Comment There are a number of competitors, however I chose this image because it clearly shows all aspects of the landing: the lunar module, rover, and astronaut. I considered the more general scope "a moon landing", but I felt the US flag in the photo limits the scope a bit. – flamurai03:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NeutralOnly one vote per reviewer. I assume it is the latter vote which should count. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC) This picture is well categorized (6). It has a full description in English unfortunately not using the Information template, but there is no information missing, while more translated text is needed for the other languages (4). It is an excellent illustration of a moon landing (3), and the scope is well chosen (2). Last but not least it seems to be to me the most valuable picture of a moon landing (1). If the description is updated I will support the image! -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The criteria do not require multiple translations of the description. All #4 says is, "Multi-lingual descriptions should use the appropriate language templates". That doesn't mean multi-lingual descriptions are required. – flamurai02:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
