File talk:Haplogrupo J (Y-DNA).png

J over-represented in western parts of South Asia

@LenguaMapa: Hi, the J percentage in western parts of South Asia are over represented in your map. Except Sindhis (Sindh region) of Southern Pakistan, who were found to possess 33.34%, no major regional group has shown 30+ percentage of J. Punjabis of Pakistan come close but fall below 30%. India Punjabis and Gujaratis are just above 20%. Even the numerically dominant Pashtuns of Afghanistan show below 10%. Kindly visit This link. Regards. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I will adapt the map to the percentage of the Wikipedia article you linked. Thank you!LenguaMapa (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. Gujarat need to be fixed. I'll try to help. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:07, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

@LenguaMapa: Hello, the 60%+ in Sindh and Baluchistan in your new map looks absurd. Where did you find those high numbers? 30+ in India (Gujarat, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh) and Pakistani Punjab is also incorrect as per South Asian Y-DNA that lists a total of J (J*, J1, J2, etc). I suggest you restore the South Asian part as in this map which is the most correct as per the above table unless you can provide other reference(s). - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I did change the colour shade and mistakenly included southern Pakistan into the 60%+. Uttar Pradesh, Punjab have ~33% and Sindh has 32%. Madhya Pradesh was only included because of imprecise work. It was not intended to include it, now fixed.LenguaMapa (talk) 13:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

@LenguaMapa: Uttar Pradesh and Punjab have +30 J according to which research? can you clarify? According to Kivisild 2003 "Punjab, India" has only 21% J, and that 33+ in Uttar Pradesh is for the Kol tribe as far as I know. And Kols form a very small percentage of the total population. See this. Even "Punjab, Pakistan" showed only 27% as per Poznik et al. That's why I said [this map is best for South Asia. Kindly verify with sources and populations in South Asian Y-DNA article - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I will look into that soon. If I find nothing reliable I will change it to your suggested version. Greetings.LenguaMapa (talk) 11:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

@LenguaMapa: OK. Kindly ping me if you find a source that supports those figures. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

This is of extremely poor quality

Pick pretty much any European country at random and the numbers contradict what is depicted in this image. For example, Ireland has negligible amounts of J Y-DNA, yet this image claims >10%. Italy has ~20% J Y-DNA but this image would have you believe it's well over 40%. Same with Greece, they have about 20% J Y-DNA but this image would have you believe it's over 60%. There are well sourced tables on the English Wikipedia which contradict nearly every frequency on this image. en:Y-DNA_haplogroups_in_populations_of_North_Africa en:Y-DNA_haplogroups_in_populations_of_the_Near_East en:Y-DNA_haplogroups_in_populations_of_Europe en:Haplogroup_J_(Y-DNA)#Subclade_distribution Dumuh (talk) 11:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

I have tried to correct misleading parts. It should be more correct now. The map was really misleading.ABCymta (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)