Open main menu

Вікісховище:Запити на відновлення

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 100% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎svenska • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎پښتو • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

На цій сторінці користувачі можуть попросити про відновлення вилученої сторінки або файлу (далі — «файл»). Користувачі можуть залишати свої коментарі до таких запитів, залишаючи такі ремарки як keep deleted або undelete із зазначенням відповідної аргументації.

Ця сторінка не є частиною Вікіпедії. Ця сторінка — про контент Вікісховища — сховище вільних медіафайлів, що використовуються у Вікіпедії та в інших проектах Вікімедіа. Вікісховище не зберігає енциклопедичних статей. Щоб попросити про відновлення статті чи іншого контенту, що був вилучений з англомовної Вікіпедії, перегляньте сторінку перегляду вилучення в цьому проекті.

Commons deletion (policy)


Contents

Як дізнатися, чому файл було вилучено

Спершу перегляньте журнал вилучень, і дізнайтесь, чому файл було вилучено. Також скористайтесь функцією Посилання сюди, щоб побачити , чи є якісь обговорення щодо вилученого файлу. Якщо Ви завантажили цей файл, подивіться, чи є якісь повідомлення на Вашій сторінці обговорення користувача, що пояснюють вилучення. Далі прочитайте, будь ласка, політику вилучення, політику щодо сфери проекту, і правила ліцензування ще раз, щоб дізнатись, чому файл міг бути неприйнятним на Вікісховищі.

Якщо вказана причина неочевидна, або Ви з нею незгодні, можете зв'язатися з адміністратором, що виконав вилучення, щоб він дав пояснення такої дії, або повідомте його про нову аргументацію, що нівелює попередню причину вилучення. Також можете зв'язатись із будь-яким іншим активним адміністратором (можливо таким, що розмовляє Вашою рідною мовою) — більшість з них будуть раді допомогти, і якщо справді була зроблена помилка, виправити ситуацію.

Оскарження вилучення

Вилучення, коректні з точки зору поточних політик вилучення, сфери проекту і ліцензування не будуть скасовані. Пропозиції щодо внесення змін до політик можна робити на сторінках обговорення цих політик.

Якщо Ви вважаєте, що файл, про який йде мова, не є ані порушенням авторських прав, ані не виходить за межі поточної сфери проекту:

  • Можливо, Ви захочете обговорити це питання з адміністратором, що виконав вилучення файлу. Можете попросити адміністратора надати детальне пояснення або надати вагомі підстави на підтримку відновлення файлу.
  • Якщо Ви не хочете зв'язуватися з будь-ким напряму, або якщо окремий адміністратор відхилив відновлення, або якщо Ви хочете мати можливість ширшої участі людей в обговоренні, можете подати запит на відновлення на цій сторінці.
  • Якщо файл вилучено через відсутність доказу ліцензійного дозволу від правовласника, будь ласка, виконайте процедуру з надання підтвердження дозволу. Якщо Ви вже це зробили, немає потреби подавати запит на відновлення ще тут. Якщо з поданим дозволом все добре, файл буде відновлено, коли поданий дозвіл опрацюють. Будь ласка, проявіть терпіння, бо це може зайняти декілька тижнів, залежно від робочих завалів і доступності активних волонтерів.

Тимчасове відновлення

Файли можна тимчасово відновлювати або для того, щоб підтримати обговорення щодо відновлення цього файлу, або щоб для перенесення його в проект, який дозволяє добропорядне використання. Використайте шаблон {{Request temporary undeletion}} у відповідному запиті на відновлення і надайте пояснення.

  1. якщо тимчасове відновлення має підтримати обговорення, поясніть, яким чином воно буде корисним для обговорення, або
  2. якщо тимчасове відновлення має дозволити перенести файл на проект, де дозволене добропорядне використання, зазначте, в який саме проект Ви хочете перенести цей файл, і дайте посилання на інформацію про критерії добропорядного використання в цьому проекті.

Для підтримки дискусії

Файли можна тимчасово відновлювати для підтримки обговорення, якщо користувачам без доступу до файлу важко визначити, чи запит на відновлення слід задовольнити чи ні. Там, де доступний опис файлу або є достатньою цитата зі сторінки опису файлу, адміністратор може надати щось із цього замість тимчасового відновлення файлу. Запити можна відхиляти, якщо користь для дискусії нівелюється іншими факторами (наприклад, відновлення, навіть тимчасове, файлів, де є значні сумніви в доцільності збереження файлу з огляду на Вікісховище:Фотографії людей, яких можна ідентифікувати). Файли, тимчасово відновлені для підтримки обговорення, будуть вилучені знову через тридцять днів, або коли запит на відновлення закриють (залежно що відбудеться раніше).

Для уможливлення перенесення контенту до іншого проекту, де дозволене добропорядне використання

На відміну від англійської Вікіпедії та декількох інших проектів Вікімедіа, Вікісховище не приймає контенту на умовах добропорядного використання з посиланням на положення добропорядного використання. Якщо вилучений файл відповідає вимогам до добропорядного використання в якомусь іншому проекті Вікімедіа, користувачі можуть подати запит на тимчасове відновлення файлу для перенесення його туди. Ці запити зазвичай можна швидко виконувати (без обговорення). Файли, тимчасово відновлені з метою перенесення в інший проект Вікімедіа, будуть заново вилучені через два дні. При поданні запиту на тимчасове відновлення. будь ласка, зазначте, в який саме проект Ви плануєте перенести файл, і дайте посилання на політику добропорядного використання в цьому проекті.

Подання запиту

Спершу переконайтесь, що Ви зробили спробу дізнатись, чому файл було вилучено. Далі, будь ласка, прочитайте ці інструкції щодо того, яким чином подавати запит, перед тим як, власне, його подати:

  • В полі Subject: введіть відповідну назву теми. Якщо Ви подаєте запит на відновлення єдиного файлу, рекомендується додати заголовок на кшталт [[:File:Вилучений_файл.jpg]]. (Не забудьте додати на початку двокрапку в посиланні.)
  • Ідентифікуйте файл(и), який Ви хочете відновити, і надайте відповідні посилання (див. вище). Якщо Ви не знаєте точної назви, надайте стільки інформації, скільки зможете. Запити, що не містять інформації про те, що саме треба відновити, можуть бути заархівовані без жодного додаткового повідомлення.
  • Вкажіть причини запитуваного відновлення.
  • Підпишіть свій запит за допомогою чотирьох тильд (~~~~). Якщо Ви маєте обліковий запис на Вікісховищі, спершу увійдіть у систему. Якщо Ви були завантажувачем файлу, це може допомогти адміністраторам ідентифікувати його.

Додайте запит внизу сторінки. Клацніть тут, щоб відкрити сторінку, де Ви маєте додати свій запит. Альтернативно, можете відкрити посилання «ред.» біля розділу з поточною датою нижче.

Архіви

Закриті обговорення щодо відновлення архівуються щодня.

Поточні запити

Watch View Edit

File:Participation Party.jpg

In some countries witch include Japan and South Korea, escheat copyright works became public domain. --Sharouser (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

If there is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is not implemented into our copyright templates, it should be discussed in COM:VPC before posting here. If it is already implemented, please point out appropriate template (or exact paragraph in the copyright law if you need help to find it; or court cases). The {{PD-textlogo}} rationale was rejected in the Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Pipenavis. Ankry (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Template:PD-South Korea contains escheat cases. (There are exceptional cases. Property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws upon the death of a copyright owner without heir or, in the case of a legal person or organization, upon its dissolution. )
Participation Party was merged into the Unified Progressive Party. After the dissolution of Unified Progressive Party by the Constitutional Court of Korea, All of property of UPP was transfered to South Korean government.
  • Political Parties Act of Korea, Article 48
    • The residual assets of a political party dissolved by a ruling for dissolution by the Constitutional Court, shall revert to the National Treasury.
  • In that case, copyrigts are become public domain by South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • Author's property rights shall expire in any of the following cases:
  • 1.Where, after the author's death without heir, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws
  • and
  • 2. Where, after the dissolution of a legal person or an organization who is the owner of author's property rights, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to the provisions of the Civil Law and others laws. 
There is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is implemented into our copyright templates. {{PD-South Korea}} --Sharouser (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:2018年台风玛利亚登陆前连江一户人家凉台花盆舞蹈.webm

And also:

Authorized mail has been sent long ago. However, the mail has not been confirmed. - I am Davidzdh. 07:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

  Question @Davidzdh: do you have ticket numbers? Did you tag the files {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.:Some people have not told me ticket numbers so that I only have these up to now:
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002114
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002098
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002892
  • Ticket#: 2018081310006494
  • Ticket#: 2018081210005988
  • Ticket#: 2017071410005022

- I am Davidzdh. 01:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

So can these files be recovered now?- I am Davidzdh. 08:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

If I need to do something to recover these files, please let me know and I will try my best. Thank you. - I am Davidzdh. 10:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Davidzdh: I   Support temporary restoration of File:2017夏福州三中滨海校区址环境.jpg, as Ticket:2017071410005022 is old enough. The rest are still too young.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: restored as requested. Ankry (talk) 08:44, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.:Is "too young" means there are some conditions I need to meet? If yes, what are the conditions? Thank you. - I am Davidzdh. 12:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Davidzdh: Other than waiting about 139 days from submission until they reach the head of the queue, no.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
I see. I wait for it. Thank you very much.- I am Davidzdh. 12:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Davidzdh: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wealden ostracod environments.jpg

I discovered that the file was deleted because somebody decided that it "These files look professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license." It looks professional because it is professional - I am a professional - and I am the copyright holder. I chose to make it freely available via Wikimedia Commons because I was asked to provide it (and several other figures) for a web page in support of a podcast that I recorded. As I indicated clearly in the text I supplied with it: This is an original diagram; a modified, black-and-white version of it was published as Text-fig. 12.3 in: Horne, D.J. 2011. Ostracods. In Batten, D.J. (ed.), English Wealden Fossils, 125–137. The Palaeontological Association, London, Field Guides to fossils 14, ix + 769 pp. It differs from the published version (to which the Palaeontological Association holds the copyright) in several aspects of layout and detail as well as the use of colour.

If I can get this image reinstated on Wikimedia Commons I will then go through the same procedure with others that were provided in support of the podcast but have since been deleted.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjhorne (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

  Info Nominated here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davidjhorne. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


File:Jetstar Airbus A320 VH-XJE.jpg

Please undelete this file because its my work. This is seriously my work (100 serious). This file only been posted on wikimedia, also 100% serious.

HutheMeow (talk) 07:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Please delete this file because its really my work and as it said "own work" in the image infobox. If the file will be restored, I agree to abide the rules and refrain from bad actions and violations. HutheMeow (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC) [1]

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
@HutheMeow: What will you do if it's not restored? Pinging @Srittau, Jdx, Jcb, Guanaco.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I see how this could be interpreted as a threat of disruption, but I'll assume that isn't the intended meaning. Regarding the images, I'll   Support undeleting the ones taken with the same camera unless there is evidence that some were taken from the web. There has been doubt about HutheMeow's contributions, but I'm willing to give them a chance. Of course, if these explicit claims of "own work" here are proven to be false, we can't trust anything they upload ever. An indefinite block would then be warranted. Guanaco (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
@Guanaco: Can you look into the camera metadata and evidence of having been taken from the web without restoring?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I can undelete them temporarily or I can download them to my computer and examine them. I'm doing some file transfers and a fresh Linux install now, so I'll make a proper list in the next day or so. I've seen a Canon camera and an Olympus. Guanaco (talk) 08:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
  Comment - this user still cannot be trusted, see here. Yesterday they still claimed that all their uploads "belonged" to them, whatever that may mean. Jcb (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

No uploads that had "own work" were false, except for the ones that were unlicensed, but the rest of them were mine for real, so please trust me and that they belonged to me. Just please let me have another chance. HutheMeow (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Template:Undelete

Full list of files

Here's the full list of files. Looking at them now. Guanaco (talk) 02:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

No identifiable camera

Apple iPhone 7

Apple iPhone 6

Samsung WB250F/WB251F/WB252F

Canon EOS 30D

Canon EOS 1300D

Olympus VG165,D765

Most are low resolution, often indicating a copyright violation.

Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT

Apple iPhone 5c

Sorting out

There are a lot of images here, and sorting these while they're deleted is tedious. Huthemeow did upload a few blatant copyvios, but they are clearly distinguishable from the others in this set. I did check several via Google Images and couldn't find any matches.   Support undeleting them all with the noted exceptions. Most of the unsorted files seem to be from the Olympus camera, and if there is specific cause for concern about some images, they can be renominated for deletion. Guanaco (talk) 03:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

@Guanaco: if you (temporarily) undelete the lot I think I can sort them way quicker than you can. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
@Guanaco: I will undelete the Olympus files for now. They seem safe at least and can be excluded from the discussion already. Jcb (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. This will be much easier to sort out now. Guanaco (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
All the files are grouped by camera now. Jcb (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Images from Flickr author 62558987@N07

Some Flickr users are labeled bad users for a small number of their images uploaded. This means that not all images that they have uploaded to Flickr are problamatic. I had inquired with the editor that had labeled this author a bad user (@Ronhjones) about the rationale behind their labeling them a bad author before I uploaded these images.SecretName101 (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@SecretName101: File:Renato Mariotto 2483.jpg is a redirect to deleted File:Renato Mariotti 2483.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:51, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Fixed that earlier today after seeing your comment.SecretName101 (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  Comment Images of copyrighted documents were uploaded from this Flickr account. I cannot say that all the Flickr images are bad, just that they each need a careful examination, and not let the Flickr bot just pass them sight unseen. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I decided that I should ping @Srittau (who deleted these images) to inform them. It appears they misunderstood that the "bad user" label was not an explicit indication that these particular images were themselves problematic.
It seems to me that their rationale for deleting these images centered upon a misunderstanding about the nature/exact implications of the "bad user" label. It would be helpful for them to provide imput into whether or not that is the case.SecretName101 (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I would push that these images should be undeleted (at least temporarily). Can easily be re-deleted if there is found reason to question the validity of 62558987@N07's claimed authorship of the images.
The photos in question were found on two flickr photo albums: this one and this one
It seems that these images were genuinely authored by Kurman Communications (the owner of the flickr account 62558987@N07). These appear to have been taken in order to promote Aaron Goldstein's campaign for the Democratic nomination in Illinois' 2018 Attorney General election. Goldstein's campaign committee did, in fact, employ the public-relations services of Kurman Communications, as can be evidenced by campaign expenditures such as this. His campaign reported three payments to Kurman Communications for PR and consulting services.SecretName101 (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Various ithkuil illustrations

Hi. I'm contesting the deletion of these files, on the ground that I had specified the licensing informations in the following way:

“According to the permissions attached by John Quijada to this files: « You may copy or excerpt any portion of the contents of this website for private, individual, or personal use which is non-commercial in nature and not for purposes of profit. Otherwise, you may copy or excerpt brief portions of the contents of this website in published, web-accessible, or commercially distributed articles, papers or webpages for purposes of review, commentary or analysis, provided you give full attribution to the author and this website. »”

This can be seen at the bottom of the ithkuil.net website I took these images from.

Copyright has never been my strength, but I believe I did not do anything wrong? If I did, do tell me what, and I will gladly reupload the files in accordance to the rules. Assuming I did in fact violate a copyright, I think my contestation of the first file of the list still applies, based on the fact that it is a simple geometrical figure.

Thank you and sorry for the bother. --Orikrin1998    22:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

It is the non-commercial restriction Orikrin1998. That is against one of the main rules of our licensing policy. It must be under a license that allows anyone to use or modify the image, at any time, and for any purpose. Including commercial reuse. As a side note, please change your signature per COM:Signatures#Images in signature. The images have to be removed. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 22:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
I see, thanks for explaining this to me. May I reiterate my request regarding the first file? --Orikrin1998 (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hmm...I never actually looked past the "non-commercial" before. But now that I do these might actually be ok. Magog the Ogre, these are apparently language glyphs. Would that not put them under {{PD-script}}? I'm not familiar with how copyright law deals with "constructed languages" (although all language is inherently constructed at some point). So if these are just "letters" of a language they may be ok, Orikrin1998. --Majora (talk) 19:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Yeah they are, you can find them here. I actually never had a doubt it would be acceptable until the files were deleted haha. But don't worry, licensing has always been an undecipherable mystery to me.
For your information, constructed languages are better called artificial, on the ground that they are created by one person, or a small group of people, over a small period of time, as opposed to natural languages. And conlangs, as far as I know, are tagged with fair use policies.
Thanks for the update! --Orikrin1998 (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Oklahoma City National Memorial images

Ten years ago, most of the images at Category:Oklahoma City National Memorial were deleted as being derivative works of the (supposedly) copyrighted Oklahoma City Memorial. In the ten years since, that category has seen a number of uploads of photos of the "chair" memorial, example: File:Another shot of the empty chairs. - panoramio.jpg. So either the new images need to be deleted or the old ones need to be restored. My thought is that anything containing no more artistic elements than just the chairs is PD-ineligible and should be restored. Something like the nighttime display, e.g. File:OKC National Memorial chair reflection.jpg is a more arguable case. But IMO, any simple depictions of the chairs were wrongly decided ten years ago - the chairs are simple shapes and should themselves be considered PD-ineligible. --B (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

SVGs by User:ಪ್ರದೀಪ್ ಬೆಳಗಲ್

So called “dark patches” are most likely a trivial SVG 1.2 compatibility problem – see File:DNA chemical structure.svg #filehistory. The story happened when mass deletionist tendencies dominated on Commons, hence no wonder that nobody attempted to do a repair job. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Category: Category:Buildings in Dambach (Fürth)

Reguest for undelete categorys, erased by A.Savin. (only with my images) Only using "Buildings in Fürth" are non well specified. The city part of Dambach have two different parts. One west side of Rhein-Main-Donau Canal, one east side from RMD-Canal (for normal peoble this looks like different parts). With using only overall category (Fürth), it is not possible to show island position (ordered by Monument-ID or̞-and street address with house number) it will only deliver ballpark figures. To generate picture galleries in Wikipedia is either not possible when cats are destroyed and nobody proof the nexus from Wiki Commons to Wikipedia. (with still existing content, the cat was never empty) I have personal issues with Alexander Savin and propose since longer time, that he should keep distance from my work and let other admins upgrade improvements...--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 12:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC) (talk)

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Kindly link your user page or user talk page in your signature to effectively enable pinging and mentioning.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Kúmókụn - Ajimoko I.jpg

This is a photograph from my private family collection. It dates from the early 1800s and would therefore be out of copyright. Please re-instate on the Wikimedia page for Fredrick Adédeji Kúmókụn Haastrup - Ajimoko I. PS It would have been helpful if I had been asked about the copyright status first before deleting.'Desola Haastrup 13 August 2018'DesoHaa (talk) 17:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

This is more likely from the late 1800s (19th century), given that Fredrick Kúmókụn Adédeji Haastrup was still alive in 1896. Copyright in many parts of the world is determined by the lifetime of the author, so we would need to know where this was taken and if the photographer can be determined. With the background of Mr Haastrup this may well be a Danish photograph, so if no author can be found, it would be in the public domain in Europe. However, all uploads at Commons must also be free in the United States, so we would need to know if this was ever published before 1923. Lastly, the burden on providing evidence for the copyright status is on you as the uploader, but you marked this as your own work while you are not the copyright holder. Owning a copy of an image does not make you own the copyright. It rests with the heirs of the photographer until a legally defined period after which the work becomes public domain. De728631 (talk) 18:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Emblem_of_People’s_Militia.svg

该图片确实是中国民兵的标识之一,根据《中华人民共和国著作权法》,属于具有行政性质的图片,因此属于公有领域。


The picture is one of the identities of Chinese militia. According to the "Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China", it is a picture of an administrative nature and therefore belongs to the public domain.Jyxyl9 (talk) 05:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

    • @Jeff G.:中国民兵的官方标志,不可能是一家商业网站的版权作品,该网页也未有声明该图片是其版权作品,当时提交快速删除的理由是错误的,提交者随意地找到一个网站当作侵权的证据,并没有经过存废讨论。本图片此前适用的是公有领域政府作品,而不是版权授权。需要强调的是,该标志是中华人民共和国政府的公有领域作品。
    • @Jeff G.:The official logo of the Chinese militia could not be a copyrighted work on a commercial website. The website did not declare that the picture was its copyrighted work. The reason for submitting the speedy deletion was wrong. The submitter optionally found a website as evidence of infringement, and did not go through the AFD. This image was previously suitable for government works in the public domain, not copyright licenses. It should be emphasized that the logo is a public domain work of the Government of the People’s Republic of China. Jyxyl9 (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Lee Seungbok.JPG

