Open main menu

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 20 2019

< Commons:Quality images candidates

Contents

Consensual reviewEdit

File:Annapurna-view-ghandru.jpgEdit

 

  • Nomination Annapurna Himalayan Range and Mount Machhapuchchhre view from Ghandruk. By User:Chandrackd --Biplab Anand 08:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:26, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Less then 2 MP. --Tournasol7 11:02, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose According to the rules, this cannot be promoted as it has less than 2 MP --Uoaei1 18:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too small.--Peulle 08:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Should be speedily declined per others. -- Ikan Kekek 01:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   speedily declined. --Peulle 13:37, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Abraham_Erb's_Grist_Mill.jpgEdit

 

  • Nomination Abraham Erb's Grist Mill, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. --СССР 04:25, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough, sorry. --Tournasol7 06:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done: improved sharpness. --СССР 04:33, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Mobile phone shots are often not good enough for QI. This one has lots of sharpening artefacts and a general lack of detail.--Peulle 09:21, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good image and interesting motive -- Spurzem 11:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others, and yes, the motif is great but isn't at issue. -- Ikan Kekek 00:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Spurzem. --Manfred Kuzel 08:38, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurring noise reduction kills details. This can not be fixed by oversharpening the original image, sorry. A pity,because the motif, composition, and lighting are really nice. --Smial 09:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Smial. It’s a pity, because subject and framing are good. --Aristeas 10:44, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 01:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Geneva_International_Motor_Show_2018,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(1X7A0410).jpgEdit

 

  • Nomination McLaren Senna at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 20:19, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose I don't think a cropped image should be promoted --大诺史 12:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I disagree. No rule against cropping. --MB-one 11:24, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The technical quality is fine, but I also have a problem with the composition; the subject isn't quite clear to me. It seems like it's a shot of the door, but also includes other things - but only partly. The half-cropped wheel in particular is a bit disturbing.--Peulle 09:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I do not see the supposedly serious lack of this detail. Incidentally, I remember photos of some critics who were less convincing and yet presented here as QI. -- Spurzem 11:48, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Crop and sharpness are OK, IMO. I'm assuming the penumbras are really purplish. -- Ikan Kekek 00:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support No problem--Moroder 09:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:45, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-05-18_Fußball,_Frauen,_UEFA_Women's_Champions_League,_Olympique_Lyonnais_-_FC_Barcelona_StP_1076_LR10_by_Stepro.jpgEdit

 

  • Nomination UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona; celebration bei Olympique Lyonnais über das 0:4; Tor, goal --Stepro 03:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Too noisy IMO. --Tournasol7 04:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok to me. --Piotr Bart 17:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Also ok for me. However what are the names of the players? Woman at the right looks like Shanice van de Sanden --Michielverbeek 06:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good shot in spite of the noisy background. But also I would like to know the names of the women. -- Spurzem 11:54, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Info Sorry, the names were only in the cats, I've added them to description. --Stepro 14:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Sharp enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 00:25, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)