Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

Commons:Запросы на восстановление

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 23% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.


Other languages:
العربية • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎magyar • ‎italiano • ‎日本語 • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎polski • ‎پښتو • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska • ‎українська • ‎中文

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Удаление (Правила удаления)

Определение причины удаления файла

Сначала проверьте журнал удаления и узнайте, почему файл был удалён. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Временное восстановление

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Добавление запроса

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.


Закрытые обсуждения восстановления архивируются ежедневно.

Текущие запросы

Watch View Edit

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


Il carrozziere in questione è fallito negli anni '50 e se ne sono perse totalmente le tracce, immagini come queste scattate all'epoca (anni 20 e 30) sono quasi gli ultime testimonianze di questo costruttore. Questa ed altre immagini simili sono facilmente reperibili sul web — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luidefran (talk • contribs) 14:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

@Luidefran: The above is about scope, not about copyright. To restore the photo, somebody (presuming: the uploader) should provide also a proof that it is free.
When the photo was created and what license template should be applied?
If it was made in 2012 as you declared during upload, it cannot be {{PD-Italy}} Ankry (talk) 15:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: From what's written above, the photo should have been taken in the 20s and 30s in Italy (thus PD-Italy and PD-1996 apply). The car manufacturer closed in 1957. Related article: Ilario Bandini. --Ruthven (msg) 15:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
@Ruthven: Maybe, if the photo was made while the can manufacturer was active and not later. This is not clear for me, so my request for more information. Ankry (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Ok, so above Luidefran said that the photo was made in the 20s and 30s. --Ruthven (msg) 15:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
  Support then; and suggest fixing date and setting as PD-Italy. Ankry (talk) 22:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-03-19 12 50 10-Übersicht - MantisBT.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Screenshot was taken of a software under GPL and it replaces an old screenshot of the same software under GPL. Please explain the deletion or undelete it. If you keep it deleted, please update referenced wikipedia articles. Sflori (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Is this free software? @Ronhjones, Túrelio: Yann (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
You tell us! Give us a link to the permissions - All i see at is "Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team"Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
  Info I see at the bottom of this page ("About MantisBT" section) info about GPL license. GPL-licensed software is copyrighted. @Ronhjones: I see no contradiction here. Ankry (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Slikanje na staklu.jpg

There are two requests for this image:

  • First request:


on this image is shown Zvonko Pižir. All of photos on this page are his ownership:

Please undelete image in subject. As I see, you found this image on some blog and that states that image is not mine?

--Zvonko Pizir (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Second request:

Reason: This is picture I took by myself. Please undelete it. You will find that all other pictures are fine also. Zvonko Pizir (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Therefore, policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose There are two copyrights here, one for the photograph, and one for the artwork shown in the photograph. Because the photograph has appeared elsewhere on the Web without a free license, we need a free license via OTRS from the photographer. We also require a free license directly from the artist, also via OTRS. It would be best if one or the other sent in the license, waited for acknowledgement from OTRS and then had the other of the two send in the other license referencing the ticket number on the acknowledgement. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

  Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Jeff Brock.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The other day I uploaded (JFB-Profile4.jpg) a picture of mathematician Jeffrey Brock, which got deleted because of copyright issues. I agree with that decision. Since then, the author of the picture (Jeffrey Brock) has added a line to the website where that picture is located ( declaring that he's the author, and included another line (visible when hovering over the picture) declaring that the picture may be used. Janedbdp (talk) 13:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

  Support Looks good to me. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
  Comment The original file should be the one to restore File:JFB-Profile4.jpg, not the re-upload. The only minor issue is that Jeffrey Brock is claimed as the author, and it does not look like a selfie to me - if it's the university taking the photo, then that would make more sense. Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Great, thanks! So, how does this work then? Will the file be (eventually) restored? Do I need to do anything? Cheers. --Janedbdp (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Energir logo.png

The closing sysop, Ellin Beltz, ignored the discussion and did not produce any rationale accessible for the common people (few oracles not included). My argument, in short: there is no other English logo of Énergir on Wikimedia Commons. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:07, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Greetings: I didn't ignore the discussion, I saw several instances of blocked user contributions and no clear indication of permission. Image is available in SVG at I would not personally contest its restoration, but would prefer a higher quality version if restored. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I might miss a discourse about either “permission” or “quality” in relation to Energir_logo.png – where did it happen? Moreover, a burst of ©-paranoia wrt a {{PD-textlogo}} uploaded by Gasexpert, a Meterrs/ConsumersDistributingonline sock, prompted by a delreq made by Tikrest, another Meterrs/ConsumersDistributingonline sock, showcases Commons practices as ridiculous, at best. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Please state your point without sarcasm or insult. The file was unused. There is a higher quality SVG. We don't usually waste time meanly debating the fine points of unused "own work" or on such low quality images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
I never saw Wikimedia Commons deleting files because a replacement exists in English Wikipedia, never before. Does it become an accepted practice? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

  Comment I would ordinarily agree with IM -- we should not delete the only Commons version of a logo just because an SVG exists on WP:EN. In fact, we do not routinely delete preexisting raster versions even if the SVG is on Commons. That said, however, this is such poor quality that I agree that deletion is justified. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

@Incnis Mrsi, Ellin Beltz, Jameslwoodward: Would this PNG rendering of the enwiki SVG at its designated size be considered a suitable replacement as {{subst:PD-Trademark-Text-Logo}}?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:17, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
I am not an expert on logos. As as image expert I certify that Energir_logo.png is not identical to a rendered Énergir_logo.svg, and as a sock buster I certify than all three suspicious accs in the history grew on the same farm. And again, there can be good and poor replacements, but the reason behind Ellin’s deletion is still unclear to me and I am puzzled why certain high-ranking Commons member indirectly encourage ConsumersDistributingonline to bring his crap. My proposal to protect the file—as an item on which the community already spent some resources—and kick all puppets off without deliberation was ignored. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: I share your concern, but can the SVG be fixed to make it render better?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Michedomi

Thank you. I have asked the artist and owner of the images to email a release, and she has done so. --Michedomi (talk) 04:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Although I did everything that was requested, notably having a release (using the template on this site) sent from the artist authorising use of all images, the images have been deleted. This is very upsetting. You gave me eight days to comply, I did so, the artist sent her release to the address you gave, and then I contacted them (OTRS I believe) and was told it would be a 49-day wait for confirmation. Why give eight days when on your side the action or response takes much longer? --Michedomi (talk) 22:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

As the artist has supplied a release, does this not mean the images can be reinstated? --Michedomi (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose Unfortunately, OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers, and, also like Commons, is understaffed. Therefore your images must wait until they reach the head of the queue at OTRS which is, as you say, around 49 days long at the moment. We all understand that this is frustrating, and we all wish that it were better, but that is the way that it is. Your images will be restored automatically when the license you have sent reaches the head of the queue, is read, and is approved. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
@Michedomi: Did you tag them {{subst:OP}}? Do you have a ticket number?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Mazar Haqani.jpg

Dear concern,

I would like to tell that the picture which was set on my page in wiki urdu was deleted due to the reason I just saw "it was a copyright violated issue, picture was copied from facebook" before that my another picture was deleted due to the same reason. I want to tell that both pictures were taken from my camera, and we have a page on Facebook as-well and pictures were uploaded there also. So now I want to ask if those pictures are not allowed? since i had the copyrights of them (because taken by me) and before uploading on wikipedia, i uploaded on Facebook so they are now allowed? kindly clear this issue so that I can arrange another photo or you redo the photo.

Thanks & Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by مخدوم عبدالرشید حقانی (talk • contribs) 22:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

  •   Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Therefore, policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Melnichenko Andrey 1.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image was duly published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. An email was sent to on Friday 16 March 2018, 00:35 UK time by the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the photograph. There is no basis to delete this image whatsoever and undo the edit. Please undelete it. Sasha-int (talk) 02:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

  •   Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 49 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anniversaire de Melanie Klein (70 ans).jpg

Hello, This picture is used on as a image maps. We cannot used the image map with the new picture File:A dinner to celebrate Melanie Klein's 70th birthday. Wellcome L0016246.jpg proposed by User:Materialscientist. Please restore. Thank you. Orphée (talk) 09:44, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

@Orphée: Why is it not listed in the delinker log?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Cette image était cliquable et on accédait directement au nom et à la page Wikipédia liée de chacun des invités, c'est un grand travail d'Orphée et je soutiens sa demande de restauration. La qualité de la nouvelle image ne remplace pas l'intérêt encyclopédique de l'ancienne image, merci à vous de tenir compte de ces éléments, --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:02, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
This image was clickable and you could directly access the name and related Wikipedia page of each guest, it is a great work of Orpheus and I support his request for restoration. The quality of the new image does not replace the encyclopedic interest of the old image, thanks to you for taking into account these elements, --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:02, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
translator: Google

  Done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Polish 1946 banknotes

Request by User:Electron copied from my talk page:

Deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Money of Poland, but nobody did care to restore them in 2017. Ankry (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Don't we need evidence that the banknote designers have been dead for at least 70 years for them to be in the public domain in Poland? What United States copyright tag would apply? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:42, 24 March 2018 (UTC)