17:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:11, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:32, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:LV1_Radio_Colón_Logo.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Current Logo "LV1 Radio Columbus" in the province of San Juan in Argentina. --Ezarate 22:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Too simple. Bad tracing. --Piotr Bart 17:05, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I disagree. --Ezarate 19:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:11, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:32, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:ClubCentralArgentinoOlimpicoCeres.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Logo of Club Central Argentino Olímpico.--Ezarate 00:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Vulphere 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Bad tracing. --Piotr Bart 17:54, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:EscudoOlimpo.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Logo of Club Olimpo de Bahía Blanca --Ezarate 00:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Vulphere 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Bad tracing. --Piotr Bart 15:52, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Juventud_de_Pergamino.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Logo of Juventud de Pergamino --Ezarate 00:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Vulphere 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Bad tracing. --Piotr Bart 17:54, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Andes_Talleres.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Logo of Andes Talleres Sport Club --Ezarate 00:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Vulphere 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Bad tracing. --Piotr Bart 15:52, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Escudo_Oficial_Centro_Juventud_Antoniana.svgEdit

 

  • Nomination Official shield of the Centro Juventud Antoniana --Ezarate 00:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Vulphere 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not made by a wikimedian, only vectorised. Bad tracing.--Piotr Bart 15:52, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note: when judging whether these images are "made by a Commoner" or not, all these images should be judged the same.--Peulle 08:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as explained.--Peulle 10:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 22:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)