Open main menu

Contents

Maginot MapsEdit

Thank you for your warning! You are right, the selected license was not correct. The license must be CC-by-nc-nd to fit with cartomaginot.org.
I hope you will agree with me... In that case, I will modify all licenses Borvan53 (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
PS: what do you wish to do on the Maginot Line? Perhaps we could help each other?

From what I see, ND or NC licenses are not acceptable on Commons, so I'm not sure that changing the license will work.
I've been working on a series of articles on wiki-en on the Maginot ouvrages; additions or improvements would be welcome. More pictures, and especially diagrams and maps, but so far I haven't found any that are freely usable, and haven't the time to make my own. Acroterion (talk) 02:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I am discussing with the webmaster about this point. I already have his aknowledgement to use the maps on wikipédia (see the forum). The CC-by-nc-nd licence deals with the DWG files. I am now discussing about the use of screen captures of these maps. Borvan53 (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
The webmaster clearly confirmed that screen captures of the maps, as I did them, can be freely used on Wikipedia. The CC-by-nc-nd licence protects only the DWG files. You can check it on the forum of cartomaginot.org (discussion entitledwikipedia between jeannot -it's me- and the webmaster).
Borvan53 (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Excellent; I'm glad you were able to get that cleared up directly with the webmaster. It was obviously their intention to make it freely available in some form, and now we have the technicalities out of the way and can use the captures you've provided. Thanks for all you help! Acroterion (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
In reading the conversation at cartomaginot.com, it appears that the webmaster is referring to French Wikipedia standards; they appear to be correctly quoting the Wikimedia policy on project-related standards. Commons has more stringent standards, as that text notes, and what would be acceptable on the French Wikipedia is not necessarily on Commons. It appears that the webmaster is not distinguishing between the French Wikipedia and Commons. See [[1]]. Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Acroterion!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamar Valley bison YNP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
fine --Pudelek 17:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

--:bdk: 18:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the nom, glad you liked it! Acroterion (talk) 04:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Noisy picturesEdit

Hi there Acroterion! You're welcome! Such a nice pic shouldn't lose the nomination because of an easy to fix problem. Well, first of all using low ISO speeds could help, just in case you already don't. But in pos-processing there are several methods that can be used. [2] This link explains really good the various methods one could use. I sometimes use the Camera Raw option to reduce noise in Photoshop. But when it is too messy, like in the picture of yours, no offense haha, I use the program NeatImage. Of what I've heard and of my experience it's the best way to reduce noise without affecting the image so drastically, you can see the results ;) Hey and nice picture, I would someday like to visit Yellowstone, it looks incredible! --Gaendalf (talk) 03:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've seen Neatimage; I'll give it a try. The image was shot at ISO 200, which shouldn't be a problem, but it apparently is for this particular camera. I ran it through Camera Raw, so the fault is with the sensor rather than the processing. I highly recommend Yellowstone, although it was quite crowded last September. Acroterion (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Opal Pool YNP2 filtered noise.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opal Pool YNP2 filtered noise.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Opal poolEdit

You're welcome! It was an excellent pic! --Gaendalf (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I've installed NeatImage and have been cleaning up a few files that might be suitable for QI and FP. It definitely helps. Acroterion (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

IP 85.132.27.130Edit

Salam. Mən və User:Vugar 1981 və digər bəzi iş yoldaşlarımız eyni IP-dən istifadə edirik. EnVikidə Vugar 1981-nin bloklanması nəticəsində bizim IP-də bloklanmışdır. Sizdən blokun götürülməsini xahiş edirəm. Və yaxud da mənə Ipblock-exempt istifadəçi hüququ verməyinizi xahiş edirəm. Təşəkkürlər! Hörmətlə, Cekli829 (talk) 08:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

Your photo Sawtooth Valley ID1.jpg is now a featured picture. I nominated this photo because I think it is an excellent quality image that represents a place, Galena Summit, where many people first see the Sawtooths and it goes well with the recent improvements I have made to Wikipedia:Sawtooth National Forest. Thanks for uploading the picture. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating it! I had no idea it was at FP. For my part, it was the first time I'd laid eyes on the Sawtooth Valley; I was deeply impressed. Acroterion (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
I also listed File:Sawtooth Range ID1.jpg as a quality image candidate, but there was objection over a dust spot in the upper left of the photo. If you're interested, I'm sure it would be promoted if you could remove this spot. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll fix it once the power is back and I can use Photoshop on the main computer again: we had a series of severe thunderstorms last night and we're on generator power. My present camera has some dust on the sensor that I can usually work around: I'm going to order a new camera next week, then clean the sensor on the old camera. Acroterion (talk) 02:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Brow Monument NRHP documentationEdit

thanks for the compliment - i feel like some old guy who started out the race and by the end, about 50 other people were carrying me over the finish line. this is an interesting process, to say the least. I packed up all of the correspondence regarding the NR pdfs and sent it to the person you suggested. i truly appreciate your help. (and everyone's) bpolkAbearfellow (talk) 20:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

You're completely welcome. Ideally, that's how it should work: somebody starts something worthwhile and others pitch in to help. After all, the interface and environment aren't exactly easy to master ... If you have any questions, let me know (you're more likely to get a fast response on Wikipedia page rather than here). Acroterion (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rufus Wilson Complex MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good subject but the file seems overprocessed. Other opinions are needed. --JLPC 23:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Scaled back, see comments on image talk. Acroterion 18:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
There’s a strange texture in the sky and visible noise all over the building, maybe a little more NR could help. --Kreuzschnabel 17:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Light noise reduction applied. Acroterion 23:45, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 04:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oregon Caves Chateau OR1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --JLPC 09:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glacier Park Lodge Lobby MT1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --JLPC 08:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate YNP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 05:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Acroterion,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatoosh Range WA MRNP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Best Farm small house MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Spot is still there. --Iifar 20:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
*   Support Fixed spot ;-) --Smial 17:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United StatesEdit

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Acroterion,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Jefferson FL11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Kraft 23:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USS Wisconsin Norfolk VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Very good! --High Contrast 15:20, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McMurray-Frizzell-Aldridge Farm MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --A.Savin 15:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopewell MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Florstein 16:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Jefferson FL14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Departures Magazine - Request for Image UseEdit

To Whom It May Concern,

I hope this message finds you well. I am contacting you from the photo department of Departures Magazine. We are a luxury lifestyle magazine exclusive to American Express platinum and Centurion card holders. We have a circulation of 1.2 million in the United States.

We are currently working on a piece about the Wolfsonian for our upcoming October issue and came across your photo of the museum in the midst of photo research. I am wondering if the image is available for use? I would like to discuss possibly using your image in this issue and it would be great if you could e-mail me at the address below by today or tomorrow as we are on an extremely tight deadline.

I would leave my phone number but this is a public post I presume – if you e-mail me I will provide you with my full contact information and you can call me with any questions you may have. Let me know and thanks so much in advance!

