File talk:Table isotopes en.svg
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Vaclav.hanzl in topic Corrections discussed at 3 places
Double beta decay edit
Is this shown the same as single beta decay? --JWB (talk) 01:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Missing stable isotopes edit
I was comparing this chart with File:NuclideMap stitched small preview.png and the number of stable unconnected 'islands' in the latter jumped out at me; is this an omission here? -- Limulus (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- For example, there are three stable Tungsten isotopes, but none in the table. Likewise, six stable isotopes of Osmium, but only four in the table. At first, I thought this table would be accurate, but then I noticed the error on Tungsten, and soon after another error. ––Nikolas Ojala (talk) 08:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Errors edit
This graph has significant errors that need to be corrected. As one example, 142Ce is theorized to have β−β− decay, not α decay. This needs serious fact-checking and revision. -- Veggies (talk) 00:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Corrections discussed at 3 places edit
Apart from this page, fixing the image (which has 7 language mutations) is also discussed here: