File:Comparison between self-reported ancestry and structured estimated ancestry proportion.png
![File:Comparison between self-reported ancestry and structured estimated ancestry proportion.png](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/67/Comparison_between_self-reported_ancestry_and_structured_estimated_ancestry_proportion.png/800px-Comparison_between_self-reported_ancestry_and_structured_estimated_ancestry_proportion.png?20160528012029)
Original file (1,200 × 730 pixels, file size: 2.51 MB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Captions
Summary
editDescriptionComparison between self-reported ancestry and structured estimated ancestry proportion.png |
English: Comparison between self-reported ancestry and structured estimated ancestry proportion. Ideally without admixture, each group would be represented by just one bar. That is if the vector Q = (q1,q2,q3,q4) represents the ancestry score for each individual in the dataset, Q should have 3 of its components equal to 0 and one component equal to 1. As can be seen from this figure, this is not the case. Self-reported ancestry is less reliable for the Hispanic-American population since its graph seems to be the farthest away from the ideal situation. |
Date | Published: 4 March 2011 |
Source |
Jasmin DiversEmail author, David T Redden, Kenneth M Rice, Laura K Vaughan, Miguel A Padilla, David B Allison, David A Bluemke, Hunter J Young and Donna K Arnett Comparing self-reported ethnicity to genetic background measures in the context of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) BMC Genetics201112:28 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-12-28 http://bmcgenet.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2156-12-28 |
Author | Jasmin DiversEmail author, David T Redden, Kenneth M Rice, Laura K Vaughan, Miguel A Padilla, David B Allison, David A Bluemke, Hunter J Young and Donna K Arnett |
Other versions |
![]() |
Licensing
edit![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 01:20, 28 May 2016 | ![]() | 1,200 × 730 (2.51 MB) | Was a bee (talk | contribs) | == {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description={{en|1=Comparison between self-reported ancestry and structured estimated ancestry proportion. Ideally without admixture, each group would be represented by just one bar. That is if the vector Q = (q1,q... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 141.73 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 141.73 dpc |