Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 26 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Neue_Synagoge,_Berlin,_Kuppel,_140525,_ako.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Dome of the new synagogue in Berlin-Mitte. --Code 06:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline *   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Due to the leaning verticals not a QI for me --Uoaei1 18:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Leaning CCW. I ask explicitly not perspective correction for this kind of images, but this one simply looks wrong. -- Smial 10:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 22:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Frankfurt Motor Show 2015 (110).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz gallery. --Rijinatwiki 08:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Comment not right : see note. --Medium69 19:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted. --C messier 16:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted and noisy, affecting detail and sharpness. Alvesgaspar 18:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Although something in the perspective (maybe the nearly horizontal line in the foreground) still gives the impression of tilt. Alvesgaspar 11:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Perspective correction
    Please sign. --Medium69 11:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   DonePerspective correction Rijinatwiki 13:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok for me. --Medium69 11:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 09:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ermitage_South_facade_Saint_Petersburg.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: South facade of the Hermitage Museum in Saint Petersburg. --Moroder 07:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry again, but stitching distortions are very strong. The left side of the pavement falls down, the right side of the Winter palace crushed. The Palace isn't similar to itself - it's flat as cardboard. --Florstein 17:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The left side of the castly is not very sharp. Maybe it's a depth-of-field issue. --Jacek79 21:04, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment In regard to sharpness it is well above standard. Are you sure your monitor is working properly?--Moroder 21:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 18:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Yogyakarta_Indonesia_Masjid-Soko-Tunggal-01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Soko Tunggal Mosque near Taman Sari. --Cccefalon 07:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose CA in the tree and perspective problem. --El Golli Mohamed 22:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •   Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Please give it some more space and let the poor building breathe! -- Alvesgaspar 15:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
  Comment More space will include unwanted side elements. This building is already squeezed into a pretty small lot. It was even not possible to go further back ... --Cccefalon 19:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 21:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 09:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)