Commons:Valued image candidates

Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


RenominationEdit

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
21,261 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
18,488 (87%) 
Undecided
  
1,163 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
1,610 (7.6%) 


New valued image nominationsEdit

   
Unni Straume film director celebrating 17 mai (Norwegian Constitution Day) in slottsparken in Oslo. 2013-May-17.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mænsard vokser (talk) on 2016-05-24 15:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Unni Straume
Used in:
it:Unni Straume
Reason:
Only image of the subject currently available -- Mænsard vokser (talk)
Open for review.
Araucaria araucana (Araucaria du Chili) - 98.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2016-05-25 11:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Araucaria araucana (Monkey puzzle tree), foliage
Open for review.
Stratocumulus cumulogenitus - 20150804 16h39 (10909).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2016-05-25 11:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Stratocumulus cumulogenitus
Open for review.
Massif des Bornes - 228.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2016-05-25 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Massif des Bornes, west slope
Open for review.
Protambulyx astygonus MHNT CUT 2010 0 34 Farreira de Teresópolis (Rio de Janeiro) dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-26 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Protambulyx astygonus mounted specimen male dorsal
Open for review.
Basilique de Sainte-Germaine de Pibrac façade.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-26 05:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilique Sainte-Germaine de Pibrac, Haute-Garonne France – Facade
Open for review.
Duomo (Verona) - Interior - Nave left part - Cappella Cartolari - the Blessed Virgin and St. Michael, S. George and St. Jerome by Michelangelo Prunati.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-26 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedrale Santa Maria Matricolare of Verona - the Blessed Virgin and St. Michael, S. George St. Jerome by Michelangelo Prunati
Open for review.
Tarana Halim (cropped).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-05-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Tarana Halim in 2016
Used in:
See Global Usage

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Carpenter's bench - Museo Agrícola el Patio - Tiagua.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-05-26 14:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Museo Agrícola el Patio, Tiagua, Lanzarote, carpenter's bench
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I feel that this image, good as it is, is poorly categorised and scoped. There should be more categories, not just the museum. One such category should be Category:Workbench (woodworking) and the scope should describe the type of workbench and link to the workbench category rather the museum category - after all this image is more likely to be of interest to somebody writing about the history of carpentry than somebody writing about the museum. Martinvl (talk) 06:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: I have added the category that I suggested. I still think that it has the wrong scope, but at least now if somebody presses the "Good Images" icon at Category:Woodworking tools it will flag up which, without my addition, it would not. Martinvl (talk) 10:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
2016 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Boguszynie 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-26 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Boguszyn, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, statue of John of Nepomuk

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kamieńczyk 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-26 19:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Kamieńczyk, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, the upper part of the village

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kaplica św. Anny w Ławicy 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-26 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Ławica, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Saint Anne chapel

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kapliczka przydrożna w Ścinawicy.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-26 19:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Ścinawica, roadside chapel, former memorial to the victims of World War I

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
18th Century cannon and tools.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-05-26 21:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Eighteenth Century cannon and tools
Reason:
There are many images of various muzzel-loading cannon in Commons, but this is possibly the only image in Commons that shows the tools associated with such cannon. -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
Adhemarius ypsilon MHNT CUT 2010 0 32 Yanayacu Napo female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-27 07:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Adhemarius ypsilon mounted specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église de l'Assomption-et-de-Saint-Michel de Verdun-sur-Garonne Les deux nefs.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-27 07:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Michel from Verdun-sur-Garonne. Interior.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo (Verona) - Interior - Nave left part - Capella della Madonna del Popolo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-27 08:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedrale Santa Maria Matricolare of Verona - Madonna del Popolo chapel

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Picture is tilted. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Kamieńczyku 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-27 12:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Kamieńczyk, exposure from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Kamieńczyku 08.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-27 12:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Kamieńczyk, sculpture of crucifixion group

