Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 27 2022

Consensual review

edit

File:20180107_Kapelle_St._Ulrich_Eresing_01.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Crucifix at the back of the chapel St. Ulrich in Eresing --FlocciNivis 10:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
      Oppose Sorry, but too noisy and dark --Jakubhal 17:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There is no indication to me that the use of a tripod and a longer exposure time at maximum ISO400 would have been impossible for this shot. The lens could also have been stopped down to f/5.6 or f/8 on this occasion, which would also have provided better sharpness. For a freehand shot in low light, the image turned out quite decent, if it had been an action shot I would have supported it. But for landscape and/or architecture, it's not good enough for QI. --Smial 13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Smial --Tagooty 13:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 21:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)