Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
44,717 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
39,838 (89.1%) 
Undecided
  
2,577 (5.8%) 
Declined
  
2,302 (5.1%) 


New valued image nominationsEdit

   
View opposition
Nominated by:
--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 22:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC) on
Description:
VISC of:
Flags of North American Free Trade Agreement
*  Oppose Sets are no longer nominated at VIC because of technical issues, but I don't know how useful the set of flags of countries involved in an agreement is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-07-27 18:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Palomena prasina (Green shield bug) dorsal
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-07-29 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Filipendula vulgaris (Dropwort) inflorescence
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-07-29 09:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Obice da 105/22 Mod. 14/61, front view
Open for review.
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-07-30 10:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1889) in Fusenich, Germany.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-07-30 15:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Harlingen. Stenen Man Inscription rear (west side).
  •   Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-07-30 21:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapelle funéraire des Comtes d'Hespel, Salomé
Used in:
Salomé
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 31 July 2021
Scope:
Papilio slateri slateri (Indo-Chinese Blue-striped Mime), ventral
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-07-31 04:27 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Julitta und St. Quiricus (Andiast) Maria altar.

  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2021-07-31 04:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Cellana tramoserica (Variegated Limpet), shell
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-07-31 04:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Delosperma cooperi (Trailing Iceplant) - Habit
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-07-31 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
N° 13 Grande-rue Nazareth in Toulouse - Facade
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-07-31 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait du cardinal Laurent Strozzi - Palais de la Berbie Albi

  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2021-07-31 10:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel at Schloss Liebieg in Kobern-Gondorf, built in 1892, view form northeast

  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2021-07-31 10:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel at Schloss Liebieg in Kobern-Gondorf, built in 1892, view form southeast

  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-07-31 10:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Sloop builted in 1903 Vrouwe Roziena II, (Belle Rosie), in Nautical Base Flandre-Lys.
Open for review.
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Rettinghaus (talk) on 2021-07-31 13:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Portraits of Fernando Sor
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-07-31 15:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Barge Phœnix , (view profil), in Nautical Base Flandre-Lys.
Open for review.
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2021-07-31 19:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Église de la Madeleine, Paris, France, photomechanical print, ca. 1890-1900. Library of Congress (anonymous).
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-07-31 13:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Lusitania propellor, Liverpool
Reason:
Least cluttered background, probably. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 06:28 or 18:28 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-07-31 19:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Anderton Monument, St Helens
Used in:
Wikidata:Q26677733, Arthur Fleischmann
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 21:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-07-31 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Arbon (ship, 1927), on Canal d'Aire
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-08-01 04:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Kapelle St. Martin/Caplutta Sogn Martin Side view.
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-01 04:33 (UTC)
Scope:
N° 41 Grande-rue Nazareth in Toulouse - facade

