Commons:Valued image candidates/Bittium glareosum 02.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Llez (talk) on 2022-06-05 07:47 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Bittium glareosum, shell
Used in	Global usage
Reason	This is a much better preserved specimen --Llez (talk) 07:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC) -- Llez (talk)[reply]
Review (criteria)	Support More details. But do the differences in color reflect differences in subspecies? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Info There are no accepted subspecies (see [1]) --Llez (talk) 05:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Support per nom. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Question I don't understand the colour difference. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Info There are many species with variable colour and/or pattern, see for example here, here, here, here, here (in the latter example not only the same species but the same population, collected in an area of a few square meters), and many more. --Llez (talk) 06:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Bittium glareosum 01.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 2. Bittium glareosum 02.jpg: +2 <-- => File:Bittium glareosum 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Bittium glareosum 02.jpg: Promoted. <-- --A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]