Neutral The new scope suggests that there may be VIs for "the transept of St. Michael church, Bamberg", "the choir of St. Michael church, Bamberg", "the portal of St. Michael church, Bamberg", "the third pillar of the northern aisle of St. Michael church, Bamberg"... I'm quite uncomfortable with that. I'd rather take "St. Michael church, Bamberg" as a scope (the monastery was definitely too broad a scope), but I won't oppose this one. I like the picture and I've been uncomfortable with the scope issue since its nomination, I couldn't make my mind about it. --Eusebius (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps it would be necessary to decide for each comparable nomination about the scope. Imho beside general views VIs should only be appointed for outstandig parts of buildings. (I will nominate another (I think extraordinary) view from inside this church). Alvesgaspar is right, what you see is the nave, nothing more. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with the nominator and Alves that having such a very specific scope is acceptable if the detail is outstanding or particularly interesting. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
