File:The price of Irish tithes!!! (BM 1868,0808.12322).jpg
![File:The price of Irish tithes!!! (BM 1868,0808.12322).jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/The_price_of_Irish_tithes%21%21%21_%28BM_1868%2C0808.12322%29.jpg/751px-The_price_of_Irish_tithes%21%21%21_%28BM_1868%2C0808.12322%29.jpg?20200512164904)
Original file (1,600 × 1,278 pixels, file size: 369 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
editThe price of Irish tithes!!!
(![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artist |
Print made by: Robert Seymour
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Title |
The price of Irish tithes!!! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Description |
English: Lithographic caricature magazine of four pages on two leaves, in the form of a (monthly) newspaper; illustrations as follows. 1 October 1832
'The Times' newspaper is represented by a man whose body from neck to hips is covered by a sheet of 'The Times'; across the columns of the paper are the words: 'Horrible! \ Dreadful!! \ Frightful!! \ Mare's Nest \ discovered near \ Hammersmith'. The square head, with fierce angular features and a pen stuck in it, is seemingly an ink-pot. The limbs are those of a vigorous man, who lunges fiercely with outstretched arms, holding a huge ink-ball in each hand. With one he knocks backward and blackens the face of an elderly man dressed like the Duke of Cumberland who watches from the left. 'The Times': 'I should not have known how to make any thing of the Duke's apology; because a short-sighted man might ride nearer than he intended, and seeing people so much more frightened than hurt, might possibly smile:—But you I have at my mercy. Where's the mustachoes Sir? Where's the mustachoes?—There, Sir— there, have you any mind for another dose'. Cumberland, stooping aggressively, exclaims: 'Oh! you officious blockhead, you will get freely belaboured for your pains'. A young lady, who watches mincingly from the right, cries, 'Oh! I am quite positive as to the mustachoes!!' |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Depicted people | Associated with: John Charles Spencer, 3rd Earl Spencer | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Date |
1832 date QS:P571,+1832-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Medium | paper | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Collection |
institution QS:P195,Q6373 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Current location |
Prints and Drawings |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Accession number |
1868,0808.12322 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes |
Notes to No. 17263: The last measure of the Session was a Bill for the Composition of Tithes in Ireland; it was opposed as likely to place 'the incumbents of the Protestant Church as mortgagees in possession' and aggravate the grievous situation in relation to tithes. Parl. Deb., 3rd s. xiv. 1006. Frequent conflicts between peasants and soldiers over the collection and valuation of tithes amounted to a tithe-war, see (e.g.) The Times, 10 Sept. 1832, 12 Sept. (leader). Farmers poisoned their hay and corn-stacks with arsenic, a process called salting. Ibid. See Nos. 17209, 17236, 17278. Cf. No. 16964. Notes to No. 17264: The ex-Duke (see No. 16276 [3], &c.) had established himself in Paris and was collecting funds for the recovery of his Duchy, posing as the victim of an arbitrary Diet (cf. No. 17212). An order of expulsion was followed (18 Sept.) by a domiciliary visit, and the supposed Prince Charles was escorted to the Swiss frontier. The real Prince remained concealed in Paris and soon obtained an annulment of the order. Le Duc de Brunswick, Paris, 1875, pp. 167 ff. Notes to No. 17266: Church Reform was the natural result of Parliamentary Reform; popular hostility to the Church was extreme (cf. No. 16805, &c.) and Disestablishment was expected. On 23 June 1832 a Royal Commission was appointed to inquire into benefices, and a schedule of thirty-two queries was sent to all incumbents in August (printed British Magazine, ii. 80); Dicey, Law and Public Opinion, 1914, pp. 311-60; W. L. Mathieson, Church Reform 1815-1840, 1923, pp. 59 ff. Many pamphlets on Church Reform appeared, 1832-3. Cf. Nos. 15791, &c, 16805, &c. See Nos. 17268, 17286, 17332-9, 17341. Notes to No. 17267: The Penny Magazine, organ of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, was edited, and also published, at Pall Mall East, by Charles Knight, who appears here in both capacities. The Chairman of the Committee was Brougham, the Vice-Chairman Russell. In its first number it was said that eight or ten penny periodicals had already established a regular sale; 'the most noxious of them have been hitherto the least successful'. The intention of the founders of the Magazine was to rival the 'unstamped weekly publications . . . nearly all dangerous in principle and coarse in language'. C. Knight, Passages of a Working Life, 1864, ii. 180. Radical journalists detested the magazine. The Ballot, 10 June 1832, in an article on the unstamped Press, calls it 'that most contemptible work ... it is in every respect a periodical of the very meanest conceivable class. There is rarely any one page which might not as well have been published ten years back . . .'. From time to time the hawkers of the more noxious were arrested by the police (cf. No. 16981). The publication of the Penny Cyclopadia, to begin in January 1833, was announced in August as a result of the success of the magazine. Penny Magazine, p. 216. See Nos. 17123, 17247, 17258, 17285. Notes to No. 17273: Cumberland was accused in a letter to the Globe of deliberately frightening two Miss Perfects by riding on the footpath of the road from Hammersmith to Barnes. The Times took the matter up with fervour between 19 Sept. and 3 Oct. (leaders on 24, 25 Sept., 3 Oct.; anonymous satirical verses by Moore, Works, p. 650), 'The Duke is the Lad to frighten a lass', on 2 Oct., with the refrain 'Galloping dreary Duke' (from the old song 'Galloping dreary dun' cf. No. 6665). Cumberland (blind in one eye) had apologized when two people came forward with alibis for him at the time in question, and Major-General Sir George Quentin (see Nos. 12315, 14640), his equerry, said that it was he who had inadvertently frightened the ladies, but when he visited them to apologize, one asked 'but where are the mustachioes'. The Times; Fulford Royal Dukes, 1933, pp. 239 f. See Nos. 17262, 17274, 17275. Bound in a volume ("The Looking Glass, Vol. III") containing nos. 25 to 36 for 1832. Vols. I to VII (1830 to 1836) are kept at 298.d.12 to 18. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Source/Photographer | https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1868-0808-12322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
© The Trustees of the British Museum, released as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 |
Licensing
editThis image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag. ![]() |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:49, 12 May 2020 | ![]() | 1,600 × 1,278 (369 KB) | Copyfraud (talk | contribs) | British Museum public domain uploads (Copyfraud/BM) Coloured lithographs in the British Museum 1832 #1,144/22,275 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Phase One |
---|---|
Camera model | P 65+ |
Date and time of data generation | 13:52, 26 October 2011 |
Exposure time | 1,347/336,749 sec (0.0040000118782832) |
ISO speed rating | 50 |
Width | 6,926 px |
Height | 5,530 px |
Bits per component |
|
Compression scheme | Uncompressed |
Pixel composition | RGB |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Image width | 6,926 px |
Image height | 5,530 px |
Date and time of digitizing | 13:52, 26 October 2011 |
APEX shutter speed | 7.96578 |
Light source | Other light source |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Color space | Uncalibrated |
Software used | Capture One 5 Macintosh |
File change date and time | 11:28, 7 December 2011 |
Date metadata was last modified | 11:28, 7 December 2011 |
Unique ID of original document | xmp.did:0780117407206811871FBEB5569652CA |
IIM version | 4 |