Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive

Closed undeletion debates are archived here by SteinsplitterBot.

Recently archived requests

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antipolo - National Shrine.jpg

Deleted because of no FOP (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antipolo - National Shrine.jpg for ref.) But enwiki article states the current structure was completed in 1954, with the year 1983 as the year of its promotion as a cathedral (promotion of status, but that didn't changed its fundamental architecture). Also per updated Commons:FOP Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

  Support per above and w:Antipolo Cathedral. The deletion reason provided in the DR was incorrect. Ankry (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose as following my stand at the bldg of the prptestant church below. 1951 to 1972 bldgs are not ok. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Until revelent discussion affirm that buildings completed in the period between 1951 and 1972 are  OK, we cannot proceed with undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Exterior of the Cathedral of the Holy Child (Aglipayan), Manila

The following files were deleted because of "no FOP in the PHL." Ref. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Exterior of the Cathedral of the Holy Child (Aglipayan), Manila. But per enwiki article, it was completed on May 8, 1969 (inauguration date) so it falls under the exemption as stated in the revised Commons:FOP Philippines (buildings completed before November 1972).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment As the building was complete after 1951, we tend to err on the side of caution (e.g. COM:PCP), especially because it's a huge maybe and there is legal uncertainty. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment N.B. I'm not opposed to undeletion, but I am not in support of it either. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Reply from requestor Despite being marked as "Maybe" for 1951–1972 buildings, it is still listed among the "exceptions" at Commons:FOP Philippines, which means they should be OK. The lack of actual cases do not signify that people are faced with stringent restrictions in terms of photography and in manners of usage, at least to buildings that are old enough. AFAIK potential copyright issues may arise at contemporary-era buildings (most esp. buildings built after the post-EDSA People Power revolution of 1986) and also to sculptures that are truly considered special works of art, such as the recent deletions of photos of famous Lion's Head in Baguio and the photos of the noteworthy Sigaw sa Pugad Lawin in Quezon City in early 2010s. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment We should make one global decision whether to accept Philippine buildings from 1951 to 1972, and change the "maybe" to "probably" or "probably not" once consensus is reached. Otherwise, decisions will be made based not on the merits of the case but on the inclination of the closing admin. We see this problem on graffiti and URAA cases as well. -- King of ♥ 13:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
@King of Hearts: is there a need to open a new discussion about this at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or another forum? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
That might be a good idea. -- King of ♥ 16:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: update.Making an inference at Clindberg's analysis at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#PHL buildings from August 1951–November 1972, 1951–72 bldgs should be fine. "The Berne Convention does state though that it's matter for domestic legislation on how photos of architecture etc. would be protected, and that legislation did not exist until 1972. I'm not sure that the question of photos of buildings has ever come up in court there, so I'm not sure what the de facto treatment is -- it's possible photos of buildings are simply used without consequence there." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Carl stated right before: " It seems as though there are still questions on how treaties become operative law in the Philippines, though (given that the Philippine Senate did concur to the Berne Convention in 1950, effective 1951) it would be reasonably valid law. That link is a presidential proclamation from March 1955, which states that every article and clause thereof may be observed and fulfilled with good faith by the Republic of the Philippines and the citizens thereof." Architectural works between 1951-1972 are still a huge maybe and maybes are generally a "not ok" per COM:CARES and COM:PCP. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Yep. It could even be the case that architecture was protected but they still needed a copyright notice to get that protection, since technically the notice requirements were not removed until 1972. It sounds like there were no court cases in that period which could have answered that question. There are a bunch of "maybe" questions for that intervening period. It may be exacerbated by any type of de facto ignoring of that possibility -- i.e. maybe people use photos of buildings commercially all the time but nobody has bothered to sue over it. It would take losing an infringement case to change such behavior. And we're trying to guess how that would turn out with basically no precedent. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Again, Just visited here. if your argument is correct Nat, them bldgs completed that period is NOT OK. Then OPPOSE. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Until relevant discussion affirm that buildings completed in the period between 1951 and 1972 are  OK, we cannot proceed with undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Oblation photo/s if de minimis

The following images were deleted because no FoP in the Philippines. Nevertheless, if some or any of these photos show the copyrighted statue 'incidentally, and/or if the photo focuses more on the plaza and the Quezon Hall (1950 bldg.)', these can be restored. I used available evidence (mostly the "cryptic file names"), since deleted photos are virtually invisible to me. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Oblation back UPLB.JPG (DM or not?)


  Not done: except File:University of the Philippines' "The Oblation".jpg. The rest are not de minimus. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Magsaysay Park Davao.jpg

Deleted because: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Magsaysay Park Davao.jpg (no FoP). But I assume it is a park, so COM:DM might apply. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

  Info From the image description: "This 25 meter long tri-pillar obelisk with the statue of Ramon Magsaysay is made by the Davao Chapter of the Philippine Veterans Legion and was turned over to the City Government of Davao in honor of the third President of the Republic of the Philippines". The same monument can be seen through Google Streetview [1]. Thuresson (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Per http://davaocitybybattad.blogspot.com/2011/10/magsaysay-park.html?m=1 , it was built sometime between 1957 (Magsaysay's death) and July 31, 1960, the year on which the Davao Chapter of the Philippine Veterans Legion turned over the monument to the City Government of Davao. Per the wording, it is assumed that they turned over the rights (even moral rights) to the city government ({{PD-PhilippineGov}}). Like the possible applicability of PD-gov for Manila Film Center and other structures in the Philippines now owned by the government. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Ownership does not equate holding the copyright. The municipal government owns the tangible embodiment of the work, but the copyright remains with the creator / commissioner (unclear situation there) unless it was transferred in writing and signed by the first copyright holder as defined by the law. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two Robinsons photos by KatorseNiAmang

Files were deleted because no FOP in the Philippines. But through the low COM:TOO reason which saved File:Sm megamall.jpg from deletion, it can be considered as having low TOO as a mall building and more utilitarian in purpose than a work of art. Are malls of the Philippines works of architectural art? I doubt this notion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

  I withdraw my nomination. It seems malls are not exempted from this threshold of originality, as evidenced by a critical section of the law of the Philippines (under Sec. 172, chapter II) provided by that Mrcl lxmna: "172.2. Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bank of the Philippine Islands

Stated files were deleted because no FOP in the PHL.

- But if this is the w:Don Roman Santos Building (my assumption only), this should be PD and undeleted.

- if these are indeed having low COM:TOO as claimed by Ubcule, then these should be undeleted too. This is evidenced by the similarities of architectures of the branches of the bank, and I doubt they are of the same architectural firm.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

  I withdraw my nomination JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Our Lady of Perpetual Help Church.jpg

Per https://m.facebook.com/pages/category/Religious-Organization/omphdumaguete/about/, 1966 bldg. Absolutely falls under the exceptions at the updated COM:FOP Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

While I personally think, that it was not the intention of anybody that the Berne Convention became a substitute for local copyright law (its intention was to grant the same protection for foreign works as granted for local ones), we cannot go on here due to some doubts raised concerning 1951-1972 architetural works. We need to gather wider consensus about how to treat these works in Commons before taking a decission here. Ankry (talk) 13:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: nothing has happened in this VFC discussion, no conclusion has been reached before its archival. I began a new discussion about 3 weeks later, but I put that on hold after new update from Howhontanozaz at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, in which they said that IPOPHL is now considering the addition of FoP as one of the possible amendments in the ongoing review of the present copyright law, but there's no assurance if it will be included in the final bill (an amendment of RA 8293). How added, however, that if IPOPHL "sees the need to insert a FoP provision in our existing laws, then sadly, I would conclude that as of now, there is no FoP in our country." The new discussion remained stale until it was archived earlier today.
In relation to 1951–72 buildings, two DR's made by the certain Mrcl lxmna were closed as kept, the Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:ABS-CBN Broadcasting Center (involving the photos of 1968 ABS-CBN Building) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Antipolo Cathedral (involving more than a hundred photos of 1954 Antipolo Cathedral). So I can assume that photos of 1951–72 Philippine buildings should be OK. The lack of case law should mean that it is allowed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
As noted above, if I base on my personal opinion, I would   Weak support undeletion. If I base on Commons policies, I would declare   On hold until we have a legal opinion (not from international users, but from a lawyer familiar with Philipine copyright law). I cannot help with this. Ankry (talk) 00:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Until relevant discussion affirm that buildings completed in the period between 1951 and 1972 are  OK, we cannot proceed with undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bimbo el oso del pan.jpg

File was deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Bimbo el oso del pan.jpg — FoP in Mexico was interpreted as only for noncommercial use during that time (2007). But the current interpretation, Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico#Freedom of panorama, is more lenient than what it was, so I think this file should be undeleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

  •   Weak oppose @JWilz12345: I don't know how this work would fit under the conditions set by the law. And there is a question of scope, as it is a picture of a Bimbo ad on a Bimbo delivery truck at an odd angle, through a car window or windshield (and as such has very faint reflections of something). I do not see how it can be realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Was the change in FoP laws retroactive? If so, I agree that this should be covered, as the artwork is clearly visible from a public place. I don't speak Spanish, so I cannot say whether the law has some further restrictions, e.g. that the photo must have been taken from a public place, which the inside of a car is not. As for scope: we have a number of Category:Grupo Bimbo delivery trucks, but none with this particular artwork. I think that's sufficiently in scope. --rimshottalk 22:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Interpreting the content of Commons:FOP Mexico: "Reproduction, communication and distribution by means of drawings, paintings, photographs and audiovisual processes of works that are visible from public places (lugares publicos)." [1996-2018 Art.148(VII)]. This can mean that photos of copyrighted works taken from inside the car is acceptable, as long as the car is located in a public space. The only known restrictions, AFAIK and based on my reading of the policy page, are in some establishments and areas, the Metro de la Ciudad de México for example. And for retroactivity, yes the FoP law (2018 ed., according to the policy page) should be retroactive. We have accepted photos of Mexico City's skyscrapers and sculptures in publicly-accessible areas, so this should also be fine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Theresa May graffiti art, Herne Hill.jpg

See also COM:GRAFFITI. --116.48.196.60 03:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

  Support per above. Graffiti author is not known. Ankry (talk) 07:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per above. {{Non-free graffiti}} added. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benghazi Municipality Interior Old.jpg

The following are photos deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benghazi Municipality Interior Old.jpg due to no FoP in Libya:

The artist mentioned was Marcello Piacentini (d. 1960). But these should be in PD by now, as Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Libya states that the copyright duration for Libyan works are 50 years after the death of the author. So 1960+50=2010+1 (completion of 2010 calendar)=2011. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose They are likely copyrighted in US due to URAA (The URAA deate for Libya is 1.1.1996). And no, Libya has not 50pma; they have 25pma and 50 post-publication. So to avoid URAA problem, you need to prove that these are pre-1946 works. Ankry (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: then how come the File:Benghazi Central Station.jpg ended up as kept? And this is a building, URAA should not be an issue according to Clindberg at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-09#Some photographs by TheCoffee. If the second file doesn't apply (I assume it's a chandelier), then the first showing the interior of the building should be OK. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Well, unsure if wall & ceiling art paintings qualify as architecture. Ankry (talk) 10:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MF logo white.svg

Reason: Files is a recreation of the official school logo in vector (SVG) format. As the school IT manager, I was tasked to create this vector file. --Fong kah chun86 (talk) 04:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Fong kah chun86: So this is COM:DW. You need to provide an evidence that the school logo is not copyrighted or that it is copyrighted by you... Ankry (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

{{Nd}} The required evidence not provided; the actual copyright holder needs to follow COM:OTRS in order to restore the image. Ankry (talk) 23:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)


@Ankry: The Ticket# to [COM:OTRS]] is 2020092810002418. No reply from volunteer yet. You only give 7 hours to the request and just claimed evidence not provided? While I respect the need to respect copyright ownership, the approach to deny request fairly baffled me. --Fong kah chun86 (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per Ticket:2020092810002418. However, this undeletion is temporary and the file may be re-deleted after 30 days. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, the undeletion will no longer be temporary. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chris Fistonich 2019.jpg

My wife took the picture. It's fair use. Screen317 (talk) 08:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose Fair use claim is not allowed on Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Fair use is not permitted on Commons and non-free content under a fair use rationale is subject to immediate deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vivek_Singh_Indian_Entrepreneur_Redlake.jpg

The file shouldn't be deleted for the following reasons:

  • The upload date was typo as claimed by the uploader and has been corrected. This looks justified and the complaint which was based on this can be ruled out.Demoticbullmat (talk) 08:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
@Demoticbullmat: incorrect date is one issue, being already published is another. We need an evidence of free license either from the publication site or from the copyright holder via email following COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paige and Snoopy.jpg

This photo was taken by my wife, Evelyn Braddock. It was published on the Schulz Museum Tokyo's website and is part of the public domain.

https://schulzmuseum.org/snoopy-museum-tokyo/

@Pb9: So we need an evidence of free license via email following COM:OTRS. Note, that we need also a permission from the Snoopy sculpture copyright holder. Ankry (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PaigeBraddock 2017.jpg

This photo is part of the public domain: https://www.facebook.com/JanesWorldComic/photos/a.375878049581/10156124357434582/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pb9 (talk • contribs)

You need to provide evidence for this. Faceboook is copyrighted, not public domain. Ankry (talk) 16:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Facebook's terms of service are not compatible with Commons' licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Helen obiageli oshikoya 2.jpg

please i want to know why this file with the above name is been deleted because it is used in the edit mode please help me work on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akintunde2020 (talk • contribs)

You did not provide an evidence that the image is in COM:SCOPE as requested. Opening new requests without earlier answering questions may be considered disruptive. Ankry (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Recreating files is not permitted. Images not proven to be in scope per policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Punkadeka.png

== {{int:filedesc}} ==
{{Information
|description=
{{Mld
 | en = Current logo of Punkadeka - Punk Web Magazine since 1999
 | it = Logo attuale della Punkadeka - Punk Web Magazine dal 1999
 | es = Actual logo de Punkadeka - Punk Web Magazine desde 1999
}}
|date=2020-09-29
|source=Punkadeka.it
|author=Punkadeka.it
|permission={{PD-textlogo|simple}}
{{Trademarked}}
}}

[[Category:Logos of Punkadeka (website)]]
[[Category:Simple logo]]
[[Category:Punkadeka]]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deka74 (talk • contribs)

Is the font used to create this logo free (evidence needed)? Ankry (talk) 15:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: no response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket:2020092910020772

Please restore the following for review now that we have an OTRS ticket.

Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


  Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Organization of the cortical somatosensory representation.png

This picture is taken from an open access journal (Brain communications - https://academic.oup.com/braincomms/article/2/1/fcaa003/5709029). you can see a prove for that at https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access thanks, Shai. Shaishyy (talk) 16:53, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FMRI measurement of the entire somatosensory cortex.png

This picture is taken from an open access journal (Brain communications - https://academic.oup.com/braincomms/article/2/1/fcaa003/5709029). you can see a prove for that at https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access thanks, Shai.Shaishyy (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neurobiology of Language.jpg

This picture is taken from article (https://www.jneurosci.org/content/32/41/14125) published at open access journal (JNeurosci). you can see a prove for that at https://www.jneurosci.org/content/rights-permissions thanks, Shai.

  Oppose Copyright © 2020 by the Society for Neuroscience I do not see any evidence of free license on this page. Ankry (talk) 18:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
from the lower link: "Authors grant JNeurosci a license to publish their work and copyright remains with the author. For articles published after 2014, the Society for Neuroscience (SfN) retains an exclusive license to publish the article for 6 months; after 6 months, the work becomes available to the public to copy, distribute, or display under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY). This license allows data and text mining, use of figures in presentations, and posting the article online, provided that the original article is credited." with link to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ "Material published from 2010 to 2014 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-NC-SA). SfN holds copyright for material published before 2010. Authors retain copyright for all material published in JNeurosci" with link to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ this article is from 2012.
Shaishyy (talk) 18:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a 2012 publication. And: Material published from 2010 to 2014 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-NC-SA). So incompatible with COM:L. Ankry (talk) 18:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I understandShaishyy (talk) 18:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Psychophysiological measurements of musical pleasure.png

This picture is taken from article (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007487) published at open access journal (PLoS One). you can see a prove for that at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/journal-information thanks, Shai. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaishyy (talk • contribs)

  Support. plos.org content seems to be CC-BY licensed. Ankry (talk) 18:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Insight and EEG.jpg

This picture is taken from article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920302445) published at open access journal (NeuroImage). you can see a prove for that at https://www.elsevier.com/journals/neuroimage/1053-8119/open-access-journal

thanks, Shai.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaishyy (talk • contribs)


  Not done Non-Commercial No Derivatives license is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons, see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NaijaMp3s_banner.jpg

Hi,

File:NaijaMp3s_banner.jpg

File:NaijaMp3s frontpage.png

File:NaijaVibe frontpage.png

The following files are photos I personally took of my website and a logo I created and uploaded. Please note that all files violate no copyright.

Thanks

--Stiphbami (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Brett Kavanaugh Yale Yearbook.jpg

The image was deleted for the following reason: "The White House is not the author of the photograph. The government cannot extinguish the original copyright simply by publishing a copy of an original work."

