Commons:Valued image candidates

Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


RenominationEdit

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
23,931 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
20,984 (87.7%) 
Undecided
  
1,260 (5.3%) 
Declined
  
1,687 (7%) 



New valued image nominationsEdit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) on 2016-12-02 02:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Hall of Prayer for Good Harvests, tiled roof
  •   Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image to Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. The scope is too broad --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  fixed --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  adjusted the category --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2016-12-02 07:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Automatic watch (backside)
Used in:
Automatic watch
Reason:
Illustrative (macro) and quality image -- Mile (talk)

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC) Per Charles --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

  •   Oppose Will be OK if full details of watch specified in scope. Charles (talk) 12:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Charles What and where should be specified; scope, file name, description  ? --Mile (talk) 19:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • something like (Pizzaro 1897) model 0606-136 3TM WR, back. You'd need to create a sub-category undercategory Category:Watch manufacturing companies of Germany. Charles (talk) 10:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
I put into description + Category. --Mile (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
need to change scope I'm afraid. Charles (talk) 23:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Into what, i dont know where you will find better scope ? --Mile (talk) 07:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
My suggestion in bold above, or put in the Watches of Germany category. Charles (talk) 10:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Its already inside. Click first Pizzaro category then see in bottom. --Mile (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, not making myself clear. It's the scope that has to change... Charles (talk) 10:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
If i change into that, the scope, there would be just one picture, this one. While i am trying to get all automatic wacthes. In that case, sure it will win, more phyrric win. ;) --Mile (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-02 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea lycoa (Lycoa acraea) dorsal

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  Oppose The greater part of the butterfly is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

  •   Comment Of course it is not a perfect image. Still valuable for identifying the species. Remember, I could say for many VIs of views: 'The greater part of the xxx is not visible' Charles (talk) 10:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
I think images with basic technical defects should not receive any awards. VI is not QI, but there are some borders of quality that should be taken into account when evaluating images. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
This image is not of a landscape or immobile building. Charles (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

  Support This may have a sharpness issue, but it's the best we have currently. I don't think the sharpness issue is damaging to the EV too much either. The butterfly is still clearly and easily identifiable. lNeverCry 18:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-03 10:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio nireus lyaeus (Narrow blue-banded swallowtail) in flight
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MartinThoma (talk) on 2016-12-03 12:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Gyroscopes

  Comment too vague. Charles (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-03 16:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Maroño reservoir, view direction E
Used in:
es:Maroño

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-03 16:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Maroño reservoir, view from concrete dam towards the woods, view direction W

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-03 22:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Lens hoods, tulip lens hood

  Comment no better than others and quite generic. Charles (talk) 23:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

This is the best in terms of quality and size of the image in this scope. Show me the better. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There are images showing Canon, Nikon and Sigma lens hoods. All are slightly different designs. This image does not specify the maker. Also, this lens hood uses ridges to reduce light contamination; most lens hoods do not. The current scope is therefore misleading. The large size of file and high quality execution are not relevant.Charles (talk) 13:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-03 22:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Agfa Optima 5000, front view with flash

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-03 22:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Agfa Optima 5000, back view

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Chme82 (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Prunella collaris collaris (Alpine accentor)
Reason:
Good and usefull image -- Chme82 (talk)

  Support useful. I have modified scope to usual format. Charles (talk) 10:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Azanus natalensis (Natal babul blue) ventral

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Abisara neavei neavei (Neave's banded judy) ventral

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Celaenorrhinus galenus (Orange sprite) dorsal
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Nougat, work by Katja Schenker
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. -- Yann (talk)

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-04 10:54 (UTC)
Scope:
House of Love, work by Robert Nortik
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. -- Yann (talk)
  •   Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wolfgang Moroder (talk) on 2016-12-04 12:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Sant'Angelo a Nilo church in Naples, North facade
  •   Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:50, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 14:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge over Irués river, on the Chorro de Fornos trail, view direction N

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Graffiti of the Pou brothers in Adurtza, in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain, view direction NW
Reason:
  Comment The brothers Eneko Pou and Iker Pou are two mountaineers and climbers from Vitoria-Gasteiz. -- Basotxerri (talk)

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Concrete dam of the Pineta reservoir, view direction SE

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 15:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Mountain barn "Borda de Lekuona" in the Entzia mountain range, view direction E
  •   Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Summit of Punta del Puerto de Munain in the Entzia mountain range, view direction SW

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Summit of Peña Roja in the Entzia mountain range, view direction E

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Adhemarius globifer Mounted specimen male dorsal

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - Coro dei Frati - Detail of stalls of the choir of the friars
  •   Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Foresti Papadopoli (Venice) - Facade on rio dei Tolentini
  •   Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Picture of painted tiles "Romeria de los Labradores", Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria
Used in:
Linked by the catogory to the German Wikipedia article.

This would be more useful if the picture was in the article. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  Done Also in the my other nomation --Llez (talk) 07:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-12-04 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
International Bank Account Number (IBAN) on a British bank statement.
Used in:
8 different Wikipedia projects plus this non-Wikipedia usage. This article get over 800,000 hits a year.
Reason:
This images shows how to find an IBAN on a bank account statement in a manner that does not promote any particular bank nor does it invade anybody's privacy. -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-04 17:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ekushey Padak
  •   Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 20:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-04 17:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Shomi Kaiser
  •   Oppose Geolocation is needed. Yann (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support For portraits, as for the Shoots studio, geolocation outside of an imortant event is not useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Well, she is talking at an event here, so geolocation is possible. Why not providing it? Yann (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment If we can have the geocoding of the event it's better. But it would be a shame to lose a portrait for this. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-04 17:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Nirmalendu Goone
  •   Oppose Geolocation is needed. Yann (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support For portraits, as for the Shoots studio, geolocation outside of an imortant event is not useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Well, he is talking at an event here, so geolocation is possible. Why not providing it? Yann (talk) 10:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment If we can have the geocoding of the event it's better. But it would be a shame to lose a portrait for this. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
    • We don't lose anything by following our common accepted rules. Yann (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-04 19:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Great War Memorial Window by Nicholas Mynheer in Southwell Minster
Used in:
en:Southwell Minster

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-04 20:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Austin Metro Mk1 - front
Used in:
cs:Rover Metro, da:Austin (bilmærke), da:Rover Metro, de:Kleinwagen, de:Mini Metro, en:Automotive industry in the United Kingdom, en:Austin Motor Company, en:British Leyland, en:Austin Metro, es:MG Metro, es:Austin Motor Company, fr:Austin Metro and numerous other articles on several Wikis.

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2016-12-05 07:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Main Hall, Kiyomizu-dera: as seen in autumn
Used in:
en:Kiyomizu-dera, de:Kiyomizu-dera
  •   Comment This is a tricky one, there are so many to choose from. Obviously the best with autumn colours if others think that's OK for a scope. Charles (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I've been looking for all autumnal versions and my personal conclusion is that there are three possible candidates: this one, File:Kiyomizu-dera,_Kyoto,_November_2016_-02.jpg and File:Kiyomizu-dera_(24294752243).jpg. As they all are quite comparable, I'm willing to consider this one as the best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2016-12-05 07:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Kyoto Station building (1997) as seen from the estern side of the main hall
Used in:
en:Kyōto Station, de:Bahnhof Kyōto

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-05 10:35 (UTC)
Scope:
"El Matriarcado" by Victor Navarro Guedes, Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) on 2016-12-05 13:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Kota Kinabalu City Mosque, night view

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-12-05 16:54 (UTC)
Scope:
26 Metre dish, HartRAO, South Africa (front view)
Used in:
  •   Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-05 17:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Adhemarius globifer mounted specimen male ventral

  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-05 17:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venice - Triptych by Bartolomeo Vivarini

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-05 17:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte dei Tolentini (Venice) in Venice - Northeast exposure

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-05 17:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Schwartziella bryerea, shell

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2016-12-05 17:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Capra hircus (Goat heart). After technique of gelatin injection and diaphanization.
Used in:
EN, PT, AN

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2016-12-05 17:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Caiman yacare (Wetland alligator). Taxidermy specimen
Used in:
Yacare caiman (en), Jacaré-do-pantanal (pt), Caiman yacare (es)
  •   Support Useful and the only taxidermy specimen in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-12-05 18:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Port Elizabeth City Hall, front view
Used in:
7 Articles in 5 languages

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-05 18:35 (UTC)
Scope:
This is not a love song, work by Didier Faustino
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. -- Yann (talk)

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-05 18:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Anisuzzaman

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-05 19:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Contreventement, work by Émilie Ding
Reason:
Part of the exhibition Open End in the Kings Cemetery, Geneva. -- Yann (talk)

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-12-05 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross, so-called "Milokreuz" (14th ctry.) in Trier-Ehrang, Germany.
  •   Support, useful and only one in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-05 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Land Rover Discovery Sport - front
Used in:
de:Land Rover Discovery Sport, en:Jaguar Land Rover, en:Land Rover Discovery Sport, fr:Land Rover Discovery Sport, it:Land Rover Discovery Sport

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 01:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-05 22:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Wrest Park wyvern gate pier ornament

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 01:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-05 22:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Cable releases, for Sony Alpha

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-05 22:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Sony battery grips, model N50, front view

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-05 23:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Sony battery grips, model N50, back view

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-12-05 23:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Sony DSLR-A700, front view

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 01:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-12-06 13:02 (UTC)
Scope:
HMS Illustrious portside from the front.
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 14:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-06 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Dilophosaurus footprint in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area .
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-06 15:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Colotis ione (Purple tip) female, ventral

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 19:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-06 15:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Cymothoe hobarti (Red glider) dorsal

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 19:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-06 15:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Colotis euippe complexivus (Round-winged orange tip) male, ventral
  •   Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-06 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Puerto de Andoin mountain pass in the Entzia mountain range in Álava, Basque Country, view direction N

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-06 15:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Pavement trail marking of the Way of Saint James in Álava-Araba, in Armentia, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, view direction W

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-06 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Rasos de Legaire plains in the Entzia mountain range, view direction E

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-06 15:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Acer campestre (Field maple) in Spain

In Spain is not a specificity of the species, nor a remarkable character. It would be good to remove it from the scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
  Comment Hi Archaeodontosaurus, perhaps this is a comprehension error of mine because I was considering the category Acer campestre in Spain. If I have to consider the whole species, I really doubt that this image would be the most valuable one of all Acer campestre. Should I withdraw this nomination, what do you think? --Basotxerri (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

  •   Comment That the sky is not blue does not matter. Only counts: the visualization of the trunk, the foliage and the general appearance of the tree in its natural environment. In this case your image is the best. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-12-06 16:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1630) near Brecht (Eifel), Germany.

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-06 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Trogolegnum pseudambulyx mounted specimen male dorsal

  Support useful. Charles (talk) 18:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-06 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - Coro dei Frati - The entrance in Istrian stone

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 19:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-06 17:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Polo (Venice) - Jesus is stripped of his garments by Giandomenico Tiepolo

  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-12-05 21:03 (UTC)
Scope:
British Rail Class 91 electric locomotive (front)
  •   Question, is the livery significant? Are we to have different scopes for the same train model in each of the several different liveries that has been used on it? Would we do the same for buses or trucks and vans? DeFacto (talk). 18:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Info I would have preferred to drop the livery bit of the scope and to link the image to :Category:British Rail Class 91 rather than to the grand-daughter category :Category:British Rail Class 91s in GNER debranded livery where it is located. In my view that would be in accordance with the VI rules on scoping, but a number of reviewers do not seem to demands that the scope echo the category where the image is located.Martinvl (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment, I'd prefer it that way too. I can't see why the image can't be in a child category of the main scope category. DeFacto (talk). 20:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

  Scope changed from British Rail Class 91 locomotive in GNER livery. to British Class 91 electric locomotive --Martinvl (talk) 12:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

  • Scope changed as per discussion with DeFacto (see above). --Martinvl (talk) 12:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment, looking at the images in the category, there are several pictures of the other end of these locomotives too. Given that the loco is not symmetrical end-to-end, I suggest the word "front" needs to be added to the scope here to leave room for another scope for "rear". And should it be "British Rail Class 91 electric locomotive" rather than just "British Class 91 electric locomotive"? DeFacto (talk). 22:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
    •   Info @DeFacto: I checked the history of this class and as it was first ordered before the privatisation of British Rail, I agree that the word "Rail" should appear in the scope. I am not 100% convinced though of the need for the qualifier "(front)" but I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Martinvl (talk) 11:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

  Scope changed from British Class 91 electric locomotive to British Rail Class 91 electric locomotive (front) -- Martinvl (talk) 11:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-06 18:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Shital Pati

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 19:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-06 18:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Cover page of a Bengali magazine Bangadarshan
  •   Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-06 20:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Historical Landmark N° 782 Calico Ghost Town
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-06 20:50 (UTC)
Scope:
The Lucy Bell Lane Marker Calico Ghost Town
  •   Comment Atention The scopes are inverted between the different appointments. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-06 21:55 (UTC)
Scope:
"Calico lives again" memorial Calico Ghost Town
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 22:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-06 22:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Blue Star memorial Calico Ghost Town
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-06 23:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Public transport ticket machine (tramway and bus), Geneva

best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-07 00:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaque in memory of Ardutius de Faucigny, Geneva

best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2016-12-07 07:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Winter Hymn' Flowers.

best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-07 10:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Junonia terea teroides (Soldier commodore) dorsal

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-07 10:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Pardaleodes incerta incerta (Savanna pathfinder skipper) dorsal

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-07 10:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Colotis evagore antigone (Tiny orange tip) dorsal

  Oppose Unsharp and too dark. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC) --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

  •   Comment lighter version uploaded. Quite sharp enough to clearly identify species in my opinion. Charles (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

  Support Best in scope. As Charles remarks, the sharpness is a minor issue as regards EV. lNeverCry 01:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-12-07 11:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Afzal Hossain

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Joalpe (talk) on 2016-12-07 12:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Chrysocyon brachyurus (Guara wolf) heart. After technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
Used in:
EN, PT, FR

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Joalpe (talk) on 2016-12-07 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Tapirus terrestris (Tapir) heart. After technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
Used in:
EN, PT, ES

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 16:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-07 16:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Chocolate fountain Bellagio Hotel (Las Vegas)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 16:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-07 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Great seal of Native American tribe Navaro at Monument Valley, (Arizona)

  Comment We need more information about the copyright status of this item. Yann (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2016-12-07 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Piscium (Fish anatomy). Technique of diaphanization – specimen clarified for visualization of anatomical structures - side view.
Used in:
Zoological specimen (en), Peixe (pt), Pisces (es)

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

  •   Oppose The scope must have the binomial. Nothing is known about this fish. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Horadrim (talk) on 2016-12-07 16:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris (Capybara). Taxidermy specimen - side view.
Used in:
Capybara (en), Capybara (fr)

  Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-12-07 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Obtusella intersecta, shell

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 16:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC) on 2016-12-07 16:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Allegories of Venice in the Venetian Hotel (Las vegas)

  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Olivier LPB (talk) on 2016-12-07 18:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Kurt Koch - Portrait
Used in:
GlobalUsage

  Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 01:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-12-07 22:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Aston Martin DB10 bonnet badge
Reason:
The DB10 is a bespoke car that was created for the James Bond film Spectre. -- DeFacto (talk).

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-08 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Trogolegnum pseudambulyx mounted specimen male ventral

  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-08 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) - Coro dei Frati - Left organ by Giovanni Battista Piaggia
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-08 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Carlo Lodoli by Alessandro Longhi - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice
  •   Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-08 10:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Colotis vesta princeps (Veined golden arab) ventral

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-08 10:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Colotis vesta hanningtoni (Veined tip) ventral
  •   Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-12-08 10:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea pharsalus (Ward's glorious acraea) dorsal
  •   Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-12-08 11:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Andrea Fumagalli (economist)
Used in:
es:Andrea Fumagalli, it:Andrea Fumagalli (economista)
  •   Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-12-08 11:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Paolo De Paola
Used in:
it:Paolo De Paola, it:q:Paolo De Paola
  •   Support Useful and only image in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-12-08 11:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Giovanni Bachelet
Used in:
ar:جيوفاني باتيستا باشيليت, it:Giovanni Battista Bachelet
  •   Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-08 15:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Black-headed Latxa sheep race

  Comment A close-up view would be better. Yann (talk) 17:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-08 15:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Badaín village, in Sobrarbe, Huesca, Aragon, Spain, view direction NW
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-08 16:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Bielsa village, in Sobrarbe, Huesca, Aragon, Spain view direction NE
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-08 16:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Bielsa village, in Sobrarbe, Huesca, Aragon, Spain view direction W
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2016-12-08 16:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Tunnel Aragnouet-Bielsa, view direction NW
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2016-12-08 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Tomb of François Théodore Louis de Grenus
Reason:
No article yet, but he certainly deserves one: d:Q27878326. -- Yann (talk)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-08 17:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba quercus mounted specimen, male, dorsal
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-08 17:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Campanile of Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-12-08 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Col tempo by Giorgione Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Satdeep Gill (talk) on 2016-12-05 18:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Farahnaz Ispahani
Reason:
Best in Scope -- Satdeep Gill (talk)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidatesEdit

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Swiss "Crocodile" locomotive (Ce 6-8 Mark II)Edit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-11-28 19:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Swiss "Crocodile" locomotive (Ce 6-8 Mark II)
Used in:
This and it's uncropped partner are used in eight different articles.
Reason:
The Swiss crocodile locomotive which first saw service in 1919 hauling freight trains in mountainous areas had a distinctive shape. I believe that this is the one of best two images image in Commons of this type of locomotive. -- Martinvl (talk)
@Yann: I have created a MVR with both images. I cropped your suggested alternative image.Martinvl (talk) 15:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-11-30 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Swiss "Crocodile" locomotive (Ce 6-8 Mark II)
Used in:
The image from which it has been cropped is used in one Wikipedia artcile
Reason:
The Swiss crocodile locomotive which first saw service in 1919 hauling freight trains in mountainous areas had a distinctive shape. I believe that this is the one of best two images image in Commons of this type of locomotive. -- Martinvl (talk)
  •   Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Wayside cross in Halsdorf, GermanyEdit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-05-05 09:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross, the so-called Metzenkreuz, near Halsdorf (Eifel), Germany.

  Support best in scope --Berthold Werner (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-12-04 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross, the so-called Metzenkreuz, near Halsdorf (Eifel), Germany.

  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

  •   Support --Yann (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.

Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

New valued image set nominationsEdit

  This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidatesEdit