User:Steindy/QI-Archiv01

Vorlage

[[Category:Quality images supported by Wikimedia Österreich in 2018]] [[Category:Taken with Canon EOS 7D Mark II]] [[Category:Taken with Canon EF 300mm F2.8L IS II USM]] [[Category:Quality Images by Steindy]] [[Category:Quality images of association football]]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (177).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (176).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (214).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (203).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (258).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (261).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (265).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gökhan Gönül - AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (244).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cenk Tosun - AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:55, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (234).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (242).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (233).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (286).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But EXIF data is missing. --XRay 03:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (273).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (283).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (299).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (303).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (301).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (307).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 06:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (289).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 06:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (256).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (243).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 06:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (207).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (232).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 06:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (327).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (332).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (335).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (339).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (341).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (315).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (317).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (320).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 23:03, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (322).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:44, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (298).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:44, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (288).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but I'd lighten the shadows a bit. --Nefronus 18:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (290).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (269).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Not as sharp as a portrait should be, but fine as this is a sports scene. --Domob 14:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (253).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Good, but I find the head in the bottom right corner quite distracting, sorry. --Nefronus 07:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC) @ Nefronus New version uploaded. --Steindy 21:17, 19 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Nefronus 21:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (287).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (266).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (343).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (346).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 19:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (319).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A bit soft, but fine for a sports picture. --Domob 13:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (353).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (355).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (358).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (368).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 22:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (274).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality---Lmbuga 13:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC) surely too similar to the other and not as sgood --Charlesjsharp 21:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)  Info This is definitely a completely different match scene! --Steindy 23:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment Please set to /Discuss if you wish to oppose. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (374).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (375).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (366).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (371).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (361).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (363).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (328).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (342).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (379).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 21:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (344).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The face is a little blurred, but OK imo. --Nefronus 08:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:48, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (381) (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 09:26, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (365).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not a reason to oppose on its own, but curious: where is the exif data? --Rhododendrites 22:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC) This is due to the PaintShop 5 used at the time. Unfortunately, it deleted the EXIF. --Steindy 00:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (360).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (362).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (354).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (026).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (030).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (033).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (038).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:55, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (044).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (048).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (049).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (050).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (383).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 22:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 22:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 22:37, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (396).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 22:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (073).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (079).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (080).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (071).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (031).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 10:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (082).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --T.Bednarz 12:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (087).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 22:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some of his frizz hairs cropped at the top, but doesnt take away from the good quality in my opinion. --GuavaTrain 16:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (091).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GuavaTrain 16:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (092).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice. --GuavaTrain 16:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (034).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (036).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 11:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (032).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 11:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (094).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (095).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (103).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (104).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (105).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (056).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, perhaps the shadows (e.g. around the eyes) could be a bit brighter. --Nefronus 11:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC) @Nefronus: A bit brighter? Please remember that this is a live recording during a football match under floodlights and not a studio recording. --Steindy 16:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC) I understanda that, but still you could adjust the raw image… --Nefronus 07:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (040).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, apart from the cut hand. --Nefronus 11:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC) the hand should be cloned out for QI --Charlesjsharp 18:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)  Support  Done. --Nefronus 07:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (115).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (116).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (117).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (119).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (120).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (106).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice action shot. --GuavaTrain 17:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (108).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GuavaTrain 17:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (111).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (113).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GuavaTrain 17:53, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (121).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (122).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (123).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (124).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (125).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (126).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (127).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (129).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (130).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (131).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (060).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (064).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (053).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (132).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (141).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (143).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (151).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (152).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (154).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (158).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (081).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (160).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMO OK for this kind of photograph. --XRay 04:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (144).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (147).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 02:19, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 02:16, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (157).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (134).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (170).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp enough for this kind of photographs. --XRay 05:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (161).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (032).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (024).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (146).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (036).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (038).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (039).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (037).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (043).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (044).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (046).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (029).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK, if a bit soft. --Peulle 14:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (049).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (050).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (051).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. TUR 2016-03-29 (163).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 00:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (056).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 00:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (064).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (065).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (066).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (069).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 00:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lambda 04:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC) with no EXIF we cannit see if this is downsized --Charlesjsharp 17:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC) New rules by Charlesjsharp? --Steindy 00:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (072).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 01:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 10:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (033).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (077).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (080).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (081).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 03:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)  Info Sorry! The Exif data was deleted from my old Paint Shop pro 5 that I was using at the time. --Steindy 18:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (082).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (084).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (085).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (087).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (079).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (053).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (075).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (052).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (034).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (095).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (099).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (100).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (090).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (092).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (101).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (102).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (103).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (106).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (097).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (089).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (093).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (107).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (108).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (109).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (112).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (105).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (113).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (115).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (155).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (111).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (096).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 16:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 16:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (120).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (121).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (126).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (114).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (116).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (117).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (127).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (135).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (124).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (136).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (138).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (140).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (130).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (131).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (179).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (142).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (143).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (146).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (147).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (148).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (181).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (139).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (172).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (152).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (144).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (062).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --John Stockla 17:20, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (010).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (129).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (012).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg (Cup) 2017-04-26 (125).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (150).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:15, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (196).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:17, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (026).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (028).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (029).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (030).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (031).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (032).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (033).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (086).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (147).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (175).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (034).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (035).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (036).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (037).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (040).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (038).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 09:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (039).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (041).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (046).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (048).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (049).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (050).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (051).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (056).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (059).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (060).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (062).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (052).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (064).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (066).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (058).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. MDA 2015-09-05 (149).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (071).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (072).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (073).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (076).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (080).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (081).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (082).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:04, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (084).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (091).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (092).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (093).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 01:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (094).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (095).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (085).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (089).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (096).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (097).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (099).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (101).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (100).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (077).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (57).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (102).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (104).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop above is a bit tight, but good quality. --Cayambe 08:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (106).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 06:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. FK Austria Wien II 2018-08-17 (107).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (67).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (59).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (62).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (71).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (72).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (74).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (64).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just ok in terms of sharpness --Poco a poco 08:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (65).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (66).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (68).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (78).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (79).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (80).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (82).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (76).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (77).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (83).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (84).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (85).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (60).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (63).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (90).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (94).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (86).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (88).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (96).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (98).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wienr Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (92).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (93).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (95).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. Team Wiener Linien 20190803 (97).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (024).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:15, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 01:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (031).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (033).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (034).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (036).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (037).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (026).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (028).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (029).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 20:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (030).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 20:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (040).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (041).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (043).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (044).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (049).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (038).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (039).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (052).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (053).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (060).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (061).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (051).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (064).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (066).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (067).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (059).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very small file size... but Good quality. --Cayambe 07:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (062).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 02:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (075).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 02:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (076).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but shame about the right shoe.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (079).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (069).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (071).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (072).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (073).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (080).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (081).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (082).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker Mödling vs. FC Red Bull Salzburg 2018-04-15 (084).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)