Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 28 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Catedral,_Norwich,_Inglaterra,_2022-11-19,_DD_60-62_HDR.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Cathedral, Norwich, England --Poco a poco 18:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Main focus to dark --Kiwiz1338 11:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
  • What do you mean by that? I don't think it was too dark, but still brightened it a bit. No reason to directly oppose IMHO Poco a poco 20:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
  • I ask for CR before the bot sweeps away this nom --Poco a poco 20:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Indeed the lower part seems to dark, while the upper part is not really sharp. Would benefit from brightening the shadows. --Plozessor 05:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment The exposure is fine to me. The signs on left and right and the cross on the top are blurry. Fixable by sharpening, or better HDR processing? --Tagooty 15:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I uploaded one more version with additional sharpening in the areas mentioned by Tagooty. I cannot believe that I have to apply additional brigthness. The photo was taken around sunset. Btw, the image has over 30 MPx Poco a poco 19:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Sorry, there is not much improvement. --Tagooty 03:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 17:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Soos_2015_08.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Císařský pramen in the nature reserve Soos in Czechia --Kritzolina 20:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Not sharp even at low resolution --Plozessor 06:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Seems adequate to me as a photo of part of a mineral spring. It's OK for a photo of running water not to look crystalline and for part of the picture to be less sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 20:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough. --C messier 17:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 17:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Museo_Británico,_Londres,_Inglaterra,_2022-11-26,_DD_57-59_HDR.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination British Museum, London, England --Poco a poco 07:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The people at the bottom left look heavily distorted. Possible to fix the distortion or crop them out? --ThibautRe 18:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
      New version --Poco a poco 21:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
    Slightly greenish? --ArildV 09:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
      New version --Poco a poco 19:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
      Support New version is fine for me. --ArildV 19:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
      Oppose Seems too green tinted? --Jay.Jarosz 03:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose There's very slight green tint (the white part of the sign is #6f7d71), but it's more the overall darkness, lack of sharpness and the perspective distortion (right side is leaning inwards) that concerns me. --Plozessor 06:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Underexposed. Slightly better now. --Kallerna 20:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment New version with adjusted crop, perspective, brightness and WB Poco a poco 11:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support OK, plausible mostly natural light in overcast London. -- Ikan Kekek 21:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan.--Ermell 23:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
  • @Jay.Jarosz, Plozessor, and Kallerna: May I ask you for a new review of the image? Poco a poco 20:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality given the circumstances. --Tagooty 03:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support OK in my view --Imehling 15:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 17:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)