Open main menu

Contents

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Laudelino_Solano, Professional Bodyguard..jpgEdit

With all due respect, The person in the picture is a public figure and one of the best known professionals in the Security Industry in USA, and Central America. There is no any contradiction in the authorship of this article. This file is from my own authorship. I've made some changes to the content to update the information that appears there.

Please let me know what changes you should I do in this file to prevent it from being deleted.

Best Regards,

El Sabatino.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by El Sabatino (talk • contribs) 16:01, 31 January 2015‎ (UTC)
This place is for requesting undeletion of content that has been deleted. This file has not (yet) been deleted. The correct place to discuss this has been pointed out at your user talk page and on the file description page. LX (talk, contribs) 16:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Nothing deleted yet. Yann (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Laudelino Solano, celebrity bodyguard working in Guatemala..jpgEdit

With all due respect, The person in the picture is a public figure and one of the best known professionals in the Security Industry in USA, and Central America. There is no any contradiction in the authorship of this article. This file is from my own authorship. I've made some changes to the content to update the information that appears there.

Please let me know what changes should I do in this file to prevent it from being deleted.

Best Regards,

--El Sabatino (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

With all due respect, are you going to keep posting identical entries in the wrong place, or are you going to read what you've been told above, on your talk page, and on the file description pages? LX (talk, contribs) 16:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Nothing deleted yet. Yann (talk) 20:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Soviet Union 1969 CPA 3790 stamp (Head of Goddess Guanyin, Korea).jpgEdit

This file was deleted as a duplicate of the file file:The Soviet Union 1969 CPA 3790 stamp (Head of Goddess Guanyin, Korea).png in PNG-format. But it isn't exact copies or scaled-down, deleted file have another format JPEG. PNG- and JPEG-files aren't identical from the point of view of assignment: JPEG-files are more intended for use in Viki (they in miniatures are usually best of all displayed, is sharper), PNG-file as providing the best quality, - it is more for external users. --Matsievsky (talk) 10:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I have examined the deleted jpg files, compared them to their respective png versions, and found the png versions to be sharper and of superior quality. We have a policy regarding duplicates, and seeing how png and jpg files are raster images, there's literally no point in keeping a crap jpg version. -FASTILY 21:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support See COM:VP#Pngs and jpgs of the same images. And Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive#File:The Soviet Union 1969 CPA 3788 stamp (Turkmenian Drinking Horn).jpg. Fastily examine is a crap. --Matsievsky (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Ah, that makes a lot of sense, you want these files in the live database because you uploaded them and are keeping some silly imagined score of some sort. If you're going to make poor quality (crap) contributions, then don't get upset when somebody else comes along and makes a better version. This is a community wiki after all, and if you're going to foolishly insist ownership over everything you've uploaded, then perhaps you should consider leaving the project. -FASTILY 21:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Stop acting up and you don't judge on yourself. If I advanced my images, would upload PNG. --Matsievsky (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
@Fastily: Could you please clarify, which versions did you examine: those in full resolution, or the ~220px thumbnails generated from them (if there is such a possibility for deleted files)? Because the primary question is (see the linked discussion), whether the thumbnail would be sharper for jpg. If not (and you're sure of that), then yes, there's no need to restore the file... YLSS (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
And the policy you link to says: Care should be taken when the format is different: For example, it is common and useful to have both a PNG and JPEG of the same image, since (due to a long-standing issue with the thumbnailer), JPEGs thumbnail is better. However, JPEGs aren't lossless images, so progressive editing of a JPEG will destroy the quality, whereas a PNG does not have this problem. Hence, a PNG for (further?) editing, and a JPEG for display is often necessary. Is this one a different case? Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Correct, that is applicable to different formats of the same image; in this case, the jpg versions appear to be derived from a different, inferior source, and are of sub par quality when compared to the png versions. I've generated thumbnails for the jpg and png files and compiled the following table for comparison:
Name Original PNG Version Original JPG Version PNG Thumbnail (~250px) JPG Thumbnail (~250px)
The_Soviet_Union_1969_CPA_3790_stamp_(Head_of_Goddess_Guanyin,_Korea) here here ([1]) [2] [3]
The_Soviet_Union_1969_CPA_3791_stamp_(Bodhisattva_Statuette,_Tibet) here here ([4]) [5] [6]
The_Soviet_Union_1969_CPA_3792_stamp_(Ebisu_Statuette,_Japan) here here ([7]) [8] [9]
-FASTILY 21:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't see a difference in quality. Unless colors of PNG files burned out from time slightly more. Over time yellow and green shades usually turn pale and stamps become more blue. --Matsievsky (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Anyway deleted "duplicates", duplicates not being. --Matsievsky (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘

So, now is unquestionable same quality, cause they are the same image as I downloaded, compressed in high quality JPEG, and for the mentioned reasons, well know reasons, we can and we are encourage to keep png and jpegs... but, as they are not same image, as you said, deleted saying that they are same, is paradoxical, to not say you're lying for the community to do whatever you want. -- RTA 05:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

RTA, you upload these 3 JPEG files from PNG files. Do you know it's better? --Matsievsky (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Interesting... the JPG and PNG versions do not appear to be duplicates at all, but separate scans of different stamps (the printing offset is different between them, and the serrations are different, so they are not of the same physical stamp). The JPG versions seem to show the individual halftone dots; the PNG scans seem to more smear those areas into being a smoother solid color, yet have some odd pixelation in places, but are sharper in others. Is that indicative of a different printing process of the two stamps of the same design (one halftone one more inkjet-like), or just an artifact of the scanning process? Personally I actually prefer the JPG scans -- they seem more accurate to the actual source. But if the stamps were printed with different processes, it would definitely be good to have versions of both. Since they are not exact duplicates, they should not fall under the speedy deletion guidelines. At the very least they should go through regular deletion request to see what others think. I would strongly lean towards keeping both. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
In my opinion as philatelist PNG-stamps slightly faded. But such stamps too are important for show. Therefore I left PNG stamps and added new JPEG stamps which practically didn't fade. Question: in this case is it necessary to transfer PNG and JPEG formats to the same scan? --Matsievsky (talk) 18:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The files above are already undeleted. Anything more to do here? Yann (talk) 09:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Yann They was not undeleted actually... -- RTA 09:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
RTA, you upload these 3 JPEG files from PNG files 29.01.2015. For what? --Matsievsky (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
OK, I restored these. I think we can close this now. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
I think we should delete the newer .jpg uploads which basically are direct copies of the .pngs, and obscure the ones just restored. If someone thinks they are useful (I have my doubts) they could be uploaded with a different name. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 20:34, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
OK. Thank you very much. --Matsievsky (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored by Yann. INeverCry 08:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Glowing Lines.jpg, File:Rainbow Station.jpg and File:Van Gogh Fietspad.jpgEdit

File:Glowing Lines.jpg, File:Rainbow Station.jpg and File:Van Gogh Fietspad.jpg should not be deleted. They are photos I received from Daan Roosegaarde himself with permission to upload them to the Wikipedia page. There is no copyright breach, the photos are free of use.

Regards,

Charlotte de Mos Office Manager Studio Roosegaarde --2001:981:A147:1:FC7F:47FF:E49A:DBC8 11:36, 30 January 2015 (UTC) 30-01-2015

According to the deletion notes, the information in the images points to pimhendriksen.com. In any case, the true copyright owner (Daan Roosegaarde, Pim Hentriksenm, or whoever) has to send in an e-mail according to the instructions here. This serves to confirm the permission and to ensure that the owner understands what "free to use" really means. Anon124 (+2) ( ) 17:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agreed. "permission to upload them to the Wikipedia page" is insufficient -- we require a license to use the image anywhere for any purpose, including commercial use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission for sufficient free license from copyright holder/s required. INeverCry 08:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Extraordinary Ordinary Life Of José González.jpgEdit

Please undelete File:The Extraordinary Ordinary Life Of José González.jpg

I (Mikel Cee Karlsson) and our production company Plattform Produktion own all rights to this work and the film "The Extraordinary Ordinary Life Of José Gonzalez.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Plattformen (talk • contribs) 18:39, 30 January 2015‎ (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Since identity theft is common here and we do not know who User:Plattformen actually is, policy requires that an authorized official of the copyright owner send as free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 08:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Promethean-Logo RGB-BlackwFlame-0714.pngEdit

is the updated logo for Promethean World llc.

A correction is needed: It should be tagged as non-free logo | registered trademark = yes {Non-free logo|regtrademark=yes}

It should not be deleted –


This logo appears in Promethean Marketing collateral and in the corporate website. http://PrometheanWorld.com

The logo that currently appears as | company_logo = File:Proetheanlogo.png that currently appears on the Promethean World Wiki page [[10]] is the deprecated, outdated logo!

--Truemoss (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. If it should be tagged as a non-free logo, then it should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia Commons is a repository of free content. We do not host non-free content. Please read Commons:Project scope/Summary to learn the basics of what this project is all about. LX (talk, contribs) 16:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Commons doesn't allow non-free logos. In order to host this complex logo on Commons, we would have to have OTRS permission from the copyright holder (preferrably from an @PrometheanWorld.com email address) granting a free license. INeverCry 07:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sari draped girl students and teacher leaving their school in Bangalore, India (1944–1945). By John Gutmann.jpgEdit

File:Sari draped girl students and teacher leaving their school in Bangalore, India (1944–1945). By John Gutmann.jpg

Please see Terms & Conditions http://www.famsf.org/terms

2.The Materials are made available for limited non-commercial, educational, and personal use only, or for fair use as defined in the United States copyright laws. Users may download these files for their own use, subject to any additional terms or restrictions which may be applicable to the individual file or program. Users must, however, cite the author and source of the Materials as they would material from any printed work, and the citations should include the URL www.famsf.org.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by WestCoastMusketeer (talk • contribs) 04:06, 1 February 2015‎ (UTC)
Commons cannot accept files with a fair use rationale. They must be usable by everyone, for any use (including commercial). The above terms do not come close -- in fact they basically allow only what is automatically allowed by fair use, so they are basically completely copyrighted. See Commons:Licensing for the permissions which works must have in order to be hosted here. The deletion was appropriate. Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Unacceptable license restrictions. See COM:L for license guidelines. INeverCry 07:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Cool Clouds of Carina.jpgEdit

This file was deleted as a copyright violation (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Cool Clouds of Carina.jpg). Huntster said: As the two sources cannot be separated, this composite is non-free and should be deleted. But in metadata of this file you can see line Usage terms: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Metadata refer to the composition (full file), not to the ESO portion only. Otherwise it would be somehow specified in the Usage terms line. /St1995 17:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. It is not unreasonable to expect that whatever image editing system the ESO uses would automatically insert that copyright statement, since all ESO works are intended to be freely licensed. Further, ESO's copyright page says "Unless specifically noted", and I would consider a specific mention at the source of a copyright entity (NOAO/AURA/NSF in this case) to be such a specific note. Huntster (t @ c) 22:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
  • You don't right. "Image editing system" of the ESO wouldn't automatically insert the licence. For example: File:Gamma-ray burst buried in dust (artist’s impression).jpg (this file comes from ESO website, but credit is NAOJ). For this reason in metadata of this file no Usage terms line. /St1995 18:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment. NSF images in PD as a work of the U.S. federal government. See {{PD-USGov-NSF}} /St1995 13:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
    • Quoting per the fine text at the NOAO website: "NOAO is the national center for ground-based nighttime astronomy in the United States and is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation." This does not make NOAO a part of the NSF, and certainly does not guarantee that the file was created by an NSF employee. And see NOAO's own image copyright page: http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html. Huntster (t @ c) 23:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
      • 1). The first line in the source: The materials created, authored and/or prepared by NOAO are copyrighted in content, presentation, and intellectual or creative origin. Use of NOAO/AURA images constitutes acceptance of these guidelines. As I understand it, it says that NOAO/AURA images are copyrighted. But about pictures, created by NOAO/AURA/NSF does not say anything. In authors of this image specified NSF also. It is a guarantee that the file was created by an NSF employee too. 2) If this file is protected by copyright, in its metadata surely there would be marks "CC-BY-SA". And I'm inclined to believe ESO employees. /St1995 15:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
        • That's a rather significant assumption to make, saying that they are distinguishing between photographs and graphic images without any evidence. As far as I'm aware, all NOAO images use that credit line "NOAO/AURA/NSF". That is not necessarily saying that the authors are NSF employees...again, an assumption on your part. It is a third assumption that the metadata would reflect anything other than the ESO copyright. Again: "Unless specifically noted" covers this, where an outside organisation that uses all rights reserved is credited alongside ESO. Huntster (t @ c) 21:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

+ Commons:Deletion requests/File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg /St1995 22:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Reasonable and clear arguments why this file is copyrighted did not shown. Can someone restore this file and close the request? /St1995 15:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
    • In your opinion. I still stand by what I've stated, and believe this is a clear-cut example of where our Commons:Precautionary principle should come into play. Huntster (t @ c) 04:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
      • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Huntster, have you read this DR? And this? Аnd this? /St1995 13:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
        • Yes, and I disagree with those closures in the strongest possible fashion. Huntster (t @ c) 15:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • And per this reply - your argument (about COM:PRP) is wrong because I sure that nominated file is free-licensed. COM:PRP says: The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file it should be deleted. If I had any copyright-doubts on this file, I didn't start this discussion. Also credit ≠ authorship. Regards /St1995 00:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


If a company is simply funded by the NSF, that does not necessarily make their employees federal employees, so would not necessarily fall under PD-USGov-NSF. It sounds like the NOAO is funded at a high level by the NSF, but is capable of owning their own copyrights, which would mean it is a separate organization, and their employees are not federal employees. Simply being funded by the NSF is not the same as PD-USGov. Their usage terms page indicates that "NOAO/AURA/NSF" is the usual credit line they want to have for their works; the same ones they are claiming copyright over. Credit does not necessarily imply authorship. I am doubtful the credit line implies NSF authorship. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Closing as  Not done - this has been open for over two weeks and there is no clear consensus to restore anything -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jules Guiart-portrait en 1930.jpg, Image:Ileana of Romania 1909.jpg, File:Patriarch Iustin of Romania.jpgEdit

All three images seem to be pre-1986, making them fall under {{PD-RO-photo}}. They should be restored and re-tagged if needed.--Strainu (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Any opinions on that? If you're not willing to recover them parmanently, can you plese do so at least temporarely, so we can mve them to ro.wp?--Strainu (talk) 09:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support File:Jules Guiart-portrait en 1930.jpg -- 1930 image, clearly published before 1991 as required by {{PD-RO-photo}}.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose File:Patriarch Iustin of Romania.jpg -- although the image description says 2009, he died in 1986, so this must have been taken before July 31, 1986. However the copyright rule cited above is triggered by publication. In order to restore this, it must be proven that it was published before 1991.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Image:Ileana of Romania 1909.jpg again, there is no proof of publication and my reading of the law suggests that unless this was published before 1991, it is still under copyright.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Can you please tell me which picture from http://ortodoxieardeal.wordpress.com/ was at File:Patriarch Iustin of Romania.jpg? Perhaps we can find out its source.--Strainu (talk) 12:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
As to the one with Ileana, is it by any change the one from bottom-left at page 17 of this newspaper? (make sure you download the file, pdf.js cannot display it correctly) --Strainu (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Iustin -- the image does not appear on the linked page -- the word "Iustin" does not appear on the the linked page, so perhaps you made a mistake with the link.
  • Ileana -- the link does not work -- reports it has timed out.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Iustin was the one visible at [11] (direct link to image: [12]).
  • Ileana was the one visible at [13].
Lupo 15:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Done for File:Jules Guiart-portrait en 1930.jpg and not done for other two per Jim -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Special:Log/Alden.harbiEdit

Ticket:2015012210018482 confirms he represents http://www.moxiepictures.com/ The producers of Ice Cold Gold are listed at http://www.moxiepictures.com/contact too. So if moxiepictures is the copyright holder, I think we can restore them. But he is not representing animal planet if they are the copyright holder. Jee 08:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC) More info: [14] Jee 08:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea. It would depend on the contract between the two companies. Technically, since the production company would be the one employing the actual cameramen and directors, they might be the initial "author" but I would imagine that copyright is normally owned by the company which funded things per whatever contracts are signed. Whether they both have rights on the material to market it, who knows. If the pictures are ones taken on set and not part of the material delivered to Animal Planet, the ownership could be different again -- that could more feasibly be owned by the production company. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Carl Lindberg. I will summaries the argument by the uploder: "We shot these stills, we paid for these GFX, we hired the artists to put together the posters, and we edit/flesh out these episodes for international airing. We are the production, we own the rights to everything along with Animal Planet." So I think the set contains both production still fully owned by Moxie Pictures and derivatives from "Ice Cold Gold". The second type can be owned by both companies. Jee 02:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I am OK with undeletion after the act of releasing under a free licence is performed. So far in the linked ticket it has not. Gryllida 23:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Gryllida, I don't think we need another release through OTRS since this account belongs to Moxie Pictures. I can't see deleted contents; but believe they all have valid license tags. Jee 02:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, if the uploads themselves had the licenses, then that is the act of releasing them under a free license. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:17, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Done -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Guifi avatar.pngEdit

The file was a part of my own work. I'm a member of en:guifi.net

Why was deleted? I request the undeletion asap. --Arpabone (talk) 00:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Click on File:Guifi_avatar.png, the deletion reason should be shown in your language, quote: "If you are the copyright holder/author and/or have authorization to publish the file, please email our OTRS team to get the file restored". –Be..anyone (talk) 01:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:고리원자력발전소.JPGEdit

This Deleted Photo files is Security Facilities(Military Facilities, Power Plants etc.)'s Photo files. In general, Security Facilities Photographing is Prohibited. However, In some caces, when the Photographer is Photographing a Security Facilities in order to introduce Wikipedia. There was a Request Deletion for Security Facilities Photo Files form the Wikimedia Commons. but Security Facilities Photo Files itself in not cause any problems for Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons etc. In these respect, For that you need to Recover for Deleted Photo Files.

For example, the Pierre-sur-Haute military radio station's Photo Files(File:Base militaire de Pierre-sur-Haute.jpg)

Fry2005 (talk) 10:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Undeletion request Modifid by Fry2005 (talk) 02:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Files were deleted with reasonable doubt of copyright status and COM:PCP, so Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. — Revi 10:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The DR mentioned is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parade ground and Barracks of ROKA 102 Replacement depot.jpg. Appears to be related to sock-pupperty of Special:Contributions/Ilhuween, who is blocked; account is globally locked. Block reason states to contact User:Nick for details. We have many more files of that series, see Special:Prefixindex/File:ROKA (those starting with "ROKA "; don't know how to include a trailing blank in the prefix search); all those that I just spot-checked have this strange (manipulated?) EXIF camera data. Lupo 10:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
See COM:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ilhuween for more details on sockpuppetry. Ilhuween is locked by WMF for uploading Child porn. (See AN archive #50) — Revi 11:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Significant doubt over copyright status; uploader is known bad actor. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • There were problems with EXIF data not matching when I deleted the images, as I recall. As mentioned, the user is now banned also. Nick (talk) 13:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per above -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Every_Woman_Foundation_Miss_Representation_Screening_Calgary.jpgEdit

also:File:Sophie_Serafino.jpg

I have applied for OTRS request at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, please undelete this file.Anzilork (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It will be restored when an OTRS volunteer determines that the license is OK. OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and badly understaffed, so that may be as much as a month from now. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Suman pokhrelEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014121910002468 confirms User:Suman pokhrel is a trusted account of him. More deleted files at Special:Log/Suman_pokhrel may be eligible to restore. Jee 15:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

@Jkadavoor: I've restored these five images. Please add the OTRS ticket. If there are more related images that need to be restored, you can add them to the list, or this request can be closed and another opened later if it's going to take more than a day or two. INeverCry 08:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks INeverCry, you can close this request now. Other deleted files seem unrelated; I will post here if I get any new request. Jee 16:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: INeverCry 02:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gjhk.JPG PanteónEdit

Solicito la no supresión de esta imagen debido a que pertenece a mi autoría y la considero importante como elemento enriquecedor del artículo de Rafael Núñez (gobernador). Xwmjlwovp (talk) 02:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


File has not been deleted -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NCFS43.1-2 Front Cover.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I didn't check your mail. I'm a new uploader and didn't the instructions. If you undelete it I will update further details. Please do it as soon as possible. Kambagiri (talk) 03:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


