Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 19 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Basilique_Santa_Maria_Novella_-_Florence_(IT52)_-_2022-08-31_-_4.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Facade of Santa Maria Novella church in Florence, Italy. --Chabe01 21:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Tower is leaning to the right, sky is posterized. No QI for me. --Milseburg 20:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Milseburg. Appears overprocessed. --Smial 12:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overprocessed, posterised sky and clouds, not really sharp, needs perspective correction. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 18:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

File:At_Los_Gigantes_2022_011.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mini golf course at Los Gigantes, Tenerife --Mike Peel 06:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality --Llez 07:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. It's the left foto with slightly different crop. (Composition, time of fotos, camera are the same.) --Mike1979 Russia 08:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
  • {{o}} Barrel distortion, perspective. I am worried that the construction crane in the background might fall over. Also some burnt highlights in the background, but that is not so important and would not in itself cause a decline. --Smial 06:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Smial: Distortion corrected (not sure how I missed that), exposure backed off a little to avoid the burnt highlights. Crane has not fallen over yet, at least to my knowledge. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
      • I'm sorry, I don't understand the reworking of the picture. The lamppost on the left is still bent and the construction cranes are still leaning. But I don't want to prolong this endlessly and withdraw my vote. --Smial 14:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Needs perspective correction, I consider it the main problem. There are also some CA (not too severe, but visible) on contrast edges in the left side of the photo. --LexKurochkin 18:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)