However, according to the Copyright Policy of whitehouse.gov (seen here), "Except where otherwise noted, third-party content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License."

The image was taken from whitehouse.gov in this link: [2] No alternative licensing is given, so the image is licensed under CC-BY 3.0.

FunnyMath (talk) 20:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose For the reasons in the deletion log. US copyright law does not work this way. Thuresson (talk) 22:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
There are many third-party photos on whitehouse.gov that are explicitly kept on Commons by DR discussions. Here is an example: [3]. If you want more examples, here's more DR discussions: [4]. FunnyMath (talk) 01:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Case in point, in this DR discussion, the closing admin kept a third-party image on whitehouse.gov, saying "... if it is a copyright violation, it is the White House's problem." FunnyMath (talk) 01:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

---- {{not done}}: per Thuresson. --[[User:Nat|<small>Ìch heiss</small> '''Nat'''.]] [[User_talk:Nat|<small>Redd mìt mìr</small>.🥨]] 02:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: Please consider deleting the third-party images in the following DR discussions:

as well as the following cropped version of the file I requested to undelete:

FunnyMath (talk) 02:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: The White House has no right to license or relicense works they do not hold the copyright to. Furthermore, it is not solely the WH's problem, but also ours if we choose to host a copyvio. @FunnyMath: Do not add to an already close discussion in the future. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MEAACT PHOTO

Per the recent consensus to accept COM:PDM as a license, I've been going through Category:Public Domain Mark 1.0-related deletion requests/deleted restoring any images that appear to be free of any other issues. I am seeking a second opinion on this batch of images by the Ministry of East Africa Affairs, Commerce & Tourism (MEAACT) of Kenya. They have applied "Public domain" (PDM) to the image on Flickr, but also indicated in the caption "MANDATORY CREDIT: MEAACT PHOTO / STUART PRICE", which contradicts the meaning of "public domain". My question is: should we accept these images? -- King of ♥ 18:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

  •   Support undeletion. I see no way that any court would decide that any person or a project has committed a copyright infringement after the author has published the work with a public domain mark, even if they have also demanded attribution. However, the question that should be asked is not whether to undelete or not, but what licence/copyright tags should we apply. I think that in this case we should be safe and assume that it is {{attribution}} rather than any form of public domain attribution, I am unsure if the court would see it this way, but in this particular case it is better to be safe, especially since it does not inflience us actually having the images. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pinging @Josve05a --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • If we think they are enforcing that requirement through moral rights only, it could still be consistent. Even so, using {{Attribution}} might be more prudent. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done: @King of Hearts: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Smith Museum stained glass.jpg and File:Asiatown IT Park.jpg

Previously discussed at here but separated from that request to continue to conversation. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: the enwiki article is vague, saying "Named after prominent Chicago collectors E.B. and Maureen Smith, the museum held over 150 individual pieces displayed in four galleries: Victorian, Prairie, Modern, and Contemporary. The majority of the works originally came from Chicago-area buildings, and a number of prominent artists are represented, including John LaFarge, Adolfas Valeška, and Ed Paschke. The collection contained religious themes, secular work, and some more unusual items, including a stained glass portrait of basketball player Michael Jordan and a window created from glass soda bottles." La Farge died in 1910, Valeška 1994, and Paschke 2004. Although I am aware that the American FoP is strictly for architecture only, I thought these as integral part of the Chicago museum building (as Category:Smith Museum of Stained Glass Windows exists). I also recategorized File:Smith Museum stained glass.jpg to this category. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done: more appropriate as a DR discussion. Will submit new DR. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Valeriu Kurtu.jpg

Guten Abend sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

Bei der Erstellung eines Beitrags, der Biografie vom Künstler Valeriu Kurtu, wurde das Foto File:Valeriu Kurtu.jpg als Urheberrechtsverletzung gekennzeichnet.

Ich besitze die Lizenz der Datei File:Valeriu Kurtu.jpg und habe die Urheberrechte sowie die Genehmigung der abgebildeten Person Valeriu Kurtu. Zusätzlich habe ich ebenfalls den Zugriff auf unsere Webseite, wo dieses Foto veröffentlicht ist. Das Foto soll mit der Lizenz CC-by-sa/4.0 veröffentlichen und auf Wikipedia bereitgestellt werden. Dementsprechend würde ich gerne die Datei wiederherstellen und wäre Ihnen sehr dankbar wenn Sie mir weiterhelfen würden.

Vielen Dank und einen angenehmen Abend

--Alexkurtu (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: no response to query. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Julia Kurtu.jpg

Guten Abend sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

Bei der Erstellung eines Beitrags, der Biografie vom Künstler Julia Kurtu, wurde das Foto File:Julia Kurtu.jpg als Urheberrechtsverletzung gekennzeichnet.

Ich besitze die Lizenz der Datei File:Julia Kurtu.jpg und habe die Urheberrechte sowie die Genehmigung der abgebildeten Person Julia Kurtu. Zusätzlich habe ich ebenfalls den Zugriff auf unsere Webseite, wo dieses Foto veröffentlicht ist. Das Foto soll mit der Lizenz CC-by-sa/4.0 veröffentlichen und auf Wikipedia bereitgestellt werden. Dementsprechend würde ich gerne die Datei wiederherstellen und wäre Ihnen sehr dankbar wenn Sie mir weiterhelfen würden.

Vielen Dank und einen angenehmen Abend

--Alexkurtu (talk) 19:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: no response to query. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


Guten Tag, Ich bin der Fotograf und Urheber dieses Bildes.

File:ECO00775-1.jpg

== [[:File:Example.jpg]] ==

Добрый день! Прошу Вас оказать содействие и вернуть фотографию Константина Ивлева (название фото: ECO00775-1.jpeg) Данная фотография это наша работа! Я присутствовала на съёмках при создании данной серии фотографий. Помогите разобраться в сложившейся ситуации!Валентина20202020 (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

== [[:File:Example.jpg]] Фотография Константина Ивлева ==

Добрый день! К сожалению указания ниже прописаны на английском языке, что не дает мне возможность ознакомиться с ними. Прошу Вас помочь мне в восстановлении фотографии под названием (ECO00775-1.jpeg) Данная фотография была создана на совместной фотосессии с участием Константина Ивлева и меня! Фото не взято из интернета, оно напрямую идет для размещения. Помогите пожалуйста восстановить нашу фотографию.


  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. translated from English to Russia via Google Translate:@Валентина20202020: Для возможности восстановления файла правообладатель должен отправить разрешение согласно приемлемой лицензии, используя процесс OTRS. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pages in the anatomy of website design.png

After uploading this file, i received the notification that it has derived works inside the pictures. This is true and i made edits to the file to ensure the respective sources (which are Creative Commons Zero (CC0) licensed). I hope this license is sufficient for Wikipedia, as i made this picture to illustrate the stages of website design, and it is made from derived works. The following sources are used inside this picture:

Panoramic Photography of Green Field

https://www.pexels.com/photo/agriculture-clouds-countryside-cropland-440731/

Trees Near Body of Water

https://www.pexels.com/photo/clouds-daylight-forest-grass-371589/

Top View of Lake Between Mountains

https://www.pexels.com/photo/clouds-daylight-grass-lake-371659/

Photo Of Cliff During Daytime

https://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-cliff-during-daytime-3259814/

Photo Of River During Daytime

https://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-river-during-daytime-2994160/

Trees Beside River

https://www.pexels.com/photo/trees-beside-river-462086/

Please assist in the un-deletion of this file and put the correct sources of derived works.

Online013 (talk) 13:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

  Info I see no evidence that the images are CC0. The restriction: Don't redistribute or sell the photos and videos on other stock photo or wallpaper platforms in pexels.com license is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons licensing requiremets. The images on Commons have to be free for any use, including redistribution on stock photo or wallpaper platforms. Ankry (talk) 16:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Pexels.com licence is not compatible with Commons' licensing policy. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jade Simmons for United States President.jpg

Hello,

Our photographer has given us rights to use this image. If there is a way that it is supposed to be posted correctly please let us know, but we are free to use when and wherever its needed.

Melissa Nixon — Preceding unsigned comment added by OR2020JS (talk • contribs) 18:16, 30 September 2020‎ (UTC)

  Oppose "© Michael Gillman Photography" at [10]. By relicensing the photo it appears that you have gone beyond the permission from the photographer. Thuresson (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Per Thuresson. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:John_Christian.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020082610006591 regarding File:John_Christian.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


  Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Team RoyalCoder official logo rounded.png

File:Team RoyalCoder official logo rounded.png I accidently requested for deletation for this file. --Asaduzzaman Atik (talk) 07:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Asaduzzaman Atik Thu, October 2020

Procedural close; this is not the forum to discuss a deletion request. Thuresson (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Some Negros Oriental photos

Following files were deleted because no FoP in PHL. But:

- Negros Oriental https://www.negor.gov.ph/capitol-building/ states that it was built in 1924, so this should be PD.

- COM:DM might apply.

* File:Bandera Building.jpg

- might be plain buildings (low COM:TOO) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)   I withdraw my nomination - for the last four photos. Application of international TOO in the Philippines is debatable. I will still retain the undeletion request for the first four photos. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: File:Negros Oriental Provincial Capitol Ground.jpg, File:Negros Oriental Provincial Capitol Grounds.jpg, and File:Dumaguete Quezon Park.jpg. The focus of the former two is not the building but a potentially copyrighted sculpture and the copyrighted elements in the latter is not de minimus but the focus.   Done: File:Valencia Industrial Park.jpg per above<. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1973 Gay Pride.jpg

- - - Reason for this request

I hereby affirm that (1) I served as legal counsel for the event depicted in File:1973 Gay Pride.jpg, that (3) the copyright tag below applies to the above-mentioned content because (2) the copyright holder intended that his work be available in the public domain for any purpose.

{{PD-because|Jim Chalgren, the copyright holder, released the underlying photo in the US before 1988, "without an explicit Copyright notice".}} [Ticket#: 2020092210007961] verifies that the reason given above complies with Commons' licensing policy.

--Y6f&tP4z (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

- - -

In the images' desscription you stated that "Egil Jonsson" is the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

- - - Reply #1

No! In my reply to Ahmad252, September 19, I said, <Egil Jonsson, the author of File:1973 Gay Pride.jpg, posted the picture of himself "in the orange ring" on his Facebook page in 2012, then reposted the same picture with context in 2019. Because Jim Chalgren released the photo in the US before 1988 "without an explicit Copyright notice", his work was not an "orphan" and could be used in the public domain for any purpose.>

I was attempting to clarify that Jonsson was the author of the "orange ring" that was added to Chalgren's photo.

--Y6f&tP4z (talk) 21:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

- - -

Temporarily undeleted for discussion. We may need some info about the pre-1988 publication (date, place) as an evidence. Ankry (talk) 12:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

- - - Reply #2

I asked the Curator, Tretter Collection in GLBT Studies, University of Minnesota Libraries, to search for records that will identify with whom its copy of the photo was shared before 1988 and/or where it appeared in print.

--Y6f&tP4z (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

- - -

Unfortunately, there is no evidence that the photo was published before 2000. (see the underlying OTRS ticket) Fair use & orphan works cannot be hosted in Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

- - - Reply #3

See [Ticket#2020092210007961]: Because the University of Minnesota holds "the item in [its] collection, and made the scan available to the [Mpls St Paul] magazine" (email, September 17), consent from the copyright holder to allow others, including the University, to share the photo in the public domain may be implied.

--Y6f&tP4z (talk) 01:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

- - -


  Not done: per Ticket:2020092210007961 and COM:PCP. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/File:FC Arsenal-Kyivshchyna Bila Tserkva Logo.png

Unfortunately I did not notice this nomination, it is the second iteration of the nomination I participated in (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Динамо-фан) but for some reason under a different name.

The nomination was closed with an opposite interpretation of exactly the same template as the previous nomination, and this interpretation is not based on any rules.

{{PD-UA-exempt}} clearly states that this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions because it is one of the following: (d) (...) symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations. Argument that that pertains only to non-commercial use is wrong: it is public domain with no additional restrictions (Ukrainian wording means that no copyright restrictions can apply).

The argument that all of those logos are not part of any of the total of six cases is wrong: these are symbols of entreprises / organisations and they fall under (d). Football clubs are entreprises / organisations, and these logos are symbols of respective organisations registered by Ukrainian government.

  • File:FC Metalurh Zaporizhya Logo last.png is a symbol of ТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖЕНОЮ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЮ "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "МЕТАЛУРГ ЗАПОРІЖЖЯ" (Limited liability company Football Club Metalurh Zaporizhya)
  • File:FC Metalist 1925 Kharkiv Logo.png is a symbol of ТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖЕНОЮ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЮ "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "МЕТАЛІСТ 1925" ХАРКІВ" (Limited liability company Football Club Metalist 1925 Kharkiv)
  • File:FC Enerhiya Nova Kakhovka Logo.png is a symbol of ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ НОВОКАХОВСЬКИЙ СПОРТИВНИЙ КЛУБ "ЕНЕРГІЯ" (Non-government organisation Nova Kakhovka Sports Club Enerhiya)
  • File:FC Bukovyna Chernivtsi Logo.png is a symbol of ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ФУТБОЛЬНО-СПОРТИВНИЙ КЛУБ "БУКОВИНА" (Non-government organisation Football Sports Club Bukovyna)
  • File:FC Arsenal-Kyivshchyna Bila Tserkva Logo.png is a symbol of ТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖЕНОЮ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЮ "ПРОФЕСІЙНИЙ ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "АРСЕНАЛ-КИЇВЩИНА" (Limited liability company Professional Football Club Arsenal-Kyivshchyna)
  • File:FC Ahrobiznes Volochysk Logo.png is a symbol of ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "АГРОБІЗНЕС" (Non-government organisation Football Club Ahrobiznes)
  • File:FC Cherkaskyi Dnipro Logo.png is a symbol of ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ОБ'ЄДНАНИЙ ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ ТЕРИТОРІАЛЬНИХ ГРОМАД ЧЕРКАЩИНИ "ЧЕРКАСЬКИЙ ДНІПРО - АКАДЕМІЯ" (Non-government organisation United Football Club of Territorial Communities of Cherkasy Oblast Cherkaskyi Dnipro - Akademia)
  • File:FC Arsenal-Kyiv logo 2018.png is a symbol of ТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖЕНОЮ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЮ "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "АРСЕНАЛ-КИЇВ" (Limited liability company Football Club Arsenal-Kyiv)
  • File:FC Naftovyk-Ukrnafta Okhtyrka Logo.png is a symbol of ТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖЕНОЮ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЮ ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "НАФТОВИК-УКРНАФТА" (Limited liability company Football Club Naftovyk-Ukrnafta)
  • File:FC Zhemchuzhyna Odesa Logo.png was a symbol of (now dissolved) Товариство з обмеженою відповідальністю «Футбольний клуб «Жемчужина»
  • File:FC Avanhard Kramatorsk logo.png is a symbol of ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ АВАНГАРД 1955" (Non-government organisation Football Club Avanhard 1955)
  • File:FC Inhulets logo.png is a symbol of ПРИВАТНЕ ПІДПРИЄМСТВО "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "ІНГУЛЕЦЬ" (Private entreprise Football Club Inhulets)
  • File:SC Dnipro-1 Logo.png is a symbol of ТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖЕНОЮ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНІСТЮ "СПОРТИВНИЙ КЛУБ "ДНІПРО-1" (Limited liability company Sports Club Dnipro-1)
  • File:Hirnyk-Sport Logo(1).jpg is a symbol of ГРОМАДСЬКА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЯ "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "ГІРНИК-СПОРТ" (Non-government organisation Football Club Hirnyk-Sport)
  • File:FC Dynamo Kyiv logo (2007-2011).tif was a symbol of (now reorganised) ВІДКРИТЕ АКЦІОНЕРНЕ ТОВАРИСТВО "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "ДИНАМО "КИЇВ" (Open joint-stock company Football Club Dynamo Kyiv)
  • File:FC Poltava Logo new.png is a symbol of КОМУНАЛЬНИЙ ЗАКЛАД ФІЗИЧНОЇ КУЛЬТУРИ І СПОРТУ "ФУТБОЛЬНИЙ КЛУБ "ПОЛТАВА" (Communal Establishment of Physical Culture and Sports Football Club Poltava).

All these logos are in public domain under provisions of {{PD-UA-exempt}}. Non-copyright restrictions like {{Trademarked}} likely apply but they are not a reason for deletion. These images cannot be copyrighted under Ukrainian law, thus there is no reason to delete them as copyright violations, and they should be restored with {{PD-UA-exempt}} and {{Trademarked}}.

Pinging both admins who closed the two DRs: @Gbawden, Well-Informed Optimist: — NickK (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Pinging contributors to 2nd DR @JGHowes, Glorious 93: Gbawden (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  Comment I have no objection to this DR being undeleted for further discussion and reconsideration. The situation with Ukraine football logos is confusing and contradictory. We have a category at Commons where many such logos have been uploaded using the {{PD-UA-exempt}} template, and a reading of the English translation of Section II-10(d) of the Ukraine Law on Copyright and Related Rights at WikiSource does refer to "...symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations..." as not copyrighted. On the other hand, Part 6 of Article 16 evidently has a trademark restriction to non-commercial use (I say "apparently" because I haven't found an English translation). Granted, we can just rely on {{Trademark}} but that seems kind of sketchy for hosting these logos at Commons. Many are instead on en-Wikipedia as Fair Use (see en:Category:Ukrainian_football_logos). There's also U.S. law to consider, were these logos created before 1996 URAA and PD in U.S. as well as Ukraine?  JGHowes  talk 18:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
@JGHowes: Could you please provide link to the Part 6 of Article 16? In Ukrainian original Article 16 has only three paragraphs, and Part 6 has only 11 paragraphs, so I don't see what you mean — NickK (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
URAA applies to works published before March 1989. So all pre-1989 logos are OK, IMO. For newer logos URAA is no-op as US Copyright law applies to them directly. And it is unclear to me why (basing on US Copyright law) post-1989 logos may be free in US, or why may we ignore that they are copyrighted in US. Ankry (talk) 18:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
@NickK: Which of the above logos are pre-1989? Ankry (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: I am a bit surprised that URAA applies to {{PD-UA-exempt}}. Coats of arms of Ukrainian cities or Ukrainian government awards can in theory be copyrighted in the US as well, but in fact we keep them on Commons. If a country does not consider some sort of works as copyrightable, how can URAA create copyright in this case?
If we do consider URAA, strange things happen. These logos technically became eligible for URAA on 16 August 2001 (Ukraine had a weird provision that public domain works are not subject to Berne Convention, and logos were public domain works). Anyway, the only logo created before 2001 was File:FC Dynamo Kyiv logo (2007-2011).tif (it only had a star added in 2007 which is not copyrightable). However, Dynamo Kyiv played so many international matches that its logo was clearly published in a foreign country, at least in the UK in 1997, thus technically probably becoming URAA-eligible as published in the UK in 1997. However, I would find it extremely strange to apply copyrights this way — NickK (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
URAA Does not apply to post-1989 works. US copyright law applies to post-1989 works directly, regardless what the country of origin is due to Berne Convention and regardless of copyright status in any other country. This is how the Berne Convention works. And the requirement that images in Commons have to be free in US is a Commons policy. For post-1989 works URAA date is irrelevant; the date when Ukraine became a party of Berne Convention may be. Some images might be not copyrighted in US due to high ToO there. (BTW, per this table URAA date for Ukraine is 1.1.1996, but this is irrelevant for post-1989 works when there was no formality required in US for copyright protection.)
Same problem exists eg. with modern ID photos which are not copyrighted in some countries (Poland, Switzerland) as below ToO but copyrighted in US, or with simple modern Italian photos which are copyrighted in Italy 20 years since creation but 70pma in US.
PS. If I am wrong in the above, feel free to correct me. Ankry (talk) 23:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
PS2. If any admin thinks that we can just ignore the US copyright status here, feel free to handle this case. Ankry (talk) 23:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: Well, URAA date for Ukraine is the date when Ukraine became a party of the Berne Convention. Ukraine became a party of the Berne Convention in 1995 with a weird provision that it does not apply to works in public domain (thus including logos), and fully joined on 16 August 2001. Ukraine was not a party to any other copyright agreements before that date.
1989 date would make this provision completely irrelevant as neither Ukraine nor this law existed in 1989.
This is however the first time {{PD-UA-exempt}} and US copyright issue is raised. I wonder why in this case this template is acceptable on Commons at all, as all PD-UA works were clearly created after 1989. Technically, say, File:COA of Kyiv Kurovskyi.svg is also copyrightable in the US, and it is a post-1989 work. We probably need a clarification of the entire template in this case — NickK (talk) 13:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
1989 is the date after which US copyright law should be applied directly to newly published (post-1989 published) works. URAA applies to works published before this date and restores (or grants) US copyright protection for some works published before this date. And URAA is completely irrelevant here, IMO. We just need to find the logos copyright status in US law (required per Commons policy: must be free in the country of origin and in US), which is independent on Copyright status in other countries (including Ukraine) for post-1989 published works. Some of them may be below US ToO, which is relatively high. But I see no other arguments that could be used if a Ukrainian club decided to enforce copyright protection for their logos in a US court. Ankry (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: So please clarify: what does {{PD-UA-exempt}} mean at all? The entire country of Ukraine did not exist in 1989, thus absolutely no works became public domain in Ukraine according to this law before 1989. If all {{PD-UA-exempt}} works are still copyrighted in the US, how this template can be used at all? With such a strict definition, perhaps this template should be completely deleted? I don't think this would be consensual, but your comments imply that {{PD-UA-exempt}} is useless as copyright is still enforceable in US courts and all post-1989 are still copyrighted — NickK (talk) 22:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
It means that the work is PD in Ukraine. But we need also a template describing the US copyright status. Like {{PD-old}} should be associated in most cases with {{PD-US expired}}, {{PD-US no notice}}, {{PD-1996}} or something similar. It is also unlikely to be PD in most other countries (but this is irrelevant for us) Let somebody correct me if I am wrong. Ankry (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • The question put forward was when were the logos created?. As Ankry stated, post-1989 works would be copyrighted under U.S. copyright law. URAA would not apply as URAA restores the work's U.S. copyright -- a copyright would not need restoration if it is extant and in force. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: No response to query. Uncertainty as to their status under US law means that the files will remain deleted for the moment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:N-9020-019.jpg

Deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:N-9020-019.jpg with the argument that it was small file (1,624 × 1,116 pixels and 148 KB in size is not a small file, in particular at the time of upload, 7 January 2011, almost ten years ago. Previously kept and the subject of this photo was the same subject of other images uploaded by this user. Also the claim of lack of exif is irrelavant, as there was no proof presented of possible copyright violation. Tm (talk) 16:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  Weak support as I agree with Tm above, but not sure if we need this particular image. Ankry (talk) 00:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hack the North 2019 Logo.png

I'd like to request undeletion of this logo picture.

For context, I am a student organizer as part of this not-for-profit organization (Techyon) which organizes/hosts Canada's biggest hackathon each year. hackthenorth.com

When I originally submitted this, I did not include that it is copyrighted by {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. The original artist(s) also belong to the same organization as myself and all works are copyrighted under the same license. The logo also appears on our 2019 website, which has been open-sourced on GitHub: https://github.com/hackthenorth/hackthenorth.com

Apologies if there's something I missed as part of this undeletion request as I am new to Wikipedia - I'm hoping to get this logo as part of Commons to be later used as a part of a Wikipedia article. Thanks!

--Timohthee (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

  • @Timohthee: I see no evidence of a free licence concerning the logo in question on either the website of the event, on the 2019 event website, or on the GitHub page. In fact, it appears that the page only has the licence "Our code is licensed under the MIT license. All other assets are copyright of Hack the North." which only covers code, but not works such as the logo. As it was previously published elsewhere first without a free licence, for the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder (or an authorised representative of the event organiser) must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PranavMallick.png

== [[File:PranavMallick.png|thumb|]] ==

The file is free and is not copyrighted and is available in public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Praveenraj1987 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 1 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  Oppose The claimed source is [11] which claims "All Rights Reserved by Punatsangchhu-I Hydroelectric Project Authority". Thuresson (talk) 15:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Thuresson. Free (gratis) availability on the Internet is not the same as free (libre) or public domain. Эlcobbola talk 16:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IrelandsFuture.jpg

Hi, if I contact Niall Murphy who owns the logo from his website where I got it can it remain?

https://irelandsfuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/1500x500.jpg

Would be good to keep some colour on the Wiki page.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siouxchief (talk • contribs) 12:36, 1 October 2020‎ (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close. @Siouxchief: this is a venue for requesting undeletion once you have obtained evidence supporting the same, not to ask what evidence would be accepted. Previously published works require evidence of permission to be provided using the process at COM:OTRS. If you have questions about this process, consider asing at the Commons:Help desk. --Эlcobbola talk 16:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Servals Rugby Vanves.png

Hi,

This file was deleted because of copyright but it is one of my creation : there is no copyright on it :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utilisateur92170 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 1 October 2020‎ (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utilisateur92170 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 1 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  Oppose This logo has been published before upload at [12]. Thuresson (talk) 15:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - This is not your creation, it is the official (non-trivial) logo of a rugby team. To the extent you're referring to making the white background black, that is a mere COM:DW that does not extinguish the logo's copyright (and is likely so slavish/unoriginal as to not even give rise to an additional one). Эlcobbola talk 16:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ALIGNED Mira DeMartino.png

== File:ALIGNED Mira DeMartino.png undeletion request ==

this photo was given to the artist by the author and was released for free use by everybody. The artist released to me. It is an excellent photo that captures best the artist and her art.

== [[:File:ALIGNED Mira DeMartino.png]] ==

I am not sure if I did submit by request properly. This photo was given to artist for free and public use by the author of the photo. I was given the photo by the artist when I requested what photo I could use. It is an important photo of the artist with her artwork. --Monitor333 (talk) 20:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)--Monitor333 (talk) 20:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)--Monitor333 (talk) 20:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)--Monitor333 (talk) 20:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)--Monitor333 (talk) 20:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Oct 1 2020

  •   Oppose @Monitor333: This is an unambiguous case of COM:NETCOPYVIO. There is no evidence of an acceptable free licence on the source website. There are two copyrights concerned here: (1) of the art depicted in the photo, and (2) of the photo itself. While Mira DeMartino may be the copyright holder of the artwork, unless it was a self-portrait or the copyright was transferred by operation of law or by contract, the copyright holder of the photo is the photographer. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder of the photo and the copyright holder of the artwork will need to send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Own Copyright of file File:Maria_Freire_headshot_2020.jpg

Hello we hired BTH Artistry to take the photo and have documentation transferring copyright ownership to Dr. Maria Freire/FNIH (me). Contract documenting transfer of right can be found here

--Wtolentino (talk) 20:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)William Tolentino, Development and Communications Systems Officer for FNIH


  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Rafael1.tif

I hereby affirm that I am Aitana S. Baines, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work as shown here https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Rafael1.tif&action=edit&redlink=1 and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Aitana S. Baines 2nd of October 2020

Mestremendo (talk) 09:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close, as we cannot process this here. @Mestremendo: This should be sent to permissions-commons wikimedia.org Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

2400x2400 1

--Qozee (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: procedural close. No undeletion request made. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Saint Raphael Church in Legazpi, Albay.jpg

Deleted because: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saint Raphael Church in Legazpi, Albay.jpg (no FOP). But https://www.vigattintourism.com/tourism/articles/St-Raphael-Church-of-Legazpi says the present architecture is from 1834 (auto. PD). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

  Weak oppose The image is low resolution and shows also neighbouring objects that are likely copyrighted. Ankry (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Response: Despite low resolution, it is still a good photo. I assume it is also w:File:Saint Raphael Church in Legazpi, Albay.jpg. For the objects concerned, the flagpole and the resto has low COM:TOO, and the lamp pole should be OK as there are various photos depicting the same type being hosted here at Category:Roxas Boulevard and some other categories. Also the fixtures are not main subjects or secondary subjects (COM:DM) as the photo is about the church. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per above. If one feels that there are copyrightable elements, please nominate for deletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MRT-2 Betty Go-Belmonte Station Exterior 1.jpg

File deleted because: no FoP in the Philippines (Commons:Deletion requests/File:MRT-2 Betty Go-Belmonte Station Exterior 1.jpg). But IMO train station buildings in the Philippines are ineligible for copyright as they are more utilitarian than artistic. Commons has hosted photos of train stations buildings (even exteriors) with no problems, from Category:Recto station to Category:Buendia station, amd from Category:Kamuning station to Category:Blumentritt station (Line 1). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Unfortuantely, this is clearly a building rather than just a platform, and, as such, it would be protected work. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Miserable Monday (30579989018).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per updated COM:PDM A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: Which copyright tag you find appropriate for this image? Ankry (talk) 09:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
I do think {{PDMark-owner}} is appropriate. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
The "owner" seems to be the subject and this is not a selfie... Ankry (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Maybe the employees of the Office of Michael John took it? As Michael John is a spokesperson of the Tea Party. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
"Maybe" means COM:PCP and COM:OTRS, not {{PDMark-owner}}. Ankry (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: My doubts here concerned one image; I said nothing about the others. Ankry (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

{{Temporarily undeleted}} 2 others for discussion. Please, note, that they are no longer available on Flickr. This may constitute doubts concerning their copyright. However, if anybody is willing to LR them basing on earlier flickrreview, feel free to do so. Ankry (talk) 06:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: I'd love to know if there has archive.org archives for 1st and 3rd on Flickr or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done: LR readded. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Company sign.png

File:Company sign.png

I am requesting the undeletion of this file as I have stake in the company, the picture is not copyright, and I state my relationship with the content in my own user page. ZanderGabriel (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@ZanderGabriel: If you are authorised to license the logo, we need evidence for this. If the logo is not copyrighted, we need a legal reason why it is so. Note: both legal states together are impossible (if it is copyrighted by you, as declared at uploaded, it cannot not copyrighted).
If a public evidence of any above cannot be provided, COM:OTRS is the right way. Ankry (talk) 16:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

---- {{not done}}: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: how do I prove its not copyright? I have the owner of the company telling me it's not. What do I have to do show you?

ZanderGabriel (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@ZanderGabriel: eg. Provide an evidence that copyright has expired (70 years after author's death), or provide an evidence of a court decision from the same country that this or very similar image is not copyrighted, or provide an appropriate exception in local copyright law and an evidence that appropriate conditions are met (unfortunately this logo is not a legal act and unlikely to be a work of US governement employee made as their duty). Copyright applies to any creative work unless there is an appropriate exception and it is independent on creator's will. Note also, that there is no evidence that "our company" is a notable company, so the logo may be out of COM:SCOPE. And note, that responding here is expected to be during the next 24 hours, not later. Ankry (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: The image was never under copyright. I can't show proof that it is no longer copyright if it never was. there was no court decision. Someone bought the company and has ownership rights over the content. I have the owner of the company, which the logo is of, telling me this. You can't assume it is copyright without evidence. What do I need to get from the owner of the company showing, not only, that I am permitted to upload the image but that it's not copyright?

22:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: no response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File uploaded by PMoPrinting

This image is my own work--PMoPrinting (talk) 05:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Stephanus Peters 01/10/2020


  Not done: @PMoPrinting: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Liam Mulhall in action for Aston Bulls.jpg

Why has this been deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mulman82 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 2 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Mulman82: It was deleted as no permission (i.e. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.). Pinging @Materialscientist for comment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Celebrity Party Hodges Bay Resort Antigua.jpg

This photo is NOT copyrighted and was taken by me. Just because it is on multiple peoples Facebook page does not mean that I do not own the rights to it and can openly make those right public.

JS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jstevens305 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 2 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •   Oppose @Jstevens305: All works, unless exempted by law or case law, are copyrighted from the moment of creation. Per policy, work previously published elsewhere with no evidence of a free licence requires permission via OTRS. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Meagan Good.jpg

This photo is NOT copyrighted and was taken by me. Just because it is on multiple peoples Facebook page does not mean that I do not own the rights to it and can openly make those right public.

JS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jstevens305 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 2 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •   Oppose @Jstevens305: All works, unless exempted by law or case law, are copyrighted from the moment of creation. Per policy, work previously published elsewhere with no evidence of a free licence requires permission via OTRS. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zinc8.png

File:Zinc8.png

Hello, I have the right for using this image. Could you please let me know the steps forward to declare my rights to the image being used? Thanks in Advance, Sincerely, Roberto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberto Orendain (talk • contribs) 22:29, 2 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Roberto Orendain: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jeff Wellemeyer Hodges Bay.jpg

This photo is NOT copyrighted and was taken by me. Andre Sullivan photography is one of my companies. I do own the rights to it and can openly make those right public.

JS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jstevens305 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 2 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Jstevens305 (talk) 22:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose @Jstevens305: All works, unless exempted by law or case law, are copyrighted from the moment of creation. Per policy, work previously published elsewhere with no evidence of a free licence requires permission via OTRS. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JeffWellemeyer.png

This photo is NOT copyrighted and was taken by me. Andre Sullivan photography is one of my companies. I do own the rights to it and can openly make those right public.

JS

Jstevens305 (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

== File:JeffWellemeyer.png ==

This photo is NOT copyrighted and was taken by me. I do own the rights to it and can openly make those right public.

JS

Jstevens305 (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose @Jstevens305: All works, unless exempted by law or case law, are copyrighted from the moment of creation. Per policy, work previously published elsewhere with no evidence of a free licence requires permission via OTRS. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ritam with Prajakta Koli at KJ Somaiya.jpg

This picture is owned by the person on whom the article is written and was first uploaded by him here - https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10157117161805719&set=pob.620745718 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahnavim4 (talk • contribs) 05:13, 3 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •   Oppose @Jahnavim4: (1) There is no evidence of an acceptable free licence on the link above where it was published before its uploading here on Commons (2) Even if there was a mention of a free licence, it was published by the subject of the photograph, but the copyright holder of a photo is the person who took it rather than the person who appears in it, unless the copyright was transferred by operation of law or by contract in writing and signed by the first copyright holder as defined by the law. (3) Its copyright status would be irrelevant as the file appears to be out of project scope as the draft was declined. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mahnaz Malik in University of Cambridge's student newspaper, Varsity..jpg

Scanned photo newspaper of my client, in the newspaper. I took the scan photo. So it's my photo. Even the photo in the newspaper I took. Sorry, i keep editing. Should i upload it as a copyright of the newspaper even though I took the scan and the photo of the client? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njinfo10109 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 3 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •   Oppose Unfortunately, content neither in the public domain according to the law nor under a free licence is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons. Regardless of whether you are the photographer of the photo in the article, it is only an element of the content. The rest of the work is the intellectual property of either the newspaper or the author of the article. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WendyJFoxAuthorPhoto.jpg

I am requesting undeletion for File:WendyJFoxAuthorPhoto.jpg.

This is a photo that I took myself. It is a photo of me. It is a photo that I give people permission to use; the permission is here: https://www.wendyjfox.com/media-kit.html

Please undelete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niente21 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 3 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

  Not done: Procedural close. File has not been deleted as of 23:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC) @Niente21: There is no evidence of a free licence on source website. If you are the photographer, please send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence using the OTRS process. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Krilin - La Tarara.mp3

OTRS file signed by author was sent September, 21th.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close. This cannot be processed here at the moment. @TaronjaSatsuma: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Questions or concerns regarding the OTRS ticket should be directed to OTRS/Noticeboard. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Postery Nerka page-0001.jpg

Добрый день!

Прошу восстановить Изображение Postery Nerka page-0001.jpg - File:Postery Nerka page-0001.jpg Я являюсь представителями продюсера фильма "Нерка. Красная рыба" (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Нерка._Рыба_красная) и имею полное право на использования данного изображения, в том числе в сети интернет.

--Agutenkov (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: per above. Request submitter informed of OTRS/permission procedures in Russian on their talk page. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wolfgang Ritsch.jpg

I request undeletion for the concerning picture. The creator of the photo has sent a publication permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

--Marusart (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close. This cannot be processed here at the moment. @Marusart: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Questions or concerns regarding the OTRS ticket should be directed to OTRS/Noticeboard. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stephen Pusey exhibit 524W26 Gallery.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020092810021344 regarding File:Stephen Pusey exhibit 524W26 Gallery.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:16002938695f628bed91a8e_1600293869_3x2_rt.jpg

The photo was uploaded from Folha de S.Paulo, a Brazilian newspaper. In Portuguese, it says below the photo "divulgação, i.e. free to be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgvwiki07 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 4 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  Oppose If you click on "divulgacao", eg. "disclosure", you get the following information (Google Translate): "To share this content, please use the link https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mercado/2020/09/professor-de-financas-sustentaveis-rodrigo-tavares-e-novo-colunista-da- folio.shtml or the tools offered on the page. Folha's texts, photos, art and videos are protected by Brazilian copyright law. Do not reproduce the content of the newspaper in any form of communication, electronic or printed, without authorization from Folhapress (research@folhapress.com.br). The rules aim to protect the investment that Folha makes in the quality of its journalism. If you need to copy text from Folha for private use, please log in as a subscriber or registered." Thuresson (talk) 15:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZorexEye.png

Hello Sir,

The following screenshots/images are from my website zorexeye.com . I am the rightful owner of ZorexEye.com, and every pictures belong to that website, so please undelete the images. If you need any kind of proof of my being the owner of zorexeye.com, I would be happy to help. File:ZorexEye.png File:Darkweb Search Engine - ZorexEye.png File:Reverse Image Search - ZorexEye.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zorexzisa (talk • contribs)

Anybody can say this and we cannot verify your identity on-wiki. And, unfortunately, I see no evidence at zorexeye.com that any its content is available under the license you declared. I think, COM:OTRS procedure is the only way to resolve this. Ankry (talk) 22:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. Please ; for Mr user : Ankry may be a user name or his actual name also??? , I am not a lier , and I am Dr/ Mostafa Sadek , and you can see my account everywhere in the internet using my name as sadeklab because I am Sadek sure name , and my specialty is laboratory, and my email is sadeklab, I will attach my Passport and my Egyptian National personal card and I will send you by email. it is very bad to tell some one that anyone can tell that.. I am not a small boy , I am already 58 years old and I am a laboratory consultant and a doctor degree . I don't know actually why the so called Turelio or whatever his name or user name deleted my photos from the start ? Thank you for undeletion of all my photos, and thanks for your patience and help. I love wikimedia and forever .

File:Muhammad Hassan Khan.jpg

I mentioned the reference of www.electhassan.com where this image was taken from. Also I got the permission of Muhammad Hassan Khan to use his picture. Woodbridgenews (talk) 07:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but source-site states "Copyright © 2019 Muhammad Hassan Khan. All Rights Reserved." If Muhammad Hassan Khan released this image under a free license, you need to forward said permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Please note that OTRS is unable to accept forwarded permissions for legal reasons. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aswhin Prajapati .jpg

--Prajapati Films (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aswhin Prajapati .jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: no rationale provide as to why the file should be undeleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coat of arms Berane.jpg

File:Coat of arms Berane.jpg

Coat of arms of Berane is published on web site of Berane Municipality www.berane.me. It os official page of local public administration, and not commercial entity. Seems that web site does not have specific copyrights rules, and coat of arms is propoerty of municipality. As coat of arms per se is not commercial sign, or could be monetized, there is no other way to publish coat of arms, as other are also published without copyrightn Brodonacelnik (talk) 11:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC) 5.10.2020.

@Brodonacelnik: The municipality claims ("Општина Беране © 2020") that the content of the mentioned site is copyrighted. In such cases, we need a written permission from the actual copyright holder or a clear evidence based on copyright law that their copyright claim is a lie. Ankry (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mira DeMartino - I'm Powerful 2015 March 7 2016.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020100310005978 regarding File:Mira DeMartino - I'm Powerful 2015 March 7 2016.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 19:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Levko Esztella kép.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020092810007324 regarding File:Levko Esztella kép.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 19:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Milad Hanniabl.jpg

احیا پرونده : Milad Hanniabl.jpg

این تصویر توسط بنده در شهر جوانرود واقع در استان کرمانشاه عکس برداری شده ما آن را در جلد آهنگ : https://open.spotify.com/track/6fyUOyZ12QehW2Tu190Df9?si=BY-ETG-UTBGwrsaUskLskg استفاده کرده ایم

من میتوانم هرچه را که بخواهید به شما بدهم برای احیا این عکس، حتی UPC این آهنگ

In English : This picture was taken by me in Javanrood city located in Kermanshah province. We put it on the cover of the song: https://open.spotify.com/track/6fyUOyZ12QehW2Tu190Df9?si=BY-ETG-UTBGwrsaUskLskg we have used. I can give you anything you want to revive this photo, even the UPC of this song

IArda (talk) 14:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

  Info: Also on soundcloud and twitter. --Achim (talk) 14:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose While the twitter image seems to be the oldest of them, neither of them is associated with information that Wikimedia user IArda is the photographer who made the photo nor that the image is published under CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. In order to undelete the photo, the copyright holder, who presumably is the photographer, needs to follow the COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SDG 6368.jpg

This photo of me is from my personal photoshoot over which I have complete authority. This photo of me hasn't been taken without permission. I would like to use this photograph as my profile photo for my Wikipedia article please, since it has appeared in various articles identifying me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Audrey Piano (talk • contribs)

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Ankry (talk) 08:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mike Tuney.jpg

I submitted the deleted file to the person who wrote that medium article for her to place it on the article and Mike Tuney has also uploaded the picture on Facebook before. I own full rights of the deleted picture. Please undelete the file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lianedavis (talk • contribs)

  Oppose Please ask the person who took the photo to provide permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Gbawden. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by Sadeklab

I am the user name sadeklab , and my real name is Mostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)sadeklabMostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Mostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Mostafa SadekMostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC) so, please undelete all of my photos , they are all mine and I painted them by my hands and here is my facebook page and albume which shows that I own all of these pictures and already published in my facebook before wikimedia. and here I sign for undeletion request please I already got an email that the deletion request is reverted, that's why I stayed calm and I thought that you already solve the problem, but I wonder yesterday that you deleted all my photos and I am so upset and really sad for that effort I suffered to put the pictures and describe them and honor I have got when I put successfuly on wikimedia , then I lost when you deleted them So, please undelete them and return them back to me and please in orded not to face this problem again, I already applied to change my name to be the user same sadeklab to become my real name to become : Mostafa Sadek not sadeklab Mostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)sadeklabMostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Mostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Mostafa SadekMostafa Sadek 07:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Deletions are based on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sadeklab. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose @Sadeklab: Anybody can say this and we are unable to verify your identity on-wiki. In order to undelete these images, you need to follow COM:OTRS procedure. Ankry (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edward Tremethick.jpg

Reasons for undeletion is that the image is an self-portrait of my own work. --Edward Tremethick (talk) 04:19, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - 1) The image was previously published here and thus requires evidence of permission to be submitted using the COM:OTRS process and 2) copyright is generally held by the author (e.g., photographer), not by the subject. The latter would hold copyright only if formally transferred by a written conveyance. The aforementioned evidence of permission would need to be in the form of a copy of that document or direct correspondence by the author. Эlcobbola talk 18:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Phanfone PSWS Map.png

The map of the Philippines has nothing to be copyrighted --219.78.190.142 09:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - Maps explicitly receive protection in the Philippines (" Literary and artistic works [..] are [...] protected from the moment of their creation and shall include in particular: [...] Illustrations, maps, plans, sketches, charts and three-dimensional works relative to geography, topography, architecture or science" [13]) and there's no reason on offer this map would be below TOO or otherwise have "nothing to be copyrighted." Эlcobbola talk 17:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Artistwajidkhanart.jpg

When I published this image, I talked to Wikipedia and after few mails, they have approved this image, why this image deleted now?

I don't think I violate any Wikipedia policy by published this image. Would like to request undeletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjaysharma5882 (talk • contribs)

  •   Oppose - The relevant ticket is OTRS 2020020810000854, and it has not been approved. As has already been explained in the ticket: copyright is generally held by the author (e.g., photographer), not by the subject. The latter would hold copyright only if formally transferred by a written conveyance. For that reason we cannot accept "permission" from a subject when it does not include evidence of such a transfer (e.g., a scan of the related document). Эlcobbola talk 18:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Insufficient permission per Ticket:2020020810000854. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Inordinately excited to have had a haircut, following a six-month hiatus, on 10 July 2020.jpg

Undeletion request will not go through without a comment. Image was deleted because this rule <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#in_use> was ignored by Valeria Domínguez Arbil44 (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  Comment Valeria Dominguez it's not able to delete a file, and file was already deleted when Valeria Dominguez told you to request the undeletion here, so... --Ganímedes (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Ganímedes, yes, Arbil44 is mistaken about who deleted the image. However, it was deleted due to lack of permission, which has now been provided to OTRS, and the response from OTRS was to request undeletion here. Is there any remaining reason to keep it deleted? Cordless Larry (talk) 12:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
It's OTRS ticket 2020100510011234, Nat. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Please read DR again: file was never deleted because of lack of permission. --Ganímedes (talk) 17:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
The nomination was "Obviously not a selfie, if this is uploader, it's not own work". If that's not lack of permission, what is it? Cordless Larry (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
The nomination by Ellin Beltz was indeed for permission/copyright concerns alone ("Obviously not a selfie, if this is uploader, it's not own work"); Gbawden gave the additional reason "Commons is not a photo album" when deleting. But as a small number of personal images for user pages is allowed, and there's a permission now, I think we could restore that image. What do you think, Ellin and Gbawden? Gestumblindi (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
It was in use on Arbil44's user page in English Wikipedia (CommonsDelinker removed it after deletion); IMO acceptable per "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project". I can't comment on the validity (or lack thereof) of the OTRS permission, as I'm not an OTRS agent. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Gestumblindi: I don't disagree with the file's scope status (and my previous statement does incline to agree that it was in scope). My issue is with the permission sent to OTRS, which is insufficient (and I am stating this as someone who is an OTRS agent). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  • If OTRS is insufficient, I cannot support restoration. This was one of a group of private images, by a variety of photographers, all uploaded by one user who felt it was OK to claim "own work" when many of them - this included - were obviously not own work. As for scope of having a large private photo album hosted on Commons, I agree that Commons is not a private photo album, but I also agree that a certain number of images of the uploader may be kept because everyone has to have their faces all over the internet for reasons of vanity and because "everyone else does it". As you know, Commons permits that. However, without actual permission on the image, scope is irrelevant. Please ping me should anything change. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, all. I've provided Arbil44 with instructions on how the copyright holder can provide permission via OTRS directly, and hope this works. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Nat, I believe that OTRS ticket 2020100610014739 contains the appropriate permission from the photographer. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Or OTRS ticket 2020100610014944, which covers several other images too. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
i'm in hospital tomorrow so may get no further opportunity to say that my asgill road trip changed 233 years of incorrectly recorded history. i'd call that something to be deeply proud of - so i find the word 'vanity' most offensive. i look forward to seeing my haircut image restored too. i will be 76 years old next week and all this is making me feel even more ill Arbil44 (talk) 21:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done:   per Ticket:2020100610014944. Sufficient permission has been received by OTRS. @Arbil44: FYI. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

thank you nat. i only logged in now to see the latest update, but had intended to say that in our marriage vows we promised that what we own would be jointly owned - so it never in a million years occurred to me that it was not 'my own work' when my camera was used and my husband pressed the button. I did not appreciate the implication of lying attributed to me by Ellin Beltz. i'm not the teeny-bopper selfie-lover she appears to think i am. perhaps lessons can be learned from this? Arbil44 (talk) 01:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Courtesy Pinging @Ellin Beltz (Sorry I did not see your note about pinging you until just now) --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kurs szycia dla jazydzkich kobiet wyzwolonych z rąk ISIS.png

Hello. I'm a vice president of Orla Straż - Eaglewatch Foundation (english name added in wiki article). I created an article on wikipedia about Orla Straż (eng. Eaglewatch). One of wiki administrator deleted our photo (name of the file in the tittle). We have full rights to this photo, it's also watermark on it if I remember (Eaglewatch/ FPD/ Tora 2018 - it's name of foundation and name of our volunteer who made that). Here I'm adding link where the same photo is publiced: https://www.orlastraz.org/en/project/occupational-therapies/

I would like to have the photo restored Best regards--Orlastraz (talk) 01:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close: Restored by @Fitindia: per Ticket:2020100710008717. --Эlcobbola talk 15:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Red Fort -Delhi -Delhi -SSI 022.jpg

Reasons for undeletion is that I mistakenly request for deletion. The file is totally ok.

--Syed07 (talk) 07:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close: Image has not been deleted. @Syed07: I will close the DR for you, but in the future comments related to not yet deleted images do not belong at UDR. --Эlcobbola talk 15:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Carlo Semenza, Neuropsychologist and Cognitive Neuroscientist.jpg

This is to request undeletion of the file whose title is in the header. I am the photographer who took this picture. I forgot to include the license (that will be CC 4.0 Share-Alike).

--Giorgio.arcara (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - This was not deleted for having no license (it had a CC-by-SA license); it was deleted for lack of permission. This appears to be a selfie by a person (Carlo Semenza) who is not you (Giorgio.arcara) and thus we have no evidence that you have permission to license this image. Carlo Semenza will need to provide permission directly (i.e., not forwarded) using the process at COM:OTRS. Эlcobbola talk 15:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Le voyage pour profession.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per OTRS 2020100710004579 kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 10:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - This is in no way an adequate ticket. 1) The ticket, at best, would apply to the newsprint, not to the prominent image which is explicitly credited separately (there is no permission from the photographer) and 2) permission needs to come from a principle, executive, director ,etc. (however stylized at this organisation). Merely being an employee of an organization does not allow one to license its intellectual property; the multiple senders do not identify holding such authority and do not communicate in a manner suggesting the same. Эlcobbola talk

  Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request undeletion of File:Google_Tables_screenshot.png since it isn't under copyright

Hi there!

I'm the Product Manager at Google who works on Google Tables. We're trying to create a draft Google Tables article, and include a screenshot of the app just like you see in the Google Sheets article.

I believe that this particular image should be ok and would not be under copyright, since I created this using my own account, which any Google user in the U.S. can also do at this point in time (we are available in a public beta now).

Please let me know if this isn't the right way to do this, happy to try another route!

Carlinyuen (talk) 17:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Carlinyuen,
the entries in this table are real ones or fake/fantasy wrt to the address / job relation? WRT to authorization, please send an email from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org repeating what you wrote above. Your email will not be made public, but can be accessed only by our OTRS-volunteers, who are obliged to treat all correspondence confidential. After their go, your image will be un-deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Per Túrelio. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roobha .jpg

Hi,

The image is of the official poster of the film, and I hold the licence and copyright to the film, poster and all publicity material. The logos on the poster have been used with the express permission of the companies and the festival authorities.

The second image was taken by me on my camera and it is of a billboard of the film in downtown Toronto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweetmangotree (talk • contribs) 23:25, 7 October 2020‎ (UTC)


  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DragonGateLogo2020.jpg

At no point did I claim that logo as my own. I just thought I'd update the page with the current logo. It is my belief that this take down is unfair. --WildMIKE123 (talk) 00:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KrekoBelaeload.jpg hu:Krekó Béla (matematikus)

The application was submitted by Judit Krekó, the grandson of Béla Krekó, the photo was taken by his father, who died in 2013, so he is the heir. hu:Krekó Béla (matematikus) --SiposBéla1945 (talk) 10:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pablo Aragón in April 2017.jpg

Hi! This is a picture of myself, taken with my camera and owned by myself. As stated in my personal webpage, this picture is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license https://elaragon.net/landscape/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elaragon (talk • contribs) 13:23, 8 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  Oppose User photo of a user with an insignificant number of edits. Thuresson (talk) 16:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Thuresson. File qualified for speedy deletion under criterion F10. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bilder Thomaskirche innen mit Glasmalereien von Max von Mühlenen

Ich habe bei der art-nachlassstiftung und Prolitteris Team Art die Erlaubnis eingeholt den Kirchen Innenraum mit den Fenstern von Max von Mühlenen auf wikipedia veröffentlichen zu können die entsprechende Bewilligung liegt vor. Für mich ist diese Löschung unverständlich. Ich habe den Durchblick nicht an wenn ich diese Einwilligung senden soll. Vielleicht kann mir jemand weiterhelfen.

Prolitteris Definitive Genehmigung Bezugnehmend auf Ihre Anfrage freuen wir uns, Ihnen die definitive Genehmigung für folgende Verwendung/en erteilen zu können: Rabatt / Zuschlag Nr. Urheber Werk Dauer/Monate Die Rechteinhaber verzichten auf die ihnen zustehende Entschädigung Fenster der Thomaskirche 9999 Liebefeld, 1968/1969 1 VON MUEHLENEN MAX — Preceding unsigned comment added by KGBob (talk • contribs)

Hallo KGBob,
der Rechteinhaber (normalerweise der Künstler, nicht der Eigentümer) sollte die Einwilligung möglichst direkt (also selbst) an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org senden. Allerdings wird eine Einwillung (nur) "für wikipedia" nicht akzeptiert; vielmehr ist eine freie Lizenz nötig, die auch anderen eine Nutzungserlaubnis gibt; siehe COM:L. Das sollte man dem Rechteinhaber vorher klar kommunizieren, um Mißverständnisse und nachträglichen Ärger zu vermeiden. --Túrelio (talk) 14:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Túrelio --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vailoatai.jpg

Please reinstate and reupload the Vailoatai1.jpg file. It was deleted. The author of the picture sent his permission to your email address. See Ticket#2020081910010482 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faitasi37 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 8 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  Oppose When the permission is verified and accepted by an OTRS agent, the image will be undeleted. @Faitasi37: The OTRS agent's message dated 19 Aug 2020 22:29:16 +0000 is still unresponded. Ankry (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pablo Aragón in April 2017.jpg

Reopening the request (see the previous one), the user is involved in a project grant, it's for the report pages on Meta, see Community Health Metrics: Understanding Editor Drop-off/Profile. As stated in the original request, the original uploader is also the person appearing in the photo, the author of the photograph, the owner of the camera and the image is released under a CC-BY-SA license as stated on the authors personal webpage --CristianCantoro (talk) 13:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: @CristianCantoro: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

File:Krantikari Madari Pasi undelete.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pasi (Caste) Official (talk • contribs) 07:16, 9 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
I guess this section is about @Bhola89:'s File:Krantikari Madari Pasi.jpg? Well this file isn't deleted yet, so how can this be "undeleted"? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
or possibly File:Krantiveer Madari Pasi.jpg from Pasi (Caste) Official's deleted contrib. --Minoraxtalk 07:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: No rationale was provided as to why the deleted file should be restored. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Composteur ecovi web.jpg

Hi, we are a french company named ecovi and we are the one who created this picture. please undelete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecovi (talk • contribs) 12:37, 9 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Ecovi: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Punkadeka logo.png

Punkadeka logo.png Hi, I'm trying to upload the Punkadeka logo, an Italian webmagazine active for over 20 years. The logo was designed directly by me, with my handwriting (no font was used) is it possible to publish it? Thank you

Deka1974 ka Fabio De Capitani posta@punkadeka.it Deka74 (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: @Deka74: We need a valid permission from the magazine's contact email. Please send it to permissions-it wikimedia.org. Ruthven (msg) 20:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sofija Erdi.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per ticket:2020092010006125. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done @Bencemac: Ankry (talk) 16:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Le voyage pour profession.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per OTRS 2020091910004666 kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 17:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: @Kvardek du: Please proceed with adding the final OTRS template. --De728631 (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:VING_Organic_Vodka.jpg

Afternoon, please allow this image. I have copyright. FrankCarlotta1 (talk) 19:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Ankry (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:VING_Organic_Kale,_Lemon_Peel_and_Cucumber_Infused_Vodka.png

Hi, please undelete this photo. I have 100% copyright permissions.FrankCarlotta1 (talk) 19:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS.
@FrankCarlotta1: At upload you claimed that you are author of this label and its copyright holder. So what permission you are talking about? Note, that making false or incorrect statements, make your other declaration non-reliable and we may need evidence for everything you say. Ankry (talk) 20:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:(前編)バレッタ裕、五十嵐巧巳、五十嵐雅出演!「ぬまてれ☆」第8回【numan】.webm

I was provided archived source and license info. this is archved google cache page of the youtube source taken in 2019 (cc-by license), and it is the cc-license info screenshot taken from the html code of the source page please find this keyward "creative commons attribution license" search phrase (Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.) from the archived page: https://archive.vn/Uc9g5, an archive version of the original source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ROgQp33kNo. also, cc license is irrevocable, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Change-of-license/en Puramyun31 (talk) 19:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

@Shizhao, AntiCompositeNumber: any comment to the above? Ankry (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done: Per archived version. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

scrapdinero

good afternoon ,

Im sending this request because we are trying to establish a artist page for an up coming hiphop artist — Preceding unsigned comment added by SCRAP DINERO (talk • contribs) 21:23, 10 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  Info The only deleted contribution from this user is User:SCRAP DINERO. Thuresson (talk) 21:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Wikimedia Commons is not Wikipedia. Futhermore, the page was correctly deleted under speedy deletion criterion U3 as it was an inappropriate use of the user page. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chinatown Festival 2019-CMI97bccba6.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020071210002041 regarding File:Chinatown Festival 2019-CMI97bccba6.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done @Ganímedes: Please proceed. De728631 (talk) 14:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket:2020070110006129

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020070110006129 regarding File:ESCUDO SAN ADRIÁN DEL VALLE (LEÓN).png and File:Bandera San Adrián del Valle (León).png. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:53, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: @Ganímedes: Please proceed. --De728631 (talk) 14:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Goku i Geni Tortuga - 014.mp3

OTRS code #2020080410007577 and/or #2020090110004207. A second ticket was sent 7th october, so it should be confirmed soon.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 18:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


{{Not done}} @TaronjaSatsuma: I feel that there is a serious misunderstanding here. The customer seems to be just who recorded the Dragonball episode, but not the copyright holder. Ask them please if they hold the rights of Dragonball for Spain, but I feel that they do not hold anything. The most probable is that the rights were bought by the Catalan network/distributor at the time. If they hold the rights, we are still missing the second authorisation.
I think that all the file linked to ticket:2020090110004207 should be deleted for the same reason. --Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
The customer is the original dubber, and under Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996, the voice actors and actresses are the sole owners of the copyright of their own voice.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
@TaronjaSatsuma: They own copyright of their performance. But the MP3 is a DW of the text been spoken, which has a separate author and copyright. Your interpretation would suggest that anybody can record their reading of an arbitrary (copyrighted) book and sell the recording as their own audioook without the book author permission. This is not true. Ankry (talk) 14:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Reopening; this may need to be discussed. @Ruthven: Please, keep the standard 24h delay before closure. This time is intended for discussion. Ankry (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: I'm already discussing with Ruthven in order to have every permission clear. The text in the MP3 is a minimal portion of the original text, intended to be non-eligible for copyright. An audiobooks lasts for hours, those files for seconds.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 18:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: @Ankry: We're exchanging over email on OTRS permission. Once we'll end the checks of the various authorisations, TaronjaSatsuma can ask an undeletion on those files to me directly. That's why we can close the request. Cheers. Ruthven (msg) 17:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DAMETO.jpg

The file File:DAMETO.jpg was created by me through a PAINT suported SW and based on the indications provided by the reference quoted on the article marquesado de Bellpuig that states as follows (in spanish)

Armas de Dameto: escudo partido perpendicularmente: el costado derecho de plata, y el izquierdo encarnado.

  • apellido=Cervantes Saavedra | nombre=Miguel de | título=Don Quijote de la Mancha | editorial=Editorial Castalia, S.A. | editor=Sevilla Arroyo, Florencio | ubicación=Madrid | año=1999 | isbn=9788470398131 | páginas=729-741

For all the above I request the UNELATION of the file File:DAMETO.jpg

--7cinco11 (talk) 07:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Question @7cinco11: How did you create the image? (What tachnique / software did you use to create it?) Ankry (talk) 13:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Ankry: I used PAINT which is a standard software available both on IOS and Windows. The process I followed was farily straight forward as well by breaking in half a shield and colouring one side in red. Very easy. Then I added the cross of Santiago since the first title holder of the marquesado de Bellpuig, Albertin Dameto y Cotoner, was a knight of Santiago. I trust this clarifies further. Best, --7cinco11 (talk) 16:23, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
    • This image does not look like an image made in Paint from scratch (IMO it looks like a scanned low-quality image, but another opinion is welcome here). I also think, that if this CoA is really needed, then it is better to make another, higher quality image (maybe even a SVG one) instead of undeleting this one. But I do non oppose undeletion; I am   Neutral about it. Ankry (talk) 16:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose I found four shields like this one in Category:Party per pale gules and argent so it is not necessary with a low quality fifth version in JPEG. Thuresson (talk) 17:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 16:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:East of the Cornmill at the Knightshow 2020.jpg

File:East of the Cornmill at the Knightshow 2020.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

== [[:File:Example.jpg]] ==

Don't cancel this file, it is appropriate for the draft page that will soon be uploaded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoppinghat (talk • contribs) 08:01, 10 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  Oppose No notability evidence provided. @Hoppinghat: You need to ensure that your draft has been accepted or you need to provide another notability evidence before you request undeletion. Ankry (talk) 17:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Portada_Catálogo_Exposición_Paco_Puertas-_Madrid,1985.jpg

File:Portada_Catálogo_Exposición_Paco_Puertas-_Madrid,1985.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

==alt=|centro|miniaturadeimagen|396x396px|Portada del catálogo de la exposición de Paco Puertas, sala Verona (Madrid), 1985 (imagen: Lazarillo de Tormes) Esta imagen pertenece es de la lámina original del pintor Paco Puertas que se usó para la portada del catálogo de la exposición de 1985 en la sala Verona de Madrid. La imagen está tomada del cuadro enmarcado perteneciente a la colección de la familia del autor.==

--Satreup (talk) 11:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done as per Nat. Ankry (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dariusz-Milczarek.jpg

The photo is my own creation and I have full copyrights to the photo. Kinga Trzepla --Kintrz (talk) 11:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Pinging @Masur for comment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support if no evidence of earlier publication is provided. I cannot find any. Ankry (talk) 14:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I also didn't find any, using reverse image search of google, yandex, tineye, bing and sogou. --Achim (talk) 19:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KacemElGhazzali EnsafHaidar n.jpg

The file (picture) was declared as creative commons by the author of the photo: https://www.facebook.com/KacemOfficialPage/photos/a.334279989941584/1462499367119635/?type=3 --Cyberdissidents (talk) 12:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done as per Nat. Ankry (talk) 17:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paolo Borchia4.jpg

The file has no Copyright holder © 2017 Marco Castelletti, the photo is my work among other things, it was taken in 2020 not in 2017. Please restore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superlor (talk • contribs) 11 October 2020, 11:34 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • The image contains the following information in metadata:
Creator   MARCO CASTELLETTI.
Rights    ©2017 Marco Castelletti
and no other information in EXIF. If this is not true, you need to follow COM:OTRS instructions, provide explanation how this information appeared in your image ans provide the original version of your photo to prove your authorship. Ankry (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Петр.Шкуматов.jpg

Файл удалили потому, что там отсутствовал EXIF и разрешение было небольшим. Но это кроп. Понятно, что я специальноу меньшил разрешение. Вот оригинал https://yadi.sk/i/Ftik8krJ12et0Q ПРошу файл восстановить и отменить предупреждение, оно последнее для моего аккаунта. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petunder (talk • contribs) 11 October 2020, 13:08 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • This image is also low-res (1Mpx) and also has no EXIF. Please note, that for images that already appeared in Internet without evidence of free license COM:OTRS permission is required. You were notified of the procedure on your talk page. Ankry (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ActaPintériana.jpg

Dear Editors,

I'm Veronika Kámán, one of the editors of the periodical Acta Pintériana. I failed to upload the logo of the periodical on Wikimedia Commons, even though we own the copyright of the logo - now I'm a bit clueless what to do. The logo was created for the periodical by András Wolsky, a Hungarian fine artist (https://www.wolsky.hu/). We'd be happy to share this logo on Wikimedia - I'd be grateful for any help.

Kind regards, Veronika Kámán (Kamanvera on Wikipedia)

--Kamanvera (talk) 17:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

@Kamanvera: No such file. Maybe, you mean File:Acta Pintériana logo.png?
Unfortunately, we cannot verify your declarations on-wiki. If a free license evidence cannot be provided basing on public records, the COM:OTRS is the right procedure. Ankry (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: Yep, that's it, bad citation, File:Acta Pintériana logo.png was what I meant. Meanwhile I found out that "Non-free content must be a work which has been published or publicly displayed outside Wikipedia by (or with permission from) the copyright holder, or a derivative of such a work created by a Wikipedia editor." In my view it's true for us as it's publicly displayed also on the website of Acta Pintériana. Do I got it right?--Kamanvera (talk) 19:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
@Kamanvera: Non-free content cannot be hosted in Wikimedia Commons. It may be uploaded locally to Wikipedia, if local Wikipedia policy accepts Fair Use content. Some Wikipedias(like English one) accept this policy, some do not. Ankry (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: @Kamanvera: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:26, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Danevirke-udstillingen.jpg undelete

The image in question is NOT taken from the mentioned website (which by the way is my website), but from my hard disk, as I am the director of the museum in question and thus in the possession of all according rights. Best regards, Lars Erik Bethge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leb1970 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 11 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Ankry (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:20180305TR026 web.jpg

And also:

The image in question is NOT taken from the mentioned website (which by the way is my website), but from my hard disk, as I am the director of the museum in question and thus in the possession of all according rights for these images. Best regards, Lars Erik Bethge --Leb1970 (talk) 18:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

In order to undelete the photo the copyright holder(s) who owns copyright to the photo as well as to the presented works need to provide a free license via e-mail following COM:OTRS instructions. We cannot verify your identity on-wiki nor we can verify that you are the copyright holder or a person authorized to represent them (if the copyright holder is not a person). Ankry (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Danevirke-udstillingen.jpg

The image in question is NOT taken from the mentioned website (which by the way is my website), but from my hard disk, as I am the director of the museum in question and thus in the possession of all according rights for these images. Best regards, Lars Erik Bethge --Leb1970 (talk) 18:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Procedural close, double request. Thuresson (talk) 19:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Satori Traders LLC Logo.png

I am the creator of this image, it is not something I found on the internet

Based on my understanding of the Wikimedia copyright guidelines the image is permissible

Because I am the creator and submitter of the image I did not think an email to OTRS was necessary

If an email to OTRS is needed, I can send it from satoritraders.com stating that I have permission to post the image

Please undelete this image

thank you --100acrewoods (talk) 00:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  • @100acrewoods: Unfortunately, as the image was first published elsewhere (here and here for example) with no evidence of a free licence, the copyright holder or an authorised officer must send permission under a free licence to OTRS or add a [14] notice to source website stating that the work is licenced under an acceptable free licence. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done: by Krd. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

All images under Category:Kyrgyz FOP cases

Commons:FOP Kyrgyzstan says the Central Asian nation, despite a former constituent republic of USSR, has now freedom of panorama (but for some reason FOP maps still mark it as "red"). After careful scrutiny of the statements at FOP Kyrgyzstan, I can assume it falls under "light green" group of countries. For this reason I am requesting the undeletion of all deleted images under Category:Kyrgyz FOP cases:

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: per Commons:FOP Kyrgyzstan. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:National Museum of Guyana (13655105515).jpg

File was deleted because Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Museum of Guyana (13655105515).jpg (no FoP in Guyana). But a recent visit at Commons:FOP Guyana shows the country now has FoP (this image should be eligible, if it is an architecture, a sculpture, or an applied art). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: per Commons:FOP Guyana. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:President Clinton and Prime Minister John Major of the United Kingdom deliver press statements.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Older file than the file it was redirected to, which should have been redirected to the older file. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 12:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: procedural close. This is not something to be processed at UDR. Pinging @Túrelio, JarrahTree FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Punkadeka logo.png

Hi, sorry for any inconvenience, I hope not to cause problems. I am the author of the logo and it is published on a site managed by me. To avoid misunderstandings I have changed on the site that the contents are published with https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en Explained in the footer and on the page https://www.punkadeka.it/policy-privacy I hope this will give me the opportunity to publish on wikimedia commons. thank you Deka74 (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tulum.ogg

I believe that it is likely that the file has been uploaded from Ian and Wendy site ( http://www.ianandwendy.com ) for which the user has OTRS permission. A little more care before deleting the files, please. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 11:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

There were some videos on that page earlier, so I tend to   Support undeletion and marking with {{Permission OTRS}} per AGF. Ankry (talk) 19:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done: per Ticket:2010051510039975. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UNES2020.png

Saludos

La imagen es de un twitter, pero la edite para quitarle las marcas de agua.

Mis disculpas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baron1993 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 12 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Google Translate: "The image is from a twitter, but I edited it to remove the watermarks."
Procedural close. File is not deleted as of 21:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Thuresson (talk) 21:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. User has been blocked. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IsidroRomero.jpg

Saludos cordiales,

No sabia que la imagen estaba en Internet, pero puedo buscar otra que no sea de fuentes de noticieros u otras

Gracias

  •   Oppose - This was not deleted when you posted here, but I've now deleted it as an unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO from social media--as you've acknowledged above/below. [15][16] Эlcobbola talk 21:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. User has been blocked. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rabascall.jpg

Saludos cordiales,

Encontrare una imagen reciente que vi de las redes sociales y hacer cambios para que no se violen los derechos.

Mis disculpas

  •   Oppose - This was not deleted when you posted here, but I've now deleted it as an unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO from social media--as you've acknowledged above/below. [17][18] Эlcobbola talk 21:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. User has been blocked. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MSalem.jpg

Saludos cordiales,

Que deberia de hacer en caso de que no encuentre mas fotos de este personaje, puedo citar

Mis disculpas

  •   Oppose - This was not deleted when you posted here, but I've now deleted it as an unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO from social media--as you've acknowledged above/below. [19][20] Эlcobbola talk 21:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. User has been blocked. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pierina2020.jpg

Saludos cordiales,

Encontrare una imagen reciente que vi de las redes sociales y hacer cambios para que no se violen los derechos.

Mis disculpas

  •   Oppose - This was not deleted when you posted here, but I've now deleted it as an unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO from social media--as you've acknowledged above/below. [21][22] Эlcobbola talk 21:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. User has been blocked. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rosemary Siemens performing at the Sistine Chapel on February 19, 2014 at The Vatican.jpg

Copyright permission was granted by both the artist depicted in this photo as well as the photographer on 2020-07-24 --JohnHill42 (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

@JohnHill42: No original photo with complete camera settings info has been provided in OTRS as requested. The ticket concening a published photo cannot be accepted without that. Ankry (talk) 19:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done The OTRS ticket is insufficient as now. Ankry (talk) 22:42, 13 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CVC Interview Rafik Hariri.jpg

Dear Sir or Madam, the above mentioned photo was taken by an assistant to Mr. Rafik Hariri on my request and with my camera to document the interview I did with Mr. Hariri. The rights are all mine. Please undelete the pic therefore. Thank you. Kind regards Christian Vogg. --Kaizen-ikigai (talk) 07:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose @Kaizen-ikigai: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Istanbul 2014 C-Vogg.jpg

Dear editors,

the above mentioned photo was taken with my smartphone on my request by an colleague during my presentation at a digital radio event in Istanbul in 2014; I was there on behalf of the European Broadcasting Union to lobby for digital radio. The rights of this pic are all mine. Please undelete the file. Thank you.

Kind regards Christian Vogg --Kaizen-ikigai (talk) 07:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  • @Kaizen-ikigai: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr. Christian Vogg (2017).jpg

Dear editors,

for the above mentioned portrait photo of myself I have received permission by SRF (Swiss Radio and TV).

-by: Copyright SRF/Oscar Alessio -nc: non-commercial -nd: no derivative works

Permission was granted by Crevatin, Roberto (SRF) <Roberto.Crevatin@srf.ch>, Head of Photo-Lab SRF.

Please undelete the requested file.

Thank you.

Kind regards Christian Vogg. --Kaizen-ikigai (talk) 09:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Comment I think it's best to follow COM:OTRS, but only after they will agree to drop Non-Commercial and Non-Derivative limitations, otherwise it is in the direct contradiction with COM:L. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 09:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done a free license and OTRS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 22:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Qjob logo.webp

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A letter from the copyright owner was sent today at 17:14 UTC +2 to permissions-hu@wikimedia.org upon the copyright permission. I have the copy of the letter, too. If I am not mistaken today wasn't the last day for the permission to be sent (today was the 6th day), so the file was deleted too early. Even more, the banner "the file will be deleted soon" and the deletion of the file happened in the same minute, I wasn't even given the time to "ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk" as mentioned in the banner. At about 18:00 I was going to put out the OTRS pending template and got such an unpleasant surprise.
I kindly ask to undo the deletion of the file. Wikicim (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose This is ticket:2020101210010767 and we need to wait for a Hungarian OTRS agent to verify it. My first impression is that this is not a valid permission, however. Ankry (talk) 19:26, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: Thank you for your answer! Can anybody say why was the file deleted before the seven days had expired? Wikicim (talk) 21:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Because the uploader did not even try to provide the missing information about licensing even though they knew that it is missing. We cannot host images without a license. Ankry (talk) 22:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: As to me, it is not fair to put out the OTRS pending template before the letter from the copyright owner is sent. I was waiting for the copyright owner to send the letter. It was the seven days banner what had misinformated the copyright owner. When the letter was sent at last, I tried to open the file page almost immediately, but it was deleted two hours before, without any respect to the 7 days "agreement". Nobody awaits that Commons should "host images without a license" after those 7 days had expired. But why was the file deleted before the day which was officially pointed out as deadline?? The problem message stated that the deadine was 7 days after October 7. That should have been today, October 14. And the file was deleted on October 12. Wikicim (talk) 09:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Abdulrahman Alanesi 2020.jpg

الأخ علاء هل يمكنني معرفة سبب حذف هذا الملف؟ Marwan2050 (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Marwan2050: Personal images of non-notable people are out of COM:SCOPE. Ankry (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Leyenda de Cantuña.jpg

El motivo es que este archivo esta en dominio publico no hay autor preciso. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonard velas (talk • contribs) 17:23, 13 October 2020‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. File is not deleted as per 18:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Thuresson (talk) 18:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Holly O'Brien performing at The Triad Theatre in New York City.jpg)

Hi Wikimedia Commons,

I took the photo File:Holly O'Brien performing at The Triad Theatre in New York City.jpg) and am the owner of the copyright. I just logged in after awhile and saw that there was a message "This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license". I am the copyright holder and can send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) etc. Thank you. Please advise. --Theatreguru11 (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: @Theatreguru11: Please send permission to OTRS. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrew Albicy Crédit photo Julien Bacot.jpg File:EDF Diandra - Crédit Julien Bacot.jpg

Hello,

I request the undeletion of these two files : EDF Diandra - Crédit Julien Bacot.jpg and Andrew Albicy Crédit photo Julien Bacot.jpg.

The author of these two pictures released the copyright for these pictures. He just sent two emails to permissions-fr@wikimedia.org concerning these pictures.

For Andrew Albicy Crédit photo Julien Bacot.jpg :

De : [redacted] À : permissions-fr@wikimedia.org <permissions-fr@wikimedia.org> Date : mercredi 14 octobre 2020 à 11:56 +0200 Objet : Autorisation wikipedia Andrew Albicy


Bonjour,

Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif des droits d'auteur attachés à l'œuvre publiée à l'adresse https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Albicy#/media/Fichier:Andrew_Albicy_Cr%C3%A9dit_photo_Julien_Bacot.jpg Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0.

Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre, y compris dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence.

Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées.

Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc.

Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.

14.10.2020 [redacted] https://fr.wikipedia.org

And for EDF Diandra - Crédit Julien Bacot.jpg

De : [redacted] À : permissions-fr@wikimedia.org <permissions-fr@wikimedia.org> Date : mercredi 14 octobre 2020 à 11:55 +0200 Objet : Autorisation Photo Page Diandra Tchatchouang


Bonjour,

Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif des droits d'auteur attachés à l'œuvre publiée à l'adresse https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diandra_Tchatchouang#/media/Fichier:EDF_Diandra_-_Cr%C3%A9dit_Julien_Bacot.jpg

Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0.

Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre, y compris dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence.

Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées.

Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierais pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc.

Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.

14.10.2020 [redacted] https://fr.wikipedia.org

Thanks, Valentin--Valentinwagner (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC) --Valentinwagner (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose This is not a request by an OTRS agent. Ankry (talk) 11:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: We cannot process permission here. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Abigail Hing Wen, speaking at Talks at Google, February 3, 2020.jpg

The permission to upload the photo stated in the subject was given on June 11, 2020. The permission email was sent to <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> by Bahwee Kimn <(Redacted)> with the subject line "Permission for image upload".


--WanderingWatermelon (talk) 13:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: This is not the venue for submitting permissions. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Samin-Sharma.jpg

File is owned by Mount Sinai Hospital, Samin Sharma's employer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimededitor (talk • contribs) 18:47, 13 October 2020‎ (UTC)

So how did it came about that you claim to own the copyright? Thuresson (talk) 20:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose OP do not respond to a relevant question. Thuresson (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Who's next? Gun control now 01.png

This Image is a response to mass shootings and meant to support people in expressing a need for gun control to stop the violence. It is my original work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unjay (talk • contribs) 22:54, 13 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Unjay: Could you tell us how such a file would be in project scope? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Not done. No response from OP. Thuresson (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Guldasta Bengali Film Poster.jpg

I Would like to tell you, Guldasta film will be released on 21st October, 2020. Film Produced by Roop Production & Entertainment. Here We saw that someone create Guldasta Film wikipedia and added wrong Movie poster. So thats why We want to change this image. I don't understand why our poster was deleted by Wikipedia. Please undelete this poster, Its actual poster on this film.. ReshmiBhattacharya (talk) 05:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: per above. Exact same file available under a fair use rationale over at English Wikipedia. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Who's next? Gun control now 01.png

This image is my own original work. It represents a response to mass shootings around the world. I hope it supports people in expressing a need for gun control to stop the violence. --Unjay (talk) 07:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

@Unjay: This is unrelated to the deletion reason provided in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Who's next? Gun control now 01.png. Why the image is in COM:SCOPE? Ankry (talk) 11:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Procedural close. Duplicate request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BBC 1 'Big In India'.jpg

Hi,

This is the only known image of Jayce Lewis first show. The Photographer (Kapil Rajwani) took this image and granted me all rights to it in 2010. The image and article it was contained within have long been removed.

I believe this is of great importance for historic and important information of the artist.

Many thanks

Scott (Devfirewiki (talk) 07:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC))

  Oppose @Devfirewiki: The photographer could not grant you the right to claim authorship: authorship is not transferrable. Depending on exact text of the contract between you and the photographer a written free license permission should to be emailed by one of you following COM:OTRS instructions in order to undelete the photo. Ankry (talk) 11:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eeopejbgmcepppha.jpg

Good evening, I would like to request the above mentioned file to be undeleted, as the picture was sent to me by Dr Jon Dron himself where he gave me permission to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by STNMGill (talk • contribs) 22:20, 14 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •   Oppose @STNMGill: (1) The work was published elsewhere first with no evidence of a free licence, (2) admitted not own work as claimed at time of upload, (3) even if Jon Dron provided you the photo, the question of who is the photographer remains, as he is the subject of the photo. If it is a self-portrait then he is the copyright holder. If it is not, and someone else took the photo then he is not the copyright holder, unless the copyright was transferred in writing and signed. In any case, for the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: @STNMGill: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Syriac Church

  1. File:Divine litugury jacobite.jpg
  2. File:Jacobite Chapel Of Kadamattom Church.jpg
  3. File:Poyyedom church.jpg
  4. File:Patriarchal Centre.jpg
  5. File:Piravom Jacobite Church.jpg
  6. File:Malecruz dayaro.jpg
  7. File:Holy Altar Kundara.JPG
  8. File:JSC Kundara.JPG

Used by Sony Digital Camera

  1. File:Tomb of saint elias.JPG
  2. File:Manjanikara Dayara.JPG
  3. File:Tomb of saint elias.JPG
  4. File:Manjanikara Dayara.JPG

These pictures don't have any illegal copyright violation, uploaded by mine, used by Nikon D5100, Sony Digital, then undelete this pictures and remove delete nominations. Eldhose (talk)


  Not done: Procedural close. Images have not been deleted @Eldhorajan92: Please address your concerns in the deletion discussion, and not here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Codelerade.jpg

== [[:File:Example.jpg]] ==

{{PAGENAME}}Codelerade {{NAMESPACE}}Bheshraj Neupane


Bheshraj Neupane (born March 16, 2004), known professionally as Codelerade, is an Nepali singer, songwriter, from Nepal, Kathmandu. Codelerade debut album, Back In My Life(Instrumental), was released in 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codelerade (talk • contribs) 14:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

  Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted. @Codelerade: Please address your concerns / comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Codelerade.jpg. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Jasonpaas

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I created and uploaded these collage images in order to provide image copyright information for the images used in an educational quiz on FunTrivia.com

Each of the combined images makes a compound word that was used in the quiz, which was geared for children. Here is the quiz for reference: https://www.funtrivia.com/trivia-quiz/ForChildren/Glittering-Compound-Words-401454.html Jasonpaas (talk) 22:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

@Scalvo98, Ruthven: Any comment? Ankry (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Commons is generally not a service for hosting images, but if educationally useful, they may be in COM:SCOPE.   Weak support Ankry (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: In this case, Commons is used exactly as an hosting website. I would not encourage this behaviour, unless the photos are used in some Wikimedia project. --Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
@Jasonpaas: Are the images useful for anything educational except your quiz? Ankry (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ankry: Unfortunately, no. I created the combined images specifically for that quiz and not for any other purpose. Jasonpaas (talk) 06:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. Files out of project scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Udalov1987.jpg

The file was initially uploaded by me to wikimedia, with all liecences. Late on it was copied on many other pages in the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitic (talk • contribs) 22:55, 12 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Mitic: Who is the photographer of this image, and by which reason you are the copyright holder as claimed? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I am the photographer and the editor of this image back in 1987. I still have the original. I edited the background to be used in wikimedia and cropped other people who were on the image. --Mitic (talk) 08:28, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - Notwithstanding this was an out-of-process recreation of File:Udalov Yuri 1987.jpg, a genuine photographer would be expected to have initially uploaded, or to offer now, a full version of the image (i.e., uncropped) and/or, more importantly, without the amateurishly photoshopped and thus marred background. One notes the uploader also claimed themselves to be the author of an image of this person dated 1943, File:Udalov Yuri 1943.jpg. With the charitable assumption they were only 18 at the time (i.e., born 1925), that would make them 95 now (2020-1925). I find that entirely implausible, especially given the other demonstrably false authorship claims in their deleted contribs (e.g., File:Berberova.JPG). Uploader, at best, appears to have a profound misunderstanding of COM:DWs. This is a textbook book COM:RPP issue. Эlcobbola talk 14:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

{{Not done}}: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Elcobbola File:Udalov Yuri 1943.jpg I made a photo picture of the original photo of Yuri Udalov at local exhibition on WWII veterans. Thus I claimed it was my picture. If needed I can present you the original picture of File:Udalov Yuri 1987.jpg but there're other people who are still alive and who probably don't want to be published in the internet without their concent. Please, help me to restore the truth--Mitic (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

If a concern in my previous comments was not clear, I'll try again: I find your credibility with regard to authorship claims to be utterly tarnished. Frankly, I would not believe even a full version of this image to be anything other than a scan of someone else's photograph. In additional to the blatantly false authorship claims I previously noted, looking in only your undeleted 2010 uploads, there are at least four different camera types (DSC-W120, Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL, E3200, Canon PowerShot A550). This is generally a red flag. Taking, again, only your undeleted images, the source/authorship claims for File:Apraksin Vasily Ivanovich 1788-1822.jpg, File:Luis-Philipp Marquis de Vaudreuil.JPG, and File:N-s-volkonskij.jpg are examples visible to all of aforementioned profound misunderstanding of COM:DWs. This is currently a significant COM:PRP issue and there is nothing to accomplish at UDR. Nothing short of a substantial period demonstrating a robust and unerring a) understanding of derivative works and b) truthfulness in authorship claims would, perhaps, restore that credibility. Эlcobbola talk 16:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Elcobbola and COM:PCP. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wefind.png

== Please undelete wefind.png ==

Please undelete the wefind.png file. Since it is our company logo and created by me. It is not copied from anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wefind.in (talk • contribs) 03:36, 13 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Wefind.in: Where is it intended to be used in Wikimedia? Ankry (talk) 22:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Info Wefind.in was soft blocked per COM:IU and may not respond (although they can certainly do so as an IP anon. user or under a new username). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Unclear how this file would be in project scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alden - AVELxALDEN Sept2019.jpg

Request to undelete this file, as this is the latest photo of Alden Richards also. Please advise what needs to be presented for this photo to be undeleted. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodvibes1234 (talk • contribs)

@Goodvibes1234: This photo was not deleted due to scope issues, but due to authorship / copyright doubts. If you are the photo author as you claimed, please follow COM:OTRS instructions and also provide an evidence of your authorship there. Alternatively, you can upload the original photo, directly from your camera, with complete camera settings in EXIF. Ankry (talk) 12:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Charlie Hulson Team New Balance London Marathon 2020.png

I have provided the relevant authority for unrestricted use of the image to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditorah20 (talk • contribs)

  Oppose @Wikieditorah20: The image will be undeleted after the permission is verified and accepted. Please note, that (a) we cannot accept forwarded permissions for legal reasons and (b) if the copyright holder of the photo is not the photographer, we need an evidence of copyright transfer. And such issues need to be resolved in OTRS not here. Ankry (talk) 11:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Webinar Room.jpg

Hello, I request the undeletion of this file. It's a screenshot from Livestorm's interface. I work at Livestorm as Brand Director and I'm responsible for the Wikipedia pages. Of course I own the rights on the use of these files. The same happens for the logo placed on the same page. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Livestorm?veaction=edit

Let me know if you need anything else in order to make it work. You can reach me at (Redacted)

Thanks in advance,

Have a nice day,

Romain Barbier — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romain Barbier (talk • contribs) 14:08, 15 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •   Oppose @Romain Barbier: As we cannot confirm your statements on this platform as a purely technical matter, please send an email, at best using this template, to OTRS at permissions-commons wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KABADADAARI FIRST LOOK.jpg

== [[:File:Kabadadaari first look.jpg]] ==

This is an original image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhananjayangovind (talk • contribs) 15:37, 15 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

  Not done: Request already previously rejected. @Dhananjayangovind: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. Pinging @Elcobbola FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PAA_Music_Launch.jpg

This is my work and was mistakenly uploaded instead of inserting it into an edit. However its been deleted but I am unable to retrieve and use it. It is a critical part of my edit.