Feel free to re-upload the file but please provide a valid license tag -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GoR.jpgEdit

please restore file:GoR.jpg I requested a free content image from Mr Dan Stuart, formerly of the band Green on Red. I explained to Mr Stuart Wiki's policies on posting free content and copyrighted media. Mr Stuart sent me the image,stating that it was free content and granting me permission to post it on the Green on Red wiki page. --The drunk mailman (talk) 03:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Is Mr. Stuart the author/copright holder of the image? Also, permission restricted to use in a Wikipedia article isn't sufficient for hosting an image on Commons. The permission would have to explicitly cover an acceptable free license allowing for commercial and derivative usage. We would need OTRS permission from the copyright holder in order to restore this file. INeverCry 08:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Mr Stuart is willing to send an email to OTRS stating ownership of image and grant free license allowing for commercial and derivative usage.--The drunk mailman (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

nevermind...replaced file with new image approved by Commons--The drunk mailman (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Since files are not systematically reviewed, the fact that something doesn't get deleted right away does not really mean that it's "approved". It seems like quite a coincidence that File:Green on Red.jpg happened to be uploaded today of all days by a user registered today. You wouldn't happen to be using more than one account, would you? LX (talk, contribs) 19:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

read my previous post...i contacted Mr Stuart and explained the problem with the original file...he contacted me back and and said a new image that complied with wiki policies had been uploaded...i then added the new file...are you calling me a liar...--The drunk mailman (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm saying I don't see how this file is in any less need of verification through OTRS than the previously deleted one. LX (talk, contribs) 21:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
A CU check shows that it is unlikely that Vollman and The drunk mailman are the same person. I agree, however, that both images require a license from the actual copyright holder using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Missing evidence of permission which must be forwarded to OTRS -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jamón de Trevélez Entrevalles (+23 meses de curación).jpgEdit

Solicito acepten dicha imagen. Esta imagen está hecha por mi. Si necesitan el archivo original se lo puedo facilitar para que lo comprueben.

Reciban un cordial saludo.

Ramón Morales
— Preceding unsigned comment added by De grana (talk • contribs) 14:57, 1 February 2015‎ (UTC)
La imagen aparece publicada previamente en http://jamonesalpujarra.com, si eres el propietario de dicha web envía un email desde una cuenta de correo ....@jamonesalpujarra.com a permissions-es@wikimedia.org siguiendo las instrucciones que se detallan en COM:OTRS. Alan (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Windows CE 2.11 Desktop.pngEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is a screenshot that I took on my Packard Bell Easynote H/PC. I'm not sure why this would be considered a copyright violation. If you look at the Windows 95 or NT 4 or any operating system Wiki page, there are screenshots. Could you please elaborate on why this is considered copyright material? Pacmania1982 (talk) 17:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Colegio Nacional de Buenos Aires - aula (03) escritorio y pizarrón.jpgEdit

Hi, I have already sent a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, today I have sent another one with the requested template complete. I have already noticed the copyright holders of this and other files from Colegio Nacional de Buenos Aires that allowed to me their use. --RoRo (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


Great, thanks for doing that. OTRS will undelete the file once they process the email that was sent -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TV_Blue_Sky_official_logo.pngEdit

This image my work. --Elekiq (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Albuquerque Mendes 2014 Round 1.jpgEdit

I request to be undeleted the image: File:Albuquerque Mendes 2014 Round 1.jpg Because: 1) The photo was taken by me; 2) The artist is my father and he gave me the copyright of it; 3) The Youtube channel is mine;

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrialbu (talk • contribs) 18:40, 1 February 2015‎ (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ac5box.jpgEdit

EN:

  1. No free or public domain images have been located for this video game.
  2. The image is of lower resolution than the original cover. Copies made from it will be of inferior quality, and could not be used as artwork on illegal copies of this video game.
  3. The image does not limit the copyright owners' rights to distribute the video game in any way.
  4. This is the artwork, intended by Namco for wide distribution. As such, it has future historical significance, and is a more appropriate choice than any other image available.
  5. This image is used on various websites, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible or visible than it already is. The cover is being used for informational purposes only, and its use is not believed to detract from the original video game in any way.


ES:

  1. No se encontraron dominios libres o públicos a este videojuego.
  2. La imagen tiene una resolución menor a la portada original del juego. Las copias hechas con esta imagen estarán en una resolución menor, y no podría ser usado como portada en copias ilegales del juego.
  3. La imagen no limita con los derechos de Copyright del autor de distribuir el juego de ninguna forma.
  4. Esta es la portada de la caja, con la intención de Namco para distribución abierta. Por eso, tiene futuro significado histórico, y es una mejor opción que otra imagen disponible.
  5. Esta imagen es vista en varias páginas web, y su uso en Wikipedia no hace la imagen más accesible o visible de lo que ya es, significativamente. La portada es usada por propósitos informativos, y su uso no es para restarle valor a la portada original del videojuego en ninguna forma.


--Nytsuga (talk) 02:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons cannot accept files under a fair use rationale. Files here must be freely licensed or public domain. Fair use files must be uploaded locally to Wikipedia or wherever it is used, if the project allows it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Carl -FASTILY 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jgelcer.jpg for undeletionEdit

Please undelete the above mentioned image. The image was taken by me in August of 2014 and the subject is musician, Jim Gelcer. I acknowledge that this photo can be used by anyone for any purpose by way of the fair use policy outlined by Wikimedia and its related sites.

Regards Patrick Ross


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 06:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MaryamTaramiActress.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122010012383 received from the subject/copyright holder. I don't know which is the deleted picture; but all three pictures at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3883439/resumephotos are marked as "Copyright: Maryam Tarami". So it s safe to undelete if File:MaryamTaramiActress.jpg is any of these. :) Jee 17:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done - but perhaps it would be easier if you ask for the admintools yourself ;). Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Komal selfie.jpgEdit

Hi, This is my work. how can it be deleted?

Msuhabe38 (talk) 08:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The author and copyright owner is Komal Jha. Please send a mail to COM:OTRS with a proof of your identity. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Colegio Nacional de Buenos Aires - aula (03) escritorio y pizarrón.jpg (2)Edit

I have sent the requested mail about the permission for uploading this and other files from the same author, Tomás Bernardo. The file was deleted 9 days after the requestion and the answer were sent by User:Alan. In this strange conversation I clarified him that I have asked the owner of the photos his permission for uploading them in a closed facebook group but in front of 4000 ex alumni of that school. In the conversation with Alan, he states that the photo is deleted because "there are thousands of dairy mails coming to OTRS so there is lag in reading them" (?). If that is happening is not legal to delete the photos. --RoRo (talk) 09:58, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I would appreciate if someone different than Fastily answer this thread. --RoRo (talk) 10:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I guess that "legality" is not breached here. A picture without permission for seven days is usually deleted. But if the permission is obtained afterwards, the file is undeleted. No worries. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 10:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Discasto. I think "legality" is what is it all about. ¿Right? I repeat, the mail was sent, there is no reason to delete the file, the permission was asked in front of 4000 ex alumni. Please I would appreciate if someone different from the Spanish wikipedia answers this. If not I should look another instance to make this request, it looks like it is falling into a "discrimination" topic more than a Commons permissions topic. ¿Should I bring the 4000 ex alumni here to confirm that permission? 9 days for processing a mail and deletion anyway doesn't look like "reasoning". --RoRo (talk) 10:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
OTRS, like Commons, is entirely volunteers and is badly understaffed. They typically have a backlog of several weeks to more than a month, although that varies -- some languages have a shorter backlog. It is entirely routine and completely within policy for an image to be deleted in a DR and then restored several weeks or a month later.
While it would certainly be nice if we had more volunteers and could act faster on requests, that is not the case. Wasting Admin time with baseless complaints about illegality and discrimination only hurts the problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Nothing further to add. Alan (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
It looks like you are missing the point that "you" are making me wasting "my" time with this nonsense. A week is a week in USA and Argentina, it was set as the stipulated time to process a request and its answer. If you lost the mail you don't have to delete the file. That is nonsense in English speaking countries and in Argentina. --RoRo (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry but this is a voluntary task and we'll not permit your attitude. Nowhere states that a permission is processed within a week, but is stated that if in a week isn't processed the image is deleted. Several users we have explained, the policies of this project are equal to all users. Alan (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Again, please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Feriköy SK.pngEdit

It only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. It was deleted after this DR which many users told that the file should not be deleted. We can not act on "possibilities" to delete files.--Rapsar (talk) 10:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

No file by this name. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Rapsar probably means File:Logo of Feriköy SK.png which is, I think, likely above the ToO. In saying "We can not act on possibilities to delete files", he or she has the burden of proof backwards. In order to keep these files, it is up to the uploader to prove that the ToO is higher in Turkey than in many countries. The fact that a number of users (including one with 17 edits here) felt that the files could be kept is irrelevant -- DRs are not votes and the closing Admin is required to use his or her best judgement and knowledge of the law and Commons policy. He must consider all the comments, but not simply count them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete File:Sabine Kornbichler 6853.jpgEdit

My name is Frieder Kornbichler. I'm the husband of the author Sabine Kornbichler depicted on the photo. The photo was taken by me and uploaded to Wiki Commons by me, but it was deleted. As far as I understand, the reason for the deletion is a text on this download page of the author's website. The page allows only private, non-commercial use of the download files.

The reason for this simplified legal notice is that the download page contains photos from different photographers as well as copyright-protected artwork and text excerpts. However, the copyright notice on the author's website is of no relevance for Wiki Commons / Wikipedia, as the author is NOT the copyright holder. I am. This is also clearly stated on the website's legal page (Impressum). Thus an "OTRS permission from an @sabine-kornbichler.de domain" (as requested by the admin who deleted the photo) wouldn't have any legal relevance.

Please undelete my photo and let me know what I can do to avoid repeated deletion (this was the second time already).

Thanks, Frieder Kornbichler (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  • When an image has appeared elsewhere on the Web with a copyright notice or an unacceptable license, as this one has, policy requires that the actual copyright holder, in this case you, send a free license to OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and badly understaffed, so it may be several weeks or a month before the image is restored. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lore Walb.jpgEdit

File:Lore Walb.jpg

Ich habe bereits die Rechte, die ich für das Bild erworben habe, per E-Mail übermittelt und ersuche um Wiederherstellung des Fotos.

K wallner (talk) 11:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose "source=Bayerischer Rundfunk, author=Fred Lindinger", neither of which is you. You say,
"Ich habe bereits die Rechte, die ich für das Bild erworben habe, per E-Mail "
I have already received the rights that I have purchased for it through e-mail
translator: Google
It seems highly unlikely that Bayerischer Rundfunk would sell you the right to freely license their image -- please explain. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Delphic Club Regimental Tie Pattern.jpgEdit

This file should not have been deleted. It was drawn by hand by myself using photoshop as a tool. I drew one torch then made copies to create the pattern. The pattern itself is over 75 years old and in the public domain. The image should not have been deleted.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by HansDieterUlrich (talk • contribs) 16:27, 2 February 2015‎ (UTC)

Done -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:La chaise Brno.jpgEdit

I've asked the company for permission to use this image.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.81.136.74 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 2 February 2015‎ (UTC)
I'm afraid permission for you to use an image is nowhere near sufficient for Commons to host it. We only host content that is free for anyone to use, modify and redistribute for any purposes, including commercial purposes. See Commons:Project scope/Summary for more information and Commons:OTRS for information on how to obtain a permission that is appropriate for Commons. LX (talk, contribs) 17:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per LX -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pack Horse Train Leaving Hazelmere for Monkman Pass 1941.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: License was ammended as per suggestion PeaceofHistory (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


Done - license review requested -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ayers Rock - Angel - Violin part.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122010004696 received from http://www.colloughnan.com/ Jee 02:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Jkadavoor: Please add the OTRS ticket. INeverCry 03:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hollie guitar Yellow dress.jpgEdit

This photo was taken by Chris Gee a friend of the singer Hollie Smith. I posted the photo before finding out who the photographer was.

Please could the photo be undeleted from the commons. Best --Moretonemusic (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 06:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gerrit Jan Heijn.jpgEdit

Please, udelete File:Gerrit Jan Heijn.jpg. It was deleted by User:Fastily reasoning No permission since 25 January 2015: If you are the copyright holder/author and/or have authorization to publish the file, please email our OTRS team to get the file restored.

However the file information block pointed to the page http://inmemoriam.ahold.com/for-the-media/photos where it says these photos are free of copyright. This was extensively discussed on the talkpage of the image as well. The nominator maintains that is not enough, but I expected the administrators would look at this from an unbiased perspective, or at least requested some explanation from me. Anyway, the reason for deleting is false. The image is free of copyright and I am not the one to contact the OTRS team. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Jan Arkesteijn, in case you have opposing arguments, you can simply convert a "no permission" tag to normal DR by one click. It will attract more eyes. Now, I support a restore for normal DR. Jee 10:51, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Where did you see a free license notice on this site? I can't see any. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Yann, "All photos can be downloaded for publication free of copyright." It is a bit vague. Jee 12:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Ah OK, I was looking in the Terms of use - Disclaimer. Restored. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Restored for DR -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:En lag blir till.webmEdit

Undelete File:En lag blir till.webm, collected from Youtube where the video is published with CC license by Mikael Elias Gymnasium and all images in the video are marked as CC licenses. Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 11:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

The "Supper Sleuths" photo with the people sitting around the table has a CC-BY-NC-SA license right next to it. We can't host a video that uses images with NC licenses. INeverCry 11:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
The photo of the stack of books also has an NC license. INeverCry 11:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Just to clarify, the NC means non-commercial, an unacceptable restriction. Commercial use must be allowed to host the images/video on Commons. INeverCry 11:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done NC licenses are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mekanisk energi och effekt.webmEdit

Undelete File:Mekanisk energi och effekt.webm, the video is collected from Youtube and is CC licensed, the video is "hand-made" and doesn't contain any images or other material that violates copyright. Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


Yes it does - cited concern was "Copyrighted toy is being used"; derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mesopotamiens religioner.webmEdit

Undelete File:Mesopotamiens religioner.webm, no copyright violation as all images and the music in the beginning are attributed at the end of the video, ok CC licenses or Public Domain. Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 14:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


Yes it does - cited concern was "Copyrighted images/no evidence of a free license in this presentation, unidentified music which may be copyrighted as well."; derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lag och rätt - Varför lagar?.webmEdit

Undelete File:Lag och rätt - Varför lagar?.webm, no copyright violation as all images and the music in the beginning are attributed at the end of the video, ok CC licenses or Public Domain. Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 14:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


Yes it does - cited concern was "Copyrighted photos are being shown in this presentation."; derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please give me a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletionFile:Dilian.jpgEdit

Good morning,

The file deleted was provided by Dilian's press office and is free to use in internet.

Can you give me please a detailed explanation or show evidence to deletion of this file.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kur4i (talk • contribs) 13:41, 3 February 2015‎ (UTC)
The file was deleted because it was published in 2009 at [15] and there is no evidence that is freely licensed. We would need evidence that the image is indeed freely licensed; you can provide such evidence by making her or her press office send a formal release as explained at OTRS from an @dilianfrancisca.org email address to our permissions team at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. (By the way, "free to use in the Internet" is not good enough. It must really be a free license: CC-BY, CC-BY-SA. or CC-0. All these licenses allow anyone to use the image for any legal purpose, subject only to the license conditions as specified by Creative Commons.) Lupo 13:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Juridik och brottslighet.webmEdit

Undelete File:Juridik och brottslighet.webm, no copyright violation as all images and the music in the beginning are attributed at the end of the video, ok CC licenses or Public Domain. Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 14:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


Yes it does - cited concern was "Copyrighted photos are being shown in this presentation."; derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Geografi Distans - Föreläsning 1.webmEdit

Undelete File:Geografi Distans - Föreläsning 1.webm, the video is collected from Youtube where it has a CC license. At the end of the video has the author stated in Swedish that all images comes from NASA and belongs to the public and that they are not protected by copyright and that the music is Stereofloat from NASA which has a CC license. Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


Yes it does - cited concern was "Copyrighted photos are being shown in this presentation."; derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vizualisation of a former gladiator school using a 3D model and geo-augmented reality on an iPad 3..pngEdit

Hello, I saw this deletion request too late and could not respond earlier.

I created the photo and I (my company "Wikitude.com") created the software that was used to visualize the Gladiatorschool.

I am the copyright owner.

Please undelete this image.


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Palo Alto, California.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122210017375 received from http://pittmanpr.com/contact.html Jee 17:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


@Jkadavoor: ✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (KKPK) International Inc..jpgEdit

I would like to request for undeletion for the image i upload. thanks and best regards --Kkpk091811 (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

A reason for undeletion is needed. Please provide one or confirm that you have submitted proof of permission. Nick (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Inactionable request - no reason given to undelete anything -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daniel Sparre EHC RB Munich.jpgEdit

Hi, I´m the photographer of the pic by myself. I´m the owner of a press card and take photos only with accreditation.--Franz Feiner (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mental Adventures.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122010001073 received from http://www.arteficiolinea.org/associazione/staff/vincenzo-ciccarello Jee 02:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 02:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Patty-limerick-orangeshirt.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122110012238 received from http://centerwest.org/about/contact Jee 02:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 02:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anna Oxygen by Cloud Eye Control.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122210016269 received from http://cloudeyecontrol.com/contact/ Jee 02:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 02:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request to undulate the file CodeRed_Cover_CDformat copy.jpgEdit

Dear Wikimedia Commons

My name is Freedom Bremner and I am the lead singer of the band Screaming Headless Torsos. I would like to request the undeletion of the file CodeRed_Cover_CDformat copy.jpg. The file is artwork for my band Screaming Headless Torsos' album cover Code Red. I am a member of Torsos Partners, LLC and as such am one of the legal copyright holders for the entire album including the album art. I have permission from the original artist Emiliano Aranguren , aranguren.emiliano@gmail.com, to use this artwork to promote my our album wherever possible. I appreciate your concern and attention to protect wikipedia against copyright infringement and I support safeguards, however this appears to be a mistake. I appreciate your help in this matter.


Sincerely,

Freedom Bremner

free@yayamangement.com 201 966 4473


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 03:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mintop_Solution.jpgEdit

Hi,

I have received permission of the copyright owner of the image.

I am pasting the mail below.

Please consider this as an undulation request as highlighted by

--NupurPathak (talk) 05:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC) regards, Nupur Pathak


Rituraj (<email>) 03-02-2015 To: Varun Nair Cc: Keerthi Raju, Nupur Pathak, Nandita Mohan <email>

Hi Nupur,

Please go ahead and upload the Mintop product images on the wikipedia page of Mintop. Since these products are available in the market, I don't think there should be any issue regarding these days images not being in Dr Reddy's website.

Regards

Rituraj


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Barge-test-failure.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122310002441 received from http://www.chassis-plans.com/ Jee 07:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: Permission received at OTRS Green Giant (talk) 08:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by FastilyEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122310013261 received from http://www.colchester.ac.uk/art/minories Jee 09:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 12:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coats logo 2015.pngEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122410010421 received from http://www.gingerjuice.co.uk/ , appointed representative of Coats Plc. Endorsed by coats.com Jee 10:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 12:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DaleSiegelHeadshot.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122410014098 received from Dale Robyn Siegel as work for hire. Jee 13:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


@Jkadavoor: ✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:P-61B-15NO cn 1234 AAF Ser. No. 42-39715.jpgEdit

Permission has been received through OTRS ticket # 2015020410018362 under cc-by-sa-4.0 international. Mike VTalk 00:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


@Mike V: ✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:13 interview flaches bild.JPGEdit

The picture is used in the context of the videos for wikipedia-articles materials for education.

It is used to illustrate how flat a picture becomes if you put your interview subject too close to a wall.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Macchrissli (talk • contribs) 20:22, 3 February 2015‎ (UTC)

 Not done Out of Project scope: Blurry/low quality image -FASTILY 05:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:bappadityabandopadhyay.jpgEdit

Respected Sir ! The image file on the name of Bappadityabandopadhyay.jpg is absolutely free from other web images whicha have already been published, you can measure the pixel size , its the original that I can say. Will be greatful if you keep the image on infobox profile pic in Bappaditya Bandopadhyay's wiki profile. Thanking you ,

Sincerely Yours
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Choudhury.gargi (talk • contribs) 06:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 05:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MzCloud screenshot1.png Undeletion requestsEdit

Dear administrator,

we would like to ask you to undelete this file File:MzCloud screenshot1.png as the content of the picture and the picture itself is purely our creation.

thank you in advance --Polar teddy (talk) 09:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image has an explicit copyright notice from HighChem LLC in the lower left corner. Therefore policy requires that HighChem send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Raheem_J._Brennerman.jpgEdit

Photo of Raheem J. Brennerman now has the correct licensing on Flickr to be used on the Wikipedia page for Raheem J. Brennerman.(Kiddingme (talk) 12:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC))

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose File's EXIF data says "©2014 Wayne Wallace".[16]. Of the other photos in that Flickr account, [17] and [18] are "© Sheri Selby"; [19] is also "©2014 Wayne Wallace". This leaves only the two low-quality selfies [20] and [21] as options. Lupo 12:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Lupo -FASTILY 05:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A senior jumping up on a pile of steps.gifEdit

This file was deleted without any discussion with the reason "he works as a professor"(?!) Please, restore it. ShustovVal (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 1) Per all of the previous discussions and the undeletion request; 2) per COM:NOTHOST - the Commons is not a host for pictures of your workouts and (presumably) grandchildren; and 3) per COM:L, as the subject of the image/video in gif form, you are not the author - that would be the man wearing red pants visible in the mirror. As the author holds the copyright, not the subject, permission would to come from them. Эlcobbola talk 20:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Let's stick to the point, please. There are only two questionable issues in my request for undeletion: without any discussion and the reason he works as a professor. Nothing more! Sorry. ShustovVal (talk) 20:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
You requested restoration; I've explained why it should not be restored. If you don't believe that is on point to whatever concern you may have, you are apparently not at the proper venue. Эlcobbola talk 21:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Again, please stick to the point! If you want to begin the discussion on "the proper venue", you may undelete my file, at least temporarily. ShustovVal (talk) 21:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Эlcobbola above, and past discussion. ShustovVal, trying to force the issue won't lead you anywhere. If you want your content to be included, follow the policies. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done nothing has changed since the last request -FASTILY 05:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antigo Palestra Itália e o novo Allianz Parque.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I was authorized by the owner of the image to share the file on this website. His name is Michal Karas, website owner where the image was found. I talked to him via email and he allowed the free use of that image. Yesterday, I sent the request to restore this image to the email permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org. I explained the whole situation and I am waiting for the reply. Montolive (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


Procedural close Per above, OTRS ticket has been submitted. Once the ticket is successfully processed, the volunteer will restore the image for you. Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Katz-ian-dairin.pngEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122610006656 received from the copyright holder. Jee 15:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete File:Sabine Kornbichler 6853.jpgEdit

Re-opened because reason for deletion has been removed:

This photo was deleted because it had previously been published on this download page of the author's website with a copyright notice, allowing only private, non-commercial use of the download files / this photo.

The previous copyright notice was now removed from the author's website. All of the photos, including the one to be undeleted here, are now published under the same CC Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 license. There is no further license conflict.

Thanks for your time, Frieder Kornbichler (talk) 17:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Эlcobbola talk 16:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nonnenmacher 1999.pdfEdit

valid permisson in ticket:201501131001841. Yellowcard (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Please leave a hint on my talk page once this has been restored. Thanks, Yellowcard (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Done -FASTILY 22:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sgarbi Macellari.pngEdit

Permission has been received through OTRS ticket # 2015020410019521 under cc-by-sa-4.0 international. Mike VTalk 00:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


@Mike V: ✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Reopened.

This undeletion was incorrect. If you refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Giordano Macellari you will see a complete discussion of the issue, including quotes from the applicable Italian law. Macellari is taking a position that has been thoroughly discussed on Commons and found to be incorrect in almost every country. Copyright belongs to the photographer and the fact that the image was made with Macellari's camera does not change the fact that the creative input necessary for copyright came from the actual photographer.

I would have appreciated being notified. I am going to reinstate the discussion we had a month or so ago where we agreed that UnDRs would stay open for at least 24 hours. This was open for four minutes.

User:Natuur12, User:Mike_V and User:Ercomar, you may wish to comment on this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry Jim. You are absolutely correct. This ticket contains the same false statement that was made during the DR. I deleted the file again. I should have double checked it myself since this is a complicated case with many discussion instead of just trusting without a more thoroughly check that the OTRS-agent handled the ticket correctly. Experience learns that this is necessary. When it comes to the legal status, the ticket seems invalid per previous discussion. Natuur12 (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Closing as moot/inactionable - ticket appears to be invalid -FASTILY 07:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ydc.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122610000992 received from Yi Da Chen Film & TV Culture Co., Ltd. Jee 07:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 07:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Armand Coustenoble.jpg‎Edit

Hi, Sylvain the autor of this photo has send the permission,can you verify please ? Thank you Have a good day --Iffrit51 (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Excellent, OTRS will restore the file once they process the email that was sent -FASTILY 07:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by HittarpEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2015010710006424 received from the photographer, http://www.lennartdurehed.se/_pages/contact.html I don't know any copyrighted materials depicted in those deleted photos. So admins, be careful while undeleting them! Jee 06:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 06:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

@Fastily:, all of them look like coprightable arts? Could you check again. We have permission only from the photographer. Jee 06:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
@Jkadavoor: I am not an OTRS member so I cannot verify the content of the email(s). However, if you believe permission is insufficient, then I will re-delete the files -FASTILY 06:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
@Fastily: Wait. I will ask the photographer about the copyright status of the artwork. Meanwhile we can see other opinions too. Let leave this as "not closed" now. :) Jee 06:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
In that case it's an FoP case. The photographer can't help you her. -- Geagea (talk) 10:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose These are modern works and there is no evidence that they are out of doors. The OTRS message is from the photographer and says nothing about the sculptor's copyright, so it seems clear that the deletion was correct and this undeletion was premature. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
So please delete them again. Jim, is it possible for admins to make a better deletion note for speedies? I mean "no permission from the coptright holder of work depicted". A simple "no permission since.." is avery vague and we can't see deleted contents. We are processing more than one month old tickets and files will be deleted in between. Jee 11:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Sure, but remember that speedies are placed by all of us, not just Admins. I certainly see what you mean -- in cases like this, we need two permissions and so the person placing the {{Speedy}} needs to say that. I'm not quite sure how to get the word out, however... .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Jim: A good topic to discuss at Commons talk:Criteria for speedy deletion? I think we need to improve Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_not_the_copyright_holder and Commons:Email_templates too. For works depicted, we need better wording. Jee 16:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Wait; the photographer suggested that uploader (Anna Nittve) is the author of the works depicted. Waiting for a Reply. Jee 15:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Uploader claims heiress of John Olsson. May be LX or Stefan4 can help. Jee 18:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
According to sv:John Olsson (arkitekt), the author is dead. The author's wife, sv:Elisabet Hasselberg Olsson, is also dead according to Wikipedia. According to the Wikipedia article, they have one daughter, Anna Nittve. All of the objects are copyrightable, so permission is needed by Anna Nittve. If John Olsson has more than one child, then permission is also needed from the other children, unless Olsson's will states otherwise (see 6 § and 41 § URL). As Wikipedia only mentions one child, I assume that Anna Nittve is the only child.
On the file information page, the uploader used the wikicode [[User:Hittarp|Fotograf: Lennart Durehed]], suggesting that User:Hittarp's real name is Lennart Durehed. In either case, permission is needed from both the photographer (Lennart Durehed) and from the daughter of the author of the photographed work (Anna Nittve). --Stefan4 (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Stefan4, the information provided by Anna Nittve, the uploader. Durehed Lennart is the photographer and we received permission from him. So if all those information are correct, the restoration is OK. Anna Nittve shared some links about John Olsson upon my request other than the Wikipedia pages Stefan mentioned above:
Jee 02:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Jim, could you re evaluate your opinion based on the new information provided by Stefan4 and in the ticket? (I updated the file pages based on OTRS) Jee 14:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg SupportWe can never be absolutely positive of anything unless we send people out to gather licenses in person, but this looks fine to me. Thanks to Stefan and Jee for moving this along in the right direction. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Closing as resolved -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Evergreen Plantation, Louisiana (64).JPGEdit

Hi

This is a request to undelete all files in the series, from File:Evergreen Plantation, Louisiana (1).JPG to File:Evergreen Plantation, Louisiana (64).JPG and all the files in between. I made a mistake in not including a license when uploading the images which I have taken because I was using Commonist for the first time and missed the deletion notification, I no longer have the files to reupload, I meant to upload them under CC-BY-SA 3.0. Here's a full list of file names.

Thanks

Mrjohncummings (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I am inclined to accept this explanation. Mrjohncummings has 14,000+ edits on Commons with over 8,000 uploads. Only a handful of the 8,000 have been deleted. The restoring Admin should run a Google search on a few of them just to check, but I think we're fine (note that although an Admin can see these files, he or she cannot run Google against them while deleted). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Done -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Premature Births in England and Wales 2011.pngEdit

This file was uploaded under the Open Government License which all Office for National Statistics content is licensed under, I'm not sure why it was deleted,

Thanks

Mrjohncummings (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Mrjohncummings. According to the deletion log (which you can read by clicking the red link to the file), it was deleted because it was missing the source or license information. It may be under the OGL (which is acceptable here), but we cannot verify that if that information is not provided.
If you did include the source, please wait for an administrator to review this. If you did not, please edit this page and note the source below my message.
Thank you. Anon126 ( ) 01:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi User:Anon126, Here's the source and here's the OGL license reference.
Thanks very much.
Mrjohncummings (talk) 04:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. @Mrjohncummings: please take a moment to update the file description page accordingly -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mitch Jacobson 2008.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122710000632 received from John Clifford, the photographer. Jee 08:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kit logo 01.jpgEdit

In actual this image is logo of our new institute. it is created by us and not copied from anywhere. SO it should not be deleted.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhirajada (talk • contribs) 10:21, 6 February 2015‎ (UTC)
"Us?" Is your account being used by more than one person? It sounds like you should read Commons:Guidance for paid editors, which includes information on how to share logotypes correctly. LX (talk, contribs) 10:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Akaemiya YPJ li bajarê Qamişlo.jpgEdit

The file/foto descripe the Training from YPJ in the City Kamishli in Syria. The Foto was on the Main web seit from YPJ.

You can see thies Foto or more Fotos from YPJ hier : http://ypjrojava.com/album/

MaxAzad, 06.02.2015

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This website has a mention "Copyright ©2014 YPJRojava. All Rights Reserved", so a permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Petr Uhl.jpgEdit

Hello, there was a problem with the licence by this picture from Flicker. It has been changed today: https://www.flickr.com/photos/113936616@N07/16419037712/. Can you refresh the picture, please? Thanks, Monika Horakova
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Monika Horáková (talk • contribs)
16:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

License review requested -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PCO.pngEdit

This photo has been freely used on the internet and I have consent to use it from the person who took it. Please can it be re added?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Allthingscoastal (talk • contribs)
Copied from Twitter [22] without permission. If you have a permission, please send it following the procedure at COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LOOK-exhibitionSibylHeijnen-Kyoto2007.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is part of Special:ListFiles/AWMGS and we have permission for it since 2013 Dec. Ticket:2013120710007675 Tagging somehow missed; new mail received. Jee 17:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ritam-219x300.jpgEdit

I have full license for the image and am willing to share this image without any restrictions. Thanks! Freddiced (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

This is copied from the Internet. You need a permission before uploading it here. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Almansa1.jpgEdit

Solicito que NO sea borrado este archivo.

