Open main menu


Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Contents

File:Metro Plaza de Espana.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: source - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks OK. Abzeronow (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MediaWiki bureaucrat.svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: because and because..

For what it's worth, there's a png version still available.. Deletions for files like these really shouldn't happen under the radar like this. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per Alexis. --Yann (talk) 15:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tekniikanakateemiset logo rgb.png

I'm trying to upload TEK's current logo to Wikimedia Commons. Apparently this has been tried before, but the current logo has been deleted, which is why I am asking for undeletion.

--Heiditomperi (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

@Heiditomperi: Which file exactly are you talking about? There is no deleted file uploaded to Commons by you and no file with above-mentioned name ever existed on Commons. Ankry (talk) 15:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tekniikanakateemiset logo rgb.png maybe? LX (talk, contribs) 20:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry:@LX: Yes that's the one! Is it possible to undelete it? Wikimedia currently has TEK's old logo only, and I would very much like to change that.Heiditomperi --Heiditomperi (talk) 13:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support I see no copyright problem as it is {{PD-text}}/{{PD-shape}} IMO. Ankry (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Szikszay György debreceni esperes arcképe (Prixner Gottfried pesti rézmetsző alkotása 1803-ból).JPG

This work is from 1803, see here. The author was Gottfried Prixner died in 1819, see here. --Regasterios (talk) 12:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Ankry (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Badly scolded IWW.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Badly scolded IWW.jpg

1923 US photograph taken during the Liberty Hill Strike in San Pedro, California. https://www.iww.org/history/campaigns/sanpedro/images Abzeronow (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Ankry (talk) 15:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @Abzeronow: Please fix the description. --Yann (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Locandina Partenze.jpg.jpg

https://storage.googleapis.com/ff-storage-p01/attachments/files/003/829/720/original/Locandina_corto_INGLESE.jpg?1551211228

The image is my creation and is copyrights free. --NikMP3 (talk) 09:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC) 27.02.2019 Nicolas Morganti Patrignani

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not see the declared CC-BY-SA 4.0 license on the above-mentioned page. Ankry (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: We need a written and verifiable permission. @NikMP3: If you're not comfortable with English, you can write to permissions-it-at-wikimedia.org. Ruthven (msg) 15:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fotogramma scena film.jpg

This image is taken from my short film and I am the holder of the copyrights. So, I allow the use of the image on wikipedia. --NikMP3 (talk) 09:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC) 27.02.2019 Nicolas Morganti Patrignani

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We cannot rely on on-wiki license declarations for already published works. Either public evidence that the film is freely licensed (or that its copyright expired) of COM:OTRS permission from the film copyright owner is needed. Ankry (talk) 14:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry, please write to OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chiba TV logo.jpg

As you can see in logs, the file has been deleted, restored, and deleted again by mistake due to a wrong copyright infringement tag. I've already explained why it is not speedy deletion material here. The second sysop who deleted it couldn't make up for it because he hasn't logged on since.--Sakretsu (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support the DR procedure here. Ankry (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. IMO this is {{PD-textlogo}}. Please create a DR if you think otherwise. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hourglass-advancedemotions.png

Not copyrighted - illustrates the article --Doomdorm64 (talk) 08:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question which article? Ankry (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: With limited exceptions, none of which apply here, all creative works have a copyright from the moment of creation until it expires, usually 70 years after the death of the creator.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grass-water-fire.png

Not copyrighted illustrates article --Doomdorm64 (talk) 08:27, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question which article? Ankry (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: With limited exceptions, none of which apply here, all creative works have a copyright from the moment of creation until it expires, usually 70 years after the death of the creator.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wandsworth, Putney and Hammersmith bridge opening.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wandsworth, Putney and Hammersmith bridge opening.jpg

1880 British illustration. Name of artist is initialed in lower left corner. Seems PD-old-assumed Abzeronow (talk) 15:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aly Ryan.jpg

No copyright violations of File:Aly Ryan.jpg

Right to share and publish photo.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wewantaly (talk • contribs) 17:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Looks like a TV screenshot from German TV channel Das Erste. Are you a TV Producer involved with this broadcast? Thuresson (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No evidence of a free license. --Yann (talk) 16:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 Not done Per Yann + OP do not cooperate to establish facts. Thuresson (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Russian Orthodox Church in Antwerpen (Sint-Jozefkerk).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/centralasian/7935754578/in/photostream/. This Flickr account was blacklisted because of https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Office_actions/DMCA_notices&oldid=260924975#Igor_Stravinsky.2C_New_York_City_.281946.29. The photo of the church that was deleted here appears to have been own work though. They appear to own at least a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and an iPhone 4. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am afraid that as the Flickr user used to provide false copyright information, we cannot apply AGF here and we need a valid OTRS permission in order to restore the photo. Ankry (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: please see https://www.flickr.com/people/centralasian/: "The majority of the photograph in this Flickr stream are of my own 'production'. I post them here to share with the community but also to use them in my blogs, so this stream works as a storage space (these days they call it 'cloud'). At some point I began to gather here not only my own works, but also the images of other people - photographs, artworks, charts, maps, and whatnots. I try to attribute all these works as accurately as I can, but it's not always possible, unfortunately. Too many things are just 'laying there' on the web, unattributed and untitled."
Yes, this Flickr user made some mistakes, but if you look at the Flickr stream you will find they own at least a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and an iPhone 4. Images without metadata from this Flickr user can't be accepted so easily, I get that. The Flickr user appears to have changed their ways since then btw. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This has EXIF data on Flickr. I believe this is the Flickr user's own photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Jameslwoodward: Any comment? --Yann (talk) 16:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm on the fence, which is why I have not commented before. I'm all right with it going either way -- perhaps a Symbol support vote.svg very weak support. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Olsw couv 1.jpg

I am the writer agent of writer Jérémi Bentham and this file is one of the covers of his book. All the covers belong to us. --JBOLWSAGA (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For already published media, like published books, a written free license permission send by the actual copyright owner following COM:OTRS is needed. If you are not the cover author, you may ąlso need to prove that you own copyright. Ankry (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done Per above. Ankry (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Planetshakers band en concierto en vivo.jpg

I need you to see my problem because it always erases my wikimedia image. Please help me. Thank you. Chico sensación (talk) 23:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Did you follow the advice given earlier? Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2019-01#File:Planetshakers band en concierto en vivo.jpg. 23:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done No response. Ankry (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Video of Antarctic krill performing metachronal swimming.ogv

Hello,

The above name is the title to my video which shows the metachronal swimming of an Antarctic krill. I request undeletion of this file because it is my own work. It was filmed in the lab at the University. The phone was used to film the animal, and the animal is in the jar. Please undelete the file since the page describes the metachronal swimming in words. It is always good to see an example of the animal performing this swimming technique. Especially this video communicates the idea better than words, and visual learners like me will greatly benefit from this video. --Kuvvat Garayev (talk) 05:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC) 2/27/2019

@Kuvvat Garayev: As you have been notified, COM:OTRS permission is needed here. When the appropriate permission is received and processed, the wile will be restored. Ankry (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done Waiting for OTRS. Ankry (talk) 08:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Poruvazhy Peruviruthy Malanada Temple.jpg

Hi,

File:Poruvazhy Peruviruthy Malanada Temple.jpg deleted for copyright violation.

malanada.com official website of Malanada Temple owns the photo, The temple authorities give the photo to me for wikipedia, How can verify the copyright, is site verification possible from wikipedia.

What are the steps to undelete the photo ?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Renishar (talk • contribs) 05:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As malanada.com is not a freely licensed site, we need a written free license permission following COM:OTRS send directly by the image copyright owner in order to restore the photo. Non-written free license permissions are void. Ankry (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done Per above. Ankry (talk) 08:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Civilní Obrana - Promo 2018.png

I'm the member of the band Civilní Obrana and the fact that the photo was used on some website does not mean I'm violating anyone's rights. I own all the rights to manipulate with the image I have uploaded to the Civilní Obrana's Wikipedia page. --Genetic99 (talk) 07:32, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose According to our rules, if the photo was used outside Wikimedia without evidence of free license prior to upload to Commons, then a written free license permission from the actual copyright holder send following COM:OTRS instructions. On-wiki license declaration is allowed only for unpublished works uploaded here by their original authors personally. Ankry (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 08:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AB Forever på Gladsaxe Stadion.jpg

I've sent an OTRS request but still the file was deleted. Best, Grasmusb (talk) 13:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 08:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:500px photo (49407980).jpeg

I apologize for not coming here in time to defend this undeletion, a few days ago. This is not an unidentified place in Paris, it is a photo of the popular Category:Café de Flore in Blv. Saint Germain. It can be cropped to the image and become very much in scope, as we've not any photo showing this particular part of the café, including the street sign over the place plaque which is generally hidden in the other photos. Can you please consider it's undeletion? -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Pinging @Mates, Ankry, Jameslwoodward: -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine with me, provided the one who does it adds the description and cat from Darwin. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 08:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sebastian Kurz RDV.jpg

Link der Veröffentlichung: https://www.facebook.com/RettetDieVereinsfeste/photos/a.876448345763923/981024891972934/?type=3&theater


Hier die Nutzungsbedingungen und der Link direkt zum Foto File:Sebastian Kurz RDV.jpg, welches auch auf Facebook öffentlich für alle im freien Internet zugänglich sind:

Linke zum Facebook-Foto: https://www.facebook.com/RettetDieVereinsfeste/photos/a.876448345763923/981024891972934/?type=3&theater Facebook-Nutzungsbedingungen und Richtlinien: https://www.facebook.com/policies Facebook-Terms: https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms/

16:39, 25. Feb. 2019‎ SimsalaBim (Diskussion | Beiträge)‎

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not see a permission for free commercial use by anybody under the above-mentioned links. Such a permission is one of the requirements for Wikimedia Commons upload; see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 06:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Логотип фестивалю БарРокКо.jpg

Це зображення належить мені. Я є його власником. Тому його видалення є помилковим.--Sera527 (talk) 01:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unpublished, personally created logos are out of scope. And for logos already used outside Commons the COM:OTRS permission from the logo copyright holder is needed. Only logos published under an explicit free license or with expired copyright do not require written permission. But this is not this case. Ankry (talk) 08:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Evil Eagle Logo.png

Hello,You have deleted my logo, which I made myself.Please explain why
— Preceding unsigned comment added by V1T0xGoD (talk • contribs) 13:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@V1T0xGoD: Hi, If it is your logo, it is out of scope. Otherwise, it is under a copyright, even if you made a copy from the original (see COM:DW). Regards, Yann (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Yann. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coastal Dunes (26763585902).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image was created by the NPS and has been uploaded to Flickr under public domain. https://www.flickr.com/photos/naturenps/26763585902/ ButteBag (talk) 16:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: Posted by NPS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose All but the last of these are text only. It is well established that type fonts, however complex, and single words in such fonts do not have copyrights. For the last, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:AmaRoma-logo.png. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

File:PabloRuz.jpg

I own that picture, i took it! i don't know why you keep erase it from wikimedia
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alromo (talk • contribs) 12:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Your image is out of scope (es:Pablo Ruz Villanueva). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Patrick. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Hapus —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 114.125.62.59 (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done Procedural close, file is not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 23:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Koncert Svitavy 2019.jpg

As a member of the band who actually took the picture "Koncert Svitavy 2019.jpg", I am allowed to use the image I have uploaded to the page Civilní Obrana on Wikipedia. --Genetic99 (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the holder of the rights as our band took that picture during our show. Genetic99 (talk) 09:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@1989: Why did you consider it copyright violation? any hints? Ankry (talk) 14:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: Low resolution, no EXIF, prev upload was copyvio. OTRS is needed to provide the full resolution with metadata included. -- 1989 (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral here then. Ankry (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
@Genetic99: Could you please upload the original file with EXIF data? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andew J. Hanson.jpg

This photograph was taken by Tracey Theriault, a communication staff member at Indiana University. She has given me permission to use this photograph on Wikipedia. Her email is <privacy snip>. She said there is no licensing or copyright on this photograph. I am a half time staff member in charge of making the Wikipedia for our faculty at the School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering at Indiana University. I have full permision and legality to use this photo. Additionally, this phot should be renamed as Andrew J. Hanson.

--Mkrampen (talk) 15:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Maridee Krampen 2/28/19

There are several problems here:

  1. "there is no licensing or copyright on this photograph" is incorrect. With limited exceptions, none of which apply here, all creative works have a copyright from the moment of creation until it expires, usually 70 years after the death of the creator.
  2. Who owns the copyright? Since you say she is a communication staff member, it is possible that this is a work for hire and the University owns the copyright. Equally possibly, photography is not part of her job and she owns the copyright.
  3. "permission to use this photograph on Wikipedia" is not sufficient. Both WP and Commons require that images be free for any use anywhere by anyone, including commercial use.
  4. The image is very small (308x308 px), which gives rise to the question of whether she is actually the photographer. If she is, once the license is given, please ensure that you upload a version at full camera resolution.

In any case, policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. In the case of the University, that would be an officer of the university corporation. If it is not a work for hire, then Theriault herself must send it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shalini Singh journalist.jpg

--Ss81 (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Hello, I had uploaded this photo which is my own and I had released it to the site http://www.theweekendleader.com/Columns/2777/taste-of-china.html to use alongside my column in November 2018. Request that this photo be undeleted and duly uploaded on the Wikipedia page.

Thanks and regards, Shalini Singh

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There's no mention about free license on that page. For already published photos, COM:OTRS permission from the actual copyright owner is required. And a proof that you are exclusive copyright holder, if you are not the author. Ankry (talk) 06:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:가수 새빈.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The copyright of this file belongs to me, Saebin. (ID:Gorgeous90) Please do not delete or edit. Thank you.:) Gorgeous90 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose But it was published elsewhere prior to upload here. For already used photos, COM:OTRS permission is required. And do not reupload deleted content. Ankry (talk) 06:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michael David Calnan.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Photograph belongs to the estate of the late Colonel M.D. Calnan, CD which has bequeathed that it may be released to public use. Pcalnan (talk) 01:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose "Released to public use" is not the same as "free license". We need the latter. And only the exclusive copyright holder (presumably the photographer) can declare that (written form required). Ankry (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agreed. Owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph does not give the owner the right to freely license it. That right is held by the photographer and may be transferred only by a written license. If such a license exists in this case, it may be provided via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Family_Symbol.jpg

I created this symbol over 15 years ago. It is open for all to use to describe the Gerety family.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishtigger416 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for already used images, COM:OTRS permission is required. Ankry (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As a personal symbol, it is out of scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AMH 1.jpg

Photo is MINE, i did take it in Oaxaca in 2017
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bakencio (talk • contribs) 06:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose But it was published elsewhere prior to upload here. For already used photos, COM:OTRS permission is required. Ankry (talk) 06:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses

Holes made from shells and filled in with resin stretches the definition of "modern monument". Thread in VPC about this. @Eleassar: @Jameslwoodward: @Smooth O: Abzeronow (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support No real creative design, therefore no copyright. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That was five years ago and I think I've gotten a little more mellow in my old age. Yann is right. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There were some more files deleted in mean time because of same reason and not listed here. Is there any possibility to find them through log or something? Reason for deletion was "Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses" --Smooth O (talk) 19:27, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't like to think further about who would be holding the copyright for those holes in the pavement... Please undelete. --j.budissin+/- 21:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The Copyright Compendium, for the U.S., says: Similarly, the Office will not register works produced by a machine or mere mechanical process that operates randomly or automatically without any creative input or intervention from a human author. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mortar shell's explosion causes a fragmentation pattern, that is filled with red resin. That´s not a work of art.--Superikonoskop (talk) 23:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

The only file that is in "what links here" for this DR is listed above. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 21:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LOGO DGCINE.png

Buenos días, Estoy trabajando en un articulo sobre la comisión fílmica de la República Dominicana (Dirección General de Cine, DGCINE), y quería alimnentar la ficha usando el logo de esta institución, el cual está dispoinble en la sección de descargables en su página web. En ese sentido, considero que no existe ninguna posible violación de los derechos de autor.