何年も前に削除され気がつきませんでしたが、「著作権の侵害」を理由としつつ具体的な理由が明示されていません。どのような審議を経てどの点が著作権の侵害とされたのか判然とせず、改めて審議をお願いします。仮に銅像写真を掲載することが著作権侵害とされるのであれば、あらゆる銅像写真あまねく波及する問題と考えます。なお私はこの写真のオリジナルを失っており、これを回収したいので、結果として削除するにしても一時的に復帰させて回収の機会を頂きたいと思います。--Kussy (talk) 08:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Although I was noticed that it was deleted many years ago, concrete reasons are not explicitly stated as a reason for "copyright infringement" as a reason. Please do not consider what kind of deliberation and which point was regarded as infringement of copyright, please again deliberate. If posting a bronze statue picture is considered copyright infringement, we think that every bronze statue photograph spreads all over. In addition, since I have lost the original of this photo, I want to retrieve this, so I would like to take the opportunity of recovery by temporarily returning it even if I delete it as a result.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Cary Kaplan2.jpg A photo of Brampton Beast President Cary Kaplan

I would like to request undeletion as the file in question has been found on the subject employer's website. I have sourced the author and the organization that Mr. Kaplan works for. I am making this edit on behalf of Cosmos Sports and Entertainment (Mr. Kaplan owns this business) and the Brampton Beast (Mr. Kaplan is the president)

I believe that the previous photo is not a good representation of Mr. Kaplan and the file I have replaced it with is more representative of him.

Thank you,--Stylinstiles11 (talk) 01:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

@Stylinstiles11: please provide an evidence that the photo copyright owner (the photographer or the photographer's employer) decided to publish the photo under the cc-by-sa-4.0 license, as you declared. This can be a link to the site containing the license evidence or an email following COM:OTRS instructions. Otherwise   Oppose. Ankry (talk) 08:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Suffian Hakim.jpg

I received a request from my publishers to upload an image of myself (file name: Suffian Hakim.jpg) to Wikipedia Commons. This photograph was taken and uploaded for free use, and is readily available on my website under the URL https://suffianhakim.com/dsc_0304/.

I am the owner of the website (suffianhakim.com) as well as the image.

Please let me know if there's further documentation that I need to produce for clearance of this image.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SuffianHakim (talk • contribs) 03:32, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:44, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose @SuffianHakim: Neither https://suffianhakim.com/dsc_0304/ nor https://suffianhakim.com bears any license at all, let alone one free enough for us. You could quickly add an appropriate license from COM:L like {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} to https://suffianhakim.com/dsc_0304/ (or to https://suffianhakim.com to cover all your photos) and tell us the URL where you did that. You could also have the photographer email permission via OTRS with a copy to you and wait months.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:44, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Kavin Bharti Mittal Founder and CEO Hike.jpg

This photo of Kavin Bharti Mittal is an original work and free to use for Wikipedia ONLY!

Kindly restore and replace the picture.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihit.rao12 (talk • contribs) 09:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:33, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose @Ihit.rao12, Andromedax13: The subject file was deleted as a reupload of File:Kavin Bharti Mittal 3.jpg, which was deleted for having "external source, no license, no permission." To comply with COM:L, please have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a copy to you. Also, do not reupload.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:33, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Debian-M68K auf einem Atari Falcon.jpg

hallo - wie wäre es mit dem kontakt zum urheber des fotos, beispielsweise über seine mailadresse in der beschreibung..? falss das nicht möglich sein sollte, wüsste ich gerne, warum es nicht geht. danke. --StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 13:32, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Das hättest du bereits vor dem Upload machen sollen. Dann mach es jetzt: Commons:Email templates. --Túrelio (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Terry Duffy.jpg

The creator of this file, Charlie Simokaitis has granted CME permission to use this work to update the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrence_A._Duffy

See his note below:


I hereby affirm that I, Charlie Simokaitis, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work attached to this email. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Charlie Simokaitis 2018-08-23


Charlie Simokaitis Groundfire Pictures

<redacted>

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Solyak (talk • contribs) 16:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
  Oppose Please have Mr Simokaitis send this permission by email via COM:OTRS. Should this have happened already, please be aware that the backlog for permission emails like this is currently at 127 days, so please be patient for this file to be processed by our volunteer email team. De728631 (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ірина Іллівна Трегубова на зйомках.jpg

I made this picture from my family album- why it was removed?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Вишневский Дмитрий Владимирович (talk • contribs) 18:40, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
It was removed because you declared it as "own work" while you are probably not the original photographer. Owning a copy of a photograph does not automatically make you own the rights to republish and licence it. To undelete the file we need a permission from the photographer, because if this was taken in 2007 it would still be copyrighted in most parts of the world. De728631 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wiki Speisezimmer Mahagoni Louis XVI 1980 Anton Spilker.jpg

