Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 30 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Reversible_USB_plug.jpg edit

 

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 21:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Озеро_Тургояк_Челябинской_обл.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The lake of Turgoyak, Miassky urban district, Chelyabinsk region, Russia --Panasenko Marina 17:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Too soft IMO --Podzemnik 05:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful composition --Green100700 15:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Podzemnik and I don't think the composotion is very succeded here. --Milseburg 19:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, composition is fine to me but the greenery is too soft. --S.Hinakawa 08:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose too soft --Sandro Halank 15:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 21:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Wüstegarten.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Wüstegarten in the Kellerwald with the village of Haddenberg in the foreground. --Milseburg 11:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Dust spot on the image, and I think a more exact file name could be useful. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • There is no dust spot. Do you mean a dark part of the cloud? The mountain shown is called Wüstegarten, so the file name is ok in my eyes. Feel free to decline or send it into CR. --Milseburg 19:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I don't see a dust spot... Where is it? --Mdaniels5757 01:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. I don't see a dust spot. I see a bird, which I wouldn't want you to remove. -- Ikan Kekek 08:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan Kekek --Sandro Halank 16:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan Kekek. --Mdaniels5757 19:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 21:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mosca_común_(Musca_domestica),_Múnich,_Alemania,_2020-06-24,_DD_01-31_FS.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Housefly (Musca domestica), Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 11:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Most hairs surrounded by a blurry area and also many hairs not sharp --Llez 07:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I accept the arguments of the other voters --Llez 10:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I mean, you could complain about the crops, but complaining about some of the hairs not being sharp with this kind of amazing closeup just doesn't cut it for me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan Kekek. --Mdaniels5757 19:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 21:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mosca_común_(Musca_domestica),_Múnich,_Alemania,_2020-06-24,_DD_32-60_FS.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Housefly (Musca domestica), Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 11:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Most hairs surrounded by a blurry area and also many hairs not sharp --Llez 07:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I accept the arguments of the other voters --Llez 10:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Come on, Llez, are you serious? Amazing closeup! Superior to the other one. -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Short DoF by design, good quality. --Mdaniels5757 19:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 21:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Dueren_station_street_facade.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Düren railway station - street facade --JiriMatejicek 10:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sharpness not good, distracting elements (cars, people) in front of the buildings, vertical perspective correction needed --Poco a poco 11:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment The image captures the hustle and bustle on a busy train station; the stuff you call distracting is meant to be there. I don't share your opinion that verticals have to be straight _everywhere_. --JiriMatejicek 10:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Poco, verticals to be staightened, see Image guidelines --Palauenc05 07:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 21:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Порецкое_лесничество_(спуск_к_р.Москве).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Poretsky forestry (down to Moskva river) --Yutskovskiy 20:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Please ensure the image is properly categorised ("Protected areas of Russia" is too broad, "Protected areas of Russia/5010142" is a red link). --S.Hinakawa 19:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I corrected the categories. Please check. --Yutskovskiy 20:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Mdaniels5757 20:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 22:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Отражение._Ветви_деревьев_над_прудом.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Александр Байдуков 14:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Proper image description needed --MB-one 12:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. The Russian description seems OK, especially with the category, though geocoordinates would certainly be welcome. -- Ikan Kekek 08:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan Kekek. --Mdaniels5757 20:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 22:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Машук_в_лучах_рассвет.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Ganzikov 08:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Proper image description needed --MB-one 12:40, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Beautiful and a fine description, but I think even in this kind of poetic composition, it's not quite sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 21:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Mdaniels5757 22:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Гора_Машук_при_низкой_облачности.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Ganzikov 08:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Proper image description needed --MB-one 12:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Very artistic, but there is posterization and a little too much noise and unsharpness even for this kind of motif, I think. There should also be categories for sunrises and clouds (I think "sea of clouds" is one). -- Ikan Kekek 22:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Mdaniels5757 22:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Вид_с_вершины_Машука.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Ganzikov 08:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Proper image description needed --MB-one 12:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful. Sharpness and noise level are marginal for Quality Image, but what a nice composition. I'd suggest adding categories for the types of clouds in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 22:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 22:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:DSC08100-Панорама-Edit_22.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Горный массив Караул-Оба: Морское лесничество, кв. 45, Новый Свет, Судак, КрымЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение загружено в ходе конкурса Вики любит Землю — 2019. --Александр Рудный 04:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Categories need fixing --Podzemnik 05:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
    Categories fixed. --Atsirlin 00:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Good picture, but it needs a meaningful filename. Also, Александр Рудный, if you can identify the body of water depicted, please add that to the file description and include a category for it. -- Ikan Kekek 22:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Mdaniels5757 22:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:View from the Karaul-Oba mountain to the Veselovskaya Bay (to the west), Crimea (2).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Горный массив Караул-Оба: Морское лесничество, кв. 45, Новый Свет, Судак, КрымЯ, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, добровольно публикую его на условиях следующей лицензии:Это изображение загружено в ходе конкурса Вики любит Землю — 2019. --Александр Рудный 04:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Categories need fixing --Podzemnik 05:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
    Categories fixed. --Atsirlin 00:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Nice photo, same comments as on the other one - you need a meaningful filename and you need to describe and include a category for the body of water. -- Ikan Kekek 22:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Mdaniels5757 22:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Timmelsjoch_Hochalpenstrasse_IMG_7468.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Timmelsjoch Hochalpenstrasse--Fischer.H 09:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 11:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Looks oversharpened to me --Poco a poco 21:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The halos are disturbing as well.--Ermell 12:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Poco a poco --Sandro Halank 19:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 21:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Дворец_Кусково_ваза.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ваза. Главный Дворец в Кусково. Вешняки, Восточный округ, Москва --Ulaisaeva 08:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Lacks details. --Ermell 20:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. Looks good to me. --Blood Red Sandman 23:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't think it's sharp enough to be a Quality Image. -- Ikan Kekek 07:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality, sorry. --Palauenc05 08:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Strong artifacts Poco a poco 12:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose not sharp enough for QI--Sandro Halank 19:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 21:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Граное_Ухо.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Михаил Шнейдер 04:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 09:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, strange artefacts at the leaves --Uoaei1 18:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, whitish halos around some of the upper leaves. Please fix them, and then this will be a Quality Image. -- Ikan Kekek 06:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ikan.--Ermell 12:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 21:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Разрез_Милановского_и_фрагмент_Президентского_моста.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Михаил Шнейдер 04:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 09:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, Lack of details --Berthold Werner 12:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose absolutely per Berthold Werner --Uoaei1 06:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Somewhat soft, but good enough to be printed to A4 or larger. --Smial 10:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Ermell 12:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose lack of details --Sandro Halank 16:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 21:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)