Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 29 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Lokstedter_steindamm_35.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Residential building Lokstedter Steindamm 35 in Hamburg-Lokstedt --Dirtsc 12:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sorry, Insufficient quality. the sky and the building is blurred. Size is to small. --Rolf H. 14:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Size is 2.5 MP, so it matches the guidelines. I removed one hot pixel and applied a little sharpening, maybe it's better now. Please consider, that I used a small camera. --Dirtsc 21:13, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Sorry, for me not a QI. --Rolf H. 15:18, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 23:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Madrid_May_2014-9a.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Organ of the Catedral de la Almudena. Madrid, Spain. -- Alvesgaspar 00:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)  Comment
  •   Oppose Strong noise reduction artefacts--Ermell 20:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment This pic looks as if id had been strongly reworked from a terribly underexposed & noisy original. Parts of it resemble me of an oil painting. --Jacek79 21:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support I think, in this case and for QI it is acceptable. --Hubertl 11:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 23:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Tapa_aceitunas.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Marinated olives as a tapa in a bar --Basotxerri 16:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose IMHO, DOF not the best and unfavorable background. --C messier 14:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per C Messier; also some noise issues. Daniel Case 20:17, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 23:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Santuario_de_Nuestra_Señora_del_Pueyo,_Belchite,_Zaragoza,_España,_2015-01-08,_DD_05.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Sanctuary of Our Lady of Pueyo, Belchite, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 18:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. I'm afraid there is a problem with the exposure which can not be fixed. Sorry --Moroder 11:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment There is no issue here with the exposure, it was a foggy day, that's all, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 18:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Compared to many other images of this tower found in the web, it looks bent and distorted. -- Smial 12:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Smial; also CA on top of tower. Daniel Case 20:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 23:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Burg_Ranis,_Vorburg,_Ansicht_von_Osten,_151002,_ako.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Castle of Ranis, bailey, exterior view from east. --Code 09:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)  Comment
  •   Oppose Too big dark area Ezarate 22:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Per comment. --Daniel Case 06:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment This is not FPC. Even in the shadows everything is visible. We have lots of QIs with large shadow parts. In this case we have an interesting contrast between dark and bright which is clearly intended compositionally. --Code 06:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I think, Code is right. For me QI --Hubertl 21:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment Who are you? --Jean11 20:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Das frag´ ich mich auch manchmal, Jean11 ;-) --Hubertl 21:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 23:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)