Lvova

ru Русский язык — родной для этого участника.	en-2 This user is able to contribute with an intermediate level of English.
be-1 Гэты ўдзельнік/гэтая ўдзельніца ведае беларускую мову на пачатковым узроўні.	uk-1 Користувач має елементарні знання української мови.
bg-1 Този потребител има начални познания по български език.	PH-2 This user is able to take good quality photographs.
AF-1 This user is able to contribute with a basic level to audio files.	Ani‑1 This user is able to contribute at a basic level to animations (GIF,...).

• Deletion requests and warnings&tokens&others

Просьба о помощи

Доброго времени суток. Не могли бы Вы помочь со следующим вопросом. Я получил разрешение на использование фотографий от одного блогера. Последний прислал письмо и получил уже тикет ( Ticket:2021032010007786). Спустя какое-то время я начал грузить его работы. Я в Вики я уже довольно таки давно, но это для меня новый опыт. Я никогда не грузил фотографии по разрешениям. Я не знаю как это делать :). Коллега PereslavlFoto предложил два варианта: 1) создать общий лицензионный шаблон для таких фотографий. 2) сообщать VRT о каждой фотографии, загруженной под таким-то тикетом, чтобы агенты VRT добавили тикет к описанию фотоснимка. Я выбрал первый вариант, тк мне он показался удобным. Вопрос как подтвердить это лицензионный шаблон? Я создал шаблон ({{Photo by Albert Voskanyan}}) но тикет скрыл т.к. при записи шаблона выскакивало предупреждения о том что я не имею права ставить тикет ибо такие права только у агентов VRT Кертог (talk) 11:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Добрый день. Признаюсь Вам честно: после перерыва в работе в проектах Фонда Викимедиа я сама ещё не до конца понимаю, как работает тот механизм, о котором Вы говорите, но я надеюсь, что вместе мы сможем разобраться. В моём свежем опыте есть ситуации, когда участник смог сам загрузить фотографии, не являясь агентом VRT; файл попал в скрытую категорию, в которую собирались размещённые не-агентами файлы (файлы попадают туда исходя из структурированных данных, по ссылке Вы эту категорию не увидите), но это не вредило, так как любая проверка добросовестной загрузки, как Вы понимаете, покажет её добросовестность. Я знаю, что при загрузке участнику высветилось оповещение, но ему потребовалось лишь подтвердить (нажать кнопку повторно) своё желание опубликовать файл с тикетом, не являясь агентом, и система это приняла. Можете рассказать порядок своих действий, в какой момент не получается указать тикет? Анастасия Львова^ru/en 12:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Я загрузил уже много фоток. Хотелось бы к ним проставить тикеты. Однако как я понял это сделать могут только агенты VRT. Именно эта надпись появилась у меня при создании шаблона. В принципе я мог нажать "подтвердить", но не стал это делать т.к. побоялся нарушить какое-либо правило. Я просто скрыл тикет. Посоветуйте как мне лучше действовать при загрузке разрешенных фотографий. Кертог (talk) 22:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

вот сейчас вывел на свет тикет в шаблоне ({{Photo by Albert Voskanyan}}). Не будет ли это нарушением?--Кертог (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Просто подтверждайте, когда система спрашивает Вас, уверены ли Вы. Ссылайтесь на мою реплику, если спросят. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 07:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Спасибо большое.--Кертог (talk) 21:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

еще один вопрос

Доброго времени суток. Извините что вновь тревожу Вас. Я плохо разбираюсь в лицензиях, поэтому к Вам и обращаюсь. Хотел бы узнать можно ли по правилам Викимедиа добавить в фонд эту фотографию? Кертог (talk) 22:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

К сожалению, нельзя, так как её лицензия не допускает коммерческое использование. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 07:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

понял, спасибо большое Кертог (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

По вопросу разрешения на публикацию фото

Здравствуйте! Получил от Вас ответ на эл. почту по вопросу предоставления разрешения на использование данного фото Jandro. Заглавная. 2021. По Вашей просьбе, связался с фотографом, сделавшим фотографию, и он уже отправил аналогичное разрешение от своего имени! Благодарю за помощь! Tolakovich (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Помогите, как поступить.

Salix kuznetzowii

Добрый день! Подскажите, пожалуйста, что делать?

Я загрузил с разрешения автора фото Salix kuznetzowii.jpg. Но её письмо не приняла служба Wikimedia VRT, так как я указал в качестве источника страницу https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/760599.html, где я явном виде не указанна почта автора.

Сайт Plantarium не публикует в явном виде почту участников, есть система обратной связи с участниками через форму https://www.plantarium.ru/page/feedback/user/3740.html.

Сайт Plantarium оставляет все права на фото за авторами фото и Татьяна Винокурова (Tatiana Vinokurova) не возражает против загрузки файла, переписка у меня имеется.

Но что мне делать дальше? Я не понимаю Afanasovich (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Татьяне было предложено несколько вариантов, размещение почтового адреса - лишь один из них. Я вижу, что у изображения есть описание; одним из предложенных Татьяне вариантов было размещение указания свободной лицензии в описании изображения. Есть ли у неё возможность отредактировать описание? Анастасия Львова^ru/en 12:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Ludmila Vasileva 2020.jpg

Добрый день. Помогите разобраться с этим фото, загруженным мною. Автором указан Алексей Нестеров (Aleksey Nesterov), который со своей почты (Photo@alexeynesterov.com) немедленно отправил в Викимедию (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) своё разрешение на публикацию данного фото, написанное по форме. Тем не менее фото было удалено. Я обращался с вопросами к Krd, но не получил пояснений, отчего произошло удаление. Не могли бы вы разобраться с этим делом? Floridorus (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Виновата, умудрилась пропустить сообщение. Нашла эту переписку; я задала уточняющий вопрос, и автор замолчал. Возможно, Вы можете помочь восстановить его даже при имеющейся переписке; где был изначально опубликован файл - на Викискладе он был опубликован впервые или до этого была публикация в другом месте? Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Файли українських телеканалів

Шановний прошу надати дозвіл файлів про українські телеканали Перелік:

• File:DIMUAlogo (2023).svg
• File:Yedyni novyny (March 2023).svg
• File:BlackUA logo.png
• File:4ever Drama.png
• File:Paramount Comedy.svg
• File:Paramount Comedy 2021.svg
• File:Enter-FilmUA (2022).png
• File:Enter-FilmUA (2013).png
• File:Kino UA.svg
• File:STB (2004, on-screen bug).svg
• File:STB (Ukraine) (3-rd logo).svg
• File:Inter 2007.svg
• File:Інтер (1996, icon).svg
• File:TakTV2022.png
• File:TET (Ukraine) (white) logo.png
• File:My-Ukraina (2022, blue box).svg
• File:Yedyni. Holovne (2022).svg
• File:Yedyni novyny (May 2022, alternative).svg
• File:Televsesvit (2021, yellow dot).svg
• File:1+1 (2010, o-sb).svg
• File:Inter HD (2021).svg
• File:1+1 (June 2013, o-sb).svg
• File:1+1 (2022, o-sb).svg
• File:1+1 (2020, o-sb).svg
• File:1+1 logo (1997-2005).svg
• File:1+1 logo (1997).svg
• File:Inter+ 2007.svg
• File:Viasat 2022.svg
• File:1+1 Ukraina (2022).svg

Олег Гарбуз 2008 (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Насколько я вижу, Вы уже переписываетесь с Ahonc, но добавлю: не являясь правообладателем, Вы не можете давать разрешение на материалы. Я вижу, что для некоторых файлов уже было оформлено разрешение так, что они предположительно будут оставлены, но не любой файл может быть загружен на Викисклад. Если Вы крайне хотите использовать все эти логотипы в статьях - попробуйте проконсультироваться с коллегой по поводу uk:Вікіпедія:Критерії добропорядного використання. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 093.JPG

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 093.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Бизюлька и Neverlove

Стася, приветствую.

• File:Бизюлька, Михаил Филимонов и Александр Бойков во время съёмок клипа «Серёня», 2004 год.jpg
• File:Бизюлька — портрет, 2005 год.jpg
• File:Бизюлька — домашнее фото, 2005 год.jpg
• File:Бизюлька на конкурсе «Мисс грудь» в стриптиз-клубе «Белый медведь», 2005 год.jpg
• File:Бизюлька во время съёмок фильма «Миша», 2007 год.jpg
• File:Бизюлька во время съёмок клипа «Занято», 2008 год.jpg
• File:Neverlove в 2023 году.jpg

По этим файлам не было разрешений в OTRS? Там же в них появилось, что сообщение получено, но ещё не рассмотрено. По Бизюльке должны были ответить уточняющей информацией, по Неверлаву просто был шаблон, что сообщение получено. Чёта я не пойму. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 00:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

На моё уточнение крайне долго отвечали, ответили за пару дней до дедлайна и я из-за поездки не успела обработать тикет до того, как истёк срок. Я постараюсь решить вопрос в субботу, в крайнем случае -- до вторника. Когда письмо будет обработано, если там есть всё необходимое, я подам заявку на восстановление, их выполняют быстро. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 19:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Хорошо, спасибо! Это насчёт Бизюльки, верно? А насчёт Неверлава? (Последнее фото) sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 19:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Подскажите адрес, с которого было письмо про Неверлава и/или номер тикета, который должен был быть указан в шаблонном письме. Навскидку такого письма не помню и столь давние письма без ответа не оставляла. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 19:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

С этой: mcurrents@mail.ru sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 20:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

А, на это письмо был ответ ещё 22 июля. Фотограф дала разрешение без разрешения на коммерческое использование, такая лицензия несовместима с Викискладом. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

А, ок. Меня просят уточнить как работает разрешение на коммерческое использование. То есть, по факту, любой человек может взять произведение с подобной лицензией и начать, например, продавать тот же самый мерч с изображением? Или как? Я просто сам не вдавался в тонкости этого требования, поэтому мне бы тоже хотелось об этом узнать подробнее. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 22:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

В целом, да, именно так. Есть нюансы (нельзя использовать для унижения изображённой личности, не могу сейчас привести по памяти точную формулировку), но в целом суть именно в этом. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 04:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Принял, спасибо! sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 12:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

А по Бизюльке там всё ок? Просто она на ЗЛВ в рувики скоро появится с фоткой. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 15:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Подала заявки на восстановление, как правило, выполняют в течение нескольких часов. В статью файлы после восстановления потребуется добавить обратно вручную. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Ооо, огромная благодарочка! sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 21:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Zemessardze's parade at 20 anniversary 036.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Low-res submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Russia

Thank you for your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2023! Unfortunately, one or several of your pictures violate the contest rule about minimum size wich is 2 Megapixel. Please, check them in the low-res category and reupload bigger version through «upload new version» option near the bottom of the page if you have one. Thank you! -- AVSBot (talk) 12:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

• File:Здание военно-походной канцелярии, барельефы 01.jpg
• File:Здание военно-походной канцелярии, барельефы 02.jpg
• File:Здание военно-походной канцелярии, барельефы 03.jpg

File:Neverlove и Макс Нестер в 2023 году.jpg

Привет! Могу попросить тебя проверить VRTS здесь? Хочу чтобы долго не залёживалось. Благодарю заранее) sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 13:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Пару дней назад прислали разрешение "только для Викимедиа и без коммерческого использования", что неприемлемо. С тех пор, кажется, не отвечали, хотя проверять буду завтра-послезавтра. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Не, эт новый файл и другой тикет. Там всё моё, я всё чётко по инструкции сделал. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 15:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Lvova, пинг) sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 10:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

На письмо был дан ответ 14 сентября с уточняющим вопросом. Ответа я не получила. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 10:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

А, ок. Я думал, дополнительных вопросов не возникнет. Я ответил. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 11:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Стася, привет, там 4 дня до дедлайна по удалению, давайте проведём файлик по разрешению, там всё ок должно быть. sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 22:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Благодарю! sᴋᴇᴘsɪᴢ ^(обс.) 13:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Avenida Roque Sáenz Peña monument.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

VRTS по сайту Ассоциации юристов России

Добрый вечер! Я вам писал о том, что я выслал VRTS-разрешение от АЮР по поводу авторских прав на новый сайт. Сейчас я оставил заявку на Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/Noticeboard на эту тему. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 362.JPG

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 362.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 102.JPG

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 102.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 00:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Улица Связи, Зеленогорск 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments MAy be good enough for QI, but the leaning out trees are disturbing. Please try to fix. --XRay 06:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)  Done Tried to fix it as much as I can. --Екатерина Борисова 23:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)  Support IMO it's acceptable. --XRay 06:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люк в Красногвардейском районе.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why not rotate it counterclockwise? From the writing it seems that this would be the correct orientation. --Plozessor 04:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)  Done Rotated CCW --Екатерина Борисова 15:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люк Малодетскосельского проспекта.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Летний сад WLM 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки и лючки 31.05.24 СПб 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fisheye Woodgrain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TOUMOU 10:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки и лючки 31.05.24 СПб 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Октябрьская набережная 22 СПб Точная нивелировка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки и лючки 31.05.24 СПб 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Куклы-неразлучники 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки 11.06.24 СПб 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Поликлиника 37, Правды 18, интерьеры 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (more categories would be welcomed). --C messier 19:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Монтессори-рамка для обучения завязыванию бантиков 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ворота на Лахтинской улице.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwinn Scarlet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люк ЛМЗ 13.06.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки и лючки 31.05.24 СПб 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки 11.06.24 СПб 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 09:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люк на Большой Морской.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки и лючки 31.05.24 СПб 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Узорчатый люк.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки и лючки 31.05.24 СПб 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки 11.06.24 СПб 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люк 5.06.24 СПб.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Летний сад WLM 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. But I think there is too much chroma noise. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 11:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Tried to fix with some help, take a look now, please. Lvova 19:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)  Support You did change the white balance as well but the result is very good. Even some overexposed stone parts got some texture back. --Augustgeyler 19:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люк на Почтамтской улице СПб.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки 11.06.24 СПб 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люк СПб Керчь 1981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Tyumen 045.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why so dark? This uses only 60 % of the available brightness range. --Plozessor 03:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC) You're right, check now, please. Lvova 03:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Yeah! --Plozessor 16:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BA Necropolis 2012-05-24 p2 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, otherwise good --Plozessor 03:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Fixed. Lvova 03:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Летний сад WLM 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Лючок на Галерной 05.06.24 СПб.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки 25.06.24 СПб 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A centered crop would be better, but still ok, I guess --Poco a poco 06:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Волжский переулок СПб 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Улица Красина, руина.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Люки 11.06.24 СПб 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment  Overexposed fixable? --Augustgeyler 13:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Please, check this version. Lvova 06:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 08:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)