Template talk:Bad name/2006 archive
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
[Untitled comments]
If Category:Incorrectly named is a subcat of CAT:CSD why put images directly in both categories? :( this is not going to help shrink CAT:CSD! --pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
also I don't really know where to put this but... I personally am not going to delete a badly named image in favour of a well-named one if the badly named one is widely in use (assuming they are exactly the same image). If the person requesting deletion is so inclined they can replace the links by all means, but having a bad name is not the end of the world. At the end of the day it's just a unique ID, it doesn't have to necessarily mean anything and for most of the world it probably won't (different languages and all that). So I consider a good name to be a nice thing but nowhere near as important as good description and categorisation. pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
What speedy deletion means
It means it can be deleted on sight/a discussion is not required before deleting. If someone disagrees about this tag, they should remove it/change it to a deletion request ("normal deletion", with discussion). --pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)