  •   Oppose - Previously published here in 2016, where it is credited to Aneri Nihalani. Nihalani will need to provide permission using the COM:OTRS process. Эlcobbola talk 21:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:09, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nuri 2014-11-03 0000Z.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Isn't it a NASA or NOAA image? If yes then it should be in the Public Domain 116.48.198.152 07:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done: per {{PD-USGov-NOAA}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flyer Ramones Musical Gabba Gabba Hey!, Zürich 2005.jpg

This is a flyer for a musical I produced in 2005. I am the producer and the right holder of all artworks regarding the musical Benutzer:Schaeumer16.Oktober 2020, 09:41--Schaeumer (talk) 07:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose "The Ramones on the site of the original Cavern Club (the birthplace of the Beatles) in Liverpool, England, 19th May 1977." (link). "Photo by Ian Dickson." "Ian Dickson is one of the most notable rock photographers of the 1970s." (link). Thuresson (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Zend2020

== [[:File:GOK Ajayi]] ==

The image is from the personal collection of Mr Abimbola Babarinde who released to me.It does not have a copyright claim too.--Zend2020 (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

== [[:File:[[:File:Chief GOK Ajayi Sage, Legal Luminary and Advocate of Law.jpg]]) ==

Used with permission of creator as seen here https://web.facebook.com/groups/nigeriannostalgiaproject/search/?query=gok%20ajayi&epa=SEARCH_BOX — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zend2020 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 16 October 2020‎ (UTC)


  Not done: Insufficient permission per Ticket:2020101610011286. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AKANDE-Hon.-Mrs.-Justice-Inumidun (1).jpg

== [[:File:ExAKANDE-Hon.-Mrs.-Justice-Inumidun (1).jpg.ample.jpg]] ==

Hello, I have sent the permission obtained to use her image from her family estate. Thank you--Zend2020 (talk) 22:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose (1) Unless the copyright was transferred to the subject or her estate in writing and signed, the copyright holder is the person who took the photo, (2) Nyaknno Osso, the listed author, is the editor of the listed source, but is unlikely to the photographer -- the listed source is akin to an encyclopaedic entry. The photo, on closer examination, appears to be a scan from a printed source (book? pamphlet? document?), judging from the mirrored text in the background. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Insufficient permission per Ticket:2020101610015068. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roland St John wiki.jpg

== [[:File:Example.jpg]]There is no valid reason to delete the photo of Roland St John. It was provided by his family and is a standard photo uused ==

G — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mincht (talk • contribs) 09:23, 17 October 2020‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. Please address any concerns at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roland St John wiki.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Francisco_Lorenzo_2012_image.jpg

I was trying to clarify what license I could share this image and by what means I have the copyright exclusively for it, and I didn't see an email that was sent to me a few weeks ago that got lost in the shuffle.

I was given full rights to share this image under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license by Andrew Cordes, the photographer at the Gittings photo studio in Houston, TX where I went to get the photo taken for exactly this type of use. I have an email from Andrew stating that I have said permission.

I would just like to get the image un-deleted and reinstated as the profile picture for the article Francisco A. Lorenzo.

Tristatehero11 (talk) 01:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Question @Tristatehero11: Is there evidence of this licence publically available? Otherwise, the photographer will need to send permission to OTRS at permissions-commons wikimedia.org. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done as per Nat: OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gabba Gabba Hey Musical Cast.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the right holder of these photos I swear These are photos of a musical I produced Schaeumer (talk) 07:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  • @Schaeumer: Who is the photographer of these images? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose If you are not the photo author, you always need to provide a free license evidence (eg. e link to a website where the license has been granted) or follow COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. If you are the photographer, please send permission to OTRS at permissions-commons wikimedia.org. However if you are not the photographer (as under German federal law, copyright cannot be transferred), please have them send permission to OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Full Moon (1291473462).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Disagree with that this file is without COM:EDUSE A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose The original is here. I don't see that this photo brings anything unique to the already existing +1200 photos in Category:Sky with the Moon. Thuresson (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done as per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 17:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amanat Ali Coke Studio.png

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020101410004896 regarding File:Amanat Ali Coke Studio.png. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 09:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 12:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG

  1. File:Australian Aboriginal flag cropped from trades.JPG
  2. File:Entering Old Junee.jpg
  3. File:Flexity tram with Adelaide Fringe advert, Victoria Square, 19 Dec 2018 (Henk Graalman).jpg
  4. File:Link (The Legend of Zelda) - graffiti in Melbourne (croped).jpg
  5. File:National Australia Bank - Yass NSW (5623698548).jpg
  6. File:Painting of Tower-1+ (150849052).jpg
  7. File:Q150 surveying memorial, Calliope River Historical Village, 2014 01.jpg
  8. File:Richlands railway station 16.jpg
  9. File:WTW NOV 2013 Lianna Henwood 016.JPG
  10. File:WTW NOV 2013 Lianna Henwood 017.JPG
  11. File:Yarralumla Primary School.jpg
  12. File:Zim-Zoom Cabaret.jpg

Different from UK (or other commonwealth that follows British copyright), {{FOP-Australia}} said that it includes the "artistic works", not just "works of artistic craftsmanship" --116.48.240.243 15:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Few doubts here:
  • (1) seems to be a symbol rather than painting or another artistic work
  • (3) the tram is not permanently placed in public, IMO
  • (5) & (7) contains text that I do not think the FoP exception applies to
  • I doubt whether the painting (6) and the poster (12) are permanently exposed; are they still there?
I see no issues about the other files, {{S}} undeletion of them. Ankry (talk) 08:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't think Australia has significantly different FoP rules than the UK. I think that section was changed by someone under a misunderstanding, who agreed that the changes needed to at least be partially rolled back, but never were. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:10, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Fixed in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Australia. Thanks, Carl for pointing this out. There is indeed the same wording in Australian copyright law. Ankry (talk) 08:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  Info @Clindberg, Ankry: I have found the related section of the Australian copyright rules, which stated that "The copyright in an artistic work is not infringed by the publication of a painting, drawing, engraving, photograph or cinematograph film". COM:FOP Australia was amended by User:Chris.sherlock in November 2019. I believed it is in good faith, as he has discussed it on the talk page.--A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
@A1Cafel: This not the whole sentence. Read, please, the second part ("if, by virtue of section 65, section 66 or section 67, the making of that painting, drawing, engraving, photograph or film did not constitute an infringement of the copyright") defining to which artistic works the section applies. More precisely, this section states that if you are allowed to make a photo, then you can also publish it. Ankry (talk) 11:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
@A1Cafel: Section 68 is only valid by virtue of the earlier sections, which restricts to the usual sculpture, work of artistic craftsmanship, etc. Sections 65, 66, and 67 say that copyright in those types is not infringed by the *making* of a derivative work when the underlying is permanently in a public place, and section 68 (the one you quoted) simply says that copyright is additionally not infringed when *publishing* such derivative works. They use "artistic works" as a catch-all since it's an additional rule for all three previous sections, but it's limited to the works where the *making* of the derivative work is also OK by virtue of one of the three previous sections.
Chris.sherlock's argument was that "works of artistic craftsmanship" was the same thing as all "artistic works", and he eventually agreed (in the discussion which followed his edits) that was not the case, but never came back to edit it. He was still arguing that murals counted as "works of artistic craftsmanship". The edits were in good faith certainly, but I believe were mistaken, and he did later agree that the edits should be rolled back to an extent, but never did. I believe Australia's law is now *exactly* the same as the UK, really. There had been a confusion about works which qualified both as paintings and works of artistic craftsmanship -- the UK allows them under the FoP clause, and Australia now does too, though the pre-2004 wording of Australia's law might not have. Australia's FoP section should be the same as the UK's. I put a lengthy post on the talk page there, but there was no further discussion at that point. I meant to change the edits back, but forgot about it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 12:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Марк Чеботарев

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am writing an article about my professor, Muryasov R.Z. These photos are from domestic archive. The article without photos is insufficient. Plese, give me opportunity to upload these photos so that I can supplement my wiki-article. Марк Чеботарев (talk) 08:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Why do you think that we will support you in violating copyright (which is a crime)? Ankry (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose As neither evidence of free license nor an evidence of copyright expiration is provided. The images were deleted due to copyright issues, not due to scope issues. Ankry (talk) 12:04, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done no evidence of free license provided. Ankry (talk) 12:53, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Web actual.jpg

The deleted file is my property, an image taken from my own website in its second version. I still have it in case you want to corroborate my property. http://sthwebsite.net/site2/home.html

  Oppose No evidence that the website content is under a free license. Eg. the twitter logo is definitely not. Ankry (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose I don't see any COM:EDUSE. --Achim (talk) 20:55, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Editura Gama logo.jpg

The copyright holder has submitted the required form to Wikipedia Permissions, per the instructions, allowing the Fair Use under Attribution License 4.0. I am therefore requesting undeletion of the file so it can be used on the page where it was originally uploaded.

A.C.C. Poet (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Info ticket:2020101610010205 Ankry (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done by Krd per OTRS. Ankry (talk) 12:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Memorial of saints killed in Sree Angan Massacre , Sree Sree Mahanam Angan, Kolkata.jpg

Please for fair use. Owner has no objection to use the photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neehar Haldar (talk • contribs) 04:52, 18 October 2020‎ (UTC)

Hi Neehar Haldar,
Fair use is not allowed on Commons. If your wikipedia has an exception for fair-use material, such as :en wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Non-free content), you need to upload it locally and provide a fair-use rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done as per Túrelio: no Fair Use on Commons. Ankry (talk) 12:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neplay.png

Hi, Neplay.png was granted a permission to be published in wikipedia pages. Please re-review your decision. Please reference to Ticket:2020090810005186

Thank you.

The ticket applies to File:NePlay.png and the file under consideretion seems to be a DW of this logo.   Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 08:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done as no copyright issues and nominated for deletion due to scope doubts. Ankry (talk) 12:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Бранислав Матић.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020101410013617 regarding File:Бранислав Матић.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

they are trying to delete my educational review withoput reading it

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ertidocles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luishernesto1221 (talk • contribs)


  Not done: This is Wikimedia Commons and not the Spanish Wikipedia. We cannot do anything about your article. Please request a review at es:Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de los bibliotecarios/Portal/Archivo/Solicitudes de restauración/Actual. --De728631 (talk) 23:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Catherine de Zegher portrait Photo by Craigie Horsfield.jpg

OTRS request - We need this image undeleted to continue processing OTRS ticket 2020101910008598. Thank you! Coffee // have a cup // 20:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


  Done @Coffee: Please proceed. De728631 (talk) 23:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yahyalı_köyü,_Şarkışla.png

It is my own work. I gave it for presentation / introduction of Yahyalı Village. But used for other purpose. In this site, the photo cropped (for backround photo, see below: "Edited version in the Web"). I have the uncropped (original) photo. Comparison: Example (bottom of the photo, houses)

Please open the two pictures abreast and compare:

  • Largest view that I have: [24] (newly uploaded by me to Wikimedia)
  • Edited version in Web: [25] (edited someone: color, contrast, brightness, dimensions. And cut photo.)

And the link says "sarkisla-kilickaya-baraji" (Dam of Şarkışla Kılıçkaya) but that is not. There is a no dam. And that place is not Kılıçkaya. Wrong knowledge, fake address... There is Yahyalı Village (right location). Also I did not violate copyright. On the contrary, my copyrights has been violated on this site --Buzancar (talk) 08:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close: Image is not deleted. Comments should be entered at the DR, which you created yourself,. --Эlcobbola talk 14:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Postcards from the early 1900s

I present these files depicting postcards from the early twentieth second that precede the First World War. knowing the era in which they were inserted, they should be licensed by PD-Italy

--37.183.21.140 20:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose created by abuser. If another user wishes to use them, they can reupload the images providing appropriate source / author / publication date information. Ankry (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  Comment Ankry but wouldn't it be more cautious to ask for a TEMPORARY RESTORATION just pending a future addition of information about the files?

since precisely because they are files loaded by an LTA it is precisely for that reason that you adopt the interim recovery is more suitable for those files there, so you can review the files in order to be able to "take them with pliers" always paying close attention obviously with the licenses--37.183.21.140 15:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Request by LTA. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Small-spartan.jpg

This image is of common use. It does not represent any form of hate or discrimination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobpick (talk • contribs) 00:33, 19 October 2020‎ (UTC)

If you are the image copyright holder as you claim, you need to follow COM:OTRS instructions for already used photos. If you are not, you need to ask the copyright holder to do so or provide a legal evidence that the image is not copyrighted (eg. anonymous and published before 1925, or made by a US government employee). Ankry (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  Not done Used on all sorts of web sites and have been published in books, but not simple enough not to be protected by copyright. Thuresson (talk) 22:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Representative Andy Whitt.jpg

Personally owned stock photo --Bamarep (talk) 01:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

See below. Ankry (talk) 12:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done No free license evidence; also it is a low-res version of File:Rep. Andy Whitt.jpg. Ankry (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

4A9A591D-988F-4F8C-8B23-25AEE504F2F6.jpeg

Andy Whitt Personally owned photo- no copyright --Bamarep (talk) 01:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bamarep: No such file. Maybe, you mean File:Rep. Andy Whitt.jpg? At upload you claimed that it is copyrighted, that you are the photographer, that copyright belongs to you and that anybody should attribute you as the author when using this photo. Can you provide rationale for your current statement? We cannot apply COM:AGF to users who provide contradicting information. Evidence is needed as per general copyright rule any photo is copyrighted (with limited exceptions). Ankry (talk) 12:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 12:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: No response and COM:OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

--Dato' Sri Dr. Sallehuddin bin Ishak (talk) 02:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

@Dato' Sri Dr. Sallehuddin bin Ishak: Do you mean File:Dato'sri.png? If so, and if you are the hotographer as you claim, then please, upload the original version directly from your camera. Otherwise, the actual copyright holder needs to follow the COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done unclear request. Likely OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Quadratic formula.pdf

Kindly see my request to review the deletation of my quadratic formula to your website as to my opinion is not against your project scope but in fact , it is proportional to your principle expression educational ( we also don't host content unless it is educational value ) first -

  • My content is providing knowledge of an alternative way of solving quadratic equation and it also provide with information and instruction on how to go about it
  • It is not a copy and paste of someone else's content but is a alternative way to solve quadratic formula that it is not in used by Mathematician at the moment
  • The only concert that was raised by Eugene Zelenko was that I didn't used the latex as it is used in most of the writing of formulas which I understand and admit and if is the an assistant from your side to convert my work to latex I would appreciate as I'm not familiar with that format — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndwandwe22 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 19 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  Not done as per Nat. Ankry (talk) 22:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cole Bennett interview June 5 2019.png

its not copyrighted its from a YouTube video and their videos aren't copyrighted

The YouTube channel is CUFBOYS I don't think they would care if it was on here therefore it is not copyrighted

