Commons:Valued image candidates

Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI statusEdit

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


RenominationEdit

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
21,990 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
19,166 (87.2%) 
Undecided
  
1,198 (5.4%) 
Declined
  
1,626 (7.4%) 



New valued image nominationsEdit

   
Paolo Monti - Serie fotografica (Venezia, 1949) - BEIC 6346672.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) on 2016-07-21 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
This historical 1949 photo by Paolo Monti offers a unique POV of the Campanile of St. Mark's Basilica, seen behind one of the St. Mark's horses.
Reason:
Paolo Monti was a notable photographer from Italy. He lived in Venice for years and captured its fascination in many shots. -- Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It seems difficult to label this type of work, in VI. It is a unique piece of art, it should be subject to the FP contest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you! Unfortunately the resolution is not so high (<2MP), so I fear it is be not possible. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 11:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
      • We made this mistake for the digitization of Fond Trutat. We decided to start with a better resolution. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
        • Unfortunately the digitalization of the archive was made some years ago, in 2009. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Hipparchia fagi MHNT CUT 2013 3 30 Cahors male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-22 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Hipparchia fagi mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Steve Jobs building at Pixar.gk.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2016-07-22 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Steve Jobs Building at Pixar
Used in:
en:Pixar
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perspective needs to be corrected. ~ Moheen (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Logo of rajshahi university.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) on 2016-07-22 18:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Logo of Rajshahi University
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. ~ Moheen (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Cochlicella acuta raphidia 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-07-22 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Cochlicella acuta ssp. raphidia, pale form, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, stajnia i spichrz 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, barn and granary

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, oficyna 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, outbuilding
Open for review.
2016 Zespół pałacowy w Żelaźnie 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Żelazno palace park

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-22 21:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Post office in Strzelin, exposure from SE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Glas Bheinn (Assynt).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-22 22:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Glas Bheinn, Assynt - a 776-metre-high mountain in the North Highlands of Scotland - viewed from the north-west

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, thanks Archaeodontosaurus, but, following a comment at QI, I've uploaded an increased contrast version of the image. Please confirm your opinion. DeFacto (talk). 09:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
No problem it was already very well before. Face-smile.svg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Tobermory Distillery.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-22 23:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Tobermory Distillery - from the east

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xylophanes meridanus MHNT CUT 2010 0 49 Parque Nacional Henri Pitter (Rancho Grande), Venezuela dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Xylophanes meridanus mounted specimen dorsal male

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Psilogramma increta MHNT CUT 2010 0 50 Ban Kheum Laos dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Psilogramma increta mounted specimen dorsal male

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cagnan della Roggia (Treviso).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Cagnan della Roggia or Siletto in Treviso. View from ponte dei Mussolini

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.090.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Swordfish

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.093-fond blanc.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Catfish

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.094.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-07-23 05:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, crocodiles

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église de Cognin (2016).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Floflo (talk) on 2016-07-23 09:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre de Cognin
Reason:
I think this picture is at present the best in scope for this church (which is not easy to photography because of surrounding trees hiding some parts). -- Floflo (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Céret portal inscription 1398.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-23 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Portal inscription at Église Saint-Pierre de Céret (France): construction dated 1398.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pélopée courbée - Nids en terre - 2016-07-23 - 05.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mathieu MD (talk) on 2016-07-23 14:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Sceliphron curvatum nest, opened
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment For this type of image, indicate the size of the object in the caption or even put a scale directly on the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Too late for the scale, but I added an other field to the description. -- Mathieu MD (talk) 07:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Peak Free Korea north face routes.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Grtek (talk) on 2016-07-23 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Free Korea Peak
Used in:
cs:Pik Svobodnaja Koreja, de:Pik Swobodnaja Korea, ru:Свободная Корея (пик)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Montesquieu Guillaume Joer 1298 (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-23 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Saturnin de Montesquieu-des-Albères, France: Funerary inscription for Guillaume Joer (+ 1298).
Used in:
de:St-Saturnin (Montesquieu-des-Albères)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stosicia houbricki 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-07-23 21:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Stosicia houbricki, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Post office in Strzelin, avant-corp

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dom Książąt Brzeskich w Strzelinie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:10 (UTC)
Scope:
House of the Dukes of Brzeg in Strzelin, exposure from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-23 22:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, exposure from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xylophanes meridanus MHNT CUT 2010 0 49 Parque Nacional Henri Pitter (Rancho Grande), Venezuela ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-24 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Xylophanes meridanus mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Idaea macilentaria MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-24 06:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Idaea macilentaria dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiese di San Vito e Santa Lucia (Treviso) - Viste della Piazza San vito.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-24 06:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Churches San Vito e Santa Lucia of Treviso, views from San Vito Square.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lille Eté2016 Eglise Sainte-Catherine tabernacle chapelle du Sacré-Coeur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 09:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC) on 2016-07-24 09:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Tabernacles in Lille Church holy Catherin (Lille)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sharpness is poor (ISO 3200). Such images make up a tripod. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment difficult to repair, the church is particularly dark.--Pierre André (talk) 19:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In most churches in France and Italy the flash and tripods are not allowed. The quality is not good but it is for this scope the best image we have and the subject is an object classified as historical monuments. It is acceptable to VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lac de Filleit - 2016-07-03 - 23.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mathieu MD (talk) on 2016-07-24 17:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Lake of Filleit, from the dam

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lac de Mondély - 2016-07-03 - 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mathieu MD (talk) on 2016-07-24 17:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Lake of Mondély, view from West

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Abdul Karim Sahitya Bisharad (1871-1953).svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Abdul Karim Sahityavisharad, Illustration
Used in:
See Global Usage
Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, sigbal box, exposure from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, signal box, exposure from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, pierwsza wiata peronowa.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, first platform shed

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, druga wiata peronowa 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-24 19:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Train station in Strzelin, second platform shed
Open for review.
Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Yaremche 2016 G2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2016-07-24 18:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Wooden church of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Yaremche, exterior
Used in:
uk:Яремче
Reason:
Good quality, geocoded, used in article. And most illustrative image of whole church. -- George Chernilevsky talk

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lille Eté2016 Eglise Sainte-Catherine .- Gravestones (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 22:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC) on 2016-07-24 22:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Gravestones in Nord Gravestone of Louis François Le Comte

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Xylophanes cyrene MHNT CUT 2010 0 49 Costa Rica female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-25 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Xylophanes cyrene mounted specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Psilogramma increta MHNT CUT 2010 0 50 Ban Kheum Laos ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-25 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Psilogramma increta mounted specimen ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Vito (Treviso) - Parte Romane del XII secolo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-25 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
San Vito of Treviso, Italy - Chapel of the Redeemer - twelfth century, by Ognibene of Treviso
Open for review.
Prats-de-Mollo Kapelle Saintes Juste et Ruffine.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-07-25 09:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle Saintes Juste et Ruffine (17th ctry.), Prats-de-Mollo-la-Preste, France (view SE).

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Arnhem-wekeromseweg-wegwijzer.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-07-25 11:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Pre-Vienna Convention Dutch directional road sign, Arnhem
Used in:
Open for review.
Lille Eté2016 Eglise Sainte-Catherine .- Gravestones (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 12:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC) on 2016-07-25 12:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Gravestones in Nord Gravestone of Franciscus Muyssart du Cappe

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lille Eté2016 Eglise Sainte-Catherine .- Gravestones (4).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Pierre André (talk) 13:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC) on 2016-07-25 13:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Gravestones in Nord Gravestone of François Lespagnol écuyer sieur de Courbe

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Alvania balearica 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-07-25 17:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Alvania balearica, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chip Zdarsky - Lucca Comics & Games 2015.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-07-25 19:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Chip Zdarsky
Used in:
en:Chip Zdarsky, fr:Chip Zdarsky, pt:Chip Zdarsky, etc.
Reason:
Not my best photo, but it's the only one we have of him. -- Jaqen (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Keddric Mays - Scafati Basket - 2013.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-07-25 20:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Keddric Mays
Used in:
en:Keddric Mays, fr:Keddric Mays, it:Keddric Mays, pl:Keddric Mays

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bridge of Oich - from the SW.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-07-25 21:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge of Oich - from the south-west
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope--Pierre André (talk) 21:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
BSCIC, Chittagong Regional Office (03).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~ Moheen (talk) on 2016-07-25 21:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Bangladesh Small and Cottage Industry Corporation (Chittagong Regional Office) exposure from west
Used in:
See Global Usage

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-25 22:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, exposure from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-25 22:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, outbuilding, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-25 22:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, residential outbuilding, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 6.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-07-25 22:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, residential outbuilding, exposure from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Theraphosa blondi MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-26 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Theraphosa blondi mounted specimen dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron MHNT CUT 2010 0 51 Male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-26 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba gaschkewitschii echephron Male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Rocco Venezia (Interno) - Cappella destra.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-07-26 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Rocco (Venice) - Right apse chapel

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Schmallenberg Sauerland-Ost 012.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Grafo (talk) on 2016-07-26 13:48 (UTC)
Scope:
City centre of Schmallenberg, aerial view from the south
Used in:
Reason:
This one perfectly illustrates down town Schmallenberg with its double main road layout. There are some alternatives (1, 2, 3), but I think this one is the clear winner. -- El Grafo (talk)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidatesEdit

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

New valued image set nominationsEdit

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidatesEdit