Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Benoît Prieur

(Redirected from User talk:Agamitsudo)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque de l'inauguration de la poste de Miribel (Ain) en 1985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Stade Grégory-Coupet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Museum of Ancient Greek Technology Sign.JPGEdit

  File:Museum of Ancient Greek Technology Sign.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Portrait de Roger Walkowiak (2008).jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait de Roger Walkowiak (2008).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

IncivilitéEdit

je n'apprécie pas votre usage de termes comme "petite susceptibilité". Je vous demande de stopper cette discussion. Ceci est un avertissement. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Le respect de la liberté d'expression ne semble pas votre fort. Celui du confort de votre - peut être - (soyons prudent) petite susceptibilité sans doute plus. Je ne suis pas persuadé cela dit que ceci soit tellement inscrit dans les attributions de votre fonction administrative. Ceci n'est pas un avertissement. --Benoît Prieur (d) 22:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Vous avez raison d'etre prudent, et vous avez tort de ne pas considérer mon avertissement comme un avertissement, car c'en est bien. Votre considération n'engage que vous et vos actes n'engagent que votre responsabilité. Reponsabilité qu'il faudra assumer si vous ne suivez pas mon avertissement. Je vous laisse tranquille, je n'ai rien contre vous ni ne vous ai rien demandé. Pour ma part cette histoire est close. Mais si vous venez dans ma page de discussion, encore une fois, dans le but d'etre déagréable, alors vous en subirez les conséquences. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Je trouve assez consternant d'envisager les outils d'administration comme support à des menaces allusives dès l'instant que vous vous sentez froissé. On peut se sentir froissé à tort et chacun à le droit ici d'être critique quant au fonctionnement général. Pour ma part, je considère à présent que vous n'avez pas compris l'esprit des outils dont vous êtes dépositaire et qu'à ce titre vous les dévoyez. Je me sens pour ma part froissé voire insulté par votre message dont le caractère intimidant est incontestable, je ne demande pas pour autant votre blocage. Je serai toutefois attentif dorénavant à votre façon d'interagir avec les autres et vous demande de reconsidérer la façon dont vous intervenez avec cette casquette d'administrateur auprès des autres. Un administrateur n'est pas un super-utilisateur et n'est de plus pas censé menacer les autres de blocage dès l'instant qu'il s'est senti froissé...Mais si vous venez dans ma page de discussion, encore une fois, dans le but d'etre déagréable, alors vous en subirez les conséquences. étant une phrase particulièrement inappropriée dans le contexte d'un projet collaboratif surtout de la part de quelqu'un muni d'outils pour le protéger.
Je suis triste pour vous. --Benoît Prieur (d) 07:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Your Rainbow PanoramaEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Colin (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Salut BenoitEdit

Un mot pour signaler Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux morts Aranc 01.jpg. C'est quoi cette offensive anti-monuments aux morts? Bonne journée et à plus.--Classiccardinal (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Oui vu. C'est usant. J'ai mis un mot à Yann également.
Reste calme et tranquille. Je ne doute pas que le bon sens l'emportera en douceur.
Bises, --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Pénible et chronophage : et celle-là, tu l'as vue: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mairie Pont Ain 2.jpg? A ce rythme, il va pas nous rester grand chose. --Classiccardinal (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Ah ben oui, tu l'as vue.
Je pense que cela pourrait presque évoquer du harcèlement quand on considère la pdd de Chabe. Le problème est toutefois un peu confus : les affiches électorales sont très probablement à supprimer. Par contre le reste (mairie, monument aux morts etc. probablement pas). Mais il est assez évident pour moi à présent qu'il y a une volonté de nuire à certains contributeurs. J'espère que les responsabilités adhoc seront endossées et que les contenus comme les contributeurs seront protégés en conformité avec le cadre du droit d'auteur.
Bien à toi, --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@Yann: après Chabe01 et Classic, c'est à présent moi qui suis visé....
{[1], [2] --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Mesquin... --Classiccardinal (talk) 06:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Ah oui, on a à faire à un professionnel...

affiches électorales 2017Edit

 
Dommage, j'ai découvert l'entrée trop tard pour te faire visiter.

Bonjour, Un utilisateur tatillon a l'air bien parti pour demander la suppression de toutes les photos d'affiches électorales de la dernière campagne présidentielle. Il a l'air d'avoir aussi une vision erronnée de la liberté de panorama (il voudrait en gros supprimer tous les immeubles photographiés en France). Sur ce dernier point je lui ai répondu sur plusieurs demandes de suppression mais qu'en est-il exactement pour les affiches électorales ? (par exemple ici) Merci d'avance. Culex (talk) 09:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour @Culex:
Pour moi les limites d'une part de la désorganisation pour un motif personnelle et d'autre part, plus grave d'une dérive s'apparentant de plus en plus à du harcèlement (critiques et attaques incessantes, et souvent gratuites, sources de stress, d'énervement, de mal-être) sont largement dépassées.
Je vous remercie de votre sollicitude et m'étonne de l'indulgence accordée ici à ce type de "contributeurs".
Cordialement, --Benoît Prieur (d) 09:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour Culex,
On ne peut pas importer d'images quand les affiches sont le sujet principal de la photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Ok, merci, dommage mais ça semble logique. Culex (talk) 13:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Cheminée de la SchappeEdit

Salut Benoît. Je te tiens au jus au cas ou: la démolition serait prévue pour mercredi, mais c'est pas sûr-sûr. Bonne journée. --Classiccardinal (talk) 07:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cassis - France - May 2017 (24).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Clément - Barrot - Lévigne - Bourdarias cours Lafayette à Lyon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menu du jour d'un restaurant asiatique lyonnais en 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque maison Raymond Boisse - Piolenc - France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borne hectométrique à la gare de Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!Edit

  lov
Hbibi Mimto (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col du Moulin à Vent - Lyas (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mégotier - cendrier au sol devant l'entrée de la gare de Marne-la-Vallée – Chessy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Disney Land Paris - 2017 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Benoît Prieur".