Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 07 2022
-
- Nomination Chipping sparrow in Green-Wood Cemetery --Rhododendrites 02:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ximonic 02:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Downy woodpecker in Green-Wood Cemetery --Rhododendrites 02:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ximonic 02:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matchscene from FC Admira Wacker Mödling (red shirts) vs. LASK Linz (black-white shirts) across the whole field. --Steindy 00:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice, very nice. Good quality. It is one of the images that I could dream of being able to make Lmbuga 00:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A typical country house at Sant'Agata Feltria, Italy --Terragio67 22:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Problem at the top: Overexposure? Blown out?--Lmbuga 22:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)-- Done You are right... I tried to correct the picture on the top. --Terragio67 23:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The upper bluish area is incompatible with QI, sorry--Lmbuga 23:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's Singles World Cup race at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Riccarda Ruetz (AUT) --Sandro Halank 19:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 20:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Training at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Daria Maleeva (RUS) --Sandro Halank 19:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 19:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Training at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Riccarda Ruetz (AUT) --Sandro Halank 19:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 19:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Training at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Evelin Lanthaler (ITA) --Sandro Halank 19:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sign with colours of ukrainian flag at peace rally, Venice, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 19:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination So-called Petrusglocke, cast by Mabilon in 1953. --Palauenc05 18:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maniola jurtina on Cirsium arvense --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 17:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination , silver linden - Tilleul argenté --Ercé 12:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --aismallard 13:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge built in the late eighties, and completed in the early nineties, over the river Limia, to save the waters of the Lindoso reservoir between Aceredo, in Lobios and Lantemil, in Entrimo. Galicia (Spain). By user:Pementa--Lmbuga 10:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 12:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the sculpture of Ramón Pla y Monge, Marqués de Amboage. Ferrol, Galicia (Spain). F-9 --Lmbuga 10:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 17:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment Funny photo. I'd suggest adding a category for the gull, but it's up to you. -- Ikan Kekek 21:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Done Larus michahellis Thank you for the review. More likeable is the previous photo--Lmbuga 22:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harpactea hombergi on a wall. --Alexis Lours 10:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 10:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Left valve of the bivalve Polititapes aureus var. beudanti --Llez 06:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture "Work" Artwork by Irma Horstman in Park De la Soblonièrekade.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture "Work" Artwork by Irma Horstman in Park De la Soblonièrekade.
-
- Nomination Faunok fountain at Fő tér in Szombathely, Vas County, Hungary. --Tournasol7 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jurisics tér in Kőszeg, Vas County, Hungary. --Tournasol7 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Jurisics tér 11 in Kőszeg, Vas County, Hungary. --Tournasol7 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Margaret of Hungary school in Kőszeg, Vas County, Hungary. --Tournasol7 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Goos quality --Llez 06:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Táblaház utca 1 in Kőszeg, Vas County, Hungary. --Tournasol7 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dead trees in Schmalo in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schmalo in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flags (European Union and Ukraine) at the Stadtweinhaus on Prinzipalmarkt in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flag of the European Union at St. Lamberti Church on Prinzipalmarkt in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint James the Greater in Liemberg, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque apse of the parish church Saint James the Greater in Liemberg, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque apse of the parish church Saint James the Greater in Liemberg, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle in Liemberg #1, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Biforium at the castle in Liemberg #1, Liebenfels, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marin Jakoliš, player of FC Admira Wacker Mödling. --Steindy 00:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oliver Glasner, manager of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fifth Normal Metro Station. Santiago, Chile. --Rjcastillo 23:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --aismallard 07:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's Nations Cup at the 2021/22 Oberhof Luge World Cup: Detelina Marinova (Bulgaria), Elsa Desmond (Ireland), Tove Kohala (Sweden) --Sandro Halank 21:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tomer T 08:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aceredo (submerged town), Lobios, Galicia (Spain). By User:Pementa --Lmbuga 10:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)--Lmbuga 10:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Good smart phone quality but not enough for QI IMO. --Ermell 20:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tufted duck (Aythya fuligula), pair --Alexis Lours 08:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tufted duck (Aythya fuligula), male --Alexis Lours 08:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vertical picture of One World Trade Center in Winter --aismallard 05:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Taken from bellow and Good quality Lmbuga 13:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lužiny shopping center, Prague, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 08:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
I'm a bit torn, I really like the photograph but I find reflection in the lower-center under the last lamp to be a bit distracting. --aismallard 06:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality Lmbuga 15:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MacAllister cordless screwdriver --LoMit 14:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Good quality but it's a drill, not a screwdriver. --Trougnouf 13:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
I agree with Trougnouf, it's a good quality image but the naming is not accurate. --aismallard 05:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Naming in Polski: If someone does not agree with the name in English, change it --Lmbuga 16:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ahorn Castle in the district of Coburg --Ermell 09:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 12:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
In which way? The castle is not straight at all. --Ermell 22:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Support. Some vertical line may not be straight, but almost all others are. clearly QI. Good quality--Lmbuga 16:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The fountain Kräutlmarktbrunnen at the Marienplatz in Munich. --DavidJRasp 10:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Would suggest much tighter crop, to exclude distracting elements --MB-one 13:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Mosteiro_dos_Jeronimos_-_Ceiling_at_Exit.jpg edit
