File:10-16696, 10-16751 - Perry v. Schwarzenegger - Part 2 - Merits.webm
Size of this JPG preview of this WEBM file: 800 × 450 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 180 pixels | 640 × 360 pixels | 1,280 × 720 pixels.
Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 1 h 23 min 38 s, 1,280 × 720 pixels, 2.21 Mbps overall, file size: 1.29 GB)
Captions
Captions
Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
Summary
edit| Description |
English: Perry v. Schwarzenegger involves a challenge by two same-sex couples to the constitutionality of Proposition 8, a voter-enacted amendment to the California Constitution, which provides that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid in California. Gay rights advocates claim the law discriminates against same-sex couples seeking to marry. The hearing consolidates arguments in two cases: Case 10-16696 (main appeal) and case 10-16751 (intervenor appeal).
This case was argued before a three judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit on December 6, 2010 in Courtroom One of the James R. Browning Federal Courthouse in San Francisco, California. The panel consisted of Judges Stephen Reinhardt of Los Angeles, Michael Daly Hawkins of Phoenix and N. Randy Smith of Pocatello, Idaho. This recording is from the second hour during which the parties addressed the constitutionality of Proposition 8 |
| Date | |
| Source | YouTube: 10-16696, 10-16751 - Perry v. Schwarzenegger - Part 2 - Merits – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today |
| Author | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Licensing
edit
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
 |
| This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. | ||
|
This file, which was originally posted to
YouTube: 10-16696, 10-16751 - Perry v. Schwarzenegger - Part 2 - Merits – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today, was reviewed on 12 February 2017 by reviewer Rodrigolopes, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 09:57, 12 February 2017 | 1 h 23 min 38 s, 1,280 × 720 (1.29 GB) | Legoktm (talk | contribs) | Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7n8HlxMfx4 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Transcode status
Update transcode statusFile usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org