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Domaszkowie 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-27 13:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Domaszków, exposure from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Międzylesie, ul. Sobieskiego 2-4 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-27 13:07 (UTC)
Scope:
2-4 Sobieskiego Street in Międzylesie, exposure from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nave da crociera Wind Surf 1989 nel Porto di Venezia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2016-05-27 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
The cruise ship Club Med 2 Wind Surf in the Harbour of Venice

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I'm terribly sorry that I confused this ship, which is Wind Surf former Club Med 1, with the twin ship Club Med 2 (I moved the file name to a correct file name)
Open for review.
Papillifera bidens affinis 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-05-27 17:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Papillifera bidens affinis, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Protambulyx astygonus MHNT CUT 2010 0 34 Guapimirim Rio Brasil female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-28 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Protambulyx astygonus female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Beaumont-de-Lomagne - Monument à Fermat.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-28 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
The Monument to Pierre de Fermat by Alexandre Falguière in Beaumont-de-Lomagne, Tarn-et-Garonne France

Symbol support vote.svg Support I have reviewed this proposal against all six VI criteria and am happy to support its nomination. Martinvl (talk) 05:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo (Verona) - Interior - Nave right part - Cappella Memo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-28 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedrale Santa Maria Matricolare of Verona - Memo chapel

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Lynn Ellen'.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2016-05-28 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Lynn Ellen' Flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Martyr Shamsuzzoha Memorial Sculpture (01).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-05-28 11:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Martyr Shamsuzzoha Memorial Sculpture
Used in:
See Global usage

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Clarinettiste - 20150805 19h00 (11042).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2016-05-28 12:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Clarinetists
Open for review.
Branta canadensis (Bernache du Canada) - 20150806 13h11 (11044).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2016-05-28 12:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Branta canadensis (Canada goose)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Several files in this scope, but difficult to find one of them. ~ Moheen (talk) 22:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Muricopsis cristata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-05-28 17:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Muricopsis cristata (Blainville's Muricop), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Münster, WL-Bank -- 2016 -- 1925.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2016-05-28 17:57 (UTC)
Scope:
WL-Bank in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (View from street Weseler Straße)
Used in:
WL-Bank (Wikidata)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:25, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Międzylesie, ul. Sobieskiego 2-4 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-28 21:35 (UTC)
Scope:
2-4 Sobieskiego Street in Międzylesie, wooden shingles

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Plebania w Domaszkowie 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-28 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory in Domaszków, exposure from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Podtynie 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-05-28 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Podtynie

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Protambulyx astygonus MHNT CUT 2010 0 34 Guapimirim Rio Brasil female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-29 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Protambulyx astygonus mounted sepcimen female ventral
Open for review.
Beaumont-de-Lomagne - Panorama.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-29 04:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Beaumont-de-Lomagne Tarn-et-Garonne, France.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo (Verona) - Interior - Nave right part - Cappella Memo - L'ultima cena.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-29 04:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedrale Santa Maria Matricolare of Verona - The Last Supper by Gian Battista Burato
Open for review.
Calandar.- Press to smooth clothes.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC) on 2016-05-29 16:05 (UTC)
Scope:
mangles Old laundry mangle.
Open for review.
Jaguar XE 2016 front three-quarter.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-05-29 17:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Jaguar XE - front
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Jaguar XE 2016 rear three-quarter.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-05-29 17:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Jaguar XE - rear
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Adhemarius ypsilon MHNT CUT 2010 0 32 Yanayacu Napo female ventral.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-30 04:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Adhemarius ypsilon mounted specimen female ventral
Open for review.
Beaumont-de-Lomagne Saint-Jean-de-Coquessac Chapelle Saint-Jean IA00039014.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-30 04:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of Saint John Beaumont-de-Lomagne Tarn-et-Garonne, France
Open for review.
Duomo (Verona) - Interior - Nave right part - Cappella Emilei.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-05-30 04:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathedrale Santa Maria Matricolare of Verona - Emilei chapel Surrounded by frescoes by Giovanni Maria Falconetto
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidatesEdit

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

New valued image set nominationsEdit

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidatesEdit