Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 04 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Pair_Indian_Elephants_Nagarhole_Kabini_Apr22_D72_23703.jpg edit

 

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Female_Indian_Leopard_Resting_Nagarhole_Karnataka_Apr22_D72_24069.jpg edit

 

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bij_Moerdijk,_het_Hollands_Diep_(westelijk_van_de_Moerdijkbrug)_IMG_0768_2022-03-28_13.29.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination near Moerdijk-NL, the Hollands Diep (at westside from the bridge: Moerdijkbrug) --Michielverbeek 05:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Peulle 07:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry! I disagree. None of this ships and nothing of the background is sharp. Surely not QI. --Steindy 13:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support A bit noisy, but sharp enough to be printed to A4, and above 6 MPixels. Many photos simulate above-average sharpness through high local contrasts. This is not the case here because of the very delicate colour gradients. Of course, you can always raise your standards further, but for me this photo is good enough. --Smial 08:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support I agree, good enough to meet the criteria for QI --Kritzolina 07:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 11:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)