Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 08 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Kullaa_Church_4.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Kullaa Church. --Kallerna 14:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Tsungam 15:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support One could possibly ask for a minimal perspective correction. On the other hand, this is an older building with a wooden structure that may not be 100% vertical in all details. I think that the image, as it is, looks very natural. --Smial 11:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
  • {{o}}<Nowiki>Tilted CCW IMO</s>--[[User:Lmbuga|Lmbuga]] 16:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC) ::<s><Nowiki>{{Comment}}: {{ping|Smial}} Tilt correction affects the entire image. It's not a question of the age of the building, it's a question of the photo. Correcting it is only having a good disposition. It is easy. --[[User:Lmbuga|Lmbuga]] 15:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC) ::{{Comment|Comment 2}}: Even so, it seems to me a very good photo and, perhaps, QI--[[User:Lmbuga|Lmbuga]] 15:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC) ::{{Comment|Comment 3}}: What (or which, sorry: poor English) are the limits if Commons quidelines are not respected?--[[User:Lmbuga|Lmbuga]] 15:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
  Comment 4: Sorry for everyone (especially Kallerna)--Lmbuga 16:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks perfectly normal to me. Maybe there's some kind of standard of perfection it falls short of, but this isn't "Perfect image candidates." -- Ikan Kekek 22:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Neutral--Lmbuga 10:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--Ermell 20:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support--aismallard 12:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Steindy 18:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)