Commons:Valued image candidates/Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 410.jpg

Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 410.jpg

**undecided**
Image
Nominated by	Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} on 2015-11-27 12:36 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Zalophus californianus (California sea lion), balancing a ball
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Question I don't know about anyone else, but I'm not happy with VI nominations pointing to a new zoo category. And the animal is not juggling. There are better images of ball balancing in Category:Zalophus californianus in zoos Charles (talk) 17:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] The fact of holding a balance ball is part of the juggling. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Comment, I believe that the linked category should be as broad as the category text. So here either: the text should be "Zalophus californianus in ZooParc de Beauval" or the category should be Category:Zalophus californianus. DeFacto (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Completed scope. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] ~~Oppose~~ I do not think it is sensible to have a separate scope for every zoo or park in the world. It adds no value. Juggling involves more than one ball. Charles (talk) 17:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] ~~Oppose~~ We could change "juggling" to something like "balancing a ball", but we certainly don't need sub-scopes for different zoos. --El Grafo (talk) 10:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] scope changed. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Comment I changed the scope and category. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Comment Scope is OK now, but there are at least two files that might be better for that: File:Zalophus californianus -Blackpool Zoo, Lancashire, England -female-8a.jpg File:SeaWorld San Diego3.jpg Don't have time to review them in detail now, so I'll stay Neutral for the moment. --El Grafo (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]