Open main menu

Commons:Kandidat gambar berkualitas

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 26% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Lompat ke nominasi
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎Canadian English • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Nederlands • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎latviešu • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎shqip • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎македонски • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎मैथिली • ‎ไทย • ‎中文 • ‎日本語
float

Terdapat kandidat yang akan menjadi gambar berkualitas. Perhatikan bahwa ini tidak sama dengan gambar pilihan. Terlebih lagi, apabila Anda hanya ingin mendapatkan umpan balik mengenai gambar Anda, Anda dapat memperolehnya di kritik fotografi.

Contents

Tujuan

Tujuan dari gambar berkualitas adalah untuk mendorong orang-orang yang merupakan dasar dari Commons, pengguna individu yang memberikan gambar unik yang mengembangkan koleksi ini. Meskipun gambar pilihan memperkenalkan seluruh gambar yang terbaik yang dimuat ke Commons, Gambar berkualitas memperkenalkan dan mendorong upaya pengguna dalam memberikan gambar berkualitas kepada Commons.
Terlebih itu, gambar berkualitas harus menjadi tempat untuk merujuk pengguna lain ketika menjelaskan metode untuk memperbaiki sebuah gambar.

Pedoman

Semua gambar nominasi harus merupakan karya pengguna Commons.

Untuk nominator

Di bawah ini adalah pedoman umum untuk Gambar berkualitas; kriteria lebih detail tersedia di Pedoman gambar.


Syarat halaman gambar
  1. Status hak cipta. Kandidat gambar berkualitas harus diunggah ke Commons di bawah lisensi yang tepat. Persyaratan lisensi lengkap ada di Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. Gambar harus mengikuti kebijakan dan kebiasaan di Commons, termasuk Foto orang yang dapat dikenali.
  3. Gambar berkualitas harus memiliki nama berkas yang bermakna, harus dikategorikan dengan baik dan memiliki deskripsi yang akurat dalam halaman berkas dalam satu atau banyak bahasa. Deskripsi dalam bahasa Inggris lebih disukai, namun tidak diwajibkan.
  4. Tidak ada iklan atau tanda tangan dalam gambar. Informasi hak cipta dan kepemilikan dari gambar berkualitas harus diletakkan dalam halaman gambar dan dibolehkan dalam metadata gambar, namun tidak mengganggu isi gambar tersebut.


Pembuat

Gambar harus dibuat oleh seorang Wikimediawan agar memenuhi syarat untuk status GB. Ini berarti gambar yang berasal dari, contohnya, Flickr tidak dapat memenuhi syarat. (Catatan: Gambar Pilihan tidak memiliki syarat ini.) Reproduksi fotografi dari karya seni dua dimensi, yang dibuat oleh Wikimediawan, dapat memenuhi syarat (dan harus dilisensikan PD-old sesuai dengan pedoman Commons). Apabila sebuah gambar dipromosikan meskipun bukan dibuat oleh seorang Wikimediawan, status GB harus dicabut segera ketika kesalahan ini diketahui.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.


Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.


Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.


Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.


Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.


How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations

Carefully select your best images to nominate. No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.


Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination.
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.


How to review

How to update the status

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

  • If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

  • If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first and, if possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.


Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.


How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red


Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 25 2019 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.


Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.


Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 01.39, 25 Juni 2019 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
If there are terms you are unfamiliar with, please see explanations at Photography terms.

Thank you.



June 25, 2019

June 24, 2019

June 23, 2019

June 22, 2019

June 21, 2019

June 20, 2019

June 19, 2019

June 18, 2019

June 17, 2019

June 16, 2019

June 15, 2019

June 14, 2019

June 11, 2019

June 9, 2019

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add   Oppose and   Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:Iglesia_de_El_Sagrario,_Quito,_Ecuador,_2015-07-22,_DD_104.JPG

  Commons:Quality images candidates/id/Discuss

File:Rheinland-Pfalz,_Ludwigshafen_am_Rhein,_Landschaftsschutzgebiet_07-LSG-7314-013,_Rehbock_002.jpg

  Commons:Quality images candidates/id/Discuss

File:Rheinland-Pfalz,_Ludwigshafen_am_Rhein,_Landschaftsschutzgebiet_07-LSG-7314-013,_Storch_Landung_004.jpg

  Commons:Quality images candidates/id/Discuss

File:Wikinoticias_Francia_2019_logo.svg

  Commons:Quality images candidates/id/Discuss

File:Monument_morts_Romanèche_Hautecourt_Romanèche_7.jpg

  Commons:Quality images candidates/id/Discuss

File:Liége,_la_Passerelle_Saucy_verlicht_in_de_avond_IMG_9709_2019-06-01_22.31.jpg

  Commons:Quality images candidates/id/Promotion

File:Dülmen,_ehem._St.-Barbara-Kaserne_--_2019_--_6394.jpg

  Commons:Quality images candidates/id/Promotion


Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

Sen 17 Jun → Sel 25 Jun
Sel 18 Jun → Rab 26 Jun
Rab 19 Jun → Kam 27 Jun
Kam 20 Jun → Jum 28 Jun
Jum 21 Jun → Sab 29 Jun
Sab 22 Jun → Min 30 Jun
Min 23 Jun → Sen 01 Jul
Sen 24 Jun → Sel 02 Jul
Sel 25 Jun → Rab 03 Jul