Open main menu

Commons:Signalazzioni pâ vitrina

Shortcut: [[:COM:FPC]]

Passa â lista di candidati Passa â lista di candidati pâ vitrina Passa â lista di livata dâ vitrina Passa â lista di candidati pâ livata dâ vitrina

Sti mmàggini sunnu candidati pâ vitrina. Stari accura di nun cunfùnniri sta pàggina chê mmàggini dô jornu.

GuidaEdit

Candidari na mmàgginiEdit

Lìnii guida pi candidari na mmàgginiEdit

È mpurtanti lèggiri li lìnii guida prima di candidari na mmàggini.

A sèguitu è ripurtatu un riassuntu dê punti essinziali pi candidari e valutari li mmàggini candidati:

  • Risuluzzioni - Li fotugrafìi cu na risuluzzioni nfiriuri a 2 miliuna di pixel vennu giniralmenti rifiutati e livati a eccizzioni di mutivi cuntrari di mpurtanza particulari. Si nota ca li mmàggini cu risuluzzioni 1600 x 1200 hannu 1.92 Mpx, appena nfiriuri ô lìmiti mìnimu di 2Mpx.
Arricurdamu ca li mmàggini carricati nta Commons vennu taliati nun sulu nta schermi tradizziunali di PC ma sunnu utilizzati puru pi stampa e visualizzazzioni nta schermi a risuluzzioni àuta. Nun putemu certu privìdiri quali ticnoluggìi vennu utilizzati ntô futuru quinni è mpurtanti ca li mmàggini scigghiuti pâ vitrina hàianu na risuluzzioni quantu chiù àuta è pussìbbili.
  • Scanzioni - È cunzigghiàbbili siguiri la guida â scanzioni, ca pruponi suggirimenti pi l'ottinimentu di mmàggini ottimali
  • Focu - ovviamenti ogni oggettu significativu dâ mmàggini havi a èssiri difinutu bonu e a focu.
  • Primu pianu e sfunnu - Oggetti n primìssimu pianu o di sfunnu ponnu distràiri dâ vista di l'oggettu principali dâ mmàggini. È lu casu di cuntrullari si quarchi elimentu n primu pianu nun copri nuddu elimentu mpurtanti e ca lu sfunnu nun leva l'attinzioni e renni cunfusa la mmàggini (p'esempiu evitari ca c'è na luci forti ê spaddi di na facci)
  • Qualità ginirali - li mmàggini candidati hannu a èssiri di qualità tècnica àuta.
  • Li manipulazzioni diggitali nun hannu a èssiri effittuati pi ngannari, ma vannu usati sulu limitatamenti e cu cura pi currèggiri difetti fotugràfici. Li manipulazzioni cumunimenti accittati sunnu lu ritagghiu e la currizzioni di pruspittiva, fucali, culuri e espusizzioni. Manipulazzioni chiù estisi, comu pò èssiri la livata di n'elimentu di distrazzioni dô sfunnu, vannu chiaramenti discrivuti ntô testu di discrizzioni pi menzu dô template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipulazzioni nun discrivuti o discrivuti n manera nzufficienti nun pirmèttinu la candidatura â vitrina.
  • Valuri - lu nostru obbiettivu principali è elèggiri li mmàggini cô maiuri valuri rispettu a tutti li sò sìmili. Li mmàggini hannu a èssiri n quarchi manera spiciali, pirciò teni accura:
    • quasi tutti li scurati sunnu esteticamenti piacèvuli, nfatti tanti mmàggini sunnu sìmili a l'àutri,
    • li scatti nutturni sunnu gradèvuli ma giniralmenti li fotu scattati di jornu ammùstranu tanti chiù dittagghi,
    • nun tutti li fotu beddi hannu n rialtà un valuri ca nun è esclusivamenti pirsunali.

Pi quantu arriguarda l'aspettu tècnicu avemu comu paràmitri l'espusizzioni, la cumpusizzioni, lu cuntrollu dô muvimentu e la prufunnità di campu.

  • L'espusizzioni s'arrifirisci â cumminazzioni ntra tempu d'espusizzioni e diaframma. Sta cumminazzioni pirmetti giniralmenti d'aviri na curva di tonu ch'è n gradu di rapprisintari ùmmiri e luci cu un dittagghiu accittàbbili. Sta curva veni ditta latitùdini di posa. Na mmàggini pò èssiri ntâ banna vascia, media o àuta. Li fotucàmiri diggitali (e li sò fotu) hannu na latitùdini di posa chiù stritta dâ màchini a pillìcula. La mancanza di dittagghi ntê zoni d'ùmmira nun è nicissariamenti na carattirìstica nigativa. Nfatti chista pò èssiri parti di l'effettu addisiatu, mentri zoni ampii eccissivamenti suvraesposti ponnu distràiri la vista.
  • La cumpusizzioni s'arrifirisci â distribbuzzioni di l'elimenti ntâ mmàggini. La “Règula dê Terzi” è na lìnia guida bona pâ cumpusizzioni e rèdita tantu dê studi di disignu. Lu cuncettu principali cunzìdira la mmàggini divisa cu dui lìnii orizzuntali e dui virticali, ca divìdinu la mmàggini n tri parti. Giniralmenti si l'oggettu veni cintratu s'havi n'effettu picca ntirissanti, mentri si l'oggettu veni pusizziunatu nta unu dê punti di ntiressi, ovveru la ntirsizzioni dê quattru lìnii, s'otteni n'effettu dicisamenti megghiu. Li lìnii di l'orizzonti nfatti nun avìssiru a èssiri pusizziunati ntô centru, pirchì tagghiàssiru la fotu a mità; è nveci prifirìbbili scègghiri una dê lìnii orizzuntali. Cumplissivamenti abbisogna tènniri a criari na mmàggini dinàmica.
  • Lu cuntrollu dô muvimentu s'arrifirisci â manera ca veni rapprisintatu lu muvimentu ntâ mmàggini. Lu muvimentu pò èssiri bluccatu (siguitu dâ fotucàmira) oppuru pò èssiri lassatu scùrriri, tuttavìa l'oggettu principali dâ mmàggini havi a èssiri visìbbili. Nudda dê dui tècnichi è megghia di l'àutra, l'arrinisciuta bona addipenni esclusivamenti dô tipu d'effettu arricircatu. P'esempiu, fotugrafannu na vittura di cursa c'appari stàtica n rilazzioni ô sfunnu, ca nveci scurri ntô retru, s'otteni l'oggettu principali nta na cunnizzioni stàtica mentri lu sfunnu crea lu senzu di muvimentu. (sta tècnica è chiamata "panning"). D'àutra parti, fotugrafannu un jucaturi di basket n sàutu, bluccatu n rilazzioni a tuttu lu restu dô sfunnu, s'ottinissi un scattu bonu propiu pâ posa nun naturali.
  • La prufunnità di campu (PdC o DOF dô ngrisi depth of field) è la distanza davanti e darreri lu suggettu principali c'appari nìtida (a focu). Stu paràmitru veni scigghiutu a sicunna dê nicissità d'ogni mmàggini e pò parimenti migghiurari o mpijurari la qualità di na fotugrafìa. Giniralmenti veni utilizzata na PdC arriduciuta pi mèttiri ô centru di l'attinzioni lu suggettu principali, siparànnulu di tuttu lu restu dô sfunnu. Nveci veni utilizzata na PdC granni p'enfatizzari la prufunnità di na mmàggini. L'obbiettivi grannangulari n gèniri na PdC granni mentri li tiliobbiettivi nn'hannu una dicisamenti arriduciuta. N granni parti la PdC addipenni dâ grapitura dô diaframma: aumenta cô diminuiri dâ grapitura e viciversa.

Pi quantu arriguarda l'aspettuo gràficu pigghiamu nveci n cunzidirazzioni nitidizza, prufunnità, culuri, supirficii, pruspittiva, valanzamentu, prupurzioni, ecc.