--Filmarenrd809 (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

@Filmarenrd809: Que sea descargable no quiere decir que sea usable. Un responsable de DGCINE tiene que enviarnos a OTRS una autorización u pueden añadir en su pagina web una licencia libre. --Ruthven (msg) 22:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: No permission. Ruthven (msg) 22:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mahesh Athirala.jpg

This file has granted permission from the source itself, please do check once.

source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/145126006@N02/45776436822/in/dateposted-public/

PandaBossa (talk) 04:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

   Symbol support vote.svg Support    This was deleted by User: Ronhjones because it had been deleted previously for lack of license, but it had passed Flickreview before the second deletion. Unless we think the Flickr user does not have the rights to this -- and there is no mention of that in the file's record -- we should restore it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Flickrwashed. Uploaded by Vampirus44 with source https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/930079566650941445/IX0DAbgq_400x400.jpg deleted 5:18, 20 June 2018 . Flickr upload is November 11, 2018. Then uploaded as File:Mahesh athirala1.jpg 12:04, 11 November 2018 by BlowDone with Flickr source, and deleted because of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mahesh athirala1.jpg. Then uploaded by PandaBossa 06:27, 28 February 2019. Looks like some heavy socking to me. Ronhjones  (Talk) 12:08, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ronhjones. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 22:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:100m Athens 1896.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:100m Athens 1896.jpg

This was a 2005 file. Any chance this could qualify as PD-old-assumed? (since 1896 is date of creation). Abzeronow (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 10:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jin Kim Montclare, Ph.D.jpg

This picture is owned by New York University's Tandon School of Engineering and grants its use under the standard Creative Commons license and requests its restoration.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmdevitt24 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose User:Kgberg also claims to own the copyright. Please ask the correct copyright owner to verify the license through Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. Ruthven (msg) 10:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request undeletion of file File:Tom_Graves_author_headshot.jpg

URL of file no longer exists

In late April 2018, Tom Graves, the author of this image, sent a proper email giving his authorization to use the file.

An OTRS agent sent a reply 13 August 2018, but Graves failed to respond to that email which caused the file to be deleted.

I now request that the file be undeleted. If confirmation from Tom Graves is needed, he will respond to your request.

--TallVenusian (talk) 22:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: @TallVenusian: It works the other way around: once OTRS has verified the permission, the file is restored. Ruthven (msg) 10:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket:2018082210005861

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018082210005861 regarding File:Saying Goodbye.jpg, File:Lightning talk about Stepanakert WikiClub.jpg abd File:Lightning talk at Wikimania"18.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: Please proceed. Ruthven (msg) 12:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Seder-Masochism

In January, all the images on Commons related to film Seder-Masochism were deleted due to lack of proper free-licensing. The same day they were deleted, however, Nina Paley (the creator of the movie) officially released the film under a CC0 license.[1] Although this public domain release was announced several weeks prior, the closer didn't notice and went ahead with deleting the images. We can now undelete them. Kaldari (talk) 02:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Please ping me when this is done so that I can add the images to article. Thanks! Kaldari (talk) 02:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: As noted at the cited site, the film is now explicitly CC-0. User:Kaldari. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:45Rest.jpg

This photo of Senator Ann Rest was deleted for possible copyright violation. The photo was taken from her page on the Minnesota Legislature website. Their policy (stated here: https://www.leg.state.mn.us/leg/faq/faq?subject=22) says that photos are considered part of the public domain unless listed otherwise on the specific website. Her website makes no claims (https://www.senate.mn/members/member_bio.php?member_id=1051). For this reason, there is no copyright violation and the image should be undeleted. Brow4067 (talk) 02:51, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Actually, the cited page says, at item (1):

"Except when specifically stated on a legislative page, anyone may view, copy, or distribute information found on a legislative website for personal or nonprofit use."

Commons requires that images be free for any use by anyone anywhere, including commercial use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done Per Jim. Thuresson (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JRL file 1.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019022610010731 regarding File:JRL file 1.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please continue. Ankry (talk) 11:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Deepak pun socialwork.jpg File:Deepak pun kpoli.jpg File:Deepak pun farming1.jpg File:Deepak pun magar.jpg

The following are the files in question:

I got the photos through the Facebook page of the person concerning the draft in review. Draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Deepak_Pun_Magar. I'm new to wikipedia, how do i verify the pictures with free licensing. Do let me know what can be done to resolve the issue.

Thank You

Saurav Shandilya
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deviantsaurav (talk • contribs) 17:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Facebook is copyrighted and is not a valid source for Commons. In order for the images to be restored to Commons, the actual photographer(s) must send free license(s) using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim: no evidence of free licence on Facebook. Ankry (talk) 11:49, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the author of the deleted photo, please put it back on...

...I am also the owner and author of www.vladimir-georgievski.com and all its contents, where the deleted photo may have been featured.

Many thanks,

Frosina
— Preceding unsigned comment added by GFros (talk • contribs) 17:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
If this is about File:Vladmir Georgievski .jpg, the photo has been published earlier here with the following copyright license: "©2018 Vladimir Georgievski – All Rights Reserved". Please use Commons:OTRS to verify that the copyright owner allow publication under a free license. Thuresson (talk) 17:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very strange user is owner of "all the contents" since Vladimir Georgievski died 2017. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above: copyrighted photo, no evidence of free license at the source site. OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 11:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Modest-solans-eugenio-ocana.jpg

File: Modest-solans-eugenio-ocana.jpg I have permission to edit because the author of this painting is my son-in-law.

EMCGS1953 (talk) 18:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Since we do not know who User:EMCGS1953 actually is or his relationship to the artist, policy requires that the artist must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 11:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (203).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The text should be in PD per {{PD-text}}. B dash (talk) 04:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Aside from the graphic elements, which probably don't have a copyright in France, we have a full sentence of text. That would probably have a copyright in the USA and certainly does in France where the ToO is lower. {{PD-text}} applies only to a word or two, such as on a logo, and not to sentences. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per Jim & Ruthven. Ankry (talk) 11:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Doerr,Cornelia-2017.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018091410003224 regarding File:Doerr,Cornelia-2017.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done by Gbawden. Ankry (talk) 11:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jasmin-of-arabesque-2.jpg

Dear Sirs,

We own all the copyrights for this image, Can you please not delete it? What shall we do to make this image ramain?

Thank you
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssasha999 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ssasha999: It's a reupload of Jasmin Vetter Of Arabesque.jpg. Please as to Hans Keller or Volker Younas to write from their "official email" to COM:OTRS service. --Ruthven (msg) 10:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Ruthven. Ankry (talk) 12:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Badelitsis

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the creator and legal owner of all these files - album art and promo photos produced and copyrighted by me. Please restore all of them! Thank you Badelitsis (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose They were deleted because they appear at https://elliniko-greek-rock.blogspot.com/2015/10/blog-post.html without a free license. You may either (a) add a CC-0, CC-BY, or CC-BY-SA license to the pages on which they appear or (b) send a free license using OTRS. We can restore them immediately after you have done (a); OTRS is likely to take several months. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: Needs OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hotchkiss Class of 1925.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hotchkiss Class of 1925.jpg

"The photo is from 1923, but is of the class of 1925. It is a scan of the Hotchkiss yearbook of that year". High school yearbooks tend to be PD-US-no notice. But anyway, 1923 US yearbook would be PD-US-expired now. Abzeronow (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Ankry (talk) 11:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @Abzeronow: Please fix the description. Thanks, --Yann (talk) 18:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (110).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The text should be in PD per {{PD-text}}, and the drawing at the back is de minimis per DR discussion. B dash (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per B dash. --Yann (talk) 18:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anrey_Istratov.jpg

Hey, please undelete the file. I've uploaded because I took on my camera during the Poligraphy photoshoot. Moscow, Malaya Nikitskaya str, 22. In October 2008. Thank you
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gohardlikemf (talk • contribs) 00:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
@Gohardlikemf: Please ask to Бен Тюрпин to write to permissions-ru-at-wikimerdia.org, sending a valid permission to publish the file under CC BY-SA 4.0. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 10:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: Undeleted by Ruthven. --Yann (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Afterbrunel

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Afterbrunel

The first if photographer is not named or unknown would be PD-old-assumed due to 1897 date. If the last 3 are illustrations from the 1840s, those would be mathematically PD-old-70. Abzeronow (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support. The last three are obviously PD everywhere. In the case of the first one, while we have used 120 years as a basis for assuming that the author has been dead for 70 years, I think that is a little too soon. However, if we can agree that this author is unknown and is not likely to be found, then the law is 70 years after publication. In the case of an old postcard, we can assume publication soon after the photo was taken, so this was PD around 1970. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. @Abzeronow: Please check the description and the license. Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This was a bad DR. Most probably all the files are in the public domain. --Yann (talk) 19:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1990 - Canal 13 Río Cuarto.png

Me and Gnangarra (talk · contribs) think differently about is the logo eligible for copyright or not. Another opinion is needed. The file is usable in es:Canal 13 (Río Cuarto), so it's in scope. Taivo (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

It's a very close call for me -- therefore, I think PRP applies, so we should delete it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: 3 colored squares. {{PD-textlogo}}. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Monochrom--Kreativlaufhaus-2015.jpg

I am the copyright holder of this file. I'm Johannes Grenzfurthner (see my user page), founder of monochrom art group who created the art project that is documented with this image. Please undelete. Grenz (talk) 12:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose You say "I am the copyright holder". You do not say that you are the photographer and the file description says "press image". That suggests that you are not, in fact, the photographer. Please remember that owning a paper or digital copy of an image very rarely gives you the right to freely license it as required here. Unless you are actually the photographer, in order for this image to be restored, the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

As mentioned on our press image page: http://monochrom.at/press/fotos.htm -- Quote: "all images by monochrom: Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 (in case images were taken by external photographers: monochrom has contracts with external photographers and therefore holds all the rights to release images under Creative Commons license)" -- we have been handling this in this way since the introduction of CC. Grenz (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Having a contract with the external photographer does not necessarily mean that you have the right to freely license the image -- photographers rarely grant that right to others. In any event, because the image is not "own work" as you incorrectly claimed, either (a) the actual photographer must provide a free license or (b) you must prove that you actually own the right to freely license the image, in both cases using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Will file OTRS and provide contract with photographer that states that he transferred all rights to us. Grenz (talk)

 Not done: Thank you, Grenz. This can be restored when and if we get the free license from the photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: Actually there is a ticket for this file: ticket:2019012210004346. Yann (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Yann that ticket has 95 entries -- I see one for File:Monochrom Eignblunzn (2003), documentation.jpg, but perhaps I missed the one for this file. Could you be more specific about where in the 95 it is mentioned. Thanks, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aidan Earley looking sharp.png

deleted by a bot when the image is the public domain

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/craig-whytes-pal-raided-over-12400588
— Preceding unsigned comment added by NaughtyNuggles (talk • contribs) 14:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Not deleted by a bot, deleted by a human administrator. Photo Credit is the Press Association, and I don't see any Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication on the page. So not public domain, and decidedly in copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: The page has © 2019 Scottish Daily Record and Sunday Mail Ltd and there is no reason to believe that this Press Association image is free. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LUF560-lulli-tactel-lace-waist-x-back-camisole-leotard-florencia.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Oleggl88mail (talk • contribs) 10:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No reason given. The named source is https://www.lullidancewear.com/shop/dance-leotards/lace-waist-x-back-camisole-leotard-florencia-luf560-lulli which does not have a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: Lifted from the Web without permission. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Mason Ewing Corporation - Fond blanc.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I want to put my logo on Wikimedia Commons. That's my right and that's why I've sent an email with the proof to Wikipedia. Sprinter7124 (talk) 22:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Anybody can say that. There is no evidence that Wikimedia User:Sprinter7124 is authorised to represent Mason Ewing Corporation. A written free license permission from authorised representative of logo the copyright holder following COM:OTRS instructions is needed in order to restore the logo. Ankry (talk) 12:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license from an officer of the corporation owning the logo. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Relaga.jpg

Il s'agit d'un fichier classique en relativité. Qui correspond au texte joint. Ceux qui ont demandé sa suppression affichent simplement leur ignorance , ou leur volonté de nuire.Chessfan (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

@Chessfan: Deleted as out of scope. If you disagree, explain why. Ankry (talk) 12:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: That graph is useful to visualise the written text. That's all! I can't understand why you censored it ? --Chessfan (talk) 23:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
@Chessfan: Which text? I do not censor anything. The scope of this file was open for discussion for a week, but nobody contesred the deletion. Ankry (talk) 10:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Hand drawn graph with no caption, no useful description, and no categories. Out of Scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:印军越界现场照片(一).png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: These files are all inseparable part of The fact that the Indian border guards crossed the border into the Chinese territory in the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border and China’s position(《印度边防部队在中印边界锡金段越界 进入中国领土的事实和中国的立场》), a diplomatic statement announced by The Department of Foreign Affairs, People's Republic of China. According to Article 5 of Copyright Law of People's Republic of China,, these files are out of copyright protection. Also, a part of vandalism of INeverCry. WQL (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Why there pics is "laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature"?--shizhao (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
    • It's an original (author: a part of PLA, affilated to Chinese Government) and indispensible part of a diplomatic statement, which clearly shows its administrative in nature. --WQL (talk) 13:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
      • It depends on the context, I think. My understanding is that if the pictures are merely illustrative - if the document is understandable without the pictures - then it wouldn't be "indispensable" and can be treated separately, copyright-wise. --whym (talk) 12:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Pictures are obviously captured *in* the official statement, which is a part of a PDF, instead of from a website that segments of "statement" and "non-statement" cannot be clearly devided. Statements are not text-only. --TechyanTalk) 12:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question which license template should be applicable if undeleted? Ankry (talk) 12:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
@WQL, Techyan, Jeff G.: Any hints? If none appropriate exists, it should be discussed in COM:VPC before coming here. Ankry (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: {{PD-ROC-official}}.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Definitely not. ROC != People's Republic of China. Ankry (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: Sorry, I meant {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. A diplomatic statement by an organ of the PRC state government appears to qualify as a decision or news thereof. I agree with your proposal below of restore and DR, as there is no mention of "text-only" in that template.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: {{PD-PRC-exempt}} is what they are getting at. However, the argument against using this license template is that it only applies to textual documents but not images, and for numerous times in the past here in Commons, the admins have agreed with such an argument. A few examples here:
--Wcam (talk) 20:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
@Wcam: Indeed, some of the above cases make me doubt. However, I would Symbol support vote.svg Support restoring and starting a DR to test whether the PDF document mentioned above should be considered covered by this template as a whole, or only its textual part. Ankry (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: If in doubt, maybe COM:PRP should be considered? --Wcam (talk) 02:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Maybe it should, maybe not. I refrain from taking final decision here as I do not speak Chinese and the douubt seems to be language / translation related. I just thing that DR is a better place where Chinese speakers can present their opinion in this matter. Ankry (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Also Symbol support vote.svg Support restoring and starting a DR Abzeronow (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the precedents cited by Wcam are persuasive. I see no reason to start a new DR unless someone who reads Chinese joins this discussion in the next day or two and argues that the "textual document" translation is incorrect. Without such an opinion, we must follow precedent. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

  • It seems that this image was taken by the army, which is a part of the government. This image is obviously shown as an evidence of India army soilders invading China's territory according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, P.R.C. I would argue that this image was indispensible to the document, obviously. --WQL (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
That may be, but unless someone who reads Chinese can show that the "textual document" language is incorrect, we are stuck with the fact that documents that contain images -- and, obviously, the images themselves without the document -- do not qualify for PRC-exempt. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
I agree with Jim here and I would also like to see a clear opinion of Chinese speaking users in this matter. That was the main reason for opening a DR: to get an opinion of wider Chinese-speaking community. Maybe ping a few users? But somebody would need to make a choice... Ankry (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion: only texts fall under the PRC-exempt (and shizhao is a trusted Chinese speaker). Ruthven (msg) 16:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nate-Greenslit-By-Reid-Simpson.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: For verifying OTRS ticket:2019030510007774 ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

@Tiven2240: Done as requested Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. Ruthven (msg) 16:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Naked male.jpg

It is in use. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.175.84.215 (talk) 11:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


Procedural close. Not deleted yet. Answer in the DR. Abzeronow (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unser Logo hat sich geändert, hiermit beantrage ich eine neue Prüfung.

Guten Tag,

unser Logo wurde von einem Designer neu erstellt und ich bitte Sie unseren Namen mit dem Neuen Logo zu akzeptieren. Unsere Webseite https://www.reisetraum-schwarzwald.de hat das Komplette Design geändert.

Wir sind ein neues Startup und wir wissen, dass wir nicht mit booking.com oder andere Größen konkurrieren können. Ich bedanke mich im Voraus für die Prüfung.

