Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 02 2018

Consensual review edit

File:African_sacred_ibis_in_Zimbabwe_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination African sacred ibis (Threskiornis aethiopicus) on the bank of the Zambezi, Zimbabwe --Bgag 00:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too much detail loss in this one imho, sorry. --GerifalteDelSabana 22:54, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Gerifalte - too unsharp on the head and neck. -- Ikan Kekek 01:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Basotxerri 09:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Castle_of_Severac_40.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View of the Castle of Sévérac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 03:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment Please check your image. It"s unsharp, please try it without JPEG compression. --XRay 04:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
    • Are you sure? For me it's sharp enough... Tournasol7 09:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
      • I'm sure. There are visible JPEG artifacts for example at the tower. The filesize is very small. IMO it's better to upload an uncompressed image. And there are some more issues, for example a blurry bird in the sky. --XRay 09:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
        • Ok, but I worked with RAW file... Tournasol7 18:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
          • And you generated a JPEG file - without compression? --XRay 07:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
            • Sorry, but I don't know what it mean "JPEG compression". I worked on RAW file in Lightroom as all my photos. Tournasol7 14:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
              • All other photos are OK. I don't know why there are artifacts from JPEG compression. If you export the image with Lightroom and choose "export", you can find "JPG". There is a controller for compression. You should use "100%", so it's without compression. Is it "100%". Otherwise I'm helpless and we should send the image to discussion. It's too good for decline. --XRay 04:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
                • So I sent to discussion. Tournasol7 14:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - The quality looks really solid to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:21, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. --Basotxerri 08:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez 20:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blocky JPG compression artifacts even in the sky. Irfanview says "82%", this is way too low. At 95% or higher the artifacts would be no more disturbing. @xray: I don't know how lightroom works, but not every software exports uncompressed JPG if quality is set to "100%". Of course the setting to "best quality" oder "uncompressed" or "100%" is recommended. Some older software like Micrografx PP use a reversed scale, where "1" means "lowest compresion" and higher values mean more compression ;-) --Smial 08:49, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
  • In Adobe Lightroom Classic CC (the fantastic full name ;-) ) it's easy to set 100%, there is a slider for compression. In Adobe Photoshop CC it's easy too, but there are 12 Steps. "12" means uncompressed, but "Highest quality" is only 10 of 12, but you can see, that it's only 10. --XRay 10:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There are artefacts visible around the towers.--Peulle 10:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Waiting for an uncompressed image. --XRay 10:40, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per above. --GerifalteDelSabana 08:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Basotxerri 18:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)