File:0102621 Gauri Somnath temple, Omkareswar Madhya Pradesh 155.jpg
![File:0102621 Gauri Somnath temple, Omkareswar Madhya Pradesh 155.jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/0102621_Gauri_Somnath_temple%2C_Omkareswar_Madhya_Pradesh_155.jpg/450px-0102621_Gauri_Somnath_temple%2C_Omkareswar_Madhya_Pradesh_155.jpg?20230218114614)
Original file (960 × 1,280 pixels, file size: 2.22 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
editDescription0102621 Gauri Somnath temple, Omkareswar Madhya Pradesh 155.jpg |
English: The Gauri-Somnath temple, also referred to as the Gori Somnatha mandir, is a 9th to 11th-century double-storey Hindu temple with the largest Shiva linga on Mandhata island. It is on a plateau in Muchkund section of Omakareshwar, closer to the top of a hill on Mandhata island, with scenic views of the colossal Shiva statue and Omkareshwar. The extant temple was rebuilt in the 18th-century from its ruins with lime and mortar, after the collapse of the Mughal empire, by the regional Hindus.
Literally, Gauri (Gori) means white and the regional belief is that the original Shiva linga was translucent white. However, the massive linga has been jet black since the earliest surveys and published reports in the 19th-century. According to J Forsyth, the regional oral folklore remembers that during the Sultanate-era destruction of Mandhata island temples, the Muslim commander inquired about the unusual translucent white Shiva linga. He was told that if you look into it and focus, you can see the form of your next rebirth. He did, saw a pig, and in anger set a bonfire around it. The heat transformed it into a jet black Shiva linga. The Gauri Somnath temple stands on a jagati (platform). It is two-storeyed, with Shiva linga on both floors. A Nandi mandapa faces it, but the Nandi is new. The original Nandi, as surveyed and reported by Forsyth in late 19th-century, was massive and made of green stone, but beheaded. The broken head and parts were scattered around, along with a broken colossal pillar about 300 feet further in front. Around the temple area are piles of ruins with signs of erosion as well as deliberate mutilation. The Vimana walls around the sanctum have bands of Hindu art. These include those from Shiva, Vishnu and Shakti tradition, as well as scenes of kama (mithuna), artha (soldiers, daily lives, dancers, musicians, others). For further scholarly discussions, see (a) Jurgen Neuss (2013), Omkaresvar Mandhata, Tracing the Forgotten History of a Popular Place, Berlin Indological Studies, pp. 115–129; (b) J Forsyth, Mandhata, in The Gazetteer of the Central Provinces of India (editor: Charles Grant), pp. 257–264. |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Ms Sarah Welch |
Camera location | 22° 14′ 57.52″ N, 76° 08′ 53.82″ E ![]() | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | ![]() |
---|
Licensing
edit![]() ![]() |
This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. |
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.enCC0Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedicationfalsefalse |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 11:46, 18 February 2023 | ![]() | 960 × 1,280 (2.22 MB) | Ms Sarah Welch (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | samsung |
---|---|
Camera model | SM-M317F |
Exposure time | 1/25 sec (0.04) |
F-number | f/2.2 |
ISO speed rating | 250 |
Date and time of data generation | 11:06, 26 October 2021 |
Lens focal length | 1.74 mm |
Latitude | 22° 14′ 57.52″ N |
Longitude | 76° 8′ 53.82″ E |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 240 dpi |
Software used | Luminar AI |
File change date and time | 11:06, 26 October 2021 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 11:06, 26 October 2021 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX aperture | 2.27 |
APEX brightness | 0.076923076923077 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.27 APEX (f/2.2) |
Metering mode | Spot |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
DateTime subseconds | 000 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 000 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 000 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 13 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |