File:Aquilinas assumption equals Gravity decays into Dark energy.jpg
Aquilinas_assumption_equals_Gravity_decays_into_Dark_energy.jpg (503 × 97 pixels, file size: 16 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
editDescriptionAquilinas assumption equals Gravity decays into Dark energy.jpg |
English: Assumptions about the Universe, prior to inflation. Assumptions about its current state. Assumptions about how long it has left. |
Date | |
Source |
I was a poster presenter at the American Physical Society in Oct. 2011 Describing how the Universe was contained by Gravity until it decayed to a point where it could no longer contain the Universe. Although it was on May 15th 2012 that I determined the relationship between the decay of Gravity, the increase in Dark energy and the accelerated expansion of the Universe. |
Author | RichAquilina |
- Other information
The Universe as we know it took approximately 14.5 billion years to reach 70% De conversion from Gravity decay. Leaving approximately 10.5 billion years until the Universe reaches 100% De conversion from Gravity which will at that point be 0%. (However I estimate that actual habitability will only last another 2.5 - 3 billion years.
Rich AquilinaI goofed, my estimations are way off (unfortunately). So I am going to toss my thoughts out at this time. My previous statement was assuming that the rate of decay is constant and that the speed of universal expansion is constant neither of which is true... So since there is no way to accurately measure the rate of decay from Gravity to Dark energy (I am sure I can get there eventually), I want to at least work with the known. So here is what I am going to be working on. Taking the figures we have (age - 14.5 billion years, rate of current expansion - 70.8 kilometers a second per MegaParsec give or take 1.6 kilometers pers second per MegaParsec, approximately 70% Dark energy) and going through them and try to figure out what the rate of Gravity decay to Dark energy is in relationship to the size and velocity of the the Universes expansion. I think with all these factors, a fairly accurate solution can be found (and I don't think I am going to like the figure) AND keeping in mind that by definition an Assumption is more than likely innaccurate. But it is a starting point.....
Rich Aquilina- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Licensing
edit- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 09:21, 20 May 2012 | 503 × 97 (16 KB) | RichAquilina (talk | contribs) | {{subst:Upload marker added by en.wp UW}} {{Information |Description = {{en|Assumptions about the Universe, prior to inflation. Assumptions about its current state. Assumptions about how long it has left.}} |Source = I was a poster presenter at the Ame... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.