  • La nitidizza s'arrifirisci a lìnii di cuntornu dô suggettu principali.
  • La prufunnità s'arrifirisci â qualità di l'aspettu tridiminziunali dô suggettu. Chistu s'otteni suprattuttu tràmiti na lluminazzioni latirali adiguata (comu chidda dâ prima matinata o dô tardu pumiriggiu) e nun esclusivamenti fruntali, ô fini d'evitari l'appiattimentu dô suggettu.
  • Lu culuri è n'elimentu assai mpurtanti e nun havi a èssiri nè troppu nè picca sàturu.
  • La supirficii s'arrifirisci â qualità dâ supirficii di l'oggetti fotugrafati.
  • La pruspittiva s'arrifirisci a l'angulazzioni dâ quali fu scattata la fotugrafìa. Chista crea na serii di ritti mmagginarii ca sèguinu li spìguli paralleli di l'oggetti e si ncòntranu ntôn puntu ca pò èssiri dintra o fora la mmàggini.
  • Lu valanzamentu s'arrifirisci â dispusizzioni di l'oggetti ntâ mmàggini e pò èssiri equilibbratu o pòniri pisu maiuri versu na dirizzioni.
  • La prupurzioni s'arrifirisci â rilazzioni ntra li diminzioni di l'oggetti ô nternu dâ mmàggini. Giniralmenti si tenni a rapprisintari oggetti cu rilazzioni arriduciuta, ma na tècnica bona è chidda di rapprisintari l'oggetti di diminzioni minuri n manera chiù estisa, cuntrariamenti a quantu è n rialtà. P'esempiu, un ciuri nicu ca veni rapprisintatu chê stissi diminzioni di na muntagna granni: sta tècnica veni chiamata nvirsioni di scala.
Ovviamenti, nun tutti li carattirìstichi hannu a èssiri nicissariamenti prisenti. Li mmàggini ponnu èssiri giudicati sia pi na sula carattirìstica ca pi diversi carattirìstichi, macari cuntimpuraniamenti.
  • Significatu simmòlicu o rilivanza particulari …Li guerri d'opinioni ponnu accuminzari!…. Va arricurdatu ca na pèssima fotugrafìa dûn suggettu difficilìssimu di fotugrafari è sicuramenti megghiu di na mmàggini ordinaria e tradizziunali (comu na scurata cumuni).
Li mmàggini ponnu èssiri scigghiuti dûn fotògrafu o di n'ossirvaturi macari pi mutivi culturali, tinennu pirò sempri cuntu dô cuntestu dô scattu e nun di chiddu di l'ossirvaturi. Na mmàggini noltri pò "parrari" ê pirsuni e aviri la capacità d'evucari emuzzioni, ca tuttavìa nun hannu a èssiri nicissariamenti piacèvuli.

P'ottimizzari le pussibbilità di successu dê candidaturi dê tò mmàggini è cunzigghiàbbili lèggire li lìnii guida cumpleti.

Comu candidari na mmàgginiEdit

Si cridi d'aviri attruvatu o criatu na mmàggini ca pò èssiri pigghiata n cunzidirazzioni pâ vitrina, c'havi na discrizzioni apprupiata e na licenza adiguata, allura segui sti nnicazzioni.

Puntu 1: copia lu nomu dâ mmàggini dintra la casedda di testu (ncludennu macari lu prifissu Image: ) a sèguitu dô testu già prisenti ntâ casedda (p'esempiu Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:LU-NOMU-DÂ-TÒ-MMÀGGINI.JPG.) e nfini clicca lu pulsanti càndida na mmàggini nova.


Puntu 2: segui li struzzioni dâ pàggina â quali veni culligatu e sarva li canciamenti appurtati.

Puntu 3: nzirisci manualmenti un culligamentu â pàggina criata n cima â lista candidati: Clicca ccà e agghiunci lu testu ca segui a l'accuminzagghia dâ lista di candidaturi:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:LU-NOMU-DÂ-TÒ-MMÀGGINI.JPG}}

VutariEdit

Pi vutari poi usari li templates siguenti:

  • {{A favuri}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) pi suppurtari la candidatura,
  • {{Cuntrariu}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) p'oppunìrisi â candidatura,
  • {{Niutrali}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) p'esprìmiri un pariri niutrali,
  • {{Cummentu}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment) p'esprìmiri sulu un cummentu,
  • {{Nfurmazzioni}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info) p'agghiùnciri dê nfurmazzioni c'arriguàrdanu la mmàggini,
  • {{Addumannata}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question) p'addumannari nfurmazzioni.

Poi noltri evidinziari ca la mmàggini nun havi pussibbilità d'èssiri eliggiuta cô template {{FPX|mutivu}}, nzirennu ô postu di mutivu li raggiuni pê quali è chiaramenti nun accittàbbili pâ vitrina.

Ogni vutanti è prijatu di mutivari lu propiu votu cu quarchi palora, n manera particulari si si vota contra. Arricorda noltri d'agghiùnciri la tò firma (~~~~). Li voti anònimi nun sunnu accittati.

Candidari na mmàggini â livata dâ vitrinaEdit

Li standard dâ vitrina càncianu cô tempu. Pò succèdiri ca na mmàggini c'avìa statu eliggiuta pâ vitrina nun è chiù adatta ê standard attuali.

Sta lista è pirciò cumposta dê mmàggini cunzidirati nun chiù adatti a ristari ntâ vitrina. Vota:

  • {{Mantèniri}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep pi fari sì ca la mmàggini resta ntâ vitrina.
  • {{Livari}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose pi fari sì ca la mmàggini veni livata dâ vitrina.

Si cunzìdiri ca na mmàggini nun rispetta chiù li criteri dê mmàggini n vitrina, candidala pâ livata cupiannu lu nomu dâ mmàggini dintra sta casedda di testu (ncludennu lu prifissu di l' Image:) a sèguitu dô testu già prisenti n chista:


Ntâ pàggina appena criata ncludi:

  • Li nfurmazzioni supra l'orìggini dâ mmàggini (auturi dâ mmàggini, auturi dâ candidatura);
  • Un culligamentu â candidatura nizziali pô nzirimentu ntâ vitrina (ca va nzirutu sutta ==Collegamenti== ntâ discrizzioni dâ mmàggini);
  • Lu mutivu pô quali l'hai candidata pâ livata dâ vitrina e lu tò Nomu utenti.

Doppu aviri fattu chistu hai a nziriri manualmenti un culligamentu â pàggina criata a l'accuminzata dâ lista di livata dâ vitrina.

Pulìtica d'elizzioni pâ vitrinaEdit

Règuli giniraliEdit

  1. Lu pirìudu di vutazzioni è di 9 jorna cumpleti, a pàrtiri dâ candidatura. Lu risurtatu veni ditirminatu â fini di stu pirìudu. Li voti agghiunciuti lu dècimu jornu o a sèguitu nun vèninu cunzidirati.
  2. Sunnu bimminuti li cuntribbutura anònimi.
  3. Li cuntribbuti d'anònimi ê discussioni sunnu bimminuti.
  4. Li voti di cuntribbutura anònimi nun sunnu accittati.
  5. La candidatura nun cunta comu votu. Lu votu di supportu va esplicitatu.
  6. L'autura dê candidaturi ponnu ritirari li sò mmàggini candidati n ogni mumentu. Chistu s'otteni scrivennu simplicimenti "I withdraw my nomination" (n ngrisi: ritiru la mè candidatura)
    o agghiuncennu lu testu {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Arricorda ca l'obbiettivu dô pruggettu Wikimedia Commons è di custruiri na cugghiuta di mmàggini utilizzàbbili di tutti li pruggetti Wikimedia, nclusi pruggetti futuri pussìbbili. Pirciò nun abbisogna pinzari ca chistu è na cugghiuta didicata esclusivamenti ô pruggettu Wikipedia e pi tantu li mmàggini nun vannu valutati n funzioni di chistu.
  8. Li mmàggini vennu livati dâ lista di candidaturi si nun hannu voti a supportu (esclusu chiddu di l'auturi dâ candidatura) intra lu quintu jornu dâ candidatura (La règula dô quintu jornu)
  9. Li mmàggini dutati dô template {{FPX}} nun hannu a èssiri livati dâ lista intra li 48 uri succissivi ô mumentu ntô quali fu applicatu lu template, purchì nun ci sia nuddu votu a supportu oltri chiddu di l'auturi dâ candidatura.

Règuli d'ammissioni e livata dâ vitrinaEdit

Na mmàggini candidata veni ammisa â vitrina si si virìficanu li cunnizioni siguenti:

  1. La licenza è adiguata (ovviamenti).
  2. Si havi armenu 5 voti a supportu.
  3. Si lu rapportu ntra voti pro/contra è armenu 2/1 (si havi dui terzi di maiuranza).
  4. Nun ponnu èssiri ammisi â vitrina diversi virsioni dâ stissa mmàggini, nn'havi a èssiri scigghiuta una sula virsioni.

Li criteri pâ livata dâ vitrina sunnu li stissi pi l'ammissioni a chista, cumprisu lu pirìudu di votu e la règula dô quintu jornu (talìa ntê Règuli ginirali).

Ogni utenti spertu pò purtari a tèrmini na vutazzioni: pi struzzioni supra comu chiùmpiri st'opirazzioni talìa la guida pi purtari a tèrmini la vutazzioni.

Nfini, sî curtisiEdit

Pi piaciri nun ti scurdari ca la mmàggini ca stai giudicannu è fruttu dô travagghiu di quarchidunu. Èvita d'usari frasi comu è orrìbbili: si t'hai a oppòniri nun fari cunzidirazzioni spiacèvuli. Noltri arricorda ch'è nicissariu scrìviri n ngrisi si voi èssiri cumprisu di l'àutri utenti e ca lu tò utilizzu di sta lingua e chiddu di l'àutri utenti pò comuegghiè ginirari ncumprinzioni si nun s'havi na canuscenza òttima, pirciò scegghi li palori cu cura.

Bonu votu… e arricorda ca.... tutti li règuli ponnu aviri quarchi eccizzioni.

Talìa macariEdit

ÌnniciEdit

Contents

Candidati pâ vitrinaEdit

Aggiorna la pàggina: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Tre Cime cows 4.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 11:50:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cattle in the Drei Zinnen Nature Park, Dolomites, South Tyrol, Italy.

File:Leonia mammillaris compacta 01.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 02:59:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leonia mammillaris compacta: Length 1.6 cm; Originating from Legzire, ca. 10 km north of Sidi Ifni, Morocco
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yeah, I know. I've seen photos of smaller shells than this from you, including some at FPC, but this is still pretty small. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Toy Poodle wearing clothes in Tokyo.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 02:57:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toy Poodle wearing clothes in Tokyo

File:Midvinterblot (Carl Larsson) - Nationalmuseum - edited.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 19:08:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Midvinterblot (" Midwinter Blót/Sacrifice"), oil painting by Carl Larsson in Swedish National Museum of Fine Arts, Stockolm.
This is one of the most noted paintings in Sweden. It is actually rectangular, but it is almost never photographed or depicted that way since it was made for this grand hall and the artist intended for it so be seen like this, framed by the arch of the ceiling. It is also very tricky to photograph the full painting due to the architecture of the hall. Given how important the painting is, I was surprised at only finding murky shots. I worked with the TIF from Nationalmuseum since it was better and had more information than the Google art file. I think this is the best way to show the painting, with as little as possible of the distracting hall, but with some of the arch included for context. -- Cart (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I am very impressed by your description --Andrei (talk) 10:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Well done! --Gnosis (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2018 - Christiansborg from the Marble Bridge.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 16:42:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christiansborg

File:Red dragonfly in Abuja 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 12:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red dragonfly (Trithemis kirbyi) in Abuja

File:Charles Pope Caldwell (restoration).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 11:40:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

C. Pope Caldwell, a U.S. Representative from New York, ca. 1915
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Men
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Created by Harris & Ewing. All the rest by Coffeeandcrumbs -- --- Coffeeandcrumbs 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- --- Coffeeandcrumbs 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Please make an argument for this photo or let us know why you picked it. Probably not because of the great historical significance of the congressman, if w:C. Pope Caldwell is any indication. Just because it's a good portrait? It is, and that might be enough of a reason (it's growing on me and I may vote for it), but I'd like to see you make the argument about why you support it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    • I definitely nominated more because of the quality of the image and the notable photographers Harris & Ewing. The subject is not a particularly notable person, but he was a U.S. Congressman for 6 years. The photograph shows a lot of detail for 1915 and more than any other Harris & Ewing portrait I have seen here. As far as I can tell, they don't often do such close ups: Category:Harris & Ewing Collection. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • There's something haunting about his facial expression, too. I'll Symbol support vote.svg Support. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mountain child.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 08:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A village girl, Palangan, Kurdistan, Iran
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Salar.arkan - uploaded by Salar.arkan - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very striking - an excellent portrait. Good background in the file description, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the combination of the portrait with the view of the village – a good environmental portrait of a child in the world it lives in. --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan and Aristeas. At first, I had my doubts about the file title from an encyclopedic point of view, but on second thought I think it sums up the photo nicely. --Cart (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Should we rename? --Andrei (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I don't think it is necessary, let's see if someone else brings it up. --Cart (talk) 23:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slightly bothered by the top-down angle, but not enough to stop me from supporting. Good wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 09:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 11:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but no metadata -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 03:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 16:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Ildefonso, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 32-34 HDR.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Ildefonso church, Porto, Portugal

File:Puente de Don Luis I, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 29-31 HDR.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:35:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dom Luis I bridge over the Douro river connecting Vila Nova de Gaia and Porto, in Portugal.
  • I see a significant difference on the building below the one with the blueish light, not on that building itself, which looks exactly the same to me. In general, you seem to have reduced highlights on buildings that already were not very light and benefited from the additional light, not appreciably from buildings or areas of buildings that were extremely bright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That said, I agree with the others that both versions are FPs. Play with the brightest highlights more if you like, though. You might be able to improve the photo further. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. There is one area where there is a little bit of aliasing going on, which I have made a note for. Cmao20 (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent, right. --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 03:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Panorama vom Böllat.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 15:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view (220°) from the Böllat on the Swabian Jura near Burgfelden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Germny
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic view (220°) from the viewpoint Böllat on the Swabian Jura, including some summits of the Alps on an outstanding clear day. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Very weak oppose Sorry to do this as I very much like a lot of your work, but this doesn't do a lot for me. It's great quality and interesting, but I don't think it's outstanding in terms of either lighting or composition. It's just not a very exciting day in terms of light conditions, and the sweep of the panorama seems a little bit random. (For what it's worth I quite often have this objection to very wide panoramas, that they have no real clear focus.) Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Technically well done and the compositional balance shows careful thought. Unfortunately, not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm not as jaded as you guys. With a panorama that extensive and sharp, I don't really care that much about the overall composition, because I'm too busy looking at the details and enjoying them. This kind of work still wows me and merits a star, in my opinion! Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It’s hard to set into words why I think this is both fascinating and not featurable. Quality is brilliant, but then mostly per Cmao20 – there’s no clear message here, this picture doesn’t "talk" to me, it just conveys loads and loads of visual information on a fine clear day. Might be a matter of taste about what makes an image "special", but since you asked for our opinion, well, there’s mine. The dark part on the left is a bit distracting; I think it would work better without that, though that means outcropping the Alps. Technically it’s a bit oversharpened I’m afraid (see Plettenberg transmitter tower). --Kreuzschnabel 06:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral for now. There are some vertical stripes or banding in the sky, hard to see, but irritating; I suggest to remove them. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per lack for good lighting and composition -- Colin (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:William Etty - Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back - Google Art Project.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:40:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back by William Etty

File:Edvard Munch - Madonna - Google Art Project.jpg (delist)Edit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:21:07
SHORT DESCRIPTION

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per nom. --Cart (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Move to keep per comment below. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Well spotted Ikan! I feel silly now for not checking it better. This version has the signature in the upper left corner while it is in the lower left corner on the other one. Even if an artwork can be shot in different lights, I doubt it will move the signature. Since they are two different paintings, I think we can keep them both and I've changed my Delist to Keep. Also 'ping' 4nn1l2, who raised the subject on the FPC talk page. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I didn't look at the placement of the signatures, but I'm quite familiar with artists doing a sketch or sketchy treatment of a subject and then working on it again as a fully-realized painting. For example, we have at least 4 pastel versions of a composition my father then realized as a very large painting, and every version of the composition is different. I'll vote to Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, too, as this seems like a good enough picture to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep these are two different paintings of the same motif, similar to what Van Gogh did with his en:Bedroom in Arles. See en:Madonna (Munch painting) for more versions/interpretations. --El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep --Claus 09:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I think keep as well. They are indeed two different paintings. Munch did lots of them. --Peulle (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination OK, neither did I know nor spot it. Thanks for correction. (Still the quality is not very good, but that's not sufficient for removal, I guess) --A.Savin 15:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Woolsey Fire - tree ridge in flames 20181119-PB-008.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 11:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree ridge in flames during the 2018 Woolsey Fire, California, US.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Peter Buschmann, United States Forest Service, USDA - uploaded, some additional editing and nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking photo of a terrible event. Some parts are a little noisy, but given the size of the photo and the conditions for shooting it, I think it's ok. Applying noise reduction will only make it blotchy and the 'grain' goes well with the motif. -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive and frightening, concerning noise I agree with Cart --Isiwal (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Better a bit noisy than mush. --Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Pretty good depiction of Hell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Ikan, you and the photographer had the same thought. Another one of his photos from that fire had the original title "Sunset in Hell". --Cart (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm not surprised and wouldn't have thought my reaction was original. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Georges Ernest Boulanger by Atelier Nadar.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:05:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Georges Ernest Boulanger

File:Elizabeth Glendower Evans (cropped).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Glendower Evans
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by The Washington Times - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like that in this profile, some of her character seems to come through. I feel a stoicism, weariness of having to keep fighting, perhaps, but a great strength and determination. I don't remember seeing a portrait of a woman from that period wearing a corduroy blouse or dress, but she is also wearing a kind of hat that was stylish at the time. I think she would have been a very interesting person to have a conversation with, if she could have spared the time in between all of her important work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 03:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 22:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Дві лелеки на снігу.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 21:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Great pose and unique capture but the image quality (especially sharpness) is not quite at the level of many bird FPs nowadays. Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background which is brighter than and similar in color to the subject. -- King of ♠ 03:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. The snow background for black and white birds is not working. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Loads of wow, and the background works for me – I have no difficulties to see the birds in front of it. What doesn’t work for me is both heads being out of focus. Pity! --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sharpness, it´s a pity! --Isiwal (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Boothsift Is Here 03:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan Kekek.--Fischer.H (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Coconut octopus in shell.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 18:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coconut octopus in shell

File:Perth (AU), Elizabeth Quay Bridge -- 2019 -- 0375-9.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 16:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Quay Bridge, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

File:Casa en Moñúx, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 47.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info An unusual shot, but I find enough interest in the shapes and colours here to make it IMO a solid choice for a feature. See what you think. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool, nice catch, than you for the nom Cmao20! Poco2 20:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Quite nice except the crop at the left, a bit tight -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support --Isiwal (talk) 08:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special and not really sharp. --Hockei (talk) 16:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I can understand that you don't think it's anything special, as wow is subjective and this isn't an obvious case, but I'm not really sure about the idea that it's not sharp. It seems very sharp to me; can you perhaps be specific about where you can see unsharpness? Cmao20 (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice house and flowers but not really a "wow" for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei. —kallerna (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei -- Karelj (talk) 20:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei --Boothsift Is Here 03:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not per Hockey. I like the coulours. The crop at the left is a bit thght, but I can live with it --Llez (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Ailuridae_(Red_Pandas)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Because awww. More seriously, this is a high-resolution shot with excellent quality of an endangered species, and it's far superior to the existing FPs: this one, which is a similar view of the face alone but which has much lower resolution than this shot, and this one which shows the whole animal but is very low-resolution for an FP nowadays. created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking facial expression -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks Cmao20 for the nomination and the laudatio --Llez (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't like zoo pictures. They never can outclass wildlife pictures or reach the same status. --Hockei (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Understood; thanks for the review. Personally I don't mind zoo pictures as long as it isn't obvious that this is an unnatural setting, and of course for some less common animals zoos can be the best realistic opportunity to get a high quality image. It is worth noting that both the other FPs of red pandas are also of zoo specimens. Cmao20 (talk) 20:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It doesn't change my sensation. I'll never support zoo pictures in FPC. This has nothing to do with whether I find the quality bad or good. Certainly are zoo pictures of rare animals and plants valuable and maybe important for documentation. But nothing for FPC in my eyes. BTW, I gave no oppose but a neutral. Although I don't like the background. --Hockei (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 21:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Park and pool, Hacienda San Jorge, Los Cancajos, Breña Baja, La Palma, Canary Islands
  • @Hockei: That's a bit unfair. You're opposing this not because of the image but you have something against touristy places. --Boothsift Is Here 05:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting point of view while my reasoning outweighs for example "no wow", "nothing special" and so on who are constantly stated and accepted here. --Hockei (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • No that's not quite the same. Here u r implying that no matter how this is shot, you'll oppose. Which is unfair, yes. - Benh (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I could sing a song about unfairness here. But this is not unfair but a valid reason. --Hockei (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Hockei: Valid? Then all the buildings are invalid then, correct? This vote shouldn't count, do you realize what you are saying? --Boothsift Is Here 02:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As I already said: It is a manmade landscape --Llez (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Llez: Look at the red panda nomination, Hockei has something against things that seem "artificial". Don't ask me why--Boothsift Is Here 03:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Boothsift, is it really necessary to incite him against me just because I have a different opinion than you? Must that really turn to personal? --Hockei (talk) 07:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Hockei: No, I was just explaining how you feel. I understand what you're saying on the zoo nomination, how you think it is not as "natural" as wildlife photos in the wild. That makes sense here as this hotel is clearly manmade. --Boothsift Is Here 08:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Please calm down. I think it is the best to finish this discussion --Llez (talk) 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment regard to Hockei's remark about empty remarks such as "no wow" or "nothing special" without further explanation, I agree with him! You can't do anything about that. You don't learn from that either! The guidelines are clear about this. I quote: Useless reasons for resistance include: No reason "I don't like it" and other empty reviews! So you have to take the trouble to motivate your rejection. Don't you do that. Then I think the rejection is not valid. Regarding the photo above: I have nothing to do with such a swimming paradise. Can't judge the photo in a neutral way. In such a case I do not vote. Then I won't harm anyone.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Official Portrait.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 19:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an American politician and activist who serves as the U.S. Representative for New York's 14th congressional district. The district includes the eastern part of the Bronx and portions of north-central Queens in New York City. She is a member of the Democratic Party.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by US House of Representatives - uploaded by Wafflepancake34 - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A good portrait of a person very much in the limelight at the moment (time will tell if she actually ends up being an important historical figure in the long term). --Peulle (talk) 08:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The source link now produces a different photo. How should that be handled, and do you think the new photo is better? I'd have to see it blown up to the same size, but on the face of it, I tend to think it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the old one was made by Franmarie Metzler; U.S. House Office of Photography (according to EXIF), so the assumption of {{PD-USGov}} is reasonable. The new one does not contain any information on author or copyright status, so until that is cleared up I would not recommend uploading it here. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC) Nevermind: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/copyright --El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not a bad portrait. As far as I can tell with my non-existing experience in portrait photography, it's reasonably well lit (apart from that shadow of the collar), sharp where it needs to be sharp, and her facial expression looks fine as well. I'd probably support this at VI or Wikipedia FP, but for Commons FP I feel a bit under-wowed. I mean, in the end it is just another formal portrait of someone in front of a US flag. We've got hundreds, maybe thousands of these, and I don't see what makes this one so special for it to be considered among the best of the best at Common. It's good, but not awesome. --El Grafo (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree El Grafo Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per El Grafo --Boothsift Is Here 05:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Reluctant Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is one of my heroes, and I'd love to support a great picture of her. This picture, as others have said, is good but not great. I think there will be a better one that can be nominated. She's very photogenic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Apis mellifera - Prunus padus - Keila.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 17:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apis mellifera on Prunus padus

File:Mangart 17.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 16:03:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Mangart Pass seen from the Via Ferrata trail going up to the mountain.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovenia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice shot. But the shadow on the rock is too dark for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Not too dark for me. Excellent form to my eyes, and I really enjoy the variety of colors and shapes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good dramatic shot to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do agree with Famberhost --Poco2 20:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A quite common view from a mountain while moderate visibility conditions. Not outstanding for me. --Milseburg (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Famberhorst. Too harsh contrast; it’s a nice scene but not the best lighting of it. Plus I think there’s simply too much within the frame. Concentrate on the winding road on the left, or the arête in center, that might make an impressive FP. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the comments. I like the complex composition, but do you prefer this (or this)? —kallerna (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great picture (could probably work a bit the contrast, reduced the highlights and increase a tad the shadow), however I'm pretty sure this would be wonderful if printed in large. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I've no problem with the shadow. --Hockei (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 07:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Famberhorst, The strong shadow on the mountain makes it look more like a hole in the middle of the photo than a mountain. --Cart (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great scenery with boring light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Funkturm Arsenal Blitze.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 06:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lightning at the radio tower in Arsenal
  • @Kreuzschnabel: Yeah, for that reason, I'm not expecting very good results. I don't know if Linie can fix this--Boothsift Is Here 08:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift: I just rotated the image (~ 1-2° clockwise), that's why there is not much more to see. Linie29 (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It works for me. --Dinkum (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just the right moment --Michielverbeek (talk) 09:57, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 10:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment would be helpful if @Linie29: updated the file to mention the changes made in Photoshop.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Kreuzschnabel. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:51:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Other_architectural_elements
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's a detail of the pier in Akaroa. I just like it, I find it quite nice to look at. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Certainly nice to look at but little wow to me. Mediocre quality, rather uninteresting flat perspective. --Kreuzschnabel 08:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I really enjoy moving my eyes around this. How do you find it if you consider it a composition of lines and forms like a work of abstract flat art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ...although I understand the idea it doesn't still wow me Poco2 10:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Fischer.H (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support These are pictures that we see too little here! In my opinion, the quality is excellent.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Famberhorst --Llez (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)}
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poco --Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose technically excellent, interesting textures, but not a wow image --Isiwal (talk) 08:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow and sharpness is not very good, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco -- Karelj (talk) 20:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I thought it was one of Cart's. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Daniel Case It's certainly inspired by her work. You can also see that the ratio of oppose vs support votes is also Cart's like :) --Podzemnik (talk) 06:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Sorry about that. I'm obviously not a good example to follow if you want to gather stars on this forum. ;) --Cart (talk) 08:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand

File:Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts-9318.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts, Boston
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hey Colin, I apologize for not getting back to you earlier. I took the photo as part of the Culture Crawl event during WikiConference North America on Friday. The conference ended today and I honestly didn't have much time taking care of this. I'll fly home from Boston to San Francisco tomorrow and take a closer look. Hopefully, I'll be able to fix the issues that you addressed. Thanks a lot for your feedback, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)--Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not that wowed--Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Boothsift on this one; the wow factor is not there for me. --Peulle (talk) 08:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The wow is subtle but it's there for me; however I oppose because per Colin I'm not convinced by the image quality. There's some odd banded textures here and there, and the image as a whole gives the impression of being slightly unsharp and oversharpened to compensate, if that makes sense. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin, a pity. --A.Savin 19:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Boothsift. —kallerna (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination After coming back from the conference and taking a closer look, I agree with the opposers. The image quality isn't good enough and the wow factor on the lower end compared to some of my other work. So, I withdraw. Thanks a lot for the feedback. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tubes at Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum (former Chestnut Hill Pumping Station), Boston
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unfortunately, a wider framing would not work, as it would add disturbing elements to the picture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support due to the poor DoF, the composition does work for me + the item is original Poco2 10:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Definitely agree with Kreuzschnabel. — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I like the image and the subject appeals to me, but I agree with Kreuzschnabel that a wider framing would be better. Cmao20 (talk) 14:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. —kallerna (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others -- Karelj (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Close-up view of a bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 00:27:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing - Benh (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely not something you see every day! Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy, DOF too shallow and it looks at least partially posterized to me. --Hockei (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ebrach Kirche rose window Orgel P4252411efs.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2019 at 23:05:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seufert organ from 1743 in the former abbey church in Ebrach
  • @Poco a poco: This is not a panorama. The picture was taken in high resolution shot (HRS) mode where the sensor moves to catch more pixel. Works only with a trypod.--Ermell (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image looked a bit odd to me in close up. I had a peek at the EXIF and you have got very high values for colour NR settings, which would tend to reduce detail and create a plastic effect. Compare our existing FP File:Kloster Ebrach BW 5.JPG which despite lower resolution, looks more realistic and natural on the figures and carvings. I've never had to raise Lightroom's standard level of Colour NR in my own photos, only touching Luminance NR when required. -- Colin (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin: I know the picture, of course. The rosette alone is not that difficult. If you take the organ into the picture it is always too dark because the church only has windows in the upper part. I have summarized three differently exposed pictures using LRenfuse. The smoothing of the edges of the window took some time.--Ermell (talk) 20:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Enfuse isn't the best program for HDR. You might be better off trying Lightroom's own tool (if you have a current version) but the best I have found is PtGui and then taking the 32-bit TIFF back into LR. If you want me to experiment for you, drop me an email with a link to the raw files and I'll send you back a JPG. -- Colin (talk) 07:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Colin. Too strong NR, and weird tones rendering. - Benh (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There is some valid criticism of the strong noise reduction above, but it's OK for me given the very high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 17:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Dwingelderveld 20-08-2019 (actm.) 10.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 16:10:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info National Park Dwingelderveld is a nature reserve in Drenthe. Pinus sylvestris under threatening clouds in a flowering heather field.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I liked this on QIC and still like it. Something I didn't think of then is that a crop on the bottom, if done right, could improve the form. Maybe about a finger's width's height from the bottom at full screen would do it. See what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Thank you. I mentioned in QIC that this is probably the nicest of this series that I've seen so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pleasant enough countryside, but photographically just a QI. Lacks wow. -- Colin (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I enjoy the colors but per Colin Poco2 09:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Painterly. Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No reason for FP nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose A textbook example on the rule of thirds :) but not that special in my eyes. Please clone/crop out the twigs on the right edge. --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Twigs removed. Thank you for your attention.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Subdued soothing colors that works well with the bleak landscape. --Cart (talk) 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin. —kallerna (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin -- Karelj (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Trappist Beer 2013-08-31.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 15:21:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Philip Rowlands - uploaded by Philip Rowlands - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately the focus to the Achel is not well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support per Michiel - I like the composition, and the focus on the sides, though not pinpoint, is IMO not bad. We use this photo on Wikivoyage's article on alcoholic beverages. I'm surprised it's not a VI. It seems like it should be nominated to VIC in the scope Trappist beers, regardless of the results here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - P.S. I concluded another photo with a greater number of beers in it was a more appropriate VI in this scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm just not impressed with the quality. There is back focus. "Orval" beer is well in focus, but other are little blurry -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Good, valuable for illustrative purposes, but the focus is not good enough for FP IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Haeckel Discomedusae 8.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 14:30:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @Basile Morin: That is true and you can kind of tell just by looking here. However, I don't think it's enough to oppose unless someone convinces me otherwise--Boothsift Is Here 05:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But maybe we could have it in some lossless-compression format? Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Collegiata dei Santi Nazaro e Celso sagrestia trittico Brescia.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 21:30:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tryptyc by Paolo da Caylina il Vecchio in the Santi Nazaro e Celso church in Brescia.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - No-one said it should be easy to shoot an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course you are right, and I absolutely did not want to criticize you, I just wanted to say that I (personally) feel that this image is excellent, even when it would be even better without the reflection. But because my comment is cryptic, I have crossed it out (but still support the image). --Aristeas (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The left one ruins it for me as per Ikan--Boothsift Is Here 06:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but yes, the reflections on the left one are very disturbing. --Cayambe (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me, glare in such a static object in a public place like a church is not acceptable in an FP, especially since it can be avoided by something as simple as a polarizing filter or wait for the sun to move a bit and make a combo of two or three photos (it is after all a triptych, so easy to do in sections) to get the whole piece evenly lit. --Cart (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @W.carter: If you say it‘s so easy in Italian churches I cordially invite you to do better. And, please, look how mandy FPs we have in Italy, and specifically in Brescia. Cheers--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Something more, Carter, churches in Italy are not „public places“ --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the info, I stand corrected on that point and I meant no disrespect. But surely a polarizing filter could be used even in a non-public place. Given that you have such a fantastic camera (I am really envious of it!), investing in some filters could be worth doing. I always keep some in my camera bag even if I seldom use them, they are handy to have at times. I have the same opinion as three users before me, yet I'm the one you chose to come down on. --Cart (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: I don't feel disrespect but IMO your comment was a bit, let's say "superficial" or hasty? That's the reason I "came down on you". You probably are not aware how difficult, well it is actually forbidden (I read the conditions to take pictures in the churches of Brescia and they made me feel a criminal) to take high resolution pictures inside the churches in Brescia and publish them on the Internet, for any reason, without written permission. I have a polarising filter, which was sold to me as one of the best (Hoya), and which takes away 2 aperture stops that are gold in such difficult conditions. The filter does'nt make miracles. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Ok, let there be peace. I have striked my vote and my comment. You are happy when I make superficial comments and fight for your photos but not when I oppose in the same way. Lesson learned. --Cart (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:20190303 FIS NWSC Seefeld Men CC 50km Mass Start 850 7458.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 19:53:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FIS Nordische Skiweltmeisterschaften Seefeld 2019 - Männer Langlauf 50km Massenstart Freie Technik. Bild zeigt Florian Notz (GER) und andere in der Verpflegungszone.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Granada - uploaded by Granada - nominated by -- Ralf Roletschek 19:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Die außermittige Fokussierung auf einen einzelnen Sportler, das Abpassen des genau richtigen Augenblicks und etwas Glück schafften hier ein exzellentes Bild. Von vorn bis hinten scharf wäre technisch ohnehin unmöglich und auch keine bessere Lösung. -- Ralf Roletschek 19:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many of the skiers are out of focus and the scene is too chaotic.--Peulle (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment English, please. I don't speak German, and neither do many of the other people on here. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Out of the seeming chaos, a good and interesting, dynamic and eye-fulfilling composition is produced, and it's best seen simply at full-screen size. It has a lot of motion and interesting complexity. I doubt that enough people here would be able to get past notions of how individual human figures "should" be portrayed, so I don't really expect this to be featured, but I think it should be and is a much more interesting composition than we usually see at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The Sigma 120-300 in combination with the 1.4x tele converter is not the sharpest and wide open it produces strange halos around contrasting edges in unsharp areas (see e.g. the sunglasses of the other skiers). --Granada (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Since you yourself don't consider this an FP, I withdraw my supporting vote, and you as photographer have the right to withdraw the nomination if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's nice work, but the creator doesn't think it's FP, and in this example I think he/she is right about the haloes. Cmao20 (talk) 08:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe technically not perfect, but I love the composition. —kallerna (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Funny, but no FP for me. Random composition with cut-off feet, the person in the foreground is completely out of focus. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just not there for me --Boothsift Is Here 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per creator's !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Bergtocht van S-charl naar Alp Sesvenna. 10-09-2019. (d.j.b) 14.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 16:01:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna. The freshly fallen snow. The lines and the clouds give this photo an extra dimension for me.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 23:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I feel as if there was something wrong with the white balance. (Too blueish.) — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At first I agreed that it might be too blue, but honestly I think this is plausible winter lighting, and I love the mood. Cmao20 (talk) 08:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice view. Thanks for WB fixing. — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just an average winter landscape for me. The composition looks quite unbalanced, and the WB of the first version looked more realistic to me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Uoaei1 -- Karelj (talk) 14:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light, not a striking scene. —kallerna (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Uoaei1. I fail to see any clear compositional idea here. Fine scenery but random framing. --Kreuzschnabel 22:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others --Boothsift Is Here 06:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Uoaei1. Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Charents arch-msu-wlm-3093.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2019 at 14:11:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ararat Arc
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Armenia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Matthias Süßen - uploaded by Matthias Süßen - nominated by Smial -- Smial (talk) 14:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, the photo could show a little less noise and a little more depth of field, but the composition, the colours and the general impression convinced me absolutely. -- Smial (talk) 14:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dinkum (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition, but for me too noisy for FP --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now per Michiel. If the photo can be substantially denoised, I'd be happy to reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am not a perfectionist but it's composition just falling apart --Andrei (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment@Michielverbeek, Ikan Kekek: I have uploaded a new version. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 10:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A spledid view. --Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A nice view, but the crop is slightly off. Also technical problems. —kallerna (talk) 13:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Thanks for uploading the new version. I'll consider whether to abstain, but right now, I'll continue to oppose because it's still quite a lot more noisy than what we usually feature, nowadays. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is looking better, but not sharp enough. --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Michiel--Boothsift Is Here 02:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but it is noisy. That alone isn't enough to kill it for me, but I also think the crop is very tight at the top, and I'd prefer to see a bit more space there. Cmao20 (talk) 08:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose Arch and wall are unsharp and noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Beautiful ceiling of isa khan tomb.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2019 at 09:11:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tomb of Isa Khan
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Photoguy ankit - uploaded by Photoguy ankit - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 09:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 09:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi Persia, some tips for you: Before you nominate photos, please make sure they are properly categorized (this one was over-categorised), that they have a neutral name (subjective words like "beautiful" should not be included) and take a good look at the FP categories so that the image ends up in the right place if it is promoted. The description on the image page should also be better, neutral and include what actually is in the photo. I've fixed the categories and gallery, the rest is up to you. An FP is not just the photo, it is the texts related to the photo too. As nominator, you are responsible for the photo here at FPC even if it's not your own photo. --Cart (talk) 10:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: Just a pet peeve, but I have fixed the typos in your paragraph--Boothsift Is Here 06:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift: Yeah, yeah... Shit happens when you edit on a computer with the auto-correct set to Swedish. It's an international site and most of us learn to live with such minor imperfections in the chatter here, since the Wiki policy is to not edit other users posts except to correct faulty codes. --Cart (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • It wasn't bad, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: and @Ikan Kekek: That was really weird, IDK why I decided to do that. Please forgive me, I seriously don't know what thought popped in my brain--Boothsift Is Here 08:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Nothing personal to me. I'm an observer here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift, Ikan Kekek: Guys, it wasn't a big deal this time. I just mentioned the policy since it's good to keep in mind in less benevolent discussions. It's easy for the brain to do a crossover since we should correct such things in articles and file descriptions. No hard feelings and my apologies to Persia for this accidental discussion on their nomination. --Cart (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I also apologize for making such an unwise decision --Boothsift Is Here 05:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hmmm, wonder how I missed this earlier. The quality is not perfect, but the ceiling is indeed very beautiful and I think deserves FP. Cmao20 (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Dhakeshwari Temple during puja.jpgEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2019 at 17:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dhakeshwari temple during puja.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by RockyMasum - uploaded by RockyMasum - nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice colorful scene, but the form isn't really doing anything for me. It feels to me more like an interesting snap to show and tell people about. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Most of the image is unsharp, and the colours look entirely artificial to me, at least hopelessly oversaturated. --Kreuzschnabel 18:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan --Andrei (talk) 00:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 07:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan--Boothsift Is Here 02:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting picture, but the image quality is very low for FPC. Cmao20 (talk) 08:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, low quality. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


Candidati pâ livata dâ vitrinaEdit

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Tre Cime cows 4.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 11:50:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cattle in the Drei Zinnen Nature Park, Dolomites, South Tyrol, Italy.

File:Leonia mammillaris compacta 01.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 02:59:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leonia mammillaris compacta: Length 1.6 cm; Originating from Legzire, ca. 10 km north of Sidi Ifni, Morocco
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yeah, I know. I've seen photos of smaller shells than this from you, including some at FPC, but this is still pretty small. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Toy Poodle wearing clothes in Tokyo.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 02:57:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toy Poodle wearing clothes in Tokyo

File:Midvinterblot (Carl Larsson) - Nationalmuseum - edited.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 19:08:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Midvinterblot (" Midwinter Blót/Sacrifice"), oil painting by Carl Larsson in Swedish National Museum of Fine Arts, Stockolm.
This is one of the most noted paintings in Sweden. It is actually rectangular, but it is almost never photographed or depicted that way since it was made for this grand hall and the artist intended for it so be seen like this, framed by the arch of the ceiling. It is also very tricky to photograph the full painting due to the architecture of the hall. Given how important the painting is, I was surprised at only finding murky shots. I worked with the TIF from Nationalmuseum since it was better and had more information than the Google art file. I think this is the best way to show the painting, with as little as possible of the distracting hall, but with some of the arch included for context. -- Cart (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I am very impressed by your description --Andrei (talk) 10:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Well done! --Gnosis (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2018 - Christiansborg from the Marble Bridge.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 16:42:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christiansborg

File:Red dragonfly in Abuja 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 12:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red dragonfly (Trithemis kirbyi) in Abuja

File:Charles Pope Caldwell (restoration).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 11:40:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

C. Pope Caldwell, a U.S. Representative from New York, ca. 1915
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Men
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Created by Harris & Ewing. All the rest by Coffeeandcrumbs -- --- Coffeeandcrumbs 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- --- Coffeeandcrumbs 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Please make an argument for this photo or let us know why you picked it. Probably not because of the great historical significance of the congressman, if w:C. Pope Caldwell is any indication. Just because it's a good portrait? It is, and that might be enough of a reason (it's growing on me and I may vote for it), but I'd like to see you make the argument about why you support it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    • I definitely nominated more because of the quality of the image and the notable photographers Harris & Ewing. The subject is not a particularly notable person, but he was a U.S. Congressman for 6 years. The photograph shows a lot of detail for 1915 and more than any other Harris & Ewing portrait I have seen here. As far as I can tell, they don't often do such close ups: Category:Harris & Ewing Collection. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • There's something haunting about his facial expression, too. I'll Symbol support vote.svg Support. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mountain child.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 08:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A village girl, Palangan, Kurdistan, Iran
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Salar.arkan - uploaded by Salar.arkan - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very striking - an excellent portrait. Good background in the file description, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the combination of the portrait with the view of the village – a good environmental portrait of a child in the world it lives in. --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan and Aristeas. At first, I had my doubts about the file title from an encyclopedic point of view, but on second thought I think it sums up the photo nicely. --Cart (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Should we rename? --Andrei (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I don't think it is necessary, let's see if someone else brings it up. --Cart (talk) 23:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slightly bothered by the top-down angle, but not enough to stop me from supporting. Good wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 09:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 11:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but no metadata -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 03:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 16:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Ildefonso, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 32-34 HDR.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Ildefonso church, Porto, Portugal

File:Puente de Don Luis I, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 29-31 HDR.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:35:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dom Luis I bridge over the Douro river connecting Vila Nova de Gaia and Porto, in Portugal.
  • I see a significant difference on the building below the one with the blueish light, not on that building itself, which looks exactly the same to me. In general, you seem to have reduced highlights on buildings that already were not very light and benefited from the additional light, not appreciably from buildings or areas of buildings that were extremely bright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That said, I agree with the others that both versions are FPs. Play with the brightest highlights more if you like, though. You might be able to improve the photo further. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. There is one area where there is a little bit of aliasing going on, which I have made a note for. Cmao20 (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent, right. --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 03:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Panorama vom Böllat.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 15:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view (220°) from the Böllat on the Swabian Jura near Burgfelden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Germny
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic view (220°) from the viewpoint Böllat on the Swabian Jura, including some summits of the Alps on an outstanding clear day. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Very weak oppose Sorry to do this as I very much like a lot of your work, but this doesn't do a lot for me. It's great quality and interesting, but I don't think it's outstanding in terms of either lighting or composition. It's just not a very exciting day in terms of light conditions, and the sweep of the panorama seems a little bit random. (For what it's worth I quite often have this objection to very wide panoramas, that they have no real clear focus.) Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Technically well done and the compositional balance shows careful thought. Unfortunately, not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm not as jaded as you guys. With a panorama that extensive and sharp, I don't really care that much about the overall composition, because I'm too busy looking at the details and enjoying them. This kind of work still wows me and merits a star, in my opinion! Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It’s hard to set into words why I think this is both fascinating and not featurable. Quality is brilliant, but then mostly per Cmao20 – there’s no clear message here, this picture doesn’t "talk" to me, it just conveys loads and loads of visual information on a fine clear day. Might be a matter of taste about what makes an image "special", but since you asked for our opinion, well, there’s mine. The dark part on the left is a bit distracting; I think it would work better without that, though that means outcropping the Alps. Technically it’s a bit oversharpened I’m afraid (see Plettenberg transmitter tower). --Kreuzschnabel 06:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral for now. There are some vertical stripes or banding in the sky, hard to see, but irritating; I suggest to remove them. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per lack for good lighting and composition -- Colin (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:William Etty - Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back - Google Art Project.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:40:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back by William Etty

File:Edvard Munch - Madonna - Google Art Project.jpg (delist)Edit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:21:07
SHORT DESCRIPTION

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per nom. --Cart (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Move to keep per comment below. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Well spotted Ikan! I feel silly now for not checking it better. This version has the signature in the upper left corner while it is in the lower left corner on the other one. Even if an artwork can be shot in different lights, I doubt it will move the signature. Since they are two different paintings, I think we can keep them both and I've changed my Delist to Keep. Also 'ping' 4nn1l2, who raised the subject on the FPC talk page. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I didn't look at the placement of the signatures, but I'm quite familiar with artists doing a sketch or sketchy treatment of a subject and then working on it again as a fully-realized painting. For example, we have at least 4 pastel versions of a composition my father then realized as a very large painting, and every version of the composition is different. I'll vote to Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, too, as this seems like a good enough picture to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep these are two different paintings of the same motif, similar to what Van Gogh did with his en:Bedroom in Arles. See en:Madonna (Munch painting) for more versions/interpretations. --El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep --Claus 09:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I think keep as well. They are indeed two different paintings. Munch did lots of them. --Peulle (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination OK, neither did I know nor spot it. Thanks for correction. (Still the quality is not very good, but that's not sufficient for removal, I guess) --A.Savin 15:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Woolsey Fire - tree ridge in flames 20181119-PB-008.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 11:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree ridge in flames during the 2018 Woolsey Fire, California, US.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Peter Buschmann, United States Forest Service, USDA - uploaded, some additional editing and nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking photo of a terrible event. Some parts are a little noisy, but given the size of the photo and the conditions for shooting it, I think it's ok. Applying noise reduction will only make it blotchy and the 'grain' goes well with the motif. -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive and frightening, concerning noise I agree with Cart --Isiwal (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Better a bit noisy than mush. --Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Pretty good depiction of Hell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Ikan, you and the photographer had the same thought. Another one of his photos from that fire had the original title "Sunset in Hell". --Cart (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm not surprised and wouldn't have thought my reaction was original. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Georges Ernest Boulanger by Atelier Nadar.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:05:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Georges Ernest Boulanger

File:Elizabeth Glendower Evans (cropped).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Glendower Evans
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by The Washington Times - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like that in this profile, some of her character seems to come through. I feel a stoicism, weariness of having to keep fighting, perhaps, but a great strength and determination. I don't remember seeing a portrait of a woman from that period wearing a corduroy blouse or dress, but she is also wearing a kind of hat that was stylish at the time. I think she would have been a very interesting person to have a conversation with, if she could have spared the time in between all of her important work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 03:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 22:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Дві лелеки на снігу.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 21:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Great pose and unique capture but the image quality (especially sharpness) is not quite at the level of many bird FPs nowadays. Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background which is brighter than and similar in color to the subject. -- King of ♠ 03:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. The snow background for black and white birds is not working. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Loads of wow, and the background works for me – I have no difficulties to see the birds in front of it. What doesn’t work for me is both heads being out of focus. Pity! --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sharpness, it´s a pity! --Isiwal (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Boothsift Is Here 03:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan Kekek.--Fischer.H (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Coconut octopus in shell.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 18:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coconut octopus in shell

File:Perth (AU), Elizabeth Quay Bridge -- 2019 -- 0375-9.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 16:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Quay Bridge, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

File:Casa en Moñúx, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 47.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info An unusual shot, but I find enough interest in the shapes and colours here to make it IMO a solid choice for a feature. See what you think. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool, nice catch, than you for the nom Cmao20! Poco2 20:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Quite nice except the crop at the left, a bit tight -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support --Isiwal (talk) 08:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special and not really sharp. --Hockei (talk) 16:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I can understand that you don't think it's anything special, as wow is subjective and this isn't an obvious case, but I'm not really sure about the idea that it's not sharp. It seems very sharp to me; can you perhaps be specific about where you can see unsharpness? Cmao20 (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice house and flowers but not really a "wow" for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei. —kallerna (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei -- Karelj (talk) 20:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei --Boothsift Is Here 03:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not per Hockey. I like the coulours. The crop at the left is a bit thght, but I can live with it --Llez (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Ailuridae_(Red_Pandas)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Because awww. More seriously, this is a high-resolution shot with excellent quality of an endangered species, and it's far superior to the existing FPs: this one, which is a similar view of the face alone but which has much lower resolution than this shot, and this one which shows the whole animal but is very low-resolution for an FP nowadays. created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking facial expression -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks Cmao20 for the nomination and the laudatio --Llez (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't like zoo pictures. They never can outclass wildlife pictures or reach the same status. --Hockei (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Understood; thanks for the review. Personally I don't mind zoo pictures as long as it isn't obvious that this is an unnatural setting, and of course for some less common animals zoos can be the best realistic opportunity to get a high quality image. It is worth noting that both the other FPs of red pandas are also of zoo specimens. Cmao20 (talk) 20:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It doesn't change my sensation. I'll never support zoo pictures in FPC. This has nothing to do with whether I find the quality bad or good. Certainly are zoo pictures of rare animals and plants valuable and maybe important for documentation. But nothing for FPC in my eyes. BTW, I gave no oppose but a neutral. Although I don't like the background. --Hockei (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 21:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Park and pool, Hacienda San Jorge, Los Cancajos, Breña Baja, La Palma, Canary Islands
  • @Hockei: That's a bit unfair. You're opposing this not because of the image but you have something against touristy places. --Boothsift Is Here 05:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting point of view while my reasoning outweighs for example "no wow", "nothing special" and so on who are constantly stated and accepted here. --Hockei (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • No that's not quite the same. Here u r implying that no matter how this is shot, you'll oppose. Which is unfair, yes. - Benh (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I could sing a song about unfairness here. But this is not unfair but a valid reason. --Hockei (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Hockei: Valid? Then all the buildings are invalid then, correct? This vote shouldn't count, do you realize what you are saying? --Boothsift Is Here 02:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As I already said: It is a manmade landscape --Llez (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Llez: Look at the red panda nomination, Hockei has something against things that seem "artificial". Don't ask me why--Boothsift Is Here 03:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Boothsift, is it really necessary to incite him against me just because I have a different opinion than you? Must that really turn to personal? --Hockei (talk) 07:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Hockei: No, I was just explaining how you feel. I understand what you're saying on the zoo nomination, how you think it is not as "natural" as wildlife photos in the wild. That makes sense here as this hotel is clearly manmade. --Boothsift Is Here 08:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Please calm down. I think it is the best to finish this discussion --Llez (talk) 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment regard to Hockei's remark about empty remarks such as "no wow" or "nothing special" without further explanation, I agree with him! You can't do anything about that. You don't learn from that either! The guidelines are clear about this. I quote: Useless reasons for resistance include: No reason "I don't like it" and other empty reviews! So you have to take the trouble to motivate your rejection. Don't you do that. Then I think the rejection is not valid. Regarding the photo above: I have nothing to do with such a swimming paradise. Can't judge the photo in a neutral way. In such a case I do not vote. Then I won't harm anyone.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Official Portrait.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 19:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an American politician and activist who serves as the U.S. Representative for New York's 14th congressional district. The district includes the eastern part of the Bronx and portions of north-central Queens in New York City. She is a member of the Democratic Party.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by US House of Representatives - uploaded by Wafflepancake34 - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A good portrait of a person very much in the limelight at the moment (time will tell if she actually ends up being an important historical figure in the long term). --Peulle (talk) 08:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The source link now produces a different photo. How should that be handled, and do you think the new photo is better? I'd have to see it blown up to the same size, but on the face of it, I tend to think it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the old one was made by Franmarie Metzler; U.S. House Office of Photography (according to EXIF), so the assumption of {{PD-USGov}} is reasonable. The new one does not contain any information on author or copyright status, so until that is cleared up I would not recommend uploading it here. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC) Nevermind: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/copyright --El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not a bad portrait. As far as I can tell with my non-existing experience in portrait photography, it's reasonably well lit (apart from that shadow of the collar), sharp where it needs to be sharp, and her facial expression looks fine as well. I'd probably support this at VI or Wikipedia FP, but for Commons FP I feel a bit under-wowed. I mean, in the end it is just another formal portrait of someone in front of a US flag. We've got hundreds, maybe thousands of these, and I don't see what makes this one so special for it to be considered among the best of the best at Common. It's good, but not awesome. --El Grafo (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree El Grafo Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per El Grafo --Boothsift Is Here 05:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Reluctant Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is one of my heroes, and I'd love to support a great picture of her. This picture, as others have said, is good but not great. I think there will be a better one that can be nominated. She's very photogenic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Apis mellifera - Prunus padus - Keila.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 17:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apis mellifera on Prunus padus

File:Mangart 17.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 16:03:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Mangart Pass seen from the Via Ferrata trail going up to the mountain.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovenia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice shot. But the shadow on the rock is too dark for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Not too dark for me. Excellent form to my eyes, and I really enjoy the variety of colors and shapes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good dramatic shot to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do agree with Famberhost --Poco2 20:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A quite common view from a mountain while moderate visibility conditions. Not outstanding for me. --Milseburg (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Famberhorst. Too harsh contrast; it’s a nice scene but not the best lighting of it. Plus I think there’s simply too much within the frame. Concentrate on the winding road on the left, or the arête in center, that might make an impressive FP. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the comments. I like the complex composition, but do you prefer this (or this)? —kallerna (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great picture (could probably work a bit the contrast, reduced the highlights and increase a tad the shadow), however I'm pretty sure this would be wonderful if printed in large. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I've no problem with the shadow. --Hockei (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 07:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Famberhorst, The strong shadow on the mountain makes it look more like a hole in the middle of the photo than a mountain. --Cart (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great scenery with boring light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Funkturm Arsenal Blitze.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 06:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lightning at the radio tower in Arsenal
  • @Kreuzschnabel: Yeah, for that reason, I'm not expecting very good results. I don't know if Linie can fix this--Boothsift Is Here 08:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift: I just rotated the image (~ 1-2° clockwise), that's why there is not much more to see. Linie29 (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It works for me. --Dinkum (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just the right moment --Michielverbeek (talk) 09:57, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 10:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment would be helpful if @Linie29: updated the file to mention the changes made in Photoshop.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Kreuzschnabel. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:51:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Other_architectural_elements
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's a detail of the pier in Akaroa. I just like it, I find it quite nice to look at. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Certainly nice to look at but little wow to me. Mediocre quality, rather uninteresting flat perspective. --Kreuzschnabel 08:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I really enjoy moving my eyes around this. How do you find it if you consider it a composition of lines and forms like a work of abstract flat art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ...although I understand the idea it doesn't still wow me Poco2 10:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Fischer.H (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support These are pictures that we see too little here! In my opinion, the quality is excellent.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Famberhorst --Llez (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)}
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poco --Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose technically excellent, interesting textures, but not a wow image --Isiwal (talk) 08:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow and sharpness is not very good, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco -- Karelj (talk) 20:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I thought it was one of Cart's. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Daniel Case It's certainly inspired by her work. You can also see that the ratio of oppose vs support votes is also Cart's like :) --Podzemnik (talk) 06:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Sorry about that. I'm obviously not a good example to follow if you want to gather stars on this forum. ;) --Cart (talk) 08:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand

File:Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts-9318.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts, Boston
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hey Colin, I apologize for not getting back to you earlier. I took the photo as part of the Culture Crawl event during WikiConference North America on Friday. The conference ended today and I honestly didn't have much time taking care of this. I'll fly home from Boston to San Francisco tomorrow and take a closer look. Hopefully, I'll be able to fix the issues that you addressed. Thanks a lot for your feedback, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)--Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not that wowed--Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Boothsift on this one; the wow factor is not there for me. --Peulle (talk) 08:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The wow is subtle but it's there for me; however I oppose because per Colin I'm not convinced by the image quality. There's some odd banded textures here and there, and the image as a whole gives the impression of being slightly unsharp and oversharpened to compensate, if that makes sense. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin, a pity. --A.Savin 19:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Boothsift. —kallerna (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination After coming back from the conference and taking a closer look, I agree with the opposers. The image quality isn't good enough and the wow factor on the lower end compared to some of my other work. So, I withdraw. Thanks a lot for the feedback. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tubes at Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum (former Chestnut Hill Pumping Station), Boston
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unfortunately, a wider framing would not work, as it would add disturbing elements to the picture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support due to the poor DoF, the composition does work for me + the item is original Poco2 10:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Definitely agree with Kreuzschnabel. — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I like the image and the subject appeals to me, but I agree with Kreuzschnabel that a wider framing would be better. Cmao20 (talk) 14:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. —kallerna (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others -- Karelj (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Close-up view of a bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 00:27:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing - Benh (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely not something you see every day! Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy, DOF too shallow and it looks at least partially posterized to me. --Hockei (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ebrach Kirche rose window Orgel P4252411efs.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2019 at 23:05:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seufert organ from 1743 in the former abbey church in Ebrach
  • @Poco a poco: This is not a panorama. The picture was taken in high resolution shot (HRS) mode where the sensor moves to catch more pixel. Works only with a trypod.--Ermell (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image looked a bit odd to me in close up. I had a peek at the EXIF and you have got very high values for colour NR settings, which would tend to reduce detail and create a plastic effect. Compare our existing FP File:Kloster Ebrach BW 5.JPG which despite lower resolution, looks more realistic and natural on the figures and carvings. I've never had to raise Lightroom's standard level of Colour NR in my own photos, only touching Luminance NR when required. -- Colin (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin: I know the picture, of course. The rosette alone is not that difficult. If you take the organ into the picture it is always too dark because the church only has windows in the upper part. I have summarized three differently exposed pictures using LRenfuse. The smoothing of the edges of the window took some time.--Ermell (talk) 20:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Enfuse isn't the best program for HDR. You might be better off trying Lightroom's own tool (if you have a current version) but the best I have found is PtGui and then taking the 32-bit TIFF back into LR. If you want me to experiment for you, drop me an email with a link to the raw files and I'll send you back a JPG. -- Colin (talk) 07:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Colin. Too strong NR, and weird tones rendering. - Benh (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There is some valid criticism of the strong noise reduction above, but it's OK for me given the very high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 17:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Dwingelderveld 20-08-2019 (actm.) 10.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 16:10:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info National Park Dwingelderveld is a nature reserve in Drenthe. Pinus sylvestris under threatening clouds in a flowering heather field.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I liked this on QIC and still like it. Something I didn't think of then is that a crop on the bottom, if done right, could improve the form. Maybe about a finger's width's height from the bottom at full screen would do it. See what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Thank you. I mentioned in QIC that this is probably the nicest of this series that I've seen so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pleasant enough countryside, but photographically just a QI. Lacks wow. -- Colin (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I enjoy the colors but per Colin Poco2 09:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Painterly. Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No reason for FP nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose A textbook example on the rule of thirds :) but not that special in my eyes. Please clone/crop out the twigs on the right edge. --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Twigs removed. Thank you for your attention.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Subdued soothing colors that works well with the bleak landscape. --Cart (talk) 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin. —kallerna (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin -- Karelj (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Trappist Beer 2013-08-31.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 15:21:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Philip Rowlands - uploaded by Philip Rowlands - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately the focus to the Achel is not well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support per Michiel - I like the composition, and the focus on the sides, though not pinpoint, is IMO not bad. We use this photo on Wikivoyage's article on alcoholic beverages. I'm surprised it's not a VI. It seems like it should be nominated to VIC in the scope Trappist beers, regardless of the results here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - P.S. I concluded another photo with a greater number of beers in it was a more appropriate VI in this scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm just not impressed with the quality. There is back focus. "Orval" beer is well in focus, but other are little blurry -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Good, valuable for illustrative purposes, but the focus is not good enough for FP IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Haeckel Discomedusae 8.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 14:30:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @Basile Morin: That is true and you can kind of tell just by looking here. However, I don't think it's enough to oppose unless someone convinces me otherwise--Boothsift Is Here 05:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But maybe we could have it in some lossless-compression format? Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Collegiata dei Santi Nazaro e Celso sagrestia trittico Brescia.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 21:30:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tryptyc by Paolo da Caylina il Vecchio in the Santi Nazaro e Celso church in Brescia.