Best,
Alex Friedlander
departuresmagphoto@gmail.com

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beaver Stadium Penn State PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 04:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Richmond Federal Appeals Court and skyline VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Richmond Federal Appeals Court and skyline VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Auditorium Ocean Grove NJ1A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Croton Dam NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 06:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cottages Ocean Grove NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach building Asbury Park NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Greetings from Bruce Springsteen. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Howard Johnson's Asbury Park NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ocean Grove tent cabins NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 11:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asbury Park Conventiuon Center NJ2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Something is wrong in the sky, see my notes. --Cccefalon 04:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC) I think contrast adjustment introduced blotchiness in the sky, adjusted workflow for smooth gradient. Acroterion 02:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Town Hall West Portal NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Occean City beach and pier MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Esthetics at its best. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observation tower Dewey Beach DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colony Farm Wawarsing NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indian River Inlet Bridge DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Golden Gate YNP1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden Gate YNP1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N70GA Bucket of Bolts MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N529B Fifi MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good quality. --DarwIn 16:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N529B Fifi MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good quality. --DarwIn 16:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairchild Packet 45-57814 MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N529B Fifi MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clover Hill Tavern Appomattox VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Appomattox barn VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodson law office Appomattox VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please remove CAs, check the branches. --Basotxerri 20:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Purple fringing found in corner and fixed --Acroterion 00:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
OK now, thank you! Nice office, btw. --Basotxerri 15:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pride of Baltimore II MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The Pride makes us proud. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sultana Pride of Baltimore II MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for QI, even when it´s a bit noisy --Hubertl 02:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sigsbee MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice photo, but I see at least 2 dust spots which should be fixed before promotion: One is to the left of the upper part of the mast, the other in the sky some ways to the right of the lower middle or so of that same mast. I figure the much smaller spots are probably birds, so those are fine. Otherwise, a quality picture. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Dust spots and distant bird removed - thanks! Acroterion 14:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Very good quality now, and conceivably a featurable picture, though I'm unsure whether it would get the votes if nominated. I might see some very light dust spots near the top margin toward the left side, so check and see if you find any. -- Ikan Kekek 09:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perri Lee MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Hampton buy boat MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sultana MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catboat MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmar Nyckel mainmast MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sigsbee MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elsworth Chester River MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TWA Flight Center 2015 NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TWA Flight Center 2015 NY3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antietam observation tower MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 01:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Wow! Never sat in a cockpit before. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mid-Hudson Bridge night NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sherrick Farm MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 03:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TWA Flight Center 2015 NY4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NC8407 Ford 4-AT Tri-Motor MD1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Acroterion,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manhattan Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NYPD boat East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Heights Promenade NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --PumpkinSky 21:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Historical Society NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Vengolis 19:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Historical Society NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 19:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrepid and west side Manhattan skyline NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Terrace NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triborough lift bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manhattan Psychiatric Center NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from the East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Floatplane East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Williamsburg Bridge NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 05:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Williamsburg Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Starrett Lehigh Building NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please check for dust spots, I found 2 of them (see note) --Uoaei1 03:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Dust spots found and fixed, thanks! Acroterion 12:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
  Done Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willis Avenue Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Vengolis 02:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spuyten Duyvil Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FDNY boat East River NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 03:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 North Fourth complex NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Queensboro-59th Street Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park Avenue Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please make verticals straight, they are leaning --Uoaei1 04:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Both towers now straight up and down. Acroterion 01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wards Island Bridge NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Needs some perspective correction and a bit of crop on the right side wouldn't hurt so that the line of the bridge meets the corner, see note. Think you could do that? --W.carter 08:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Sure, PC and crop adjustments made, thanks. Acroterion 01:50, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! Very nice! Good quality. --W.carter 12:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highline and IAC Building NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. But please add geo location. --XRay 04:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Floatplane East River NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NYBG Conservatory NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Finlandia shipsEdit

Hei, Acroterion!
Lue B. How to name the category Category:Ships by name hei-hei,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

7.If there are several ships with the same name built in the same year, the place where the ship was built/location of the shipyard is added: "<name of ship> (ship, <year>, <place>)". Sample: "Mistral (ship, 1999, Saint-Nazaire)" as there are several Mistral (ship, 1999). --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 23:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, that had me puzzled. Thanks for cleaning up after me! Acroterion (talk) 02:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mid-Hudson Bridge night NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support A bit dark but good quality --Podzemnik 01:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Withdrawing FPCEdit

When you withdraw an FPC, please don't just write that ion the nom and remove the now from the list. Place the {{withdraw}} template on the nom and sign it. The nom will then be closed and archived. I have fixed this for you with this nom ([3] [4]), but please remember this in the future. All the best, --Cart (talk) 12:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up after me, I appreciate your help. Acroterion (talk) 16:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad NHP VC2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tug Evening Light and Barge 264 Hudson NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tug Evening Light Hudson NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assateague Light interior VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Only very slightly noisy at 300% of my laptop screen, more noticeably noisy at full size, but I think it's acceptable for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 04:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chilhowee Dam NC3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad NHP VC3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrified wood Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peaceful Valley Ranch Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxbow overlook Theodore Roosevelt NP north unit ND3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 04:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jim Gatchell Museum WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 04:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxbow overlook Theodore Roosevelt NP north unit ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scenic drive Theodore Roosevelt NP north unit ND2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prairie dog Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bison Theodore Roosevelt NP ND1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 16:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murie Ranch WY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Dirtsc 12:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teepee Fountain Thermopolis WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 08:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Teton range WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermopolis terraces WY3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peaceful Valley Ranch Theodore Roosevelt NP ND3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roaring Mountain YNP4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:20, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Togwotee Pass WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Lovely. --Seven Pandas 01:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ocean City beach and pier MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 07:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C-47 N62CC Virginia Ann FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C-47 "Miss Virginia" 0-30665 N47E engine FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C-47 "Miss Virginia" 0-30665 N47E FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C-47 N62CC Virginia Ann FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NC33611 DC-3 Tabitha Mae FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C-47 "Miss Virginia" 0-30665 N47E FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 224064 C-47 Placid Lassie FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C-47 N47SJ Betsy's Biscuit Bomber FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Platte River bowstring truss bridge WY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Platte River bowstring truss bridge WY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilatus PC-12NG N834NG FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Nice sunrays. --Aldnonymous 03:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N178FA Cirrus Vision SF50 FDK MD1A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Quite dramatic, and good quality, IMO, but I expect this to go to CR and possibly be voted down because the blown area of the sky distracts from the plane, which people will say is the only legitimate subject. I don't agree. I think "View of Plane with Sun Peeking from behind Dark Clouds" is a fine idea for a picture. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  Support Nice timing for the sunrays. --Aldnonymous 17:54, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Laramie NHS WY3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoopers Island Bridge MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stewart AFB SAGE center NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chesapeake Bay Bridge at Sandy Point MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 09:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Digging dog Delaware seashore DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manitowoc crane DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assateague rabbit MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assateague laughing gull MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. I'm not sure if the gull's laughing though. I'd prefer more neutral description :) --Podzemnik 02:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assateague pony and foal MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delaware Seashore State Park DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indian River Lifesaving Station DE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indian River Inlet Bridge DE5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assateague naturalist shack MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 03:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sinepuxent Bay Assateague MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grain elevator Snow Hill MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assateague MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! One WTC NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. A little bit grainy in the sky. --XRay 04:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 02:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paramount Theater Asbury Park Convention Hall NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 02:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheney bldg Huson River State Hospital NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. ----
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheney bldg Hudson River State Hospital NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. ----
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucy the Elephant NJ10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Fix the typo in File:Cheney_bldg_Huson_River_State_Hospital_NY2.jpg, though. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val-Kill winter NY2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Appomattox barn VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frederick E Patrick St MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View east from Clingman's Dome GSMNP NC1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dan Lawson place GSMNP TN1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pennsylvaia Memorial vaulting PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slave quarters Appomattox VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Perspective correction of verticals required --Uoaei1 04:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Perspective and crop adjusted. Acroterion 17:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cades Cove fire GSMNP TN1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Imehling 07:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sharp Top VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

IMO the photograph is too dark, especially the trees. --XRay 02:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Adjusted up level in the trees that the sun had not yet reached as far as I dare. Acroterion 01:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Industrial building Johnstown PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

The building is leaning in. Please fix the perspective. --XRay 02:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)   Done Adjusted perspective a little more. Acroterion 01:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support A little bit oversharpened, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miller Farm Antietam MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 03:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Hancock, Gateway National Recreation Area, New Jersey, USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone Cottage Val-Kill NY1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Hancock officer housing NJ1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Pretty stuff. GQ --Podzemnik 03:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Acroterion".