Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Abzeronow!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: Archive at User:Abzeronow/Archive1


Contents

Thank you!Edit

Hi, thanks a lot for editing the copyright status for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Podiumsdiskussion_-_Open_Science_Policy_und_gute_wissenschaftliche_Praxis_(26.11.2018)_052.jpg and other pictures in this category. Much appreciated! I keep having this problem since i started uploading images with pattypan...

You're welcome. It was obvious that the intended license wasn't transcluded, and so it was a simple but somewhat time-consuming(since there were over 100 files) task. Abzeronow (talk) 09:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


File:Vizsolyibiblia.jpgEdit

Hi! And the license of the photographer? This photo not contains only the book. --Regasterios (talk) 16:10, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

OK, filed a deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vizsolyibiblia.jpg. Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
Hi, I award you the Public Domain Barnstar for your research on public domain works to be undeleted. I am going through your list. Happy New Year! Yann (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Ciclovia.jpgEdit

Is there any way I can prove the photo was done by me•? I still have the original photo, if I can have an e-mail I can send. And the picture was done with the same camera of this picture (File:Pisa_(2004).jpg). --Santista1982 (talk) 20:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The original File:Ciclovia.jpg (histlogsabuse log) was deleted because was published on https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=243304 in 2005—that is, earlier than the Commons upload—hence it won’t be restored without a written declaration. @Santista1982: try Commons:Email templates; or perhaps you can identify the Wikimedia account with account on the Web forum? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Incnis Mrsi is right. You need to contact COM:OTRS. If you still have original data for that photo, send it to them. Abzeronow (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: But if the photo was done by me and I can prove where is the problem if I uploaded somewhere else before? For example the File:Tufara.png (histlogsabuse log) I took from the video I uploaded first on youtube here [1] so it should also be deleted? --Santista1982 (talk) 21:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Santista1982: if online, the solution would depend on the copyright status. Www.skyscrapercity.com is explicitly copyrighted hence no leniency may be expected. You shouldn’t specify {{own}} for anything which appeared in Internet before uploading. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: on the template own it says "Use this to say that you personally created the entire original image by yourself". So if the picture was done by me I can use {{own}} even if I uploaded on another place. --Santista1982 (talk) 22:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Can you prove identity of the Google user with the Wikimedia user? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes. --Santista1982 (talk) 22:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Really? I disconnect from now on and also regret that wasted time of a third user trying yo help Santista1982 with Ciclovia.jpg. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
But what do you mean with "third user"? --Santista1982 (talk) 23:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Acted upon. Let’s see outcome. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Post-RfC on music notation filesEdit

Hi. If you're interested, the discussion regarding music notation files on Commons has moved to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T208494, as the RfC was archived without a formal closure. Feel free to comment (if you've never used Phabricator before, you can log in with a MediaWiki account). Jc86035 (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Adam Ilory.jpg - deleted pictureEdit

Hi Abzeronow. You deleted a file I uploaded File:Adam Ilory.jpg which indeed was not CC or public domain. However I believe when a person is deceased and no other pictures of him are available it can be uploaded under fair use. Is that correct? Or am I missing something? I will not upload it again until I get an answer. Thanks.--الدبوني (talk) 12:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not an admin, I can't delete anything. I merely tagged it as having no license. Commons doesn't allow Fair Use though. COM:Fair Use. Pinging @Jcb the admin who deleted it. @الدبوني: Abzeronow (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

German copyrightEdit

Hi,

can you elaborate what are you talking here about? According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany anonymous German works are generally copyrighted 70 years post publication. Am I missing something? AFAIK, 120 years since creation is only term for most US unpublished anonymous or corporate works (not applicable here). Ankry (talk) 07:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Rosenzweig mentions a very much stringent definition of anonymous with German works, but I could strike my oppose if you think it should be undeleted. Abzeronow (talk) 14:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Nassau County flagEdit

Hi. I got the flag picture from this site: https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us-ny-nc.html

County flags are obviously not copyrighted so I see no issue.

Uh, if they were created after 1978, yes they are copyrighted. See https://www.nassaucountyny.gov/2218/Copyright-Notices also "All content © 2006-2013 City / County / Hospital and its representatives. All rights reserved." Pinging @Magog the Ogre to check Abzeronow (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
@JayKay716: most non-federal government works are in fact copyrighted. If it was first published after 02-28-1989, it is not public domain. If before, it is public domain unless the county followed formalities to get it copyrighted (which they probably didn't). Regardless, we'll need proof of that before we can post it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Faculty of Economic Sciences emblem.pngEdit

Hello! There was a copyright problem with the File:Faculty of Economic Sciences emblem.png and I wonder if you help me to upload it as a fair use pic from the university web site (this pic is an emblem of the university faculty and the officials agree for the fair use). How can I do it correctly? Thank you!

RFA SupportEdit

Hi. Since I cannot edit on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jeff G. 3 anymore, I wanted to reach out and thank you for your support on my recent RFA. Even though it didn't end the way I wanted, I appreciate your support.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Muraltengut - 1.jpgEdit

Hi, I'm new to wikipedia commons and not sure if this is the mode of communication. Anyway, you added a comment to my inserted picture that it is lacking detailed information. Could you be more specific about what is lacking? I have this picture from Zentralbibliothek Zürich and by email got their explicit approval to post it here.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Heinrich Spöndli (talk • contribs) 13:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
@Heinrich Spöndli: Sure, you have the uploaded date as the date of the file. When was the photograph originally taken and/or published? Also, third party permission tends to have to go through COM:OTRS if you're going to use a free license rather than a public domain one (which there isn't enough information supplied to determine). Abzeronow (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi again, the date and author of the picture is now added. Seeing that the picture now comes without notice that it will soon be deleted, I'm assuming this issue is resolved.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Heinrich Spöndli (talk • contribs) 11:01, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!Edit

Thanks for letting me know to fix the dolphin upload. I'm really new to wiki markup. and I didn't know you had to add the PD-self tag rather than just writing what it was... :( Thanks for letting me know! Tabbycatlove (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Deletion requests vs speediesEdit

Hi Abzeronow. Could you explain in more detail why you replaced my speedy deletion nominations with regular deletion requests at File:PM-Message-to-Dadasaheb-Phalke-Internl-Film-Festival.jpg, File:White house baldrige award 1988.jpg, and File:White house baldrige award 1988 secy of commerce.jpg? I believe all of these images meet CSD F1 because the uploader provided "no good evidence of Commons-compatible licensing being issued by the copyright holder or status as a free work". I would also like to point out that the Narendra Modi file appears to be taken from http://www.dpiff.in/about/ rather than being a self-scan by the uploader. Thanks. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

The last two might be {{PD-USGov}} if they were taken by a government employee. Yes, I agree that CC license has no basis but those are not clearly copyvios in my opinion and so I felt they needed discussion. The third probably needs to be deleted anyway, but I wanted to make sure there wasn't some way of keeping that Modi file. I'll correct the source, thanks for that. Abzeronow (talk) 14:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
The impression I'm getting is that {{copyvio}} should only be used when there is positive evidence of a copyright violation (e.g., the webpage an image was taken from), while deletion requests should be used when a copyright violation is only probable or likely. Would you say that's accurate? (I'm relatively new on Commons and still trying to get a feel for the deletion criteria.) Also, why do you think the third image in particular needs to be deleted? How does it differ from the other White House photo? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:29, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Oops, third one is fine, meant the first one (had gotten the order mixed up and forgot to edit to the first). Abzeronow (talk) 13:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Do you have an answer to my first question? Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 20:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Teamwork Barnstar
Faced with the easy choice of deleting an image or working to correct an error, this user decided that the project could be improved. This generous and honorable action represents the essence of the project. If the project had more souls like Abzeronow's, the quality of the project would increase exponentially. Luizpuodzius (talk) 02:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Abzeronow".