Mfg

Edgard Buckowitz
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Reisetraumschwarzwald (talk • contribs) 18:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This appears to be about File:Reisetraum Schwarzwald Logo.svg which was deleted because there is no evidence of a free license. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 18:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JFK at Rally for Smollette.jpg

I took this picture with my camera at the rally on 2/1/2019.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanemaster (talk • contribs) 10:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No EXIF and available on Instagram. Both are reasons to request a COM:OTRS permission from the photographer. If you are the author, follow instructions on that page. Ankry (talk) 12:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michael David Calnan.jpg

This image was originally taken in 1975 as an official portrait of Colonel Michael David Calnan by the Canadian Department of National Defence. When Colonel Calnan retired from the military in 1988, DND gave him the photograph and released all copyrights and reproduction rights to him. When Colonel Calnan passed away in 2018, ownership of the photograph was assumed by his estate. A copy of the image was given to the funeral home to be posted with his obituary with limited reproductive rights granted at that time for that purpose. Full copyright and reproduction rights remained vested with Colonel Calnan's estate. As a representative of Colonel Calnan's estate, I have been instructed to release this image to the public, relinquishing all copyrights and reproduction rights so that the image may be available for public use. Please undelete this image so that it may be used in Colonel Calnan's Wikipedia article.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcalnan (talk • contribs) 14:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
@Pcalnan: You can provide the evidence of copyright transfer to OTRS while providing a written free license permission as required for already published photos. Read COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roberta Rabellotti new.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The file is a not utilised picture of Roberta Rabellotti, I named it "Roberta Rabellotti new" as the previous, that were given to me by Roberta, my wife, appeared to have already been on the Internet. The picture was requested by Aalborg University, Denmark, for their website. Juliusdutchman (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

@Juliusdutchman: Who is the photographer who made the photo? Ankry (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done No response from the requester. Ankry (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Foto de presentación de Carlos Maya.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I can proof i have persmission to use this image. The photograph gave it to me. Please give me tips and were to put that permission Julianaloaizamaya (talk) 17:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Permission "to use" does not fit Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements. Can you prove that you are the photographer who made the photo, as you declared? Ankry (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
I think he means "I have permission to use this image. The photograph[er] gave it to me." in which case, the answer to Ankry's question is "NO". If that is the case, in order for the image to be restored, the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Robotics Arts.png

Buenas Tardes, un saludo desde argentina. recien entro a wikipedia y tengo un aviso del mismo diciendo que borraron mi imagen (Robotics Arts.jpg) por cuestiones de copiryght, cuando el logo fue creado por mi, y el nombre y la imagen estan echas por una sola razon y es el inicio de mi empresa de robotica, entonces quiero que vuelvan a revisar por cuestiones de tengo la suficiente evidencia o como quieran llamarlo, que es MIO y YO TENGO LOS DERECHOS DE AUTOR, la imagen fue puesta en wikipedia para poder concluir con crear una nota aca sobre mi futura empresa.

Muchas Gracias Alejo Costa. AlejoCosta50@hotmail.com

RoboticsArts@hotmail.com
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alejo Costa (talk • contribs) 22:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done our of scope. Ankry (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:André Carreiras no Campeonato Ncaional De Séniores de Portugal.jpg

I think you should undelete that image because it was me who took this picture.

Thank you for your comprehension.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by André Carreiras (talk • contribs) 22:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose That may be, but the image was taken from Facebook and therefore policy requires that the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 17:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Surabaya collage.jpg

The file was wrongly deleted. The source of the pictures is wiki commons and the collage is my own work. Please undelete.

--Buhadram (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

@Buhadram: If the source images license are compatible with the license you provided (CC-BY-SA 3.0), the image can be undeleted. Could you list the used images? Note: most Wikimedia Commons image licenses require autor attribution which you did not provide for used images. Ankry (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Eg. File:Tugu Pahlawan Surabaya.jpg is CC-BY 2.0 licensed and requires atribution to sbamueller in derivative works, which is missing. Ankry (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done copyvio. Ankry (talk) 17:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Þórdís Lóa Þórhallsdóttir.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: For verifying OTRS ticket:2019030610000108. Thank you. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Tiven2240: Ankry (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Insurance-arena logo.png

I reckon that the file I was trying to add on Wikicommons does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, since letters' logo are not stylized enough to be eligible, since the logo consists only in 2 words.

Even Amazon logo, Amazon Alexa App logo, &samhoudlogo, and so many others do not meet the threshold of originality (and are on WikiCommons) and I do not undertsand why Insurance-arena logo does.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Carloia13 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@Carloia13: Amazon is a US, not Italian company. TOO in US is much higher than in EU. Can you provide an Italian court case example where a logo of similar complexity was considered not copyrighted? Or a clear declaration from the logo owner, that they do not consider it protected by Italian Copyright law? Ankry (talk) 06:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. I found some italian logos that are considered not copyrighted like *File:Logo Pirelli.svg

and others... I still can't find differences with the logo I was trying to upload... thank you :) Carloia13 (talk) 14:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose All but the last of these are text only. It is well established that type fonts, however complex, and single words in such fonts do not have copyrights. For the last, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:AmaRoma-logo.png. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
The problem is the red curved line above the text, not the text itself. Ankry (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
This is still a simple shape IMO. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree I would like to point out that Italian threshold of originality is pretty high; see COM:TOO Italy. --Ruthven (msg) 16:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per above discussion. Ankry (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Interim Manager Siegfried Lettmann.jpg

I would like to request the undeletion of this file. We (User: SLIM Redaktion) own all the rights for the photo as it belongs to us. Patrick Rogel refered to a press release, where the same photo was used (by us). As said, we own the photo and all the rights to use it. Please undelete if possible. Best regards!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by SLIM Redaktion (talk • contribs) 08:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Take note that the current backlog for OTRS is 167 days, OTRS depends completely on volunteers, who work as hard as they can. Ankry (talk) 10:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: requires a free license via otrs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:François Veyrunes.jpg

Cette photo est libre de droit. © Christophe Guibbaud
— Preceding unsigned comment added by François Veyrunes (talk • contribs) 14:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
  • How can you simultaneously say it is libre de droit and indicate someone as owning the copyright? - Jmabel ! talk 17:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: The uploader is apparently the subject and Christophe Guibbaud is the photographer. In order to restore this, Christophe Guibbaud must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Верблюд в Чуйской степи.jpg

Хочу сообщить, что эту фотографию сделал я сам/ Непонимаю зачем его удалять --Alexandr frolov (talk) 19:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose But it was published elsewhere prior to upload here. For already used photos, COM:OTRS/ru permission is required. You will also need to prove your authorship there. Ankry (talk) 06:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC
My photos are many where applied. I photographed this camel at home. I have a lot of them. If you want to see other photos of this camel on my site www.camp-altai.ru --Alexandr frolov (talk) 21:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The new file is bigger, and has EXIF data. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted. --Yann (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Raja Ram Mohan Roy.jpg

This file was deleted due to copyvio, stating that the artist, Atul Bose, died in 1977. No evidence given that it was drawn by that particular artist. The deleted image can be seen here: http://www.kamat.com/kalranga/art/2480.htm, where it is ascribed to Bose. But a better source is the website of the Indian Parliament, where the Bose painting is actually kept. The portrait by Atul Bose can be seen here: https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/picture_gallery/mm_roy_7.asp. By comparing, you can see that the two images are different. Hrishikes (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose These are not the same paintings, but they are very similar, so it is quite probable that Atul Bose is the author. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree that the two paintings are different:

  1. sky to the right of the subject's head in the deleted version versus the column in the cited version
  2. a lighthouse(?) on the horizon in the cited version
  3. the balustrade to the left is much closer to the horizon in the deleted version

However, they are so close that one is almost certainly a copy of the other.

In order to restore this image, it must be shown that

  1. another artist painted the original and Atul Bose painted a copy
  2. the other artist's work is out of copyright, presumably because he died before 1941. Note that the subject died in 1833, so this may well be long out of copyright.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

  • This image from a 1914 book may also be seen, which is in nearly the same style. And as agreed by the opposers above, the deleted image is different from the painting by Bose kept in the Indian Parliament, although very close. The image from 1914 is also very close, but still different. Obviously, different painters rendered their versions, based on some more ancient version. The deleted image is the most well-known version among this set (1, 2, 3, 4) of similar images. Hrishikes (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
That adds little to this discussion. A painted copy of a painting has its own copyright, even if it is as exact a copy as possible. As we have seen, the deleted image is not identical to the others, so it certainly has or had a copyright. Without knowing the author, we cannot restore it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Monochrom Eignblunzn (2003), documentation.jpg

I am the copyright holder of this file. I'm Johannes Grenzfurthner (see my user page), founder of monochrom art group who created the art project that is documented with this image. Please undelete. Grenz (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Entirely aside from the question of whether you are the actual photographer here, as you claim, is the question of whether this contact sheet is actually in scope. While several of the images might be in scope if printed large, these are small, mixed, and have no useful descriptions. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

This is the official documentation format of the performance. We released the images in this way back in 2004. It's high res, we could also extract one of the single images. No prob with that. Here it is on Flickr, CC licensed: https://www.flickr.com/photos/monochrom/8754592394 -- Another option would be to use the logo of the performance on Wikimedia Commons: https://www.flickr.com/photos/monochrom/8754572924/ --- Grenz (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Again, are you the actual photographer of all of the images shown on the contact sheet? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
In this case, I am. Grenz (talk) 10:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion per AGF. Ankry (talk) 12:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

OK, so it is not a copyvio, but there is still the scope question. I think this violates our policy of wanting images as large as possible -- having only a contact sheet makes it impossible for anyone to use any of the individual images and there is no likely use of the whole contact sheet. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support The resolution is still high enough to use the images. However it would be better to scan each negative individually. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
How can I be of help? Should I pick 2 or 3 of the individual images and upload them? Grenz (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support The resolution is really high enough to use the images. People will be able to extract better pics later on. K-pachs (talk) 16:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sculpture Sias International University- 10420101534.jpg

out of process. FoP china. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:37, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Chinese FOP requires that the name of the creator and the title of the work be present in any derivative work.

"A work may be exploited without the permission from, and without payment of remuneration to, the copyright owner, provided that the name of the author and the title of the work are mentioned and the other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner by virtue of this Law are not infringed upon...
in the case of:
copying, drawing, photographing, or video recording of an artistic work located or on display in an outdoor public place.""

Neither are present here, so FOP does not apply. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question So this would be OK if the artist is mentioned? Regards, Yann (talk) 19:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
The law calls for artist and the title of the work. I looked for them and found a further problem. The image comes from https://www.flickr.com/photos/101561334@N08/10420101534/ where it has the PDM. That site says it is from WorldHistoryPics.com, which no longer exists. I doubt that the Flickr user is the actual photographer and there's no reason to believe that the image has any free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Badener Salon 1895.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Badener Salon 1895.JPG

1895 German photograph from an unknown photographer. Would be PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info If the 2009 book was the first publication of this photo, it may be hit by the EU "first publication" 25-year protection, the right belonging to the book publisher. Do we care of this? Ankry (talk) 10:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, if 2009 was first publication, it would seem this would have to wait until 2035. (Still learning I guess, hadn't heard of EU "first publication" protection until now). Abzeronow (talk) 14:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
The original DR was willing to assume it was published before 1923 (i.e. the 2009 book was most likely not the first publication). If so, the EU publication right would not apply. It would also not apply if 2009 was less than 70 years after the photographer's death. I'm not sure I would delete over that unless the book itself documented that the photograph had never before been published. Otherwise, it would seem that we have crossed the PD-old-assumed threshold since this was deleted. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Ankry (talk) 07:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZjHeinrich Brüning.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:ZjHeinrich Brüning.jpg

Apparently by w:Erich Salomon who died in 1944. Public domain in Germany. Abzeronow (talk) 15:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is the upper photo from https://web.archive.org/web/20070405114817/http://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/biografien/BrueningHeinrich/index.html IMO unlikely to be pre-1924. SO Copyrighted in US. Ankry (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info Clicking on that photograph gives this information
"Heinrich Brüning während einer Rede im Reichstag
Photographie. Berlin, Februar 1932. DHM, Berlin" Abzeronow (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
So Undelete in 2028. Or later. Ankry (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 15:34, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Yann, why do you support restoration. It appears to fail URAA, so it is copyrighted in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I think we should have an exception for URAA-affected files. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
The subject has been debated endlessly here and the conclusion was that since the URAA has given USA copyrights to many works, they cannot be kept here since they violate the US copyright. This is not the place to reopen the URAA discussion. Given the state of the DR backlog, I hope we don't reopen it any time soon. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
This was discussed on COM:VPC recently. While there are divided opinions, I think there is a majority for having an exception for URAA affected files. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
That may be, but you are proposing a major change in policy. A discussion at VPC does not change the fact that our official statement at Commons:URAA-restored copyrights says:
"If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle."
I agree that the URAA law is not a good law, but should Commons be in the business of picking and choosing what laws we should obey? If we take that route, then we need to do more than have a discussion at VPC and we certainly cannot change our rules arbitrarily on a case by case basis. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
we are following the guidance of WMF legal. do you want hebrew and german wikipedians to come again and re-establish that consensus again? or perhaps you could write a strongly worded legal opinion to WMF legal? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 03:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion." no URAA evidence provided to delete. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 03:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  • This is not a mere alegation. This is a 1932 German photo, so clearly copyrighted in Germany at least till 2002. More likely, till 2014 as the author died in 1944. Clearly copyrighted there in 1996. How can URAA not apply here? IMO, only if it was published initially in the US without copyright notice or without renewal. Very, very unlikely and we would need an evidence for that. Ankry (talk) 12:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Again, I would not object if Commons changed its policy on the URAA -- I think it is a bad law -- there is no reason why the USA should give a longer period of copyright protection than that given in the country of creation. However, at the moment it is our policy to honor the URAA and I am committed to uphold our policy as it stands, not as I would like it to be. Individual DRs and UnDRs are not the place to have this discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
again produce actual evidence of a violation. maths calculations are not evidence. i am committed to seeing the WMF legal advice followed, to the letter. you will not cherry pick to suit your deletionist ideology. if you delete files without evidence you should expect undeletion requests across the board. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 03:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Makfa Pasta promoted in Brazil

The Makfa pasta was promoted and sold to Wal Mart in Brazil by the first time because of the expertise in sales of Mr. Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho. Mr. Rosset worked as Commercial Director to Hyundai Corporation Brazil and Samsung C&T.

He is also the President of the Brazilian Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - www.brasil-russia.com.br
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arosset (talk • contribs) 15:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
@Arosset: And what do you request to undelete? Ankry (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 18:47, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Escudo Aguilas 2015 Blanco.jpg

Logo oficial del club, de mi propiedad.--Luchouski (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Policy requires that for corporate, sports club, school, and association logos, an authorized official of the organization owning the rights to the logo must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 18:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Restaurar Página

Saludos cordiales Por medio de la presente solicito a ustedes que restauren "Sabina Paredes Artista" la información fue subida con mi autorización ya que yo soy la autora de la obra subí dos imágenes y una biografía, me gustaría saber cuál es el procedimiento para restaurar, soy una artista y académica publica en el Ecuador, la información se encuentra en el internet para comprobación,

https://www.efe.com/efe/america/cultura/guarichas-la-rebeldia-femenina-hecha-arte/20000009-3324985 --© Agencia EFE, S.A. Avd. de Burgos, 8-B. 28036 Madrid. España Tel: +34 91 346 7100. Todos los derechos reservados:https://artepopularecuatoriano.blogspot.com/2017/10/exposicion-guarichas-presente-y-paso.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LT0mc6_X9ks - not freely licensed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlQ-OeXyufQ - not freely licensed
https://www.metroecuador.com.ec/ec/entretenimiento/2017/07/13/guarichas-la-rebeldia-femenina-hecha-arte.html -- © Copyright 2009 - 2019 Metro International

Agradecería mucho me ayuden con la restauración.

Sabina Paredes. MSc. Artista Plástica, Master, Esp. Diplm. Estudios del Arte. PhD student.

E. [snipped email addresses]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabina Paredes (talk • contribs) 02:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sabina Paredes for the three images uploaded by this editor. Each of the three contains modern works of art. The second one also has a variety of copyrighted photographs. I am not sure why you listed the web sites above, but as shown, all of them are either explicitly copyrighted or do not have free licenses and therefore are implicitly copyrighted.

File:" Con mi corazón en tus manos".jpg -- requires a free license from the artist using OTRS.
File:"Proyecto de arte y género ".png -- As a general rule we do not keep collages on Commons unless each of the individual images is properly licensed. In order to keep this, each of the photographers and artists whose work is shown must send a free license via OTRS.
File:"taller de la artista".jpg -- The photographer and the artist must send a free license using OTRS.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 18:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Osmand auf Samsung Galaxy S Advance (Hamburg).jpg

Please undelete this image as it was deleted for invalid lilcense. Should be fine by just adding "ODbL OpenStreetMap" license template therefore. Would have been nice if the deleting admin would have communicated this issue in advance, since the initial argument in the request was about the GUI elements. --Alexrk2 (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I suggest you read Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:OsmAnd again. While the OSM maps are free, the GUI is not and therefore screenshots of Osmand are not acceptable on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 18:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PashupatinathTemple.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: please don't delete my file because what i have done is all legal and is confined within the competition terms and conditions I can also prove my work is all authentic because in the first page of the competition it says that if the monument is more than 150 years old then copyright is allowed and for your kind information the file that I have posted is a temple which is more than 200 years old and according to the information you have provided to me my work is legal and there should be no copyright. i am really sorry to say Wikimedia that in this case your team is irresponsible .so for this reason my work should be granted and Wikimedia should also be responsible in its work and yes Mr Rohnjones i want to say you that first read full information about your competition then only think about deleting others work. Puskar chapagain (talk) 13:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The problem here is not the temple, which is, as you say, old enough to be free of copyright, but the image itself. Google turns up at least 50 uses of it on the Web. Policy therefore requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 18:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:10 Custom.jpg

This is an image of a Chinese Custom Gold Unit, I came to ask an administrator if this image was a scan or not, according to Chinese copyright © laws this banknote is in the public domain, and its uploader (Schazzennegar) uploaded another image of this series which was their own work which makes me think that they might also be the author of this image and simply didn't know how to fill in the form of the old UploadWizard. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Note that for whatever reason my notifications don't seem to work that well but pings seem to still work so please ping me when replying, if this file gets undeleted I could organise it properly.

Also the log reads: "Warning: You are recreating a page that was previously deleted. You should consider whether it is appropriate to continue editing this page. The deletion and move log for this page are provided here for convenience:

Also whenever I start a new request it States this. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: This was deleted as no license tag was provided. A valid tag is needed in order to undelete. Ankry (talk) 11:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry:, alright, but was it a simple scan or not? If so both "{{PD-Scan}}" and "{{PD-China}}" apply. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done @Donald Trung: please categorise. Ankry (talk) 14:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adalbert Seligmann - Recital im Studio.jpg

no evidence provided of actual violation, merely speculation. "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion" [2] Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 03:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Assuming it was not published prior to 2003, it may be PD in US. So GA candidate.svg Weak support unless an evidence of earlier publication (prior to the 2007 auction) is found. Or a clear evidence is found that it was made and published before 1.1.1924, what would make it obviously is PD. Ankry (talk) 07:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
The URAA cite above is obsolete. Policy is set forth at Commons:URAA-restored copyrights:
"If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle."
I don't like the URAA any more than anyone else here, but unless and until we change our policy and explicitly decide to ignore the URAA, we are stuck with the fact that our policy is that images must be free in the source country and in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
you are selectively quoting the consensus policy. you need to provide actual evidence, to support your "significant doubt". your history suggests you have never seen a license you have not doubted. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lack of a publication date is not sufficient to say it's protected by URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Ankry and Abzeronow. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pedda Manushulu movie poster 1.jpg

Although initially, I forgot to mention license, I added later. This poster is in the public domain due to this reason: "This is a movie poster created by an unknown and uncredited artist of Vauhini productions, Madras, India. As Vauhini productions employed the artist for that, Studio holds copyrights. Per, Indian copyrights laws it was in public domain post-2015." I even wrote that in Deletion request. As this is a public domain work, please restore the file. --Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 03:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Typo in license template name should not be a reason for deletion. {{PD-India}} pointed out in the DR is a valid license template. Ankry (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose PD in India in 2015, but will be under copyright in the USA until 2049 due to the URAA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Abzeronow (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Ankry and Abzeronow. --Yann (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Stromer V1.jpg

Please do not delete this Picture. I've been to the other website you named as the reason why the picture is going to be deleted. This Website is an extern Website with tons of Pictures of different E-Bikes. They did not take these pictures by themselves. As the user MyStromerAG represents the company myStromer AG we do have all the rights needed to use the picture. Thank you for your understanding. MyStromerAG (talk) 09:14, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In the image's description, you claimed that you were the actual photographer of the image. Above, you say that your company has the rights to use the image, which tells me that your claim of being the photographer is incorrect. That is a serious violation of Commons rules. In the case of images where the uploader is not the photographer, we require that either (a) the actual photographer grant a free license using OTRS or (b) the holder of a license from the photographer which allows the holder to freely license the image send proof of such a license also using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bandeira de Camutanga.png

This is a public image, belonging to the people. This is not violate the copyright.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucenaneto (talk • contribs) 14:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Even if distributed free to the public, photograph may still have copyright. @Jcb: Abzeronow (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
This is not a photo, this is a municipality flag image. And no copyright tag was provided (neither PD nor free license). Ankry (talk) 11:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Ah, OK, well, I'd presume the flag is copyrighted unless it can be shown to fall under an exemption. Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - in principle everything is copyrighted, unless there is a proper explanation to the contrary, which is absent in this case. Jcb (talk) 19:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Source site does not have a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bobby Robson More Than A Manager.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Accidental deletion request. ErtritK (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not accidental. An evidence of free license should be provided by the copyright holder(s) in order to restore the poster. Read COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Requires a free license via OTRS from the holder of the copyright to the poster, probably the movie's producer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Дело чести(постер к сериалу).jpg

What is the problem ? I did not install the license correctly? All the rights belong to the company that made this movie, I just make a wiki page for this movie.

Help solve this problem.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikazz777 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
@Nikazz777: You did not provide an evidence (in the Permission field) that the copyright owner declared the DVD cover to be CC0 licensed. If no such public evidence, COM:OTRS permission is needed. On-wiki license declaration works here only for original, unpublished works made personally by the uploader. Ankry (talk)
@Ankry: I already know, thanks. Nikazz777 (talk)

 Not done: Requires a free license via OTRS from the movie's producer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Shelley Long

Category deleted for being empty but now has images. William Graham (talk) 18:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: Not empty. --Yann (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Wiederherstellung für gelöschte Bilder beantragen

Names of the files to undelete:

Begründung: Fotorechte-Erklärung (ausgefülltes Standardformular) vom Urheber wurde am 27.2. an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org gemailt

Rosa Schöffmann Rosa Schöffmann (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done:

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte.jpg

OTRS permission has been arrived (ticket:2019022710000571), please restore the file. Thanks! Bencemac (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Bencemac: FYI. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YolanDa Brown Portrait 2019.jpg

I write to request that this file reinstated as the required information (shown Below) regarding copyright was mailed on the 31st January 2019 at 13.18 under [Ticket#2019012910026551] File YolanDa Brown Portrait 2019.jpg

To: Permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, Ivan Brown, the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work as shown here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:YolanDa_Brown_Portrait_2019.jpg and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free licence: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the licence and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the licence chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Ivan Brown Copyright holder 31st January 2019 Idtenti (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


Please patiently wait until the OTRS ticket is being processed. Jcb (talk) 22:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yolanda Brown plays the Barbican London.jpg

I write to request reinstatement of the above mentioned file as the required certification of copyright was submitted on the 31st January 2019 under [Ticket#2019012910026382] File YolanDa Brown plays The Barbican London.jpg

Please advise

Regards, Ivan Brown

Idtenti (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


Please patiently wait until the OTRS ticket is being processed. Jcb (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Comcast Ventures.png

I want comcast ventures to have a logo
— Preceding unsigned comment added by NevinMaasa (talk • contribs) 08:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@NevinMaasa: So which image you wish to undelete and why is it free? Ankry (talk) 10:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) There has never been a File:Comcast Ventures.png. There is nothing similar in your uploads. I see that you added a link to File:Comcast Ventures logo.png to the WP:EN article Comcast Ventures, but that file name has never been used either. It is possible that the logo at https://www.comcastventures.com/ simple enough to be PD, but there is nothing to do about that here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done nothing to undelete. Ankry (talk) 08:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JewHyper - Banner.png

Hello, My name is Maor (JewHyper) and I really don't understand why someone deleted my banner. Firstable, this is a file with the banner I created and I said that no one can use this banner except me. Secondly, I didn't even understand why you deleted my file, I'm only using this file as my banner in my wikipedia's profile.

Hope you will undelete my file!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by JewHyper (talk • contribs) 11:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

JewHyper (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Banner made from screenshots from the computer game Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six. Thuresson (talk) 17:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson: no evidence that the uploader is the game author. Ankry (talk) 07:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Транс-Атлантик.jpg

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko, Данная фотография была предоставлена, Клубу Форте и клубу ДуровЪ в качестве превью для концерта. Авторские права им не пренадлежат. У меня имеется pdf файл оригинала фотографии откуда была взята данная фотография. (09.03.2019)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nik-chip (talk • contribs) 11:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Almost every photo is copyrighted until copyright expires (usually 70 years after the photographer death). Ankry (talk) 14:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 07:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

undeletion request for File:Sunit Gajbhiye.jpg file

Hi, Please can you undelete the file as i have taken the picture and the source is https://www.sunitgajbhiye.com/ in the crew section --Aditya.ya (talk) 15:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image appears there with "© 2018 Sunit Gajbhiye. All Rights Reserved." Policy therefore requires that the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 07:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Bruin2

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bruin2

First photograph is from 1878 and looks like it was published before 1924. http://cdm15020.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p15020coll1/id/4695/rec/1

2nd is from 1886. Photographer is not named, and photo was created more than 120 years ago. PD-US-unpublished http://cdm15020.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p15020coll1/id/7362/rec/4

3rd photo is from 1894. http://cdm15020.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p15020coll1/id/8605/rec/32

4th is from 1893. Photographer not named, and was created more than 120 years ago. Would be PD-US-unpublished

http://cdm15020.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p15020coll1/id/16665/rec/14

5th photo is from 1884. http://cdm15020.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p15020coll1/id/6205/rec/2 Abzeronow (talk) 15:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support If these were first published between 1923 and 2002, then they may still be under copyright. Otherwise they are PD. It's a close call, but I think it is safe to assume that they are either unpublished or published in the 19th century. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Invalid license changed to {{PD-old-assumed}}. @Abzeronow, Jameslwoodward: feel free to change to something more appropriate if you wish. Ankry (talk) 08:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kansas-Governor Laura Kelly.jpg

Official portraits of state government officials are openly available public records according to Kansas law.

Kansas statute 45-217 defines "public record" as "any recorded information, regardless of form, characteristics or location, which is made, maintained or kept by or is in the possession of... any public agency." Furthermore, 45-217 goes on to specifically state that "this act shall be liberally construed and applied." Under a normal definition, let alone a "liberally applied" one, the official portrait of a Kansas government official is a form of recorded information and is maintained by their related public agency in records and on an official state government website.

Kansas statute 45-216 declares it "the public policy of the state that public records shall be open for inspection by any person unless otherwise provided by this act." The act provides no exemption for official government portraits. Furthermore, statute 45-219 allows that "any person may It was deleted because we do not know who you are or whether you actually are the photographer as claimed or whether you simply lifted the image from the copyrighted newspaper. Because we get liars and forgers here, policy requires that when an image has appeared elsewhere without a free license that the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 179 days before the email is processed and the file is restored of any public record to which such person has access."

In conclusion, official portraits of state government officials in Kansas are public records that are available for inspection and copying by any person. They therefore qualify as public domain and are available for free use on Wikimedia Commons.

--Kurtwfan13 (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC) March 8, 2019

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Public record is not the same as public domain. A DVD copy of the 1992 movie Titanic will not become public domain if somebody sends a copy to Kansas State department of education. Thuresson (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Titanic is from 1997 if you mean the movie with Leonardo DiCaprio. But yeah Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Thuresson and Jameslwoodward Abzeronow (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Further, I can legally go to the library and make copies of copyrighted works, or photograph copyrighted works, but that does not mean that I can freely license them for commercial use. Allowing "inspection and copying" is very much less than freely licensing for any use anywhere, including commercial use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 08:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Metin Kayar (Hanshi - 10. Dan).jpg

This file is my own work as a photographer. We put this file on the homepage of Metin Kayar, so of course I have the right to use it.

Please undelete my file.

Marxer001 (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)MArxer001
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marxer001 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposePolicy requires that when an image has appeared elsewhere without a free license that the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Now I understand and sent email for OTRS Licencing. Thanks

--Marxer001 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Marxer001


 Not done per above: waiting for OTRS. Ankry (talk) 08:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WKU 2018 Toni Dietl and Metin Kayar.jpg

This is my own work as a photographer. We gave the picture to the newspaper which displayed it for the news. I cannot understand why you deleted it. please undelete the picture.

Marxer001 (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Marxer001
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marxer001 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
@Marxer001: "My" or "we"? Our rules do not allow to accept on-wiki license declaration for already published images. The license should be provided either via the initial publication site, or following COM:OTRS. However, I see also a COM:DW problem because no evidence that the photographed items are free/not copyrightable. They are not COM:DM. Ankry (talk) 10:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It was deleted because we do not know who you are or whether you actually are the photographer as claimed or whether you simply lifted the image from the copyrighted newspaper. Because we get liars and forgers here, policy requires that when an image has appeared elsewhere without a free license that the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

So you deleted it, no problem. Don't need it to be here on Wiki. --Marxer001 (talk) 12:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Marxer001


 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 08:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Survivethis

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi, there.

I previously uploaded a couple of images from our library of press photos. The images is owned by, and and fully licensed by, NITO Norway. Most of them were approved, but some seems to not have been taken to consideration. I’ll paste the approval from our media manager below.

I would like the images to be available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license. I want it to be attributed to the organization who owns the images, "Norwegian Society of Engineers and Technologists". In Norwegian: "Norges Ingeniør- og Teknologorganisasjon".

“Dear whomever this may concerne.

This is a free license release to Patrik Svendsen from NITO for the use of the attached photos of our former presidents.

I am the media and content manager for NITO, and can confirm that all photos have been bought, licensed and paid for with the agreement to use publicly, since they also serve(d) as press photos.»

This regards the following images:

File:Gro Harlem Brundtland and Lars Harlem.jpg File:Marit Stykket 1996.jpg File:NITO Offshore.jpg File:Trygve Haneas and Erik Bjore.jpg

Best regards Survivethis (talk) 14:51, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Except for works where the uploader is the creator, all uploads require that the actual creator of the work or a person who holds a license that allows him to freely license the work must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by the Nipponese Dog Calvero

I'd rather not post an undeletion request here but I've pinged @Jdx: on their talk page with no response and they keep deleting often useful files which have been hosted here for years many of which are "COM:INUSE", I request an admin to undelete them and if possible convert them into regular deletion requests (and not a mass one as these files have individual merit), Jdx has taken the rules upon himself, deleting files simply because a ussr has been previously blocked is not a criteria for deletion on Wikimedia Commons and many of these files are the only files of notable Taiwanese human rights activists. Also please hurry as the CommonsDelinker could remove a large number of these soon, these deletions are without consensus and against policy. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Please look at Category:Stella Chen as an example of a notable person who doesn't have any images anymore on Wikimedia Commons, if anyone undeletes these files then also undo the CommonsDelinker, the damage has in some cases already been done. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: OK, I have undeleted almost all of them. Four still deleted fall into category "recreation of previously deleted content". --jdx Re: 12:31, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@Jdx:, thank you, please forgive me for pinging you often, I'll try to add the images back that were delinked later when I will have the time. Also I will add as much as possible to my watch list as I usually detect the Nipponese Dog through his sockloads (get it, sock uploads, not funny, I will let myself out). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚)
@Donald Trung: Almost all of delinker edits are already undone. There is one article left on enwiki which requires extended-confirmed privileges an one on zhwiki which is guarded by a kind of abuse filter (likely created specifically against the Dog). --jdx Re: 14:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done as it seems thereis nothing to do here. Ankry (talk) 16:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Texas Tech Adminstration Building 1923.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Texas Tech Adminstration Building 1923.jpg

Circa 1923 United States photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. "The cornerstone for the Administration Building was laid in November of 1924, and the building opened 1925." (same image at Texas Tech) So the photo of the complete building cannot have been published before 1924. However, there is a chance of PD-US-no notice which would have to be demonstrated. De728631 (talk) 07:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the info, De728631. I can wait until 2021 for this. Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Thomann In(ter)vention. Poster of short documentary about monochrom's Georg Paul Thomann (2018).jpg

Request undeletion. I am the producer and copyright holder of this film (and poster). I am willingly releasing this image under CC 4.0. Grenz (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: Not currently deleted. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Escudo de cortegana.svg

What is this all about? Yann (talk) 23:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Yann: I don't understand. Anyway, this is about this user requesting the deletion of this file under a bad rationale (see {{Coa blazon}}: Any illustration conforming with the blazon of the arms is considered to be heraldically correct. Thus several different artistic interpretations of the same coat of arms can exist. The design officially used by the armiger is likely protected by copyright, in which case it cannot be used here.) and that file being deleted when it shouldn't have been. Strakhov (talk) 21:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Curtiss CR3 1923 A.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MAC06130

Circa 1923 United States photograph. (Airplane was American-made). Pinging @Jcb as a courtesy. Abzeronow (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done - Jcb (talk) 22:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

As a rule, Jcb, we leave UnDRs up for 24 hours before acting. In this case, I Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose restoration. "Circa 1923" is not sufficient. In order for the images to be restored, the user must prove that the images were actually published before 1/1/1924. Also, I think the first two are the same -- note the gray dot a little above and to the left of the upper wing. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Do you have a source for that 24 hours rule? It's not at Commons:Undeletion_requests#Instructions_for_administrators where I would expect it. Many UDRs are closed in less than 24 hours. Jcb (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Waiting for 24 h is not a written rule, but is what I usually do, unless it is a non controversial closure. IMO these are OK. We usually assume that the images were published soon after being taken, unless we have a different evidence (family archives, etc.). Regards, Yann (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm also now working on trying to find if I can narrow down when it was published. The first two photos(which are similar but slightly different in shading) are from September 28, 1923 http://wight.hampshireairfields.co.uk/cowes.html Third describes it being the same event. Abzeronow (talk) 23:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
OK, found a 1925 publication in Flight. Matches up with source that mentions that too. November 5, 1925 issue: https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1925/1925%20-%200725.html?search=Rittenhouse%201923 Abzeronow (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Third photograph was published in Flight in the August 30, 1923 issue. https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1923/1923%20-%200521.html?search=Irvine%201923 So, all three were published in a British magazine with no photographer credited, and both were published before 1926: PD-UK-unknown and PD-1996 @Jameslwoodward: Abzeronow (talk) 00:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
That's good, thank you all. However, we still have the first two -- I think we should pick one and delete the other. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 08:58, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
My personal preference would be to keep the 2nd one but I'll leave that matter up to you. Abzeronow (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
A photo published anonymously in UK in 1925 was PD in UK on 1.1.1996, and so escaped from URAA copyright restoration. IMO, all three are PD in both: UK & US. Ankry (talk) 07:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done by Jcb. Ankry (talk) 14:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Naked male.jpg

Incorrect "Deleted" rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked male.jpg#File:Naked male.jpg 2. The file satisfied COM:INUSE by being in use at simple:Nudity, therefore it was in scope.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 06:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Jeff. I'm also quite surprised about the closing rationale provided by Jim in the DR. A file inserted into an article by the uploader does automatically become "in use", or the whole purpose of Commons should be redefined. See also COM:INUSE: "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose." De728631 (talk) 06:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pinging the DR closing admin @Jameslwoodward: for possible explanation of their rationale here. Ankry (talk) 07:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree. As I said in my closing comment, an uploader cannot force us to keep an otherwise unacceptable file by putting it into use somewhere. That's particularly true when the place he puts it is not edited often, so it is likely to stay in use without being removed by another editor. Note that the consensus at the DR was that file should not be kept except for the fact that it was in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: Why do you say "otherwise unacceptable"? Did I miss anything? Yann (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Perhaps I am wrong, but I thought our policy was that since we already have hundreds of images of standing nude men (315 in Category:Nude standing men alone) that we were not taking new images unless they were exceptional in some regard. That was the opinion of the nominator and two others in the DR, in addition to me. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
So why deleting this and not the others? Ankry (talk) 21:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: We don't need such a special rule for nude pictures. This one looks fine to me. There are several billions men on Earth, so 315 nude pictures seem OK to me. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

It is worth noting that the DR was created by an anon IP, the same IP that is likely to have been here before as they are Commons-sophisticated enough to comment on this page diff apparently to undelete the image, and yet has made no other contributions to Commons apart from this DR. The only real delete !vote was from an account that has for a long time been a self declared pron warrior and has a notice on their Commons user page of "Fighting a never-ending battle against copyright vios and smut." Let's discount the other delete !vote as in the DR, they stated they had not even looked at the image, so their deletion was a somewhat meaningless "me too" statement.

At some point, it may be worth considering a case book for revising the COM:PENIS guidelines, the limitation of "we have enough" is debatable and lacks context, such as distinguishing between amateur graphicly sexual closeups versus culturally acceptable nudity and photographic life studies. The intention of the guideline is stated to target low resolution or poor quality, the DR should have focused on whether this recently taken and credibly released photograph was either low resolution or poor quality. The claim in the DR, by the uploader, that the photograph was copyrighted elsewhere had no source and would have been worth investigating, especially as it remains unclear if the uploader was effectively asking for deletion. As Yann points out, 315 photographs of standing nude men is not excessive. In fact if Commons were to be a useful resource for anyone wanting a selection of comparison photographs for examining the techniques used in classical statues or 18th century life studies, then we should really have several thousand good quality portraits to select from. If we were attempting to teach an AI how to distinguish potential porn from acceptable or artistic nudity, then again we need thousands not hundreds of photographs. -- (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

  • @Jameslwoodward:, did you mean to restore also the three older versions, which are mostly unrelated photos from disparate uploaders? -- Tuválkin 18:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Haris Stamboulidis.jpg

this files has been provided to me by Haris Stamboulidis from his own collection and has given me the photo to use on his Wikipedia page

REgards, Aphrodite--Akarnikos (talk) 08:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Akarnikos: Maybe, but this does not give you the right to claim that you are the photo author (the photographer). COM:OTRS free license permission from the actual copyright owner is needed in order to undelete the photo. Ankry (talk) 09:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: First, please do not claim that you were the photographer when that is not the case. That is a violation of Commons rules and if you do it again you may be blocked from editing here. Second, it is unlikely that the subject of the image has the right to freely license it. That right almost always belongs to the photographer.

In order for this image to be restored, the actual copyright holder -- as noted above, this is almost always the photographer -- must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:قاسم حیدری نژادد.jpg

با سلام و احترام. این صفحه که میخوام بسازم متعلق به استاد بنده بوده و این لینکی ارجاع دادین و عکسی که فرمودین هم متعلق به ایشونه. من الان موندم چیکار کنم اخه به ایشون قول دادم که براشون این رو میسازم

فایل مورد نظر : File:قاسم حیدری نژادد.jpg

--Rza khdi (talk) 10:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Rza khdi: As the photo was already published somewhere outside Commons, we need a free license permission from the fotographer send following COM:OTRS/ar instructions. Ankry (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license from the actual photographer using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Russ Wetmore.png

I understand that there was a lack of permission to use which resulted in my photo being deleted. My permissions have been sent under separate cover and I request the file be undeleted to that end.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsswtmr (talk • contribs) 14:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If you are the photographer, who made the original photo and you have send a permission to OTRS, then we can only wait until it is processed by volunteers. Ankry (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Your username indicates that you are the depicted person. As the image isnt a selfie, we would need a releasing mail by the real photographer through COM:OTRS for it. regards. --JuTa 17:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license from the actual photographer using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Osmand auf Samsung Galaxy S Advance (Hamburg).jpg

Argument for deletion was: "Only one image had a proper license tag, all others were "licensed" under a clearly invalid CC license." The image can be restored with proper license tag "ODbL OpenStreetMap". Also see previous UDR. --Alexrk2 (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

@Alexrk2: Have you read comments to your previous request? Do not repeat rejected request with the same rationale: this is disrupting behaviour. Ankry (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Of course I've read this. And there is nothing about copyright of GUI elements. The decisions was made because missing OSM licence template. --Alexrk2 (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: repeat request with nothing new. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hans am Ende 00001.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hans am Ende 00001.jpg

I don't speak German, so I had to use Google Translate for this. This seems to be an 1890 photograph with an unknown photographer Seems like it could be PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Abzeronow: This is the same photo in much higher resolution. Isuggest uploading this version instead or undeleting a low-res one (193 × 267px), if you think that the photo is PD. Ankry (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agreed. Please upload the cited file with the same file name. It is not only larger, but is less contrasty, so it is a much better image. Good catch, User:Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
OK, uploaded cited file under this file name. Abzeronow (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: -- that is, did not restore the smaller file. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Matthew Yang King Powers.jpg

This is a photo taken of a public person in a public place, and I am the subject of the photo. I have the right to upload this photo.

--Maddking (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC) March 11, 2019

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose First, the subject holds the copyright in three cases (1) if the photo is selfie (not the case), (2) is the employer of the photographer or (3) hes a copyright transfer contract with the initial copyright holder. The latter two cases needs a proof via OTRS. Moreover, the photo was published without evidence of free license that is also a reason to require a free license permission from the actual copyright holder through OTRS. Ankry (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 Not done "CULVER CITY, CA - MAY 26: Actor Matthew Yang King arrives at the 'Powers' Premiere at ArcLight Cinemas on May 26, 2016 in Culver City, California. (Photo by Rich Polk/Getty Images for Sony Pictures Television)" (gettyimages.com). Thuresson (talk) 20:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Phil hanson (racing driver) Silverstone August 2018.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Originally deleted because the Flickr source page ([3]) had a non-free license. It's now licensed CC BY 2.0. clpo13(talk) 18:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: But EXIF says that the copyright holder is David Lord Photography. @Clpo13: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 23:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Phil hanson united autosports LigierJSP217 elms 2018 01.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Originally deleted because the Flickr source page ([4]) had a non-free license. It's now licensed CC BY 2.0. clpo13(talk) 18:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Clpo13: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alisa Pomerantz-Boro.jpg

I have added a Creative Commons License to the photo on Facebook. Sboro (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Neither non-commercial nor non-derivatives licenses are accepted in Wikimedia Commons. Read COM:L for details. Ankry (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: NC and ND are not acceptable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Attraction Club logo.jpg

On March 10th, at my request, Attraction Club, the owner of the logo, has confirmed me sending an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org allowing the usage of the file.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Solicromania (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 March 2019‎ (UTC)
  • @Solicromania: Signing your posts on talk pages is required by Commons:Signatures policy. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Must wait its turn in the OTRS queue. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Attraction Club Insider first issue front cover.jpg

On March 10th, at my request, Attraction Club, the owner of the logo, has confirmed me sending an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org allowing the usage of the file.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Solicromania (talk • contribs) 15:36, 12 March 2019‎ (UTC)
Ibid.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Must wait its turn in the OTRS queue. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Representative photo of Attraction Club swingers club.jpg

On March 10th, at my request, Attraction Club, the owner of the logo, has confirmed me sending an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org allowing the usage of the file.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Solicromania (talk • contribs) 15:36, 12 March 2019‎ (UTC)
Ibid.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Must wait its turn in the OTRS queue. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pierre Romera.jpg

License changed and is now Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Molestor (talk • contribs) 11:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done restored par above. Ankry (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Liebestraum-01.jpg

The file is in this website: https://www.uniquefilmsupinc.com/Twilight-Films-US.html with a big sign that reads: "This website's content has been published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 license"

We did this following your instructions 2 years ago.

Artemisalee (talk) 18:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

I tend to Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion. If there are copyright doubts here, they do not qualify as speedy. Maybe the nominator @Herbythyme: provide some rationale why they doubt the license? Ankry (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
RV self - yes this looks like an undelete. Although the free licesing statement is at the top of the website that is not where I usually look (!!) so apologies. I'll undelete --Herby talk thyme 19:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done by Herbythyme. Ankry (talk) 19:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Apocalipsis Nuclear Stills-01.jpg

The file is in this website: https://www.uniquefilmsupinc.com/Twilight-Films-US.html with a big sign that reads: "This website's content has been published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 license"

We did this following your instructions 2 years ago in an email sent by you with all the instructions.

Artemisalee (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Per the one above - apologies and undeleted - my mistake --Herby talk thyme 19:11, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done by Herbythyme. Ankry (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Brasão de Timbaúba.jpg

Public Domain. Image of the people of the city Timbaúba. Public art.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucenaneto (talk • contribs) 03:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
If you meant File:Brasão de Timbaúba.gif, please note that this has not yet been deleted. However, your reasoning might be correct. If the image of these arms was commissioned by the municipal government of Timbaúba, it qualifies for {{PD-BrazilGov}}. De728631 (talk) 06:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Already deleted. @Yann: your opinion? Ankry (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
This was uploaded with Google as source, and without a license. What's the rationale for being in the public domain? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The Brazilian exemption for government works is very limited -- only "legislative and judicial documents". A flag or CoA is none of the three. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done no explanation from the requester. Ankry (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bobby Robson More Than A Manager.png

I have requested an undeletion of this file with no response or help of any kind.

Please process my request for undeletion as this was a mistake because of miscommunication from the copyright holders.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by ErtritK (talk • contribs) 14:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @ErtritK: The poster cannot be undeleted until a proper free license permission is received from copyright holder(s) and processed; read COM:OTRS for details. Note, that there probably more than one copyright holder (for each photo used in the poster) or copyright transfer evidence may be needed in OTRS. Ankry (talk) 16:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Note that a similar request for this image was closed on March 9 with much the same comment and reason. User:ErtritK, you say "with no response or help of any kind". That's simply not true.
User:Ankry commented:
"An evidence of free license should be provided by the copyright holder(s) in order to restore the poster. Read COM:OTRS for details."
And I closed the request with:
"Not done: Requires a free license via OTRS from the holder of the copyright to the poster, probably the movie's producer."
What part of that don't you understand? In order for the image to be restored, the actual copyright holder, which is probably the movie's producer, must send a free license using OTRS. There is full information about how to do that at OTRS, which Ankry suggested you read and I linked.
Since this is the third request you have made for the undeletion of this file, I must warn you not to do it again. You may ask questions here or at User talk:Ankry or User talk:Jameslwoodward. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done same reason as previously. Ankry (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:折居社・由来の説明看板.jpg

過去2回において、著作権上の問題及びOTRSの方針にそぐわないために削除されていましたが、最新のアップロードにおいて、著作権者(姥神大神宮、現在の宮司による)からのOTRSの形式に従った許諾申請を得た上でOTRSに申請していたにもかかわらず今回の削除となってしまったため、削除の撤回を求めるものです。
著作権者側もOTRSの方針と「Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International(クリエイティブ・コモンズ 表示-継承 4.0 国際)」とする同意を許諾申請書類によって得ているので、今回行われた削除は全く不当なものとしか考えられませんし、許諾申請書類上、ファイル名の変更も困難となっています。
以上の点から、著作権上の問題はクリアとなり、OTRSの方針にも沿っていると考えられるため、削除の撤回を求めます。--BATACHAN (talk) 18:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC) (英訳:Google翻訳による)
(English translation: Google Translate)
In the past two times, it was deleted because it did not meet copyright problems and OTRS policies, but in the latest upload, it follows OTRS format from the copyright owner (Ubagamidaijingu Shrine, by current chief priest) Even though I applied for OTRS after obtaining permission application, this time it became deletion, so we ask for withdrawal of deletion.
The copyright owner also got the consent of OTRS policy and "Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International" by permission application documents, so the deletion made this time is totally unjust It can only be thought of as a thing, and it is also difficult to change the file name on the application for permission application.
In view of the above, copyright issues are cleared and it seems to be in line with the OTRS policy, so we ask for withdrawal of deletion.--BATACHAN (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

As the image requires OTRS permission, we cannot restore it without a confirmation by an OTRS agent that there is a valid permission in OTRS. As OTRS (as almost everything in Wikimedia) is operated by volunteers, nobody can grant you a real estimation how long you need to wait for a response. You can try to ask in COM:ON (or directly a Chinese speaking OTRS agent - assuming the permission was send in Chinese) about the status of the ticket. But also here: nobody can grant you to receive a response. That is why it is much simpler when a photographer uploads themselves their own photo prior to publishing it elsewhere. Ankry (talk) 21:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per my comment. Ankry (talk) 20:39, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Keeley Hawes 2019.jpg

Keeley_Hawes_2019.jpg

REASONS: image is not from Getty Image. It is from https://www.hawtcelebs.com/keeley-hawes-at-charles-finch-chanel-pre-bafta-dinner-in-london-02-09-2019/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Random bestest (talk • contribs) 00:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

http://prideandprejudice05.blogspot.com/2018/10/happy-birthday-matthew-macfadyen.html.jpg

http://prideandprejudice05.blogspot.com/2018/10/happy-birthday-matthew-macfadyen.html

The twitter account you mentioned is also a fan based account and was not even certified by twitter
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Random bestest (talk • contribs) 00:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Random bestest: Signing your posts on talk pages is required by Commons:Signatures policy. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).
Where are the free licenses for these files?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose You say the file is from

www.hawtcelebs.com/keeley-hawes-at-charles-finch-chanel-pre-bafta-dinner-in-london-02-09-2019

Unfortunately, that site is clearly marked " Copyright © 2019 HawtCelebs". In order to restore this image, the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done OTRS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mike Gruntman.jpg

Kindly restore file Mike Gruntman.jpg as it was again deleted in wiki commons despite permission email sent by mike gruntman himself dated Jan 26 2019 from his usc emial id. What more is needed to get this sorted out once and for all ?

Ticket#: 2018121910007152 Profile Pic Request and wiki Release agreement

wikipi3146 Sat, Jan 26, 6:29 PM to mikeg


Hello Prof. Gruntman,

Can you please authorize us to use the attached ( Mike Gruntman.jpg) image sent earlier (by you) as your profile pic on your wikipedia page. Moreover, kindly also confirm to the below text (in green) that affirms that you agree to the below release agreement from wiki commons.

Please include permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in cc to your response. Thanks, pi3146

I hereby affirm that I represent Mike Gruntman, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media attached to this email. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

wikipi3146 Wikipedia creator of page Mike Gruntman of Mike Gruntman 2019-01-26

[generated using relgen]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pi3146 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC) Mike Gruntman <redacted> Sat, Jan 26, 6:34 PM to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Dear wikipi3146,

Yes, I authorize you to use the attached image in the wiki pages.

I understand that this photograph will be used following the rules

described in your email (below) and that you represent me

on that matter

Thank you again

Sincerely,

Prof. Mike Gruntman, PhD

Professor of Astronautics and Chair

Department of Astronautical Engineering Viterbi School of Engineering

Pi3146 (talk) 04:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Krd, you own this OTRS ticket. It looks good to me. Is there a reason why the file was not changed from {{OTRS received}} to {{OTRS permission}}? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done OTRS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Рыбас Тарас Михайлович.jpg

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! Restore this file, please. It's my father's photo from the family album. All T.M.Rybas relatives agree, that it would be better to change the photo on Рыбас,_Тарас_Михайлович wiki page. Not the best one is used in present, maybe the source photo was distorted some way. He never wore a beard and never appeared unshaven, as one can see on his wiki page now. His 100 anniversary comes in a few days, so restore the photo ASAP, please.

--Rybas AT (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Rybas AT: Who is/was the photographer who made the original photo? You claimed that you are the photographer, what is doubtful. Ankry (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose First, claiming that you were the photographer when you know that the image came from a family album is a serious violation of Commons rules. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing here.
Owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. That right almost always belongs to the photographer or his heirs. This looks like a professional studio portrait. In order for this image to be restored to Commons, the photographer or an heir must send a free license using OTRS. If you cannot determine who the photographer was, then the image is a copyright orphan and cannot be kept here until 120 years after its creation. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done unclear copyright status. Ankry (talk) 21:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:David Petrovsky in 1924.jpg

Dear Administrator in Wikipedia:

The "File:David Petrovsky in 1924.jpg" - is a photo of my grandfather David Petrovsky (from Petrovsky Family Archive). I am the only grandson of David Petrovsky. My father - Alexey Petrovsky (he died in 2010) - was the only son of David Petrovsky. My family (wife and adult children) decided to published this photo in the article about David Petrovsky. The article about David Petrovsky is the result of many years of work of famous researches, historians, and writers from the US, Great Britain. Please, don't delete this photo from the article about David Petrovsky.

Sincerely,

Michael A. Petrovsky

E-mail: (Redacted) Phone number: (Redacted) —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.86.152.117 (talk) 06:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose From Commons:Deletion requests/File:David Petrovsky in 1924.jpg: "The author of the picture is unknown, the photo is taken from the family archive, there are no sources of lawful disclosure of the picture."
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thuresson (talk • contribs) 07:57, 10 March 2019‎ (UTC)
Yes and no. As a general rule, owning a paper or digital copy of an image does not give you the right to freely license it. That right is almost always held by the photographer and his heirs. However, this appears to be a studio portrait. If this was taken in the UK, then the UK law before 1989 applies and copyright to the image belongs to the person who paid for the portrait -- the subject. In that case, this is OK. If, however, this was taken in the USSR, then the photographer's heirs own the copyright until it expires 70 years after the death of the photographer. There is no special provision for unknown photographers. So, if it can be proven that this is a UK image, then it can be kept, otherwise not. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Good afternoon, James.

Thank you for your comments. This photo of my grandfather David Petrovsky (from family archive) was digitized for Wikipedia by me - Michael A. Petrovsky (the only grandson of David Petrovsky). The cousin of my father Joyce Rathbone gave this photo to our family when she came to Moscow to visit us from UK in 1985.

Sincerely,

Michael A.Petrovsky

E-mail: (Redacted)

Phone number: (Redacted)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael A. Petrovsky (talk • contribs) 20:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@Michael A. Petrovsky: It is irrelevant who is on the photo and who did digitize it. Copyright belong to the original photographer, regardless whether we know who they were or not and expire (in US) in most cases 95 years after the first publication (unless it was a US publication) or 120 years from creation with rare extempts. If you cannot provide photographer name and their death date and you cannot point out a pre-1975 publication of the photo, it is unlikely that it can be restored before 2045. Ankry (talk) 07:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support It appears from the image itself and the circumstances described above that this is a studio portrait made in 1924 in the UK. In that case, the copyright belongs to the person who commissioned the work, presumably the subject. see:https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ownership-of-copyright-works

"Prior to 1 August 1989 though, the copyright in photographs, portraits and engravings (and only those types of work) which were created as a result of a commission were owned by the commissioner and NOT the creator."

Since AGF tells me that I can assume that the uploader is, as he says above, the grandson and an heir of the subject, he has the right to freely license the image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. @Jameslwoodward: marked as {{PD-UK-unknown}}; please change if you find more appropriate license template. Ankry (talk) 23:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NarendraRocherolle.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Public Domain photo on flickr.com

https://www.flickr.com/photos/narendra/47306515622/in/dateposted-public/ Narenpublic (talk) 14:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per COM:PDM. Please have the Flickr license changed or send permission via OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The Flickr user, the subject, and the account here all have similar names. Since the image does not look like a selfie, we will need a free license from the actual photographer. Only if the Flickr user is actually the photographer will changing the license on Flickr be sufficient. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Jim. Ankry (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:東森集團總裁王令麟.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I, an OTRS agent (verify), found that the copyright holder of the file(s) send a permission request to OTRS (Ticket:2019031310003404). I checked this ticket and confirmed that the declaration of the permission is valid. Please restore the file(s) and, if necessary, add the {{PermissionOTRS}} on the description(s) of the file(s). Thanks! This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 04:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

已由此照片著作權擁有之ETtoday.net 官方公用信箱提出版權聲明,懇請恢復此照片於「王令麟」頁面上使用。代表人 曾雅玲 yaling@ettoday.net
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylviatyl (talk • contribs) 02:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per OTRS agent request. Ankry (talk) 05:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alaska via Canadian Pacific. Taku Glacier (3531517944).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Boston Public Library collections - Vintage Travel Posters

Poster by Charles James Greenwood, a Canadian artist, who died in 1965. Now Public Domain in Canada. Pinging @Yann Abzeronow (talk) 14:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Canada is pma 50. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request for restoration

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Why not the uploader can be the subject of the photograph? timer, camera stand do exist in this world? right? Face-smile.svg Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

The uploader can be a subject if the photo is a selfie or there is an evidence of serf-timer in the photo EXIF data. The conference/meeting photo is unlikely to be made using tripod & self-timer. Ankry (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I withdraw this request. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:بیدی.jpg

hi,

i took this picture myself, and add it in a relative essay, please Undeletfe it‍‍ --13:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)79.132.208.107

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The packaging is copyrighted. We cannot keep the image here without a license from the manufacturer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: Per COM:PACKAGING. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ratnamanjarii Poster.jpg

The above file is own work. Requesting for speedy undeletion of the same.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by DexterBud (talk • contribs) 18:28, 12 March 2019‎ (UTC)
No such file has ever existed. DexterBud: If you followed the instructions and signed your entry, it would be much easier to find your upload log via your contributions to figure out that the file you're talking about is probably File:Ratnamanjarii Poster.png. LX (talk, contribs) 22:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
And for copyrighted posters, like this one, free license permission from the poster copyright holder is necessary in order to undelete it. Read COM:OTRS for details. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose until proper permission is received and processed. Ankry (talk) 19:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

request to un delete file:20171125_Day_8_studio24596.jpg and file:Congo Tales image.jpg

Hi, I am Pieter Henket. I submitted a declaration of consent for the following images, 2 of which were deleted. I emailed it in from pieter@pieterhenket.com. Primage2 is currently awaiting OTRS approval. The other two images were deleted before I sent the email in. Because I have sent the declaration for consent in for the other two images I am requesting that they be un deleted. Thank you.

I hereby affirm that I am Pieter Henket, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work as shown here:

and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Pieter Henket

March 7, 2019
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pieterhenket (talk • contribs) 19:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: must wait their turn in the long OTRS queue. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1899 - Radu S. Corbu - profesor de gimnastica la Liceul Nicolae Balcescu din Braila.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Macreanu Iulian

"The image was published for the first time in Atanasie Popescu, Liceul "N. Bălcescu" din Brăila şi Şcolile a căror continuitate este. Monografie; 1863-1908, Tipografia Românească, Brăila, 1937 and reproduced latter in Vasile A. Cocoş, Liceul „Nicolae Bălcescu” - Brăila. 1863-1963, Brăila, 1970." Meets {{PD-RO-photo}} Abzeronow (talk) 16:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Ankry (talk) 19:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ROC-1912-10cash.jpg

Just curious, but is File:ROC-1912-10cash.jpg a scan? If so then this image is in the public domain, if it's not a scan then please don't undelete it. Also please ping as my notifications don't work properly. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The coins may be PD, but the image is not. It has no author, source, or license, all of which are required for Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward:, my bad, I thought that this was a banknote as I only saw a discussion on it describing it on the English-language Wikipedia. Coins are 3D objects so you could close this request. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Nom. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Portrait de Gérard Haas.jpg

Bonjour,

Je me permets de vous écrire suite au message suivant émis par Ronhjones reçu le 8 mars 2019 : "Votre document File:Portrait de Gérard Haas.jpg a été supprimé récemment dans le cadre de nos procédures et de notre politique de gestion des contenus. Vous avez de nouveau téléchargé ce fichier sur Commons. Ce n'est pas une pratique recommandée. Si vous souhaitez contester la suppression, merci d'aller sur la page Commons:Demandes de restauration et de suivre les instructions qui y sont mentionnées, afin qu'une nouvelle discussion s'engage sur le bien-fondé de la suppression. Recréer le contenu supprimé en dehors de ce processus n'est pas une bonne idée, et la répétition d'un tel comportement peut conduire au blocage de votre compte, vous empêchant ainsi de continuer à contribuer. Merci de votre compréhension. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)"

Le 5 mars 2019, j'avais reçu un message de Patrick Rogel me spécifiant que le fichier File:Gérard Haas.jpg (ancien nom du fichier File:Portrait de Gérard Haas.jpg) avait été marqué comme violant le droit d'auteur : "File:Gérard Haas.jpg a été marqué(e) comme violant le droit d'auteur. Wikimedia Commons n'accepte que des documents libres, c'est à dire des images ou d'autres médias utilisables par tout le monde, dans n'importe quel cadre. Vous trouverez plus de détails sur ce que l'on considère comme acceptable sur Commons:À propos des licences, et vous pouvez si besoin poser des questions sur le Service d'aide. Le fichier que vous avez ajouté va bientôt être supprimé. Si vous pensez qu'il ne constitue pas une violation du droit d'auteur, vous pouvez l'expliquer sur la page de description de l'image. Ce fichier viole des droits d'auteurs pour les raisons suivantes : https://www.haas-avocats.com/presentation-cabinet/equipe/"

Suite au message de Patrick Rogel, j'ai fait ajouter la mention "Licence libre – réutilisation autorisée sans but commercial" sur le fichier de la page https://www.haas-avocats.com/presentation-cabinet/equipe/ comme expliqué par BrightRaven (d) 10:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC) sur https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Service_d%27aide#toc-bottom : "Bonjour. Pour que cette photo publiée précédemment soit acceptable sur Commons, il faut : soit transmettre l'autorisation de l'auteur de publier cette photo sous une licence libre en suivant cette procédure : COM:OTRS/fr ; soit afficher une licence libre sur le site où la photo a été initialement publiée."

J'ai ensuite de nouveau importé le même fichier dans Commons mais en changeant son nom pour éviter toute confusion.

Le fichier File:Portrait de Gérard Haas.jpg est maintenant un document libre. Serait-il possible de le restaurer svp ? Sinon, pourriez-vous svp m'expliquer la marche à suivre ?

Je vous en remercie et reste à votre disposition.

Cordialement,

--Catherine Pin (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Catherine Pin: Bonjour, vous avez envoyé un courriel à OTRS indiquant une license libre? Dans ce cas, le fichier sera restauré quand l'autorisation sera lue et acceptée (quelques petites semaines à attendre). Ruthven (msg) 18:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Ruthven Bonjour, je vous remercie pour votre message. Je n'ai pas envoyé de courriel à ORTS, je pensais que le fait de préciser Licence libre sur la photo était suffisant. Merci. --Catherine Pin Cela me l'avait été précisé ainsi dans Aide Commons : Bonjour. Pour que cette photo publiée précédemment soit acceptable sur Commons, il faut :

  • soit transmettre l'autorisation de l'auteur de publier cette photo sous une licence libre en suivant cette procédure : COM:OTRS/fr ;
  • soit afficher une licence libre sur le site où la photo a été initialement publiée.

Vous me confirmez que je dois malgré tout envoyer un courriel à OTRS ? Je vous remercie par avance pour votre réponse. --Catherine Pin 09:44, 11 March 2019

Bonjour, Je me permets de vous soumettre de nouveau ma question ci-dessus qui est restée sans réponse car j'avoue être un peu perdue. Faut-il faire un courriel à OTRS alors qu'il était spécifié que j'avais compris que le fait d'"afficher une licence libre sur le site où la photo a été initialement publiée" était suffisant ? je vous remercie par avance pour votre réponse à ce sujet. --Catherine Pin (talk)

@Catherine Pin: Bonjour,
S'il y a une licence libre à la source, il n'est pas nécessaire d'envoyer un courriel. Mais la licence mentionnée ici est "utilisation non-commerciale" uniquement, ce qui n'est pas une licence libre. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour Yann, Je vous remercie. Cela signifie qu'il faut supprimer la mention "réutilisation autorisée sans but commercial" pour ne laisser que "Licence libre" ? C'est bien cela ? Merci. --Catherine Pin(talk) :@Catherine Pin: 11:22, 12 March 2019

@Catherine Pin: Indiquez simplement : "Licence CC-BY-SA-4.0" avec le nom de la personne à qui il faut attribuer l'image. C'est obligatoire pour la licence, et en droit français, pour sauvegarder les droits moraux de l'auteur. Avec éventuellement un lien vers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.fr . Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

@Yann, Je vais faire placer "Licence CC-BY-SA-4.0" avec le nom de la personne à qui il faut attribuer l'image sur la photo présente sur le site où elle a été initialement publiée (https://www.haas-avocats.com/presentation-cabinet/equipe/) et ensuite, le fichier File:Portrait de Gérard Haas.jpg sera restauré de manière automatique ? OU est-ce que j'aurai une manipulation à faire ? si oui, pouvez-vous me dire laquelle ? Merci par avance. Cordialement, --Catherine Pin(talk) :@Catherine Pin: 12:08, 12 March 2019

@Catherine Pin: Non, vous n'avez rien à faire, sinon de nous prévenir. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

@Yann, D'accord, pour prévenir suffit-il de laisser un nouveau message ici ? Merci. Cordialement, --Catherine Pin(talk) 12:33, 12 March 2019

@Catherine Pin: Oui. Yann (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

@Yann, Avec mes sincères remerciements. Je vous tiens au courant dès que possible. Cordialement, --Catherine Pin(talk) 12:53, 12 March 2019


 Not done: as per above. Please request undeletion once the change is made. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Willie Haggart and Wife Likkle Miss.png

This is photo is from an old AMATEUR VHS TAPE ..it is not from a 'copyright' video. The process of automatically dismissing Screenshot is FLAWED, not all screenshots are from copyrighted videos. Regards.

File:Willie Haggart and Wife Likkle Miss.png
— Preceding unsigned comment added by AROO8 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Who did make the video and where? Who did add the blurred text and why is it added/blured? Ankry (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg propriété de aarfa-groupe.com

je suis propriétaire de cette photo je souhaite la partager
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarfagroupe (talk • contribs) 21:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Aarfagroupe: File:Example.jpg hasn't been deleted. Three of your uploads have been deleted. The last one to be deleted was File:Tenu d'un groupe aarfa en france.jpg. It was deleted because it was deemed a likely copyright violation. As explained on your user talk page, it was a low resolution image with metadata indicating that it was an edited version of an image originally sourced from Facebook. If you are the author of the photograph, you would be expected to be able to provide a full resolution version with original camera metadata. LX (talk, contribs) 23:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fiat Centoventi (interni).jpg

Buonasera, l'immagine in oggetto è stata segnalata (e rimossa) a causa di una possibile violazione di copyright. Si tratta tuttavia di una fotografia fatta dall'amministratore del portale Autopareri.com, durante una delle 2 giornate riservate alla stampa (5-6 marzo 2019), presso il salone dell'auto di Ginevra.

Le immagini originali sono visibili a questo link, cercando a fondo pagina l'album “Fiat al salone di Ginevra 2019”.

Ringrazio per l'attenzione e saluto.

