File talk:ImageinNicolas.jpg

I delete "(originally uploaded to commons as Image:Sayyid Kazim Rashti.jpg)" because I orginally uploaded that image in Image:Bab.jpg and Image:Báb.jpg --Rohan 11:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

& delete this claime "This photograph [sic] was mistakenly identified as one of the Báb by Nicolas in his book Seyyed Ali Mohammed dit le Báb" Becase I not found this in that book in Google library [1]. regards --Rohan 11:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I got it from Image:Sayyid Kazim Rashti.jpg. That's why I put that. Anyway, it doesn't matter. But please use the talk page for discussion. Editwars don't solve anything. Rocket000 19:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Read the statement on the page before removing it. It's not from the book you're pointing to, but Balyuzi's book "The Bab", hardcover version. It's not on Google books. Regards, -- Jeff3000 19:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

clearly reply --Rohan 19:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

As you know verifiability doesn't mean it has to be online. Go to your library, get the book. -- Jeff3000 20:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes. But claiming deference between the softcover version and hardcover version is very wonderful. please scan that page and proof your wonderful claims --Rohan 20:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

The hardcover and softcover have different ISBNs, and are thus different books. As you know, scanning the page and posting it here would be a copyright violation, as the book is not out of copyright. Get the book, it's your perogative. Regards, -- Jeff3000 20:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I response this in Administrators' noticeboard --Rohan 21:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)