  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-01 04:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Le blanchisseur de la "maison"(The "House" Launderer) by Toulouse-Lautrec in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-01 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Motte féodale de Le Doulieu, South-west side
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-01 15:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Blockhaus de Villeneuve d'Ascq, East side.
Used in:
Wikidata: Q107742967
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-08-01 15:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Kapelle St. Jakob/Caplutta Sogn Giacun Altar,
  •   Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 15:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-08-01 17:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1766) in Trier-Feyen, reused as a war memorial
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Carsten Steger (talk) on 2021-08-01 19:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Nymphenburg Palace (aerial view)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-08-01 14:19 (UTC)
Scope:
St Helen's Church, St Helens, Merseyside
Used in:
Wikidata:Q18157642
  Comment it is close but this isn't cropped at the right. It's a tricky shot because of all the people passing by, and I'm not keen on waiting around all day. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support You're right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-08-01 19:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Cannington Shaw Bottle Shop
Used in:
Wikidata:Q17643809
Reason:
In the absence of a complete view of the building, a substantial example of its architectural style is perhaps better then nothing. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-08-01 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Keiron Cunningham statue at Totally Wicked Stadium, St Helens
Used in:
Wikidata:Q3194711, Keiron Cunningham
  •   Support Useful. What a weird name for a stadium! I looked it up - vaping/e-cig company. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2021-08-01 20:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Aphantopus hyperantus (Ringlet) underside
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2021-08-01 21:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Inter-species confrontation for a scarce resource (water)
Reason:
I believe that I have now sorted an appropriate scope for this image. All of the articles where this image appears deal with animals confronting each other, but none specifically mentions elephants, warthogs or water, hence the fairly general scope. The scope can be made more specific or more general, depending on the community viewpoint.Previous reviews -- Martinvl (talk)
  •   Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The scope is too broad ; The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Question @Archaeodontosaurus: How do you suggest that I narrow the scope down? IMO, including the words "elephant" and "warthog" in the scope is too specific. Would you be happy with "Inter-species confrontation for a scarce resource (water) in an African game park" or do you have a better suggestion? You can see the use of this image in, for example fr:Compétition interspécifique. Martinvl (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • There is too much anthropocentrism in this image, the road in the background, the artificial pond: The warthog does not seem to be afraid of the elephant! We are not in the wilderness. I have no idea which leads to a scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose This is not a confrontation. Inappropriate file name. There is no appropriate scope for this photo. There could be many thousands of different two-species images of animals at water holes. The previous reviews were emphatic. Why a new nomination? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-01 21:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Fort de Mons, Mons-en-Barœul, West side
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-08-02 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Vituskapel begraafplaats Vitushof, Leeuwarden
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-02 05:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Clematis integrifolia - flower

  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-02 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
N° 9 Grande-rue Nazareth - Labit's building
  •   Support Useful and a very nice building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-02 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Femme qui tire son bas (Woman pulling her stockings) in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi

  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2021-08-02 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Bullia vittata (Ribbon Bullia), shell
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Biplab Anand (Talk) on 2021-08-02 08:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Turdoides nipalensis
  •   Comment There is already a promoted image for this scope. It is possible to go through Pending Most valued review candidates.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-08-02 09:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculptures of the first three bishops of Trier (1717) at St. Matthias' Abbey, Trier
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-08-02 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1866) near Trier-Euren, Germany.
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-02 15:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Olivier looms, (1910), in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-02 15:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Dewaele-Schotte looms, (1910), in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-08-02 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail of Harlingen. Old train carriage NS D 6066
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-08-02 12:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Totally Wicked Stadium - Exterior, main frontage
Used in:
Wikidata:Q610481
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-08-02 16:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Steve Prescott Bridge
Used in:
Steve Prescott
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-02 21:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancet-Fayolle Looms, in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-02 22:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Pinacol looms (1992) , in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-08-03 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Sint-Michaëlkerk, Harlingen main altar.
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-03 05:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Les anges couronnant le Saint Sacrement (The Angels crowning the holy sacrament ) by François Lucas
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-03 05:33 (UTC)
Scope:
La Goulue et Valentin le désossé in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi

  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2021-08-03 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Murex aduncospinosus (Short-spined murex), shell
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-08-01
Scope:
Pacelli-Cross in the courtyard of St. Matthias' basilica (Trier), Germany.

  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 08:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Spurzem (talk) on 2021-08-03 16:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Bugatti Type 35 (original) from 1924, left side and rear, at Nürburgring in 1975, driver Marc Nikolosi
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-08-03 17:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Kapelle St. Martin/Caplutta Sogn Martin Front.
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-03 21:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Ribbon looms (1884), in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2021-08-03 21:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Old Lambert Time Recorder, in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix
  •   Question You are calling this "ancient"; how old is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Question Can the perspective be corrected? The clock face in the picture is oval, but it should be circular. -- Spurzem (talk) 07:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Ikan Kekek: In 1907, Arthur Lambert, clockmaker and jeweler from Valenciennes in the North, patented a sheared card recorder. This factory time clock is dated about 1920. At the end of the great war, Arthur Lambert with his nephew M. Caron developed the mechanisms of time clocks. Best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Spurzem:   Done correction of perspective .The clock face in the picture is now circular.. Best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment 1907 may be "ancien" in French, but it's nowhere remotely close to "ancient" in English. Ancient would be maybe 1,500 years ago. We speak of ancient Greece, ancient Rome, ancient Egypt, ancient China and so forth, and most of the time, we're talking about times BC and maybe up to some point in the first millennium AD (like AD 500, maybe 600 or so). Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I misspoke the appropriate term would be "Old Lambert Time Recorder", so I am correcting, best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-08-04 04:33 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Julitta und St. Quiricus (Andiast) church building.
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-04 04:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Cymbalaria muralis (Ivy-leaved toadflax) - leaf
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-04 04:53 (UTC)
Scope:
N° 34 Grande-rue Nazareth Toulouse - facade
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-08-04 04:56 (UTC)
Scope:
La Loïe Fuller aux-Folies-Bergère - Toulouse-Lautrec (1893) in Musée Toulouse-Lautrec Albi

  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2021-08-04 05:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Buccinanops globulosus, shell
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Carsten Steger (talk) on 2021-08-04 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Schloss Weißenstein (aerial view)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrei (talk) on 2021-08-04 13:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Andrei Cojocari
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrei (talk) on 2021-08-04 13:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Hanna Knyazyeva-Minenko
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Andrei (talk) on 2021-08-04 13:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Baruch Shmailov
Used in:
8 different wikis
Reason:
Better full size and not cropped, because quality is not very good, and it also shows important attributes of the profession (including the name band) -- Andrei (talk)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2021-08-04 15:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Casa Wieland in Waltensburg-Vuorz. (South side.)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2021-08-04 16:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Self-portrait of sculptor Willi Hahn, at Heuschreck-Brunnen in Trier
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sandro Halank (talk) on 2021-08-04 18:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Wiebke Binder
Used in:
de:Wiebke Binder, d:Q67008249
Open for review.


Closed valued image candidatesEdit


Pending Most valued review candidatesEdit

Scope: Bistorta officinalisEdit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-10-19 07:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Bistorta officinalis (European bistort), florescence
Used in:
de:Schlangen-Knöterich
  •   Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done Scope changed accordingly, thanks for your advice --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The scope is perfect. But the caption is poor. In addition to geocoding must put the locality. A good caption ensures better distribution of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  Done Caption enhanced with locality information --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not as sharp, less detail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2021-06-23 17:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Bistorta officinalis Inflorescence.
  •   Support. Excellent, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unfortunately there is already an image promoted in VI for this topic. You have to go through Pending Most valued review candidates . Personally if you choose this path I will vote in favor because your image is much better.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Question Do I have to perform certain actions? Am I hurting someone else with that?--Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
A competition should not hurt anyone. You have to format your request and place it in the competition. You have a tutorial for that. It's not complicated ... but it's a bit long. Do it: it is an experience to be done.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Question I hardly dare to ask, but where can I find such a tutorial?--Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Sharper, more detail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Actuall I prefer the other one, but not enough to vote this FP down. The dark background ruins it for me; surprised it got unanimous support with all the chromatic noise. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Scope: David Cameron, portrait photographyEdit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
A1Cafel (talk) on 2021-06-22 03:08 (UTC)
Scope:
David Cameron, portrait photography
Used in:
David Cameron
  •   Question Is the year relevant? How do we recognize the difference in appearance between his being photographed in 2010 and 2011? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
    •   Comment Scope changed, year removed. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I have a feeling of deja vu. I spent a long time looking through all the photos of Cameron for a previous nomination. What happened then? You didn't change the scope to being just a portrait of him and it failed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: I will make a Most Valued Review within this scope--A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Aren't the votes in a Most Valuable Review all supposed to be new? There was something wrong with the procedure, I think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Indeed only the positive votes made since the new appointment count. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
What about the negative votes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
At the moment there is no vote for the left image and one vote for the right image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
A1Cafel (talk) on 2021-06-25 03:32 (UTC)
Scope:
David Cameron, portrait photography
  •   Support More evenly lit, more flattering. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.