- Nomination Mosteiro dos Jerónimos - Painting on ceiling at Exit --Imehling 06:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)<br / {{o}}The frame on the right side is very inconvenient (disturbing, sorry)--Lmbuga 15:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)- I have uploaded a new file with different crop --Imehling 10:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good enough now. --Smial 10:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good enough now--Lmbuga 11:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Tafers_Sensler_Museum_01.jpg edit
- Nomination Regional Museum in Tafers, Switzerland -- --Matutinho 05:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- OpposeOverblown sky, object too dark, vertical lines tilted. Sorry. --Imehling 07:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC) --
- Comment Thanks for the commentary. I have modified the image. --Matutinho 08:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Tut mir leid, das funktioniert so nicht. Wenn man etwas fotografiert, sollte man die Sonne im Rücken haben, damit sie die Vorderseite des Objekts beleuchtet (Ausnahmen bestätigen die Regel). --Imehling 11:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- CommentUnfortunately, my knowledge of English is limited. So I will take the liberty of answering here in German as well. Du hast Recht, aber bei Nordfassaden wird das auf der Nordhalbkugel schwierig. Das Haus ist gut ausgeleuchtet, gerade weil die Sonne nicht direkt auf die Fassade scheint, auch die so genannte Untersicht (Dachvorsprünge) sind klar strukturiert. Andernfalls wären sie im Vollschatten. Das wäre meiner Meinung nach ziemlich mies. Und noch fürs breitere Publikum: The main façade faces north. In Central Europe, the sun shines in the south. Precisely because the sun does not shine directly on the façade, the eaves / arch do not cast full shadows. That would look pretty bad. --Matutinho 21:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- OK, let's have a discussion. --Imehling 06:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- CommentUnfortunately, my knowledge of English is limited. So I will take the liberty of answering here in German as well. Du hast Recht, aber bei Nordfassaden wird das auf der Nordhalbkugel schwierig. Das Haus ist gut ausgeleuchtet, gerade weil die Sonne nicht direkt auf die Fassade scheint, auch die so genannte Untersicht (Dachvorsprünge) sind klar strukturiert. Andernfalls wären sie im Vollschatten. Das wäre meiner Meinung nach ziemlich mies. Und noch fürs breitere Publikum: The main façade faces north. In Central Europe, the sun shines in the south. Precisely because the sun does not shine directly on the façade, the eaves / arch do not cast full shadows. That would look pretty bad. --Matutinho 21:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Tut mir leid, das funktioniert so nicht. Wenn man etwas fotografiert, sollte man die Sonne im Rücken haben, damit sie die Vorderseite des Objekts beleuchtet (Ausnahmen bestätigen die Regel). --Imehling 11:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the commentary. I have modified the image. --Matutinho 08:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Version 2 of the file is rather blurry compared to version 1. --Tsungam 07:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Although the photo has been scaled down to about 6 MPix, which I can accept depending on the shooting situation, it is still relatively blurry in wide areas. There is also some noticeable CA. In general, I don't think it's a good idea to darken burnt, overexposed clouds to some muddy gray level. This neither makes the photo look more natural nor adds any details. I realize, of course, that this is a very difficult lighting situation. --Smial 10:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others--Lmbuga 21:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry, and top and right crops are problematic. -- Ikan Kekek 22:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Sandro Halank 14:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Sandro Halank 14:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Raggiolo_Tuscany_Italy_2020-08-25.jpg edit
- Nomination A pedestrian way at Raggiolo - Tuscany - Italy --Terragio67 08:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 21:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose All the right side is tilted. Overprocessed sky: It has two collors--Lmbuga 18:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lmbuga. -Smial 10:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- I still remember every wall and every house were tilted there. Anyway I enjoyed whatever I saw. ;-) --Terragio67 21:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- And, excuse me, did you enjoy a sky with two colors? Sorry--Lmbuga 21:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Honestly, I didn't apply any filter on the sky. It was, probably, the consequence of the relative humidity level, that went up during the sunrise. --Terragio67 22:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- And, excuse me, did you enjoy a sky with two colors? Sorry--Lmbuga 21:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- According to Image quality guidelines, do you think the two colors sky is a typical issue that should be handly corrected? --Terragio67 06:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, excuse me, the sky is overprocessed IMO--Lmbuga 11:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lmbuga --Sandro Halank 14:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Sandro Halank 14:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Ludwigstraße_60,_Modegeschäft_20210821_HOF04258_RAW-Export_20220128001287cens.jpg edit
- Nomination A fashion store in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Needs some tilt/perspective correction. --C messier 19:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose No reaction since one week. --Steindy 22:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Support I do not see a consistent lean in any direction. Looks OK to me. --King of Hearts 00:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Perspective is good enough here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC) - Comment Check the buildings to the left. They lean in significantly. --C messier 07:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I have corrected the original version with ShiftN as a test. If you don't like it, just reset it. --Smial 15:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good now IMO. --Lmbuga 16:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality now. -- Ikan Kekek 07:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Freedom_Convoy_2022,_February_12_(BW_3).jpg edit
- Nomination: A person is writing on a truck during "Freedom Convoy" protest in Ottawa, Canada --Maksimsokolov 00:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. The photo is not only too noisy for me, but also has strong vignetting. --Steindy 12:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Special case. Love it--Lmbuga 21:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy. --Tagooty 15:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support seems good for these type of photo. Tomer T 09:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but per Steindy. This isn't a QI to me. --Sandro Halank 14:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Sandro Halank 14:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Burgruine_Stollburg-20220213-RM-162108.jpg edit
- Nomination Stollburg Castle Ruin --Ermell 08:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The top is kind of blurry and distorted. It detracts from the rest of the image. --Adamant1 07:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC) - Support Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support It is OK to me. --Matutinho 06:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Burned subject. Poor quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Burned highlights, per Lmbuga. --Smial 12:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Question Really burned? There are plenty of details, and pretty much every stone is individually visible. -- Ikan Kekek 18:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Smial --Sandro Halank 14:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Sandro Halank 14:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)