Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Australia/Prejury
Home |
Rules |
Step by step instructions |
FAQ |
List of protected areas |
Past Winners in Australia |
Prejury |
Prizes |
Contact us |
This year we are again using the Australian version of the German prejury tool. It allows Wikimedians to
- rate all competition entries (except your own)
- on a scale of 1 to 5
- while at the same time being able to check all the information on the photograph's page
- photographs can also be ignored. But we would prefer that you use a rating of 1 to 5 on all photographs you are permitted to rate
- review your ratings (click on the three horizontal bars at the top above the voting section) and look at the photos you rated with
- one star: A weak picture with regard to the WLE competition, no chance of an award!
(It can still be a valuable image on Commons!) - Two stars: A useful competition photo
- Three stars: A good competition photo
- Four stars: A very good competition photo (The main jury should look at it.)
- Five stars: An outstanding (perfect) competition photo (in your opinion among the best of the competition)
- one star: A weak picture with regard to the WLE competition, no chance of an award!
- use all values (1-5) if you can
When making your assessment, you should consider these aspects:
- Encyclopedic / content quality
Is the picture suitable for an illustration of Wikipedia? Does it show the place/habitat/species in an encyclopedically meaningful way? Fundamental is the usability of the photos to illustrate protected areas in Australia. The photos should therefore be incorporated into the nature conservation lists, used in nature conservation articles and it should be possible to replace poorer pictures. - Aesthetic quality
Is it clear what the subject of the picture is? Is the subject clear? Do irrelevant objects protrude into the picture? Has a good viewing angle and section been chosen? - Technical quality
Does the picture have a good resolution? Is the picture in focus and properly exposed? Do the colours look natural? Has the image been over photo-shopped?
The purpose of the tool is to allow us to identify the photographs from which our jury will choose the winners (a maximum of 15, with a maximum of 10 being photographs of some characteristic of the protected area, and a maximum of 10 which are close-ups of species).