Pido disculpas al autor de esta fotografía.

JorgeLC.


 Not done File not deleted. Nothing to do. Yann (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by AdiprmnEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122910000969 received from http://www.indikaenergy.co.id/ Jee 09:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


@Jkadavoor: ✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FECOFA LOGO 2015.pngEdit

Ce logo est le logo correct à appliqué sur l'entité correspondante, de plus tous les autres pays l'on et il n'y a aucune violation de droits d'auteurs sur ces logos dont celui-ci aussi, étant celui d'une fédération de Football ne doit avoir aucune violation. De plus j'ai mentionné la source don cil n'y a AUCUNE raison pour laquelle le Logo doit être supprimé.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonino95 (talk • contribs)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vous n'êtes pas l'auteur de ce logo, aussi vous n'êtes pas autorisé à l'importer ici sans une autorisation de l'auteur. Merci de lire COM:L/fr et Commons:Œuvre dérivée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 19:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Humanfolk.JPGEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014122910001306 received from Johnny Alegre (alegre.com) Jee 12:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo of the festival "Green Grand-Prix".gifEdit

This was me who designed this logo for the festival of singers-songwriters "Green Grand Prix" which is held in Grodno, Belarus. I am one of the organizers of the festival and PR manager of the festival, you can find my name (Pavel Soloviov, Павел Соловьёв) on the official site of the organizers http://grodno.bardy.org

This logo is free for any use. When I designed it I did not think about any licensing.

Pashick (talk) 13:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Non-commercial usage with no modification rights is not enough for Commons. Please read read COM:L. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
For all complex logos, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Robert_Heylbroeck.jpgEdit

Please undelete this file. It is my property. If you think i have not the copyright of this photograph, send me a email at <email> Thanks,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Delacer (talk • contribs) 14:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. You have to prove that you own the copyright of that picture, or that it is in the public domain. So either post it in the description page, or send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org if confidential. See COM:OTRS for details of the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Wow, you waited for a reply for 12 whole minutes before you decided to ignore consensus and proper procedure and just recreate it yourself? LX (talk, contribs) 16:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lore Walb.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I've sent the permission via e-mail ... I have the permission of the photographer, who has taken the pic. Please restore the pic. Thanks in advance K wallner (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


Great, thanks for doing that. OTRS will restore the file once they process the email that was sent -FASTILY 19:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sugihara visa - image taken by me from my own private WW2 collection of documents.jpgEdit

Hello

This image is from my own private document collection for over 20 years. I scanned it from the original item in my hands.

I take full responsibility. -Huddyhuddy (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC) for the image.

Thanking you, Neil Kaplan.


 Not done Not deleted, nothing to do. FYI ownership doesn't give you the copyright of this document. Yann (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Romance Complicated Official Poster.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014123010005934 received from Gopal Soni / http://romancecomplicatedthefilm.com/ Jee 16:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


@Jkadavoor: ✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Günter Bommert.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014123010010722 received from Hartmut Drewes from a web.de ID. It is not possible to verify that address; but I see another photo from same author and probably the subject himself, transferred from de wiki. The mail ID is same. Jee 17:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


@Jkadavoor: ✓ Done Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Spind2.jpg Edit

eigenes objekt - eigenes Foto Wenn copyrigth dann ja wohl mein eigenes my own object and photo


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two deleted files ...Edit

File:Visto_forlag_Black.jpg License permission was sent to OTRS January 21, 2015 following the recommendations at Commons:OTRS and therefore mailed to the address permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. File deleted 25th of January by User:INeverCry

File:Vandrare omslag i 3d.png License permission sent to OTRS January 21, 2015 as promised in discussion.

File deleted 23th of January by User:Natuur12 who answered "I'm afraid that I can't find the related OTRS-ticket"

Please can I get these two files undeleted according to license permission!? Kind Regards, Deryni (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

If there is a ticket someone will find it eventually. If there is no ticket we can not host this file. Natuur12 (talk) 22:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Great, thanks for doing that. OTRS will restore the file(s) once they process the emails that were sent -FASTILY 01:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:John Falcone Memorial.JPGEdit

Of the 4 jillion other photos of memorials Wikipedia has online, mine was chosen for deletion? I see memorial photographs all over Wikipedia. Edward Gein's grave marker is on Wikipedia; is there permission from the sculpture to post that photo I wonder.

I can't understand why a photo of a memorial that's built in a public place has to be deleted from Wikipedia. Hundreds of people walk by it and look at it on a daily basis, but a photo of it somehow breaks Wikipedia's high standards? How is a public memorial breaking a copyright guideline? It's really petty considering I can see many other memorials all over Wikipedia and they're somehow okay.

I wonder why people even bother contributing to Wikipedia in the first place when losers and the dregs of society take precedence over a hero from my hometown.

Can't wait for my article to be rejected by another Wikipedia member.

Jcl6543 (talk) 00:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 Not done There is no FOP for 3D works of art in the US -FASTILY 01:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lester bird.jpg Request to UndeleteEdit

This file, a picture was taken by the Office of the Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda. That means that it is publicly available for public use. For someone to imply that it was a breach of copyright without outlining their own reason is illogical and unreasonable, because the last time I checked, the user who reported the picture is so far removed from Antigua and Barbuda, that the report against the picture is mischievous and malicious. Many websites have taken this picture from the government website (the old website) and have claim it to be their own picture.

  1. I am putting it to you that [User:Smooth O], who made, the complaint has no right to make such a report because they have no right to the picture.
  2. I am putting it to you that [User:Smooth O] failed to outline a proper reason why there is an issue with the copyright
  3. I am putting it to you that [User:Smooth O] is not a citizen of Antigua and Barbuda, nevertheless to be present at that press conference in the capacity of a official government photographer.
  4. I am putting it to you that [User:Smooth O] is malicious and mischievous, and many other users are complaining that [User:Smooth O] has done similar actions unjustly.

I am therefore asking for this picture to be undeleted if [User:Smooth O] can show a document that they took the photo in the capacity of an official government photographer. I know they can't.

Regards, --Jmoul Francis (talk) 02:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)J'moul 8/02/2015

I think you are complaining about the {{No permission since}} tag on File:Lester-Bird.jpg, not the long deleted file named above. Since the file has not yet been deleted, this is not the place for this discussion. However, please note that there is nothing in the Antigua Copyright Act of 2003 which makes government works free of copyright, so this tag appears to be entirely correct. As for your four statements above.
  1. Any Commons editor may tag a file if he thinks it is a copyvio.
  2. The reason is given -- you have no permission from the Government to upload the file.
  3. Citizenship is irrelevant, see (1)
  4. This tag is entirely correct, certainly not "malicious and mischievous" -- I cannot speak to other work by User:Smooth O.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
I agree with Jim's analysis. We have no reason to believe that this image has been released under a free licence, and it is likely to be deleted soon. The only way it could be kept is if you could persuade the copyright owner (probably the government) to license it freely or confirm that they will release it into the public domain. That would require official correspondence from the responsible government department. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per above -FASTILY 00:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GBrookfield.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The picture was removed as it was tagged for noncommercial use but I'm not using the picture for commercial gain, therefore I think I should be able to use it Strid3r 2442 (talk) 13:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, we can't accept the image. Although you may not yourself be using it commercially, our policy here is to host only images that are free for anyone to use both commercially and non-commercially. Restrictions which prevent commercial use by others are not allowed. The only way we could host this image is if you could arrange for the copyright owner to re-licence it under a less restrictive licence. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Non-commercial licenses are unacceptable on Commons. OTRS permission for a free license from the copyright holder is needed. INeverCry 23:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Microsoft Lumia 535 device.jpgEdit

File was deleted but was uploaded on a Flickr license, I even noted the author and linked to his pages, the bot confirmed that I did everything right (including placing the right copyright license which expressed that I can freely distribute it), in fact here is a file that has exactly the same lisence and is taken from a similar angle, but isn't deleted. --Namlong618 (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 00:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Windows Phone 7.5 (Mango) and Windows 8 similarities.jpg and File:Zune on Windows Phone 7.8.pngEdit

These files are pictures I've made myself and pictures I "give" away to freely use for anyone for whatever reason they want to use it, I personally wanted to use them for Wikipedia in relevant articles, or at-least the Zune one in a paragraph relating to the Zune Software on Windows Phone 7. If I made these pictures myself ¿how do they exactly violate any copyright? and if the phone is somehow copyrighted ¿can anyone ever upload anything that contains any products of any corporation? @Herbythyme: next time you speedy delete someone's own work ask them on their talk page first before deleting someone's own work, or at-least give me a detailed explanation why I can't upload pictures I took myself. --Namlong618 (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Those images are derivatives of non free content. Natuur12 (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 00:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Podemos 2014 - Cara Pablo Iglesias.jpgEdit

Caption from a voting baillot deleted without giving any reason. Is a caption from a baillot caption, and all logos in election baillots are published in the BOE, which is, per definition, in Public Domain.--Coentor (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The fact that copyrighted elements belonging to a political party are published in the BOE does not mean the political party looses its copyright. Anyway, said copyrighted elements haven't been published in the BOE (see here or here). That is, the logotypes and symbols of the political parties are not published (quite sensible, as the Spanish administration cannot license-wash other institutions' copyrights). --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 Not done per above -FASTILY 00:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2015 Paris attacks.gifEdit

I clearly stated the tool that I used to create the image. I used the map from the site described and then added the points on the map myself. There was absolutely no infringement upon copyright. --Undescribed (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 00:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daniela Blume 2010.jpgEdit

A poor rationale and a poorly closed DR on this one (and I must say that this is the very first time I ever witnessed User:Gunnex being anything less than perfect in his DR arguments): As indicated, this is a cropped-off derivative of File:Enrique Dans and Daniela Blume.jpg, licensed as cc-by-2.0 in Flickr and confirmed as such. Hosting a cropped detail of it as a separate image is accetable, and indeed a good service for Commons, as the only image we have/had in Category:Daniela Blume is/was the original photo, with an extraneous person in it.

User:Campeones 2008 is entitled to COM:AGF, I suppose, and was probably decieved into claiming {{Own}} work as the source of this image. We all know that useful uploading tools such as DerivativeFX or CropTool are either dead or buried, and the craptastic buggy riggamarole the WMF loves to spend our donations on (yes, the “recommended” Upload Wizard) cannot easily allow a user to document and license a derivative.

This image should be dully undeleted and steps should be taken to make use of the proper source and authoship mentions (with {{Extracted from}} and {{Image extracted}}) on both file pages.

-- Tuválkin 22:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, you are right. Restored. Yann (talk) 22:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Come on, please read Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Campeones 2008 (II) where I stated: "File:Daniela Blume 2010.jpg (01.2014) --> false claim of authorship/license/etc. as it was cropped from the in 2011 Flickrreviewd File:Enrique Dans and Daniela Blume.jpg (by "Enrique Dans")". This is NOT "(...) being anything less than perfect in his DR arguments". My DR argument described the exact copyright situation. Of course: a "good alm" could just "corrected" the false infos but considering the mess of supposed "own works" discovered every day I certainly lost some motivation to do it for each file. I corrected the restored file. Gunnex (talk) 22:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Marking as resolved. @Tuvalkin: please dial down the harsh tone and assume good faith. We've discussed this before, and I want to see indications that you are making an effort to change your behavior :) -FASTILY 00:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PowerColor ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2.jpgEdit

This is not the same picture as http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ati-radeon-hd-4870-x2-hands-on/1100-6196419/. I can attest to having taking this picture by myself of my own 4870 X2. As you can tell, my photo is four times the resolution of the one on Gamespot, and you can see it's a different shoot. Look at the PC logo on the fan hub, the position of the AMD reflection near the P/N, and the pose of the brightly colored fan(?) cord. FakeShemp (talk) 20:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Although the photograph may indeed be yours, it is nevertheless a derivative work of the artwork on the heatsink. Эlcobbola talk 21:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Under U.S. law, that may not be a derivative work -- the artwork on the card itself is incidental, i.e. the photo is taking a picture of the entire card and whatever happened to be there -- the photo wasn't taken specifically because of the existing artwork. That is part of the Ets Hokins decision (a photo of a bottle is not a derivative work of a label on the bottle, even if the label is copyrightable), plus another case (Latimer v. Roaring Toyz) involving photos of a motorcycle with some artwork on it, where the decision basically indicated that it was not a derivative work since the photo was based on the motorcycle as a whole, though the ruling itself was more based on some contractual details. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Although I don't agree that the photo is a derivative work as per Carl Lindberg's argument, I can understand its deletion for that reason. I just want to make clear it is NOT a picture stolen from Gamespot, which was the original reason for deletion. FakeShemp (talk) 06:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think I would follow Carl here. Эlcobbola, would you agree? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

I can't see the image, but as long as it's focusing on the entire product and not the artwork, it should be OK. Carl Lindberg (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Restored, DR created, so we can discuss about the de minimis argument. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

{{notdone}} No clear consensus to restore -FASTILY 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Fastily, could you please wait for 24h after the last comment before closing a request? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Restored for DR, so marking this as resolved -FASTILY 04:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ks23m.jpgEdit

I request the inmediate restoring of this file, because it's a key component in the KS-23 Shotgun Wikipedia topic. If this request is not feasible, i demand to the user who reported the picture User:Krdbot to replace it with another similar, if not identical photograph to keep the intention of contribute to the general culture and knowledge for all the people. I hope that Krdbot wants to collaborate with my request, in order to contribute to the objectives of Wikipedia. Otherwise, I will undertake further action in accordance with the laws and regulations currently in force.--Maverick chile86 (talk) 00:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The source (http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/rus/ks-23-e.html) states: "All texts and some pictures Copyright © 1999-2010 Max R. Popenker". It doesn't give an explicit free license or any direct author/license info for this particular file. @Maverick chile86: Please don't make any further legal threats, as these may lead to your account being blocked. INeverCry 01:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 04:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Largest Painted Mural Stamp.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014123110010195 received from http://www.franciscovargas.com/ Jee 04:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 04:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr Ajeenkya D Y Patil.jpgEdit

it can't be a violation...this image was uploaded by me


 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 05:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sugihara visa.jpgEdit

According to this - 1940 issued visa by consul Sugihara in Lithuania, showing a journey taken through the Soviet Union, Tsuruga, and Curaçao. Might be qualify as {{PD-Japan}} - "50 years after publication for anonymous or pseudonymous authors or for works whose copyright holder is an organization" (organization=Empire of Japan). -- Geagea (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Based on this new arguments I tend to Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion but I am not familiar enough with this area to be a hundred percent sure. Natuur12 (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support as per above. Yann (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I made the comment that Natuur12 cited in closing the DR. As I said there, I think the lion ("crowned lion rampant"?) in the background on the passport page has (or had) a copyright. It can't be a Japanese passport -- a citizen of country X does not need a visa issued by country X. And there's a cross on the lion's shield, that's not Japan either. One of our heraldry buffs can probably recognize the lion and tell us what country issued the passport, but it can't be Japan. Unless we can figure out the issuing country, I don't think we can keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    • It looks like the symbol of British passport, it would be under Crown Copyright. Anyway, this was published by a government 75 years ago, it is most probably in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
      • Today visas comes with sticker. The visa singed by Chiune Sugihara so it is Japan but the page is a passport page not a visa sticker. Maybe the user can help with the nationality. I'll ask him. -- Geagea (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
        • Czechoslovakia. The users answer: Yes, the holder was Czech and used his Czechoslovakian passport, issued to him in 1938. He managed to escape to Poland in 1939 and from there to Lithuanian. In 1940 he received the Visa from Sugihara, using it to travel via Siberia to China. -- Geagea (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think we are OK with Czechoslovakia. Thanks, Geagea. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


✓ Doneas per above consensus. Please fix auhtor, date, source, and license. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AgenaTrader ListChartGroup.pngEdit

All pictures i have uploeaded are NOT copyright protected. Please stop deleteing process.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Achilles25 (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With some exceptions, none of which apply here, every created work has a copyright. You must give a better reason for why you have the right to freely license this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 05:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EmoSPARKcubeandbox.jpg File:EmoSPARKcube.jpg File:EmoSPARKlogo.jpgEdit

Copyright has been given by email on Sun 23/11/2014 11:26 to wikipedia by the inventor and CEO of Emoshape free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) Andrzej Krzysztofowicz from wikipedia commons confirmed reception.

“I hereby affirm that I, Patrick Levy-Rosenthal give exclusive copyright of EmoSPARKlogo.jpg, EmoSPARKcubeandbox.jpg and EmoSPARKcube.jpg. I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.”

--Steania89 (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


Great! OTRS will restore the file once they process the email that was sent. -FASTILY 05:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gabi Grecko.jpgEdit

The image of model Gabi Grecko was removed from the infobox on the page created for her even though the image is taken straight from her website.

This has happened with me three times already and I don't understand how we can place an image on Wikipedia if someone keeps deleting them.

Kindly undelete this photo so the model's page will become complete. We have done the writing correctly, placed all the correct references, and even added backlinks as requested.

Appreciate your help!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayank77 (talk • contribs)
Hi, Rayank77. The photo was deleted because we can't be sure that your account really belongs to the copyright holder of the photo. We need permission to use the photo, and only the copyright holder can grant that permission. To confirm the permission, the copyright holder (most likely the photographer) needs to send an e-mail according to the instructions on this page.
The e-mail address needs to be "verifiable." That is, it must end end in -at-officialwebsite.example.com, or be listed on the website or social media. Anon124 (+2) ( ) 21:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 05:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Peloponnesian Folklore FoundationEdit

A handful of images from this user were deleted. Could an admin undelete those found in the Collection of the Peloponnesian Folklore Foundation category? They have been released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 international on behalf of the organization via OTRS ticket # 2015020310013083. Thanks, Mike VTalk 18:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please use [[ticket:ticketnumber]] link so adminis can access OTRS interface faster. :P — Revi 08:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Done: I also found COM:AN's thread about this one, so undeleted things after 2015-01-29. Leaving {{PermissionOTRS}} tag to Mike V. — Revi 08:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mccracken&faust@comicon.jpgEdit

I'm the personal assistant to Craig McCracken and Lauren Faust (I am also Lauren's brother). I have their permission to use this photo that I took at comic con.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfaust76 (talk • contribs)
  • Please see COM:OTRS for what you need to do; we'll need an email from a verifiable address. - Jmabel ! talk 01:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Fichier:Logo-INGDIRECT.jpgEdit

I work for the corporate communication of ING Direct France. The use of our logo for our Wikipedia page is not a copyright violation, I have downloaded the file from our pressroom. We put the logo at this place for external use, and I think that Wikipedia is exactly the kind of media targetted. Thank you to authorize the upload of our logo. Best regards,

Anthony Bouyer
— Preceding unsigned comment added by AnthoBouyer (talk • contribs)
@AnthoBouyer: Bonjour,
Pour tous les logos complexes, une autorisation écrite formelle est nécessaire. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure. Demandez-moi si vous avez besoin d'aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roberto Menia.jpgEdit

Hi,

the file in question in File: Roberto Menia.jpg. It has been deleted because suspected of copyright violation. None the less, I uploaded the file because it is the picture of a public figure (Italian politician) shot in a public place (Belgrade, 1991). Having read your licensing information, I thought it was possible to upload the picture.

Can you give me more information? Thanks.

--PaoloRosi (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose "Public figure shot in a public place" has nothing to do with copyright. The copyright belongs to the photographer who is listed in the image description as "Unknown". It will be under copyright for many more years. The image description also says that it was taken from http://www.wumingfoundation.com/giap/?p=20327 where it does not have a free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 21:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Christopher Carter portrait.pngEdit

The image copyright holder Christopher Carter has been sent the proper form - Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) - and i expect him to send the completed form to permissions-en@wikimedia.org today or tomorrow.

This was my first image upload and i seem to have done things out of proper order.

Carroll F. Gray (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 21:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Scratch screenshotsEdit

Hello, I would like to request the undeletion of the following files.

  • File:Starten met Scratch.png
  • File:Scratch startscherm.png

Screenshots of Scratch are permitted under the can be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. See also the of use on scratch.mit.edu.

Regards,

Tim, Timboliu (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

"3.7 Commercial use of Scratch, user-generated content, and support materials is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. However, the Scratch Team reserves the right to block any commercial use of Scratch that, in the Scratch Team's sole discretion, is harmful to the community. Harmful commercial use includes spamming or repeated advertisement through projects, comments, or forum posts."
The reservation stated there is inconsistent with Commons requirement that media be free for any use by anyone anywhere. Commons and its users cannot be beholden to what the Media Lab might think about any given use of its creations. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Jim. The terms of the scratch license is de facto NC, which is forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 23:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

James Napier Robertson Moa Award.jpgEdit

This is my photo. I own it. It is not in any copyright breach. Please undelete it.--Sugarloafrd (talk) 22:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 23:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Actually, perhaps not. The award pictured has a copyright, so restoring it here will require not only clarifying the license for the photograph, but also getting a free license from the creator of the award. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlotta_Montanari#mediaviewer/File:Carlotta_Montanari_red_carpet.jpgEdit

Hello, I took this photo with Carlotta Montanari's camera during red carpet or Los Angeles Film Italia Feb 17th 2013. This photo has been posted by us on her page/ what can I do to avoid this deletion on her page? thank you


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 23:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request for undelete File:Yangon University Logo.pngEdit

It is free to use. It is the logo given by my rector from my university. Current logo is totally wrong and they just revised the logo. The deletion was not appropriate. --Swanhtet1992 (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

The image was deleted as we have no evidence from the copyright owner that it is, as you say, free to use. To prove that it is, could you please ask the rector to read the page OTRS and to follow the instructions there? The email with permission would need to come from an official university address, and from someone with legal authority to release the copyright. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 04:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WRB icon.pngEdit

Hi Wikipedia Team

I have permission from Reliance Games to use the Real Steel World Robot boxing icon in the wiki page. I do not know under which of your copyright certifications it comes under. Please tell me you requirement for Undeletion [example: agreement via mail] and I will fulfill it.

But I or Reliance Games cannot commit to the Clause [as given in your mail format]:

'I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.'

The reason being The image will and should only be used in the Real Steel WRB Wikipedia article. Kindly advice.

Regards

Lewin

Lewin51 (talk) 06:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A free license for any use by anyone anywhere is required for all images on Commons.
"The image will and should only be used in the Real Steel WRB Wikipedia article"
is not acceptable. Unless the copyright holder changes his mind, the image cannot be restored. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dcpla-xl.pngEdit

Dear Sir/Madam,

On behalf of the company DCPLA, I have uploaded the logo of the company (File:Dcpla-xl.png) to be used in their page on wikipedia.

best regards, --K.maziar (talk) 07:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gregorio_Manzano.JPGEdit

Hola, me gustaria solicitar que esta fotografia fuese restaurada a todas las paginas de las que se ha borrado. El motivo es que he obtenido permiso por parte de su dueño. De hecho, tras llegar a un acuerdo con el propio señor Manzano, a partir de ahora actuare en su nombre para intentar mantener la pagina actualizada. Muchas gracias de antemano.

Hello, I would like to request undeletion of this photograph and restoration to all the pages in which it appeared. The reason is that I have obtained permission from the owner of the photo's rights, in fact, after reaching an agreement with Mr Manzano, I will hereinafter be acting on his behalf to keep the profile up to date as accurately as possible. Thanks in advance for your help in this matter. -JKL-Ekipero (talk) 11:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File Monika Ballwein Foto Stefan Panfili.jpg WIEDERHERSTELLUNGEdit

Ich möchte das Foto wiederherstellen, allerdings hatte ich beim ersten Mal hochladen noch nicht die Rechte für das Foto. Wiki schreibt zwar, dass das Foto glöscht wurde, aber eine Datei mit dem selben Inhalt vornhaden ist. Kann ich das Bild erneut hochladen? Wenn ja, wie? Oder kann ich einfach die Lizenz von dem Bild ändern?

--StarCoelh (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)StarCoelh 17:23, 11. Februar 2015

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Please do not upload the file again -- it is against the rules to do so. If the community decides that the file can be kept here, it will be restored to visibility.
The image is a photograph taken by Stefan Panfili, not you. Therefore in order to restore it, we will need a free license from Panfili, see OTRS for instructions. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by BekoEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2014123010012453 received from http://www.bluecanvas.com/hagopishkanian who is the artist and photographer. (an old ticket I started processing last week.) Jee 17:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 02:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:W3C Semantic Web Logo.svgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: CC-by-nc doens't matter in this case, because the "W3C" and "3 colors" logo parts are already uploaded on Commons and the rest is just {{PD-text}}. It is a composite work.

Free images used in this work
Rezonansowy (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done as above. Yann (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Supercolisor.pngEdit

I own all rights related to Supercolisor image and music and, for that matter, I am willing to keep the deleted image online and in Wikipedia. The related article is online and being subjected to discussion before permanent stay. Please, restore the image.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.2.149.159 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 12 February 2015‎ (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image appears elsewhere on the Web without a free license. Policy therefore requires that the actual copyright holder send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 18:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Main_Menu_-_FiM_Premium.pngEdit

why is this considered a copyright violation? I remember this image being official and posted by the author herself. Also, I was granted permission for uploading (and using) this image.

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It was uploaded from the web site http://premiumedition.weebly.com/. The web site does not have a free license, so that is one problem. As the web site admits, the pony is Hasbro's My Little Pony, so in order to keep it here we would need permission from both Hasbro and the source web site, and Hasbro is certainly not going to give permission for a knock-off game, even a free one. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 18:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zlatko Zahovic.jpgEdit

It was uploaded in 2008 as own work of the uploader with a valid PD licence[23] and now suddenly deleted as "No permission" for no good reason. --Sporti (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 18:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Абдулатипов Рамазан.jpgEdit

Не понимаю почему был удален этот файл. Ведь имеется разрешение на его использование от официального органа... Хаджимурад 13:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

"Copyright © Официальный сайт Главы Республики Дагестан, 2015 г. Все права защищены. Использование любых текстовых, фото- и видеоматериалов, размещенных на сайте, разрешается только с ссылкой на сайт (для интернет-проектов - с гиперссылкой) Контакты для обращений в Пресс-службу Главы и Правительства РД: тел.(8722) 67-87-90, mail: pressa@e-dag.ru
Copyright © The official website of the Head of the Republic of Dagestan, 2015 All rights reserved. Use of any text, photo and video materials posted on this site is permitted only with reference to the website (for web resources - with a hyperlink) Contact us for references in the press service of the head and Government RD: tel. (8722) 67-87-90, mail: pressa@e-dag.ru
translator: Google

That is not a free license.
I also see the document at File:Dagestan_authorisation-Russian.png, which I cannot read, but the specific prohibition on the source page of this image overrides any general permission which we may have. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Уважаемый, вы читать умеете? Там ведь написано разрешается только с ссылкой на сайт, а ссылку на сайт я указал, имеется также официальное разрешение на использование фотографий с этого сайта. Воспользуйтесь переводчиком если не понимаете что там написано. Файлов с подобным статусом на Викискладе полно. Точно такое же разрешение опубликовал сайт Кремля, сайт Главы Башкортостана... и фотографии с этих сайтов свободно публикуются на Викискладе. А удаляются почему-то только мои. Мне не понятна ваша логика. Хаджимурад 17:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
My logic is simple. A basic principle of law is that the specific overrides the general. The specific web site from which this image was taken has an explicit copyright notice. No matter what the cited document says, it cannot override that. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 18:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Species 2 mutacao.jpgEdit

Arquivo presente na Wikipedia EN, porém não disponível na Wikipedia PT, por isso foi criado um novo ficheiro com as mesmas caracteristicas e permissões para estar disponível também na Wikipedia PT.

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It appears on WP:EN with a fair use rationale. Fair use is not permitted on Commons and it is clearly a copyrighted movie poster. It cannot be kept here without a license from MGM. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done copyvio -FASTILY 18:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marcelo miraglia.jpgEdit

la foto en cuestión es de mi autoría. La misma ha sido incorrectamente eliminada. solicito su restitución. Gracias! The photo in question is my authorship . It has been incorrectly removed. request your refund. Thank! ((unsigned2|12:52, 12 February 2015‎| Guillermosanmartin }}

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image appears elsewhere on the Web without a free license. Policy therefore requires that the actual copyright holder send a free license to OTRS .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 18:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anny Felbermayer mit Ihren Eltern.jpgEdit

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: we have a permisssion via ticket:2014122710003433 Emha (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


Done -FASTILY 18:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:INF Reg Eu Logo Stack FC Grad Pos.jpgEdit

Own work. I forgot to indicate this when uploading. --Sixpacz (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Are you associated with the website http://www.netball.org/europe-region? If so, and you can show that you are the copyright owner, please follow the instructions given at OTRS. Thank you. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Caricatura Williez 2.jpgEdit

Hello: I want to restore a file (specified in the title), it was eliminated by not having the correct license. However, allow me to upload the image to Commons, for the reason that already suppressed. I hope your help. Atte. Luisedwin2105 (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please explain which license you'd like to use this time? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Apparently, the caricatures were published in 1855. The caricaturist is one "L. Williez", on whom I could find no further information. --rimshottalk 19:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello: It's true: the cartoon was made in the 1850s, so it is free content. The image was removed for being labeled as own work. Atte. Luisedwin2105 (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done OK, I have restored it temporarily. Please correct the author, replace 'own work' with details of the actual source from which the image was acquired, and change the licence tag to a PD tag; you'll need to do that promptly or the image is likely to be deleted again. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Marking as resolved -FASTILY 22:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rodinné fotoalbum.jpgEdit

This image should illustrate a traditional family photographic album in a Czech wikipedia article. It is just one page from my family archive with five photographs dated 6.12.1941. This was the wedding day of my parents. These photographs of an unknown author were published at the same time, i.e. more than 73 years ago, and of course, never claimed for authorship. I have inherited them from my father who died in 1999. I believe there is no copyright violation in this case. As a newbie in Commons, I have probably wrongly specified the necessary source facts, and do not know now how to fix it. Deleted photo cannot be uploaded again. Therefore I submit this Undeletion request, hoping it could help.

Best regards, Jaroslav Mares

Pilsen, Czech Republic, jrmares@atlas.cz, Photolis (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unless you can show that the photographer died before 1945, we must assume that the photograph is still under copyright. In most countries, copyright lasts for 70 years after the death of the creator so we generally assume that works later than 1885 are still under copyright unless proven otherwise. There are special rules for anonymous works, but in order to use them, you must prove that the work was actually anonymous. That is essentially impossible in the case of a wedding portrait, unless somehow the photographer wore a mask while taking the picture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 22:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by MadriCREdit

Please restore the following pages:

List (199 files)