--Autopareri (talk) 21:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There are two problems here. First, there is no evidence of a free license on the source site that you show above, www.autopareri.com. Therefore, to keep this we would need a free license from the photographer. Second, concept cars are generally not usable on the street. Therefore, they are not utilitarian and are copyrighted. So, to restore the image, we need a license from Fiat as well as from the photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. Although, I don't there is a copyright on the vehicle: no one can drive a F1 on the street, but there is no copyright on it either. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Womanspreading.jpg

The rationale for deleting this file was "out of scope". But the file is not out of scope. It was used on enwp's page Manspreading to show that thing is not unique to males. The editor who had nominated the file for deletion had reverted and removed the photo from that article. I do not find the media is out-of-scope.
acagastya 04:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Deletion Request rationale. Abzeronow (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agreed. We might keep it if the woman's face were cropped out, but I would be reluctant to keep this as it is even if it were taken in the USA where the privacy rule is much less strict.
And, user :acagastya, it is not helpful to mislead us by stating that the reason for deleting this file was "out of scope", when in fact it was given as "Out of scope & personal-rights-problems". The fact that it was in use clearly eliminates "out of scope" as a problem, but does not change the fact that it violates Indian law and Commons policy, "Images must not unfairly ridicule or demean the subject." .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
that is not misleading. On the thread for deletion, I have explained about the rule in India, and how it was for the "intimate" body parts of females.
acagastya 08:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Jim above. --Yann (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:J.T. Carter's Crests.jpg There is no copyright restrictions on this image!

This image is not from the website with that rights reserved, please feel free to research it. It is not on any website that has a copyright notice!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by BillyB1950 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The source shown in the file description is:

www.swinginsoiree.com/crests

which is a 404 error -- page not found. Since we cannot verify that the image is freely licensed at the named source, it cannot be restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lack of copyright notice does not mean that something is not copyrighted (at least for post-1977 pulications). We need an evidence of free license or en evidence of PD status (eg. because copyright expired or a copyright exception applies). Ankry (talk) 00:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Katrin Helling-Plahr MdB.jpg

Bei dem Foto handelt es sich um ein eigenes Werk von Frau Helling-Plahr, welches durch einen Mitarbeiter (Marius Hoppe) des Büros aufgenommen wurde. Die Rechte an dem Foto liegen vollständig bei Frau Helling-Plahr. Im Auftrag von Frau Helling-Plahr soll ich (Martin Jäger) das (auch öffentlich zugänglich und frei zu verwendende Pressefoto, https://helling-plahr.de/presse.html) bei Wikipedia hochladen.

Eine Urheberrechtsverletzung liegt nach meinem Dafürhalten deshalb nicht vor.

--Poppxa (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose First, I note that in the file description, you claimed that you were the photographer. Now you say that Marius Hoppe was the photographer. Incorrectly claiming "own work" is a serious violation of Commons rules. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing here. It also makes it difficult to believe that anything else you say about the image is correct.

In any case, because the image appears at https://www.helling-plahr.de/presse.html with "© 2018 Katrin Helling-Plahr", policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. It would be easiest if the photographer sends the license. If anyone else does, they must document that they have a license from the photographer that allows them to freely license the image or that Marius Hoppe is employed as a photographer by the person or entity sending the license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Petr Svoboda.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have an explicit permission from the author (Miroslav Lepeška - https://www.fotomirekle.cz/) to upload the photography on Wiki. Třiatřicet (talk) 07:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose permission to uploade is not the same as free license. We need a free license directly from the copyright holder (author). Read COM:L and COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 09:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Амбивалентность_(постер).jpg

I am a representative of the film company holding the rights for the film and all the marketing media and we want to publish the movie poster. --Kkalegina (talk) 08:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC) Ekaterina Kalegina March 14 2019

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In order to restore the image a written free license permission from the copyright holder(s) of the poster and of the photos used is/are needed. Read COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Betty Bossi Hauptsitz.jpg

Reason for request: I am the head of communication of Betty Bossi and also the person responsible for media relations, my name is here on the Betty Bossi Website in the lower part: https://www.bettybossi.ch/de/Admin/Display/37 This photo shows the entrance of our current head quarter in Zurich.

Zurich, March 14 2019

--Viviane Buehr (talk) 09:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose From Swiss FOP restrictions: freedom of panorama does not apply to interior spaces. Permission from the artist (wall art inside) is needed in order to restore the photo. Ankry (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Land your dream career.jpg

This is educational content we use to Facilitate group discussions and presentations to school learners and unemployed youth. How can it be deleted when it is Learning material that does not go against your Policy. Please read message body as Mr. Herbthyme did not because if he did he would see that we offer free educational course, skills development workshops,on-going support to previously disadvantaged youth from the rurals of KZN, South Africa which is FREE !
— Preceding unsigned comment added by SINAZO SOLUTIONS (talk • contribs) 11:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose You have six deleted files, none of which have the file name above. That's not a problem, because all of them are copyrighted text and photos. In order to have them restored, an authorized official of the copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. Note that this policy is in place because we do not know who User:SINAZO SOLUTIONS actually is and, unfortunately, we get far too many liars and forgers here to do otherwise. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FrancescoFranchi.jpg

It's not a copyright violation. I took the picture. Do not delete it please.

--NeelixIT (talk) 13:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please note Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#NeelixIT. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
@NeelixIT: EXIF says Author and Copyright holder is JING, and the image is also available online. Could you please send a permission via COM:OTRS, or faster add a free license at this URL. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1944 liberated soviet civilians return home near vitebsk.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1944 liberated soviet civilians return home near vitebsk.jpg

1944 anonymous Russian photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CollinsKeyHeadshot.png

The image previously updated "Collins Key headshot or image", is wholly owned by Collins Key. He is requested I upload it for him as his hired publicist, so I'm trying to attach the headshot to his wikipedia page. The company "Undefeated Creative" took the photo (specifically, one of their photographers name Cynthia Gonzalez Espinos), but Collins Key wholly purchased it from them so he has 100% ownership of this image. I'd like to get this connected to his wikipedia page soon -- thank you for your help. --TheJonesKnows369 (talk) 17:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Kat Jones

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In the case of images not actually taken by the uploader and not PD for some reason, policy requires that either (a) the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS or (b) a licensee of the photographer (in this case presumably Collins Key) must send a free license together with appropriate evidence that he has the right to sublicense the image freely. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Αμετανόητος Δικαστής 1 Logo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image has gone up to the discogs by me. Οδυσσέας123 (talk) 21:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Policy requires that for corporate, sports club, school, and association logos, an authorized official of the organization owning the rights to the logo must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dinosaria wa Tendaguru.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: File:Dinosaria wa Tendaguru.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation and was deleted on Feb 21,2019. When I uploaded it again on Mar 14, I made sure to include the copyright licence under Commons 04. - Maybe I made a mistake in uploading the licence? Anyway, I would like to know why it cannot be used and request revision for eventual undeletion. Thanks Munfarid1 (talk) 22:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It was deleted the second time because you uploaded it out of process, which is a violation of Commons rules and wastes time and resources. Please don't do it again or you may be blocked from editing here. Instead, do as you have done now -- come here.

The image is a book cover. Since we don't know who you are, policy requires that the copyright holder, usually an authorized official of the publisher, must send a free license using OTRS. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 167 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Metro Carmes Toulouse1 copie

Madame, Monsieur,

vous serait-il possible d'annuler l'interdiction de transfert des photographies des oeuvres de Jean-Paul Marcheschi par M. Stefan Meyer qui vous a envoyé une autorisation de diffusion de ses images il y a deux jours ? En particulier cette photographie : File:Metro Carmes Toulouse1 copie.jpg

Mille mercis, et sincères salutations,

Stéphane Bily
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stéphane Bily (talk • contribs) 13:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
See ticket:2019031210008901
@Stéphane Bily: Bonjour,
L'autorisation doit venir de l'artiste lui-même, ou M. Stefan Meyer doit fournir une preuve qu'il est habilité à agir au nom de M. Jean-Paul Marcheschi. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

AEPROSER.

Dear Sirs,

By using this account of ChezChaton, managed by one employee of the entity, I would like you to learn that in the wikipedia page of AEPROSER (the Spanish pool of banking BPO companies), the legitimate, all-rights-granted logo of the organization (check it in the official web: www.aeproser.org) has been deleted. I beg you to undelete it because neither domestic no international laws han been breached, and the page is now shown incomplete without that relevant part of our public identity.

Kind Regards.

Julio Marcos García Maceiras Managing Director / General Counsel AEPROSER

c/ Juan Bravo 51 Dpo 28001 Madrid <redacted>

www.aeproser.org
— Preceding unsigned comment added by ChezChaton (talk • contribs) 11:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Please wait for other user's OTRS ticket to be processed. (Deletion log for File:AEPROSER logo.jpg). Thuresson (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 23:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:informe Brailovsky.pdf

Buenas tardes

                       Quisiera saber si alguien me puede ayudar con un problema que tengo en un articulo de wikipedia.
                       En el artículo "caso carrasco" era de vital importancia, especialmente para referir a una investigación posterior que ponía en duda la sentencia de ese caso judicial, un informe de un perito oficial que se denominó "Informe_Brailovsky.pdf" y fue borrado, aparentemente.
                     Quisiera si alguien me puede explicar el motivo, y en su caso, si me puede aconsejar cómo puede restaurarse el informe Brailovsky en el "Caso carrasco". 
                     Entiendo que hay un problema de licencia, pero la verdad es que no manejo el tema. lo unico que pude ver es lo que sigue: 

"...Este documento persuasivo está en formato pdf y se adjunta a una página wiki interesante en español. No estoy muy seguro de que los archivos * pdf se usen de esta manera, y sé que en general * los archivos pdf están fuera de COM: SCOPE . Ellin Beltz ( conversación ) 19:54, 10 de noviembre de 2017 (UTC)..."

                     Lo único que puedo asegurar es que el informe es de dominio publico ya que está dentro de un expediente judicial, que como se sabe, expresa las decisiones de un magistrado que como es sabido, sus actos son públicos, por el principio republicano de la "publicidad de los actos de los magistrados" amparados por la Constitución Nacional Argentina.
                     El archivo en cuestión sigue siendo de importancia investigativa como así tambien histórica. Si alguien pudiera explicarme el motivo de la eliminación, se los agradecería.  
                     

Razones admisibles para los formatos PDF y DjVu [ editar ] ••• • El archivo es un escaneo de un documento de importancia histórica u otra importancia externa, por ejemplo, escanea libros, informes, periódicos, etc., libres de derechos de autor o con licencia. •••

                   Les pido si ud me puede ayudar a restaurar este documento indicándome cómo hacerlo.
                   les envío mis respetos y un saludo cordial

(Ignaciocanevaro (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC))

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose First, there is the question of whether the PDF is in scope -- we do not generally keep PDFs of text, but we do keep documents of historical interest and this probably qualifies.
However, there is the question of copyright. In most countries, judicial decisions are PD, but that does not extend to copyrighted material contained in them. This PDF contains at least two substantial excerpts from a newspaper and a scholarly journal. Since they have copyrights which are not eliminated by the PD status of the judicial decision, we cannot keep this. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done Scope doubts not responded by requester. Ankry (talk) 09:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Johan_Lundin.jpg

The image is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. It can be seen here: https://www.galleryextra.com/johan-lundin-3/

--ArtworksData (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

@ArtworksData: Any evidence that it was "licensed" by the photographer? Ankry (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response; evidence of author's permission needed. Probably via OTRS. Ankry (talk) 09:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Erect micropenis.jpg

File:Erect micropenis.jpg

It is a picture of me that I took

--Micro1522 (talk) 02:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Well, this is not your Facebook page or personal album of penis pics. Please read COM:NOTHOST. --E4024 (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
I explained here why I deleted this photo. This is almost certainly cyberbullying. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Magog, and consider further sanctions. -- Begoon 11:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:N.ermekbayev.jpg

Добрый день! Файл File:N.ermekbayev.jpg был скопирован с сайта https://mod.gov.kz/rus/rukovodstvo/ministr_oborony/ для использования на вики странице Нурлан Ермекбаев. Разрешение на использование данного изображения имеется. Прошу восстановить изображение. --QZRustemmedia (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The copyright notice at the bottom of this page states: "2009 – 2019 © Министерство обороны Республики Казахстан Все права защищены" that is not a free license. @QZRustemmedia: plese do not upload images from sites that do not claim a free license explicitely. Ankry (talk) 10:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr Jonas Ekfeldt.jpg

I, personally, own the copyright to this image, as well as the domain https://www.jurit.se. Hence; It's publishing on Wiki has wrongfully been flagged as a potential copyright violation.

15 March 2019 Viroptimus (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Viroptimus: All permissions have to be confirmed via OTRS mailing system. Please follow the procedure. Due to high backlog of requests it might take up to 185 days to proceed your e-mail. I recommend sending your e-mail to permissions-sv@wikimedia.org in order to get response speedily. The file will be undeleted once the request is processed. --Mates (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KingsprimeTV Logo Icon.png

This file is owned by me. i created this file by myself. please reinstate File:KingsprimeTV Logo Icon.png--Joseph Ozojie (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info The file was deleted based on Commons:Deletion requests/File:KingsprimeTV Logo Icon.png closed by @Ruthven:. I assume the problem with the file was not because of copyright but COM:SCOPE (marked as spam). I recommend to specify where would you like to use the file if restored. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Mates (talk) 14:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
I should have written "closed per discussion". Begoon had it right, because the copyright violation identified by Jeff G. was very relative: the file was used for self-promotion, being apparently out of scope as well. --Ruthven (msg) 23:25, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Meh, it seems pretty spammy to me, see also w:File:Kb global, kptv kingsprimetv.png and w:Draft:kingsprimetv (from which I just removed a chunk of copyright violations) which will never be accepted in its current form, if at all. Again, my heart says delete because [a] I dislike spammers as much as the next man, and [b] I personally think US(/Canadian) TOO is too permissive (and we can tend to be even more permissive in our interpretations) - but my head says keep because those are my personal opinions rather than policy and it seems to me to be below TOO as we do interpret it. This time, though, I'll vote with my heart: Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Begoon 11:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. It was used for spam, we have no approved OTRS permission, and there is no actual use for it at present. If an unbiased policy-compliant article were to emerge and we had approved OTRS permission for it, I would reconsider.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ineffable EP Album Artwork.jpg

I own the record label that this EP was released through and created the artwork. I own all the rights to this content. My company is registered with PPL and companies house in the united kingdom. We also have deals with Gracenote, Nielsen and Lyricfind.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alystarhynes (talk • contribs) 17:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Alystarhynes: All permissions have to be confirmed via OTRS mailing system. Please follow the procedure. Due to high backlog of requests it might take up to 185 days to proceed your e-mail. The file will be undeleted once the request is processed. --Mates (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Petra_Ahola.jpg

Photo was taken by Kari Sunnari from TTT-Theatre. Permission has confirmed via phone to use this picture at Wikipedia.

Kari Sunnari, tel. +358 44 7201 218

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Genz (talk • contribs) 08:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Genz: All permissions have to be confirmed via OTRS mailing system. Please follow the procedure. Due to high backlog of requests it might take up to 185 days to proceed your e-mail. Based on your phone number, I recommend sending your e-mail to permissions-fi@wikimedia.org in order to get response speedily. The file will be undeleted once the request is processed. --Mates (talk) 13:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CAPA APPLE MUSIC.jpg

venho fazer esse pedido levando em conta que sou o outro da imagem e a mesma refere-se a mim mesmo.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nestorferras (talk • contribs) 19:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Take note that the current backlog for OTRS is 167 days, OTRS depends completely on volunteers, who work as hard as they can. Ankry (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Landa Freak foto de perfil.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The link has been deleted and the picture is public we have the rights and we give the rigts to anyone to distribuite or share for any purpose this pic Landa_Freak_foto_de_perfil.jpg SKYREDBot (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose All permissions have to be confirmed via OTRS mailing system. Please follow the procedure. Due to high backlog of requests it might take up to 185 days to proceed your e-mail. The file will be undeleted once the request is processed. --Mates (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Headshot - Dan_Pickett_CEO_nfrastructure.jpg

Hi -

I am trying to undelete the head shot that we had previously uploaded on Daniel T Pickett III's wikipedia page. This is a head shot that was purchased from a photographer years ago.

Please advise as to how I can re-upload or undelete the photo. I still don't understand why it was deleted.

Thank you, Amy Harlow on behalf of Daniel T Pickett III

--Abharlow (talk) 21:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

@Abharlow: You didn't upload any file here, and you don't have any deleted one. You probably want to ask on Wikipedia instead. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is probably about Dan Picket CEO nfrastructure.jpg. Uploader claimed that the subject himself is the author, now it is claimed that the author is an unnamed photographer. The permission should be clarified through Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Αεν τιμησ logo.jpg

Please undelete this image since is the logo of our team and since I am in the board of the team I own the copyrights to upload this photo.

Thank you in advance
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Proman545 (talk • contribs) 08:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Proman545: you provided contradicting info in the image description: (1) that this is the official club logo, and (2) that you are the author and exclusive copyright owner of the logo. If the club wishes to make the logo available under a free license, their official representative still can send a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ankry. Another – and faster – method would be releasing the logo under a free licence at the club's website. De728631 (talk) 16:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Giza zoo 1950.jpg

Kindly undelete this image. The copyright has ended in Egypt. It's in public domain as by Egyptian bylaws. It was taken in 1959 AD. The photographer is unknown. The source is a facebook group of history interested critics. Regards. --Ashashyou (talk) 10:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@Ashashyou: The copyright lenght depends not on photo creation date, but on the photo publication date. What is the initial publication date/place of the photo? If in 2019 on Facebook, then the copyright did not expire yet. Ankry (talk) 10:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response in 24h. Ankry (talk) 22:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

The pictures were artistic impressions of free copyrighted pictures available on the Internet. They were not any type of copyright violations.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maiju Perälä (talk • contribs) 15:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Why do people request all the time to undelete File:Example.jpg, although this file has not been deleted for the past decade? Jcb (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: If you expand the "request undeletion" box, you'll get the answer. --Mates (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose All of user's deleted files were copyright violations of pictures available on web. I don't know what is meant by "Artistic impressions of free copyrighted pictures" but I guess it would be considered against COM:DW or COM:L. --Mates (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 22:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket:2018080810009018

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018080810009018 regarding

Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: ✓ Done - please process the ticket - Jcb (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done by Jcb. Ankry (talk) 21:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aouatefe LAHMANI.png

--Shihab.iglesias (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Passiflora pectinata.jpg

The use has agreed to make this photo public domain. See the original Flickr page.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaattc (talk • contribs) 22:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support CC-Zero at flickr.com. Thuresson (talk) 08:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support per Thuresson Abzeronow (talk) 20:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tonnara Bordonaro.jpg

Seems to be a self-made, unpublished, photo. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: Restored. I started a regular DR, so that Gbawden can clarify his doubts. --Mates (talk) 20:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Katrin Helling-Plahr MdB.jpg

OTRS permission has been arrived (ticket:2019031810003548), please restore and rename the file to a better name. Many thanks! Bencemac (talk) 17:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Bencemac: Restored. Please close the OTRS ticket (locked by you) and add categories to the file. Please propose a better file name on its discussion page. --Mates (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1944 destructed buildings pushkin road bobruisk.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1944 destructed buildings pushkin road bobruisk.png

Description is cut off in all public logs, but it might be PD for the same reason that [[5]] was (could be PD-Belarus if description is the same or similar) Abzeronow (talk) 14:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Image description: "destructed buildings Pushkin Road Bobruisk (Belarus), autumn 1944". Source: "Russian State Archive (former Archive of the USSR), scanned from book: Е. Морозов (Ed.); Преступления немецко-фашистских оккупантов в Белоруссии. 1941-1944 Минск, "Беларусь", 1965". The same photo is also available at [6] with the caption "Zerstörungen in Babrujsk, Bereich Puschkin Straße" (Destruction in Babrusjk, area Pushkin street". Thuresson (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info If autor is unknown, the photo seems to PD in Belarus since 2016 (50 post publication) but we still have URAA problem here. Ankry (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Turkish newpaper reporting on arrests of turanists may 1944.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Turkish newpaper reporting on arrests of turanists may 1944.jpg

"The newspaper has been published in 1944 and according to Template:PD-Turkey it will be public domain in 2015." Abzeronow (talk) 00:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info And PD in US in 2040? Ankry (talk) 10:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
At this point, my views on URAA are well known enough. Abzeronow (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: I, too, don;t particularly like the URAA, but it is the law in the USA and our current policy requires us to honor it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Associação Nacional de Estudantes de Engenharia Biomédica.jpg

A imagem foi feita pelo departamento de Marketing da Associação Nacional de Estudantes de Engenharia Biomédica (ANEEB). Não existe qualquer violação dos direitos de autor, uma vez que estes são da ANEEB. É importante termos a imagem na wikipedia da ANEEB pois esta refere-se ao atual logo da associação.

17-03-2019 Diana Cruz, Presidente da Mesa da Assembleia Geral da ANEEB
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Diana S Cruz (talk • contribs) 22:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose So you are not the copyright holder for the logo as you declared. For images that are not private personal ownership of the uploaders or were published elsewhere prior to upload to Commons, the actual copyright holder (or their official representative) needs to send a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions in order to keep or restore the image. Alternatively, they can claim that the logo is freely licensed on their official web page. Tha latter is faster. Ankry (talk) 06:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: per ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JR 2019-1.jpg

Greetings,

When I first uploaded the photo, I thought it was copyrighted material and it was sent to me following an interview I did with the artist an I assumed it was a professional piece.

It was actually a personal photo and actually has no copyrights on it at all.

Does that qualify for un-deleting the image?


--Wayneb13 (talk) 23:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unless copyright is specifically waived or a free license is given, all photographs made in this year are under copyright and that copyright lasts until 70 years after the death of the photographer. Have the photographer contact COM:OTRS. Abzeronow (talk) 21:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: requires a free license from the photographer via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A. Walker.jpg

I am requesting deletion of this file.

This photo is a publicity headshot of Arnetia Walker. It is from her personal collection, commissioned by her with rights secured and as such, she owns any and all rights. However, considering the purpose of a publicity headshot, Ms. Walker has granted free use of the photo in public domain and creative commons which is why the website (https://www.tvmaze.com/people/157625/arnetia-walker) cited by the editor who deleted, it has it posted on that site. They do not own the photo, nor did they create it, but instead use it from it's availability in in public domain.

Please let us know if your need further documentation, or support for this claim directly from Ms. Walker

Trevsdad1 (talk) 03:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Trevsdad1: If there is no publicly available evidence that the photographer made the photo freely licensed or that copyright has been transferred to somebody else, then the actual copyright holder must send a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions in order to restore the photo. If the copyright holder is not the author, then an evidence of copyright transfer may also be needed. Ankry (talk) 21:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Como ministro, Gustavo Rocha participou de Prêmio Direitos Humanos 2018.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: File:Como ministro, Gustavo Rocha participou de Prêmio Direitos Humanos 2018.jpg

Foto publicada com autorização. Hellen Lopes dos Santos (talk) 12:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This page states: "All rights reserved" which is not a free license. Ankry (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CNMP adere à campanha de apoio a gestantes.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: File:CNMP adere à campanha de apoio a gestantes.jpg

Foto publicada com autorização. Hellen Lopes dos Santos (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this page states: "All rights reserved" which is not a free license. Ankry (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jonathan González.jpg

Puse creditos
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Guerolol2001 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can se no indication that credited source added free license to their photo. --Mates (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Todos los derechos reservados | miseleccion.mx ©. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:N.Ermaekbayev.jpg

Копия изображения разрешено использовать на викистранице Ермекбаев, Нурлан Байузакович на всех версиях языка <img style="float: left;" src="/uploads/11на сайт.jpg" width="349" height="350" alt="Копия изображения разрешено использовать на викистранице Ермекбаев, Нурлан Байузакович на всех версиях языка"> Источник-https://mod.gov.kz/rus/rukovodstvo/ministr_oborony/

Копия изображения разрешено использовать на викистранице Ермекбаев, Нурлан Байузакович на всех версиях языка

<img style="float: left;" src="/uploads/11на сайт.jpg" width="349" height="350" alt="Копия изображения разрешено использовать на викистранице Ермекбаев, Нурлан Байузакович на всех версиях языка">--QZRustemmedia (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can't find any indication for a Creative Commons licence at https://mod.gov.kz/rus/rukovodstvo/ministr_oborony/. Maybe someone with a knowledge of Russian or Kazakh can find anything there? De728631 (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is Wikipedia-only permission in the page source code. Invalid and not acceptable for Commons. But even if there is a free license provided this way, I would Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per COM:PCP as the site claims that everything there is "All rights reserved". @QZRustemmedia: We need a free license that allows any use by anybody, including commercial reuse. And if a permission is not from the photographer, it should follow COM:OTRS instructions. Please, do not request undeletion of images from this site anymore (unless the site license is changed). This can be considered as abusive behaviour. Ankry (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per De728631 and my comment. Ankry (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

2009-02 surprise 38x53cm.jpg

I am the author of the image and I permit its use. ProfDrDrB (talk) 09:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Permission "to use" does not fit Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements; see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:L.amidor2.jpg

greetings, it's my first time creating a page on Wikipedia. i wanted to build a page about the first law firm in Israel to represents tenants in projects of urban renewal. unfortunately, i didn't know quite well how to write a description and it ended as an advertising page. after changes, i wrote a page which not looks like an advertise, based on facts only. i would like to undelete the picture above so i can use it again for the upcoming page.

i got this picture from the firm and they accepted to publish this picture on wikipedia.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yali0607 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

thanks in advance, --Yali0607 (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose When and if the article is published and accepted on WP:EN or WP:HE, or both, come back and make the request again. That will prove that the logo is in scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paul T. Liamos.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I took this picture and I thought I had released all rights to it. Please direct on how I can correct it so it can be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons. Thank you! Tlobrien (talk) 15:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Tlobrien: please upload a full-resolution image with EXIF data from your camera, or follow COM:OTRS instructions to send free license permission and prove your authorship. The latter can take few months till your permission is verified and accepted. Ankry (talk) 21:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tomasz Papaj.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is my photo, I've rights to this photo Bossmsz (talk) 18:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Bossmsz: The picture was published on Facebook previously, please follow the procedure of COM:OTRS and send a permission. Please note that due to high backlog in requests it might take up to 185 days to proceed your e-mail. I recommend sending your e-mail to permissions-pl@wikimedia.org to get response speedily. The file will be undeleted after your authorship is confirmed. --Mates (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Felder2018.jpg

This photo was taken by Michael Helms and from https://donfelder.com and http://facebook.com/donfeldermusic. Don himself is asking us, his management team, to re-upload use as the primary Wikipedia photo.

--Mattwcoh (talk) 18:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Matt Cohen, 3/18/19

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As the photo has been already published and there is no evidence that it was published under a free license, the actual copyright owner has to send us free a license permission following COM:OTRS instructions in order to restore the photo. Plase note also, that this is up to the Wikipedia community, not up to the subject which photo is used in Wikipedia. Ankry (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lisa_Beres_headshot.jpg

For some reason, the image I added to Lisa Beres' page on February 28th was deleted. It says the reason for deletion was that I did not have permission but I was given permission from Lisa Beres herself to use the image. --KB (talk) 19:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

@Kari Brownson: Have you sent the permission you were given to COM:OTRS? If not, please do so. If yes, please wait until it is processed. Due to big queue it might take up to 187 days to proceed your request. I recommend sending the permission to some language-specific e-mail address according to your babels to speed up the process (see page COM:OTRS in your language version for more information). Regards --Mates (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CartaoAEIOU.jpg

Hi,

this file is a photo about an old SIM Card.

The reason for undelete is, this image was taken by me, and this SIM Card belongs to a company that no longer exists.

--Rafaelbf (talk) 00:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Copying a 2D image by you does not establish new copyright, so you cannot be copyright owner here. And I see no way that the image copyright expire. So we need permission from the image copyright owner in order to restore the photo: it belongs either to the company legal successor(s) or to the image author(s). Ankry (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ASEM map only.pdf

Do not delete the file.

Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) is a Process, and does NOT have secretariat. Therefore, the map showing the Partners' countries belongs to all 53 partners. The image permission is not applicable to this case.

--AdelaJLN (talk) 02:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. @AdelaJLN: First, images in pdf are not acceptable for Wikimedia Commons. Second, you declared that the image is copyrighted and freely licensed. Our rules require that for any copyrighted image we have either (a) an evidence that it is a personal, exclusive work of the uploader (which is not), or (b) a link to a site where it was published under the specified free license, or (3) a written free license permission from copyright owner(s) via email, following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 05:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YY的WIKI大頭照.jpg

Dear WIKI,

We're the agency, Project House, who represent the actress 張榕容. And we uploaded the profile picture of her which has deleted or removed. The profile picture is our company took the actress to shoot for a magazine in China. Please kindly restored the file and upload to the page, thanks.

Sincerely,

人民舞台有限公司/澤東電影有限公司 經紀部 陳臻 Avelyn Chen

T:(Redacted) e-mail:(Redacted)

11083台北市信義區松山路421號17樓 17F, No.421, Songshan Rd., Xinyi Dist., Taipei City 110, Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Avelyn Chen (talk • contribs) 03:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Avelyn Chen: Only freely licensed images can be stored in Wikimedia Commons. There is no free license evidence on the source page provided. Read COM:L for details. Ankry (talk) 05:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2019年3月18日港鐵金鐘站車禍.jpg, File:2019年3月18日港鐵金鐘站車禍01.jpg, File:2019年3月18日港鐵金鐘站車禍02.jpg


Reason for not deleting: These photos are widely posted all over the web including Facebook, Instagram, also, sent to lots of people via. Whatsapp and other tools. Even newspapers have copyrights to use these photos as the photos are posted to be distributed to the public. Therefore, I don't see any reasons for deleting them as offending copyright.

I hope admins will make a fair decision and with a convincing reason. Thank you.

Anson. (talk) 13:17, 19 March 2019 (UTC) For more about me, please visit my Chinese Wikipedia Page at https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anson.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The fact that images are widely distributed says nothing about their copyright status. The sites mentioned above frequently have images that are not free. Unless you can prove that the images have an explicit free license, they cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Instagram.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: need to get my divorce done 2600:1700:8F80:19F0:C4CE:9CCC:F7C2:77A5 02:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: Obviously not, no reason provided anyway. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RCoury.jpg

The subject of the article, Mr. Robertino Coury, owns the photo (RCoury.jpg) that was posted and would like it to be included

Minc3597 (talk) 14:17, 19 March 2019 (UTC) Jamie Kuhn 3.19.2019

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph does not give one the right to freely license it. That right almost always remains with the photographer. In order for this image to be restored, either the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS or Mr. Coury must send a free license together with evidence satisfactory to the OTRS agent that he has the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: per above. --Strakhov (talk) 11:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ohio State Rep District 42 Niraj Antani.jpg

The owner of this photo has given me permission to use this specific photo for his wiki page as it is off of his official Facebook page --Feelthehurns (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Permission "to use" is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements; read COM:L for details. Ankry (talk) 17:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Please, ask the photographer to send their permission to COM:OTRS. "Derivative works" & "commercial use" should be explicitly allowed. Read COM:L. --Strakhov (talk) 11:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bel_fiore_dança_(keyboard).ogg

Please undelete this file [7]. Reason for deletion was: "Dw no source since 2 February 2019". Music was written in ca. 1450 and performed by myself in 2019. I am pretty sure (cannot check since the file got deleted) that I checked "own work" and licenced it under a permissive licence. 151.82.74.207 18:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

If you perform music composed by somebody else, this is not your purely own work, even if you hold copyright for this. You need to provide author/source info about the original work even if it is PD. As you did not compose the music, you did take the composition from somewhere. So more information is needed in order to restore the file. Ankry (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
The author is unknown, the collection is "Codex Faenza", compiled in the 15th Century. I believe I added this information when I first uploaded the file, but I cannot be sure because the metadata is public no more. Is there anything else needed? 151.36.74.27 11:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
It seems you did not:
|source=Own work
|author=Fari2
but I Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion per the above explanation if the above information is confirmed by the logged in uploader. Ankry (talk) 08:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I am logged in, I confirm the above information Fari2 (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per above and converted permission request to a DR. @Fari2: You may need to provide some explanations there. Ankry (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @Ankry: I edited in the relevant info, Hopefully the DR can be closed now. Fari2 (talk) 13:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr. Beth Shubin Stein.jpg

I added the Creative Commons licence in the backend of the website, on Wordpress.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doinashalaru (talk • contribs) 14:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
@Doinashalaru: Which license, where, and who is the photo author (photographer)? Ankry (talk) 21:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
I, too, do not see any free license on https://www.drbethshubinstein.com/our-office/dr-beth-shubin-stein/ .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

The license is in the footer of the home page, bottom right corner.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is indeed a mention of a free license at the bottom right of [8]. Yann (talk) 10:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: Huh? Either I missed it, or it has just been added. Sorry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dietiminsta.jpg

Image is publicly available on Istagram and has been supplier by the owner, @dietim_ (Tim van teunenbroek).

Unreasonable marked as copyrighted and not Proven with evidence
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Luxurylifenl (talk • contribs) 13:55 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Publicly available doesn't equal free from copyright. Have dietim send permission via COM:OTRS if they are the photographer Abzeronow (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.