Einverständniserklärung an permissions-de@wikimedia.org ohne Ticket# am 01.09.2018 von Anton Spilker GmbH & Co., Steinheim Anton Spilker GmbH & Co. i.L., Amtsgericht Paderborn HRA 2819

Eine Bestätigung von "Permissions - German Wikipedia" am 01.09.2018 mit [Ticket#2018090110002393] Ich beantrage eine Wiederherstellung! Urspilk (talk) 19:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose Die Warteschlange für die Bearbeitung solcher Emails liegt derzeit bei ca. 3 Monaten, weil alle diese Fälle von freiwilligen Helfern abgearbeitet werden. Sobald die Erklärung für gültig befunden wurde, wird das Bild aber wieder hergestellt. De728631 (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wiki Schlafzimmer Innenausbau Rokoko Schleiflack 1983 Trueggelmann.jpg

Einverständniserklärung an permissions-de@wikimedia.org ohne Ticket# am 04.09.2018 von Trüggelmann International Interiors Collection, Bielefeld Möbelwerk A. Trüggelmann GmbH ] Co. KG, HRA 11166 Bielefeld

Eine Bestätigung von "Permissions - German Wikipedia" am 04.09.2018 mit [Ticket#2018090110007669] Ich beantrage eine Wiederherstellung! Urspilk (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose Die Warteschlange für die Bearbeitung solcher Emails liegt derzeit bei ca. 3 Monaten, weil alle diese Fälle von freiwilligen Helfern abgearbeitet werden. Sobald die Erklärung für gültig befunden wurde, wird das Bild aber wieder hergestellt. De728631 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Recorte Periodico, El DIARIO, sobre la declaración de hijo adoptivo de la ciudad de Girardot al doctor Edmundo Navarro Acosta.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Son recortes de periódicos antiguos, se esta haciendo referencia en todo caso a la fuente de donde se tomaron. Estos diarios o revistas ya no existen y no circulan en Colombia. Gabrielsalanava (talk) 22:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

They are cuttings from old newspapers, they are referring in any case to the source from which they were taken. These newspapers or magazines no longer exist and do not circulate in Colombia.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Gabrielsalanava: ¿Qué edad tienen los artículos? ¿Tienen bylines? How old are the articles? Do they have bylines?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Todos los recortes de prensa o revista que he subido son de los año 1954 a 1974 de una revista que se llamó el CAMELLON y de un periódico llamado EL DIARIO. ambos del municipio de Girardot Cololmbia. Estos ya no existen, ya no circulan, son recortes históricos y los conserva mi familia desde la época en que fueron publicados. No tengo intensión de dañar a nadie, no quiero afectar a nadie. No considero que este afectando derechos de autor en cuanto la información que allí aparece son reportajes que fueron publicados en estos medio de hace mas de 50 años. igualmente en cada imagen coloqué la fuente de donde fueron recortados. por lo que no estoy vulnerando a nadie. agradezco su colaboración y compresión. Gabrielsalanava (talk) 22:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
All the press clippings or magazine that I have uploaded are from 1954 to 1974 from a magazine called CAMELLON and from a newspaper called EL DIARIO. both of the municipality of Girardot Cololmbia. These no longer exist, they no longer circulate, they are historical cuts and my family keeps them from the time they were published. I have no intention of harming anyone, I do not want to affect anyone. I do not consider that this affecting copyright as soon as the information that appears there are reports that were published in these media more than 50 years ago. also in each image I placed the source from which they were cut. so I'm not harming anyone. I appreciate your collaboration and understanding.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Important-influences-on-Speech-Intelligibility.jpg

Please undelete this file. I own it. --Phonical (talk) 05:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

You are telling us that you "own" all 6 images (3 of them photographies) in this montage? --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
That aside, owning a copy of an image does not automatically make you the copyright holder. Copyright usually rest with the original photographer. De728631 (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Greg J. Marchand.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018050410003938 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


  Done @Jeff G.: please check the file. De728631 (talk) 15:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kleinermeilert alfred 90.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018050410004222 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


  Done @Jeff G.: please check the file. De728631 (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

File:ROHAN MEHRA.jpg

This file with a peramission with photo holder

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheetal parmar (talk • contribs) 16:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose Since this was published on Facebook without a free licence, we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Copyright is usually not held by the subject depicted but by the photographer. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC)