Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in South West Nigeria/Jury

This year we are again using the South West Nigerian version of the German prejury tool. It allows Wikimedians to

rate all competition entries (except your own)
on a scale of 1 to 5
while at the same time being able to check all the information on the photograph's page
photographs can also be ignored. But we would prefer that you use a rating of 1 to 5 on all photographs you are permitted to rate
review your ratings (click on the three horizontal bars at the top above the voting section) and look at the photos you rated with
1. one star: A weak picture with regard to the WLE competition, no chance of an award!
  (It can still be a valuable image on Commons!)
2. Two stars: A useful competition photo
3. Three stars: A good competition photo
4. Four stars: A very good competition photo (The main jury should look at it.)
5. Five stars: An outstanding (perfect) competition photo (in your opinion among the best of the competition)
use all values (1-5) if you can

When making your assessment, you should consider these aspects:

Encyclopedic / content quality
Is the picture suitable for an illustration of Wikipedia? Does it show the place/habitat/species in an encyclopedically meaningful way? Fundamental is the usability of the photos to illustrate protected areas in South West Nigeria. The photos should therefore be incorporated into the nature conservation lists, used in nature conservation articles and it should be possible to replace poorer pictures.
Aesthetic quality
Is it clear what the subject of the picture is? Is the subject clear? Do irrelevant objects protrude into the picture? Has a good viewing angle and section been chosen?
Technical quality
Does the picture have a good resolution? Is the picture in focus and properly exposed? Do the colours look natural? Has the image been over photo-shopped?