Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 23 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_March_2023_-_116.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Malecón, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The contrast seams to be   Overprocessed. In addition the level of detail is very low. --Augustgeyler 10:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Low level of detail --Jakubhal 06:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 07:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

File:At_Tenerife_2023_017.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Barranco de Santos in Finca España, Tenerife, with water flowing during the winter. --Mike Peel 11:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment Looks a bit oversaturated on the left side an in the sky. --Der Angemeldete 12:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
    • @Der Angemeldete: Thanks for the review, I've desaturated it a bit, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
      •   Oppose Yes, it slightly improved, but afterwards I found a low rate of detail in the creek behind the wall. However the composition is great. I'm really unsure and would like to set it to discuss to hear other opinions, if you allow. --Der Angemeldete 03:44, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 07:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Black_vulture_(Coragyps_atratus_brasiliensis)_in_flight_Copan.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Black vulture (Coragyps atratus brasiliensis) --Charlesjsharp 22:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 00:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The head looks unsharp to me. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)