--TeddyRoosevelt's Grand Dad (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC) 10/19/2020

  •   Oppose YouTube videos are automatically copyrighted without a notice being required. So they cannot be uploaded here unless the original video comes with a Creative Commons permission. This one does not have a free permission so it is "all rights reserved" by default. De728631 (talk) 23:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done as per De728631: no free license. Ankry (talk) 23:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Постер к фильму Мисс Американа.jp

This is a movie poster by Netflix and it free to use but was deleted for no reason. This file was already used on english wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Americana so why it can't be used here: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Мисс_Американа


  Not done: Procedural close. Duplicate request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RickCordeiro3.jpg

Request reason: Rick Cordeiro is a notable actor. It is no way to way these files are out of scope. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose @A1Cafel: The uploader Nhl4hamilton states that they are Rick Cordeiro on their userpage. But none of these images or photos of Rick Cordeiro uploaded by Nhl4hamilton are seemly selfies or self-portraits. Under Canadian federal copyright law, unless the copyright was transferred in writing and signed, the copyright holder is the photographer -- this includes commissioned work. OTRS may be required. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • The above is true for post-2012 Canadian photos. For earlier photos (these photos were uploaded in 2011) copyright belongs to the initial owner of the photo medium (film, memory card) unless a contract states otherwise. While this still may need OTRS, the photos were not deleted due to copyright issues, but due to COM:SCOPE issues. As the subject is notable, they are in scope and the deletion was unjustified. I   Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 11:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ankry. De728631 (talk) 20:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  Done per discussion: in scope. Feel free, however, to re-nominate for deletion with another rationale. Ankry (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Joe Kirby Reimagined.png

Undelete that,That is my Work since im Leogames2016 on Scratch LeoKids123 (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - This request isn't responsive to the reason for deletion. That notwithstanding, this is a derivative of the Kirby character. While you may have made certain contributions, they do not remove the original underlining expression (e.g., the vertically elongated eyes; the spherical body; the over-sized conical feet; the narrow oval "cheeks"; etc.) and thus do not remove the original copyright. As an alternative, even if it were entirely your expression, that wound render it mere fan art with no realistic educational purpose. Эlcobbola talk 16:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:St stefan grundriss.jpg

Deleted because no FOP (Commons:Deletion requests/Image:St stefan grundriss.jpg). But, {{FoP-Turkey}} (if ever this is exterior). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

This seems to be a printed plan of the church. Unclear where it was presented and whether FoP-Turkey applies to it. Pinging @Fragwürdig: the uploader if they are still around and if they wish this image to be undeleted. This deletion was a self-nomination by the uploader. Ankry (talk) 08:47, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose undeletion as deleted per uploader request. Anybody can upload this or similar photo if they are able to provide an evidence that FoP applies here. Ankry (talk) 22:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - {{FoP-Turkey}} applies to "Works of fine arts permanently placed"; as per above, this is a "printed plan" and does not appear permanently placed (and one wonders whether it would be considered "fine art".) Absent evidence that this is permanently affixed, there's no basis to believe this qualifies for FoP treatment. Эlcobbola talk 17:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pierre_Labat_en_SDF_.jpg

Comme indiqué lors du débat sur la page concernée, la photo prise par G Ferney au début des années 50a été mise en Créative Commons par son ayant droit unique (Christian Floquet). La suppresion de cette image s'apparente ainsi à une révocation de la licence libre à l'encontre de la philosophie et des principes meme de Wikipédia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayeul 75 (talk • contribs)

@Mayeul 75: Link to the free license publication or OTRS ticket number with the permission, please? Ankry (talk) 19:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

All details (including free license publication) were on the deleted file/page. So I cannot help you.--Mayeul 75 (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

There was no link to a freely licensed source site there. It is up to the uploader to provide evidence for copyright status. If the uploader is not the author, but the author's heir, they also need to follow COM:OTRS or provide another evidence that they own copyright. I see no such evidence and it is up to the requester to provide it. The uploader was Priad123456789. Moreover, in this case, the uploader claimed that they are the author (photographer) and this contradicts with the information that the author died in 1982. Ankry (talk) 12:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
We can undelete the photo in 2053 if no evidence of free license is provided before this date. Ankry (talk) 12:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done No evidence of free license; OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 20:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Irynarybakova93

== File:3агс.jpg ==

Reason: я є автором цієї світлини і можу надати RAW-файл чи факли, зроблені до і після Irynarybakova93 (talk) 15:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

== File:Репорт 19.jpg ==

Я являють автором цієї світлини і можу надати RAW файл.

== File:Колоннаввввввв.jpg ==

Я є автором цієї світлини і можу надати RAW файл

== File:Пппі.jpg ==

Reason: Я є автором цієї світлини і можу надати Raw-файл Irynarybakova93 (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

== File:Впост.jpg ==

Reason: File:Впост.jpg Irynarybakova93 (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Ankry (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2017 Chuck Mead photo.jpg

Hello, I am requesting an undeletion of the photo of Chuck Mead entitled Chuck Mead 2017.jpeg

I have attached written permission from the photographer to use. Please let me know if you need any further info.

--Moremarkable (talk) 17:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Comment from non-admin: @Moremarkanle:. I think there are two problems: 1) this should be attached on the electronic form through email (Commons:OTRS), and 2) that permission is still insufficient. It doesn't indicate free commercial use. Under Commons:Licensing, all media files in Commons must be freely usable as much as possible, including non-personal and commercial reuses and/or publications by anyone off-wiki. But since he permits use on Wikipedia, it should be reuploaded there (locally on English Wikipedia) and use w:Template:Do not move to Commons, under the reason that the copyright holder has allowed use on Wikipedia, but did not provide for permission for commercial reuses (a number 1 condition for files to be kept here on Commons). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - This is effectively forwarded permission, which we cannot accept. Joshua Black Wilkins will need to contact us directly using the email indicated here (i.e., one that is verifiable) through the process at COM:OTRS. That permission, further, must identify an explicit license and be applicable to everyone, not merely "anyone related, in business with, associated with and hired by [Chuck Mead]." En.wiki also has this requirement ("Note that images that are licensed for use only on Wikipedia [...] are unsuitable." (w:WP:IUP)), so the bizarre suggestion this be uploaded there instead should be disregarded. Эlcobbola talk 18:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
@Elcobbola: for a long time I thought Wikipedia can be a suitable place to host files that are not OK at Commons (including files not licensed for commercial use and all images of Philippine landmarks that are not allowed here because of no FoP in the Philippines). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Image link fixed. @JWilz12345: English Wikipedia Fair Use exception does not apply to photographs of living people. But I do not think that Commons is the right place to discuss this. Ankry (talk) 06:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done Needs appropriate OTRS permission. Ankry (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

University of Texas at San Antonio

File:Paseo at UTSA.jpg

This photo added was from the official university flickr account. I personally verified this information. The images were deleted with no real proof that it wasn't from a legitimate source.

File:Seb-exterior 2.png

Again: This photo added was from the official university flickr account. I personally verified this information. The images were deleted with no real proof that it wasn't from a legitimate source

File:UTSA Main Campus Entrance.jpg

Again: This photo added was from the official university flickr account. I personally verified this information. The images were deleted with no real proof that it wasn't from a legitimate source.

Discussion

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 189866422@N05.

  • @Beepbeep210: How did you verify that the Flickr account in question is officially linked to UTSA? As has been stated in the deletion discussion, this is somewhat doubtful. In such cases we usually need a verification by email from the involved organisation. De728631 (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Requestor would have us believe that this Flickr account is the official account of The University of Texas at San Antonio despite: a) being created August 2020; b) having only 11 photos; c) having 0 Followers; d) following 0 others; e) blatantly misrepresenting the photos of others to be their own; and, my favourite, misspelling their own name "Uinveristy of Texas at San Antonio" (!!!). This is transparent nonsense. Эlcobbola talk 16:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @De728631: I verified this by sending the university a message via e-mail. Those requesting to delete these photos never bothered to verify for themselves yet still linked the university communications website. Their email is listed near the bottom of their website: https://www.utsa.edu/ucm/ Beepbeep210 (talk)
  • @Elcobbola: Also to note, spelling a word wrong is not "proof" that a profile is illegitimate. Humans make mistakes. Beepbeep210 (talk)
    • Per our rules, those requesting to delete these photos were not required to prove that the Flickr profile is actually legitimate. Instead, as the uploader it would have been your task to provide verifiable evidence from the beginning, and in such cases we do not accept personal email contact. To undelete the images, a UTSA representative needs to send a verification email using the process at COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Humans do a great many things. Humans also lie, and lies are often betrayed by mistakes and inconsistencies. That notwithstanding, I've not called anything "proof"; I've given a number of red flags that, in aggregate, are significant doubt. Is there a particular reason you've not addressed any of the other concerns, or the optics of their combination in the context of your duty to provide appropriate evidence? Is there a reason you've not had the person at UTSA with whom you've purportedly spoken contact us directly? Эlcobbola talk 20:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  Not done Nothing substantially has changed since the deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 189866422@N05. Thuresson (talk) 17:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Viktoria-Forbes0.jpg

I own the rights to this. Please undelete!--Polariscapital (talk) 10:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - This is the cover of Forbes India. Previously published works (e.g., [26][27],[28], etc.) require additional evidence of permission to be summited using the COM:OTRS process. Эlcobbola talk 15:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done As per Эlcobbola: OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 20:04, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bros article 1990.jpg

Dear Wiki

I am the copyright holder of this work and it was created 17/9/1990 through my publication of magazines if you wish to contact me you can email duncana064@gmail.com, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ageorge789 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 20 October 2020‎ (UTC)

  •   Oppose - 1) This was an out-of-process recreation by a sock and 2) owning a tangible, physical copy of a magazine ("Upload images from my own personal collection" [29]) does not mean you own the intangible copyright(s) associated therewith. This is a mere scan of a magazine which you have no ability to license freely. The actual author/rightsholder, presumably the publisher, can provide permission using the process at COM:OTRS. Эlcobbola talk 16:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done per Эlcobbola. Ankry (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Maralou Gray - Against All Flags.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The reason for deletion by the administrator I don't believe is valid enough, the sources and photographer credits were provided. Most of these photos were taken prior to 1950, which I believe puts them in the public domain. Please advise. BioWriter818 (talk) 14:55, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - COM:EVID requires "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain." (underline added) For this image: a) you claimed the source to be "Maralou Gray," an 89-year-old actress who is the subject of the image (copyright is generally held by the author, photographer, or, in this case, the studio--not the mere subject); b) you gave the author as "unknown," (i.e., unknown to you personally, not necessarily to the world); c) you gave only the creation date (copyright term is generally based on date of author death or publication, not mere creation); and d) you applied a bogus cc-by-sa-3.0 license, which is not PD. No evidence--let alone appropriate evidence--was provided. The other files nominated with this one suffer the same infirmities. Эlcobbola talk 15:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done Evidence of PD status is needed, belief is not enough. Note: the copyright status for anonymous photos (is this one's author really unknown?) depend on publication country and publication date; this is irrelevant when the photo was made in most cases. Ankry (talk) 20:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Постер к фильму Мисс Американа.jpg

Это постер к фильму и его можно спокойно использовать в статье на Википедии JustElf13 (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - As you say, this is a movie poster. You yourself attributed it to Netflix. We do not accept non-free works and do not allow fair use. (Indeed, you uploaded this with the UploadWizard, the very first page of which is a giant licensing tutorial image which makes this quite clear, including in Russian.) Эlcobbola talk 16:34, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a poster of movie! I can use it on Wikipedia and as I want, omg, why moderators don't want to help to new members and just deleting everything??? You just want to get achievements on wikipedia or really help it? It was already used on English Wikipedia! Check Miss Americana, so why I can't use it on Russian Wikipedia? JustElf13 (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Dear Эlcobbola, please, just stop do it. You do not want to help Wikipedia, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustElf13 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 20 October 2020‎ (UTC)
COM:AGF, like my comment above and the numerous warnings on your talk page, appears yet another thing you've not read. Эlcobbola talk 16:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

This poster is free to use and I readed what you wrote to me. You doesn't give me an answer why it can be uploaded on English wikipedia and can't on Russian. And why? Because You don't care at all! You don't want to help Russian Wikipedia be better! JustElf13 (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC) I can't help with you, please, leave wikipedia forever and give your work to somebody who really cares about it and want to help JustElf13 (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

The English Wikipedia allows fair use of images that are otherwise copyrighted and non-free. However, at Commons all uploads must be free to use as declared by the copyright holder and not with a fair use rationale. So while the English Wikipedia often shows movie posters or album covers in the articles, such images usually cannot be transferred to Commons. De728631 (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done Copyrighted movie poster: no Fair Use on Commons. Ankry (talk) 20:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elena Rezanova.jpg

Dear Sirs, this photo was made by me, and I have all the authorship right to use it. All the websites use this photo with agreement from Elena Rezanova side, so you can find a hundred websites which are using it now. To prove that this photo was made by me i can provide you the date and camera type it has been made with, so I'd like to protect this photo for the Elena Rezanova page from further deletion.

Best regards, ~~ Roman Martsinkevich ~~

Anybody can say this. We need an evidence for your statement. Please, follow COM:OTRS instructions. This is needed for any photo that has already been published without a free license granted by the photographer. We cannot rely on on-wiki license declarations for published photos due to legal reasons. Ankry (talk) 19:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Among Us - Mira hq map.jpg The author of this image gave full permission to use his work.

The author of this image gave full permission to use his work.

  Oppose A permission to use is not the same as a permission to grant a license. We need either an evidence that the copyright to this work was transferred to you or a free license permission directly from the author. Both can be provided following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Billetes-BCU- (## de 126) copia.jpg

Banknote images taken from Banco Central del Uruguay website. Terms of Use, found here, state:

El usuario puede ver, trasladar a su computador, imprimir o reproducir total o parcialmente el material disponible en este Sitio, sin someterlo a modificaciones o alteraciones que impliquen menoscabo de su contenido, para uso personal, académico o de su organización, siempre que lleve a cabo tales operaciones sin fines de lucro y citando la fuente de la cual procede.

This allows to reproduce the material as long as it is not altered, not commercialised, and it is cited appropriately.

--Sebast732 (talk) 13:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Oppose That does not allow me to sell coffee cups with photos of these bills. See also COM:CUR#Uruguay Thuresson (talk) 16:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  Oppose Wikimedia Commons images must be free for comme=rcial use by anybody. The Bank permission does not allow for this. Ankry (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:אמיר איל.jpg

--Daniellag007 (talk) 13:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Hello, my name is Daniella from Infinity house of investment. this picture is ok fot use in Amir Ayal page. It photographed by Nofar Handelman and we paid her about this. please upload it again to the page. Thank you, Daniella Grumet

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Ankry (talk) 19:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gigi Hangach Singer.jpg

File:Gigi Hangach Singer.jpg Please do not delete the file. I am new to this. I am not familiar how to do the licensing. I am connected to this person and learned I can not do edits due to the fact I am her music manager and own her record label. Gigi owns the rites to this pic uploaded from her record label web page. https://www.rstelabel.com/gigi-hangach Thank you Philip H Taylor (talk) 15:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - After this file was deleted 04:36, 20 October 2020, you reuploaded it out-of-process as File:Gigi Hangach.webp at 11:40, 20 October 2020. In the reupload, you claimed it "a work by Taken by a fan and given to Gigi it is all over the internet." The fan would be expected to own the copyright, not Gigi Hangach. Hangach would own the copyright only if it had been formally transferred by a written conveyance; if such a document exists, it needs to be provided using the process at COM:OTRS. Please also see COM:PRP#5 and gratis versus libre. Эlcobbola talk 15:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:George A Danos, President of the Cyprus Space Exploration Organisation (CSEO).jpg

This file was deleted with explanation: non-free image of living person, fails WP:NFCC#1

I believe that this in not the case. WP:NFCC#1 states that a non-free image can be used if:

1) Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose.

Which is indeed the case. Therefore I understand that the image does not fail that condition, but meets the condition. If somehow I am miss-understanding the above regulation, can I please request for a clarification and temporary undeletion to properly discuss. Thank you.

Stellar77 (talk) 21:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


  Not done: Procedural close: This file was uploaded to, and deleted from, en.wiki. This is the Commons and we both cannot restore a file that was not hosted here and cannot accept fair use. These comments will need to be made there--see, for example, w:Wikipedia:Deletion review. --Эlcobbola talk 21:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

تAachener Dom[[Media:[[Category: Commons]]]]


  Not done: Procedural close. No request made. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fig_Phones_or_Fig_devices.jpg

This file is uploaded by user Knowkiri, and maliciously deleted by user Majora.

Kindly undelete this file (File:Fig_Phones_or_Fig_devices.jpg) as this file is original work contains hand drawings and original work has been maliciously deleted by user Majora (mailicious user who has inactivated the account after deleting the file)

Thanks.


  Not done: procedural close. duplicate request. --Ìch heiss Nat.