File talk:Human Vagina.jpg
 | This file was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2022 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on 28 January 2021 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on 17 February 2014 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
Its a harmfull view, why this male hands? Can you removed it Plesse and fast? What if children search the common?
edit
H Miluna Ratched (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I agree with you! This is inappropriate and users seem to upload their explicit, private pictures. There are no harmful pictures found on the entry for male genitals. Remove those images. Cliterature (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Remove it
edit
The whole topic is full of inappropriate images. Users seem to upload their private, sexualised picture here (file names: geil (horney) etc. There are no such pictures of penises on the entry for the male genital, so remove the pictures. Cliterature (talk) 00:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Health Issue
edit
A healthy vulva and vagina without symptoms of irritation and inflammation looks like this: File:Spread human vulva.JPG. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Personal rights issue
edit
Da die Frau ihre Vulva nicht mit ihren eigenen Fingern spreizt, sondern ein Mann von hinten um sie herum greift und ihre Vulva mit seinen behaarten Männerhänden auseinanderzieht, wobei am unteren Rand des Scheideneingangs Rötungen und Schwellungen sind, wo sich keine erektilen Gewebe befinden, könnte das ein Fall für die forensische Gynäkologie sein. Die Frau sitzt nicht auf einem Untersuchungsstuhl eines Arztes, sondern auf einem Sofa. Das Foto wurde von einem oder zwei Männern gemacht, um es ins Internet zu stellen. Wir können nicht prüfen ob die Frau einverstanden war, ob ihre Persönlichkeitsrechte und ihre sexuelle Selbstbestimmung gewahrt wurden.
Das liegt nicht an der Person, die das Bild auf Wikimedia commons hochgeladen hat, sie hat diese wichtigen Details wahrscheinlich nicht gesehen. Ich glaube nicht, dass wir auf solche Fotos so zweifelhafter Herkunft angewiesen sind.
Since the woman is not spreading her vulva with her own fingers, but a man is grasping from behind and pulling her vulva apart with his hairy male hands, with redness and swelling at the lower edge of the vaginal entrance, where there is no erectile tissue, this could be a case for forensic gynaecology. The woman is not sitting in a doctor's examination chair, but on a sofa. The photo was taken by one or two men to put on the internet. We cannot check whether the woman agreed, whether her personal rights and sexual self-determination were respected.
This is not up to the person who uploaded the picture to Wikimedia commons, they probably did not see these important details.
I don't think we need to rely on such photos of such dubious origin. Sciencia58 (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Other photos
edit
Ich bitte erneut darum, die anderen Fotos unten, die hier bei diesem Bild von User:Sarah 1985 und User:Jayceen regelwidrig mit demselben Bildnamen als "neue Version" hochgeladen wurden, zu entfernen.
I ask again that the other photos below, uploaded here with this file by User:Sarah 1985 and User:Jayceen with the same file name as "new version" in violation of the rules, be removed. Sciencia58 (talk) 17:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
