Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 17 2023

Consensual review

edit

File:Konev_nad_mraky.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Thunderstorm in the Czech Republic. By User:NinoJirásek --IamMM 20:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • It does, what it does. It sure bares an articifial quality, and could be promote but speaking of geolocation in other reviews, would it be possible to add here also a more precise location in the decription? --Der Angemeldete 23:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- 05:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As already stated. Proper description of location would be recommended. Or isn' it needed here due to quality standards? Please discuss. --Der Angemeldete 16:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
  • My understanding (which can totally be wrong) is that the geo-location, whether through description texts or through templates, is not mandatory but recommended, since it is not listed as required in COM:QIC and merely a recommendation in COM:IG. I am fine if we would prefer to codify it as required whenever applicable for quality images. -- 20:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Massive overprocessing.--Smial 11:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I guess, that was the intention of the uploader :).--Der Angemeldete 19:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 01:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_March_2023_-_124.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination En Busca de la Razón, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. -- 05:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Good composition, but   Overprocessed and level of detail too low. --Augustgeyler 22:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Needs perspective correction and the shadows on the main subject (the ladder) are too deep. --LexKurochkin 09:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Pretty but tilted. -- Ikan Kekek 19:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 01:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_position_of_Spindasis_ictis_Hewitson,_1865_–_Common_Shot_Silverline_WLB_DSC_7883_.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Close wing position of Spindasis ictis Hewitson, 1865 – Common Shot Silverline --Sandipoutsider 02:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose oversaturated --Charlesjsharp 17:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Slightly yes, but the main object is fine.--Der Angemeldete 12:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The oversaturation does not disturb.--KaiBorgeest 23:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 01:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)