File:Carthago exhibition - Cosmetic Container in the Shape of a Duck (49340664406).jpg
Size of this preview: 291 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 116 × 240 pixels | 233 × 480 pixels | 373 × 768 pixels | 498 × 1,024 pixels | 1,960 × 4,032 pixels.
Original file (1,960 × 4,032 pixels, file size: 859 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
editDescriptionCarthago exhibition - Cosmetic Container in the Shape of a Duck (49340664406).jpg |
With little baby duck. From Kamid el-Loz, ivory, late bronze age (circa 1550-1200 BC). |
Date | |
Source | Cosmetic Container in the Shape of a Duck |
Author | Jamie Heath |
Licensing
editThis file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by MumblerJamie at https://flickr.com/photos/184393744@N06/49340664406. It was reviewed on 29 October 2020 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
29 October 2020
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:30, 29 October 2020 | 1,960 × 4,032 (859 KB) | Onceinawhile (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | samsung |
---|---|
Camera model | SM-G960F |
Exposure time | 1/50 sec (0.02) |
F-number | f/2.4 |
ISO speed rating | 125 |
Date and time of data generation | 17:01, 27 September 2019 |
Lens focal length | 4.3 mm |
Width | 4,032 px |
Height | 1,960 px |
Orientation | Rotated 90° CCW |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | G960FXXU6CSGD |
File change date and time | 17:01, 27 September 2019 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 17:01, 27 September 2019 |
APEX shutter speed | 0.02 |
APEX aperture | 2.52 |
APEX brightness | 7.05 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.52 APEX (f/2.39) |
Metering mode | Center weighted average |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
Color space | sRGB |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 26 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Unique image ID | H12LLKF00SM |