Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:Kühlungsborn,_Pier_--_2024_--_5213.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Pier (and sailing ship “Engelina”), Kühlungsborn, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany --XRay 03:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 03:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. The lights of the pier are overlapping the ship resulting in unnecessary clutter. In your other image (already QI) you managed to find a good way to show both but not this one. --GRDN711 02:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Composition works for me (and technical quality is good too). --Plozessor 14:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Milseburg 10:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Ущелье_Туюксу,_октябрь.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination October in Tuyuksy gorge, Medeu national park, Kazakhstan. By User:Exxocette --Екатерина Борисова 00:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Sky looks unnatural dark to me. --Milseburg 15:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  •   Question Was there a polarization filter used? Why is no EXIF data left and which camera was used here? Additionally the image looks downscaled. Was it? --Augustgeyler 10:48, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose overprocessed. --Smial 15